reuters.com — Premier Wen Jiabao said rich nations must abandon their ''unsustainable lifestyle'' to fight climate change and expand help to poor nations bearing the brunt of worsening droughts...China is widely believed to be the biggest emitter of carbon dioxide, but says "Developed countries shoulder the duty and responsibility to tackle climate change"
Nov 9, 2008 View in Crawl 4
Closed AccountNov 9, 2008
Why the hell is this dumbass dugg up at least 53 times when China already has a one-child policy to control their population?
wexmajorNov 10, 2008
f**k China.
shady8xNov 11, 2008
Tea smuggling is an offense punishable by death in China...
shady8xNov 11, 2008
Developed nations actually have a negative population growth... and developing nations should strive to achieve that...
shady8xNov 11, 2008
Realize that their IOU's get paid by their own money... or not at all..
writieNov 13, 2008
China is not hte first country that has asked the US to clean up. Remember Kyoto, when the major countries tried to take a lead on this? Who was it that pooh-poohed all the evidence and opted out of every attempt to do anything? Seems like some people are still trying to pass the buck on.
bobbi21Nov 17, 2008
The climate in mars is 1 regional changes and 2 have their own explanation due to martian climate. If the change was due to the sun then every planet would be changing in the same way which it hasn't. I've even seen ppl link pluto's changing temperature to the sun (which provides like 0.0000001% of the heat to pluto. and this is based on like 2 readings)And it's 2 years vs 100. and we know why it's going down. La Nina effects and such. You still see global warming underneath those effects when you take the average like you should.
bobbi21Nov 17, 2008
true. but just making the point with the most easily accessible stats.Here's the birth rates data<a class="user" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_birth_rate">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_ ...</a>United States 14.0China 13.1Fertility rateUnited states 2.10China 1.73US still isn't at negative growth in terms of birth rates and should control it's immigrant birth rate. Go yell at them. Would have been a nice rebuttal since I was lazy in my response and gave a somewhat poor predictor of birth rate but you're still wrong and I'm still right with the more accurate data.
pandabearshenyuMar 28, 2009
I think you mean India. If China didn't control the population growth, I say its pop would be over 2 billion right now, which is probably where India would be in a few years unless they disallow people to have babies altogether starting now.