chiroandosteo.com — I quote: "vitalism does not require any further or more extensive analysis before rejecting it. To reject vitalism is to simply to announce that one accepts the conventional view of biology similar to the way one accepts the convention view of cosmology by rejecting a geocentric universe." Naturopathy claims vitalism survives scientific scrutiny.
Dec 19, 2007 View in Crawl 4
daijiyobuDec 31, 2007Submitter
For naturopathy's essential vitalism, visit <a class="user" href="http://thevitalismofnaturopathy.blogspot.com/">http://thevitalismofnaturopathy.blogspot.com/</a> . For the essential nonscientific status of vitalism & kind, see <a class="user" href="http://novfsinscience.blogspot.com/">http://novfsinscience.blogspot.com/</a> . For naturopathy's claims that they are science-based / scientific / medical science anyway [!!!], see <a class="user" href="http://thesciencethataintscience.blogspot.com/">http://thesciencethataintscience.blogspot.com/</a> ."Danger, Will Robinson...pseudoscience!!!!" Visit <a class="user" href="http://aanpalliancesciencebasedclaim.blogspot.com/">http://aanpalliancesciencebasedclaim.blogspot.com/</a> too: "10 Fraudulent Years On - My UB, AANP-Alliance, FNPLA Naturopathy Education," a commemoration of the naturopathic deception I experienced.