politiken.dk — According to a report in Britain’s Independent, the computer hackers who accessed and then published the e-mails may have been none other than Russia’s FSB intelligence service. According to the report, the e-mails were first posted on a server in the Siberian city of Tomsk.
Dec 7, 2009 View in Crawl 4
swampswingDec 7, 2009
I wonder what there up to........
cyberdroppingDec 8, 2009
"It's really difficult to put myself into the position of someone who doesn't think that we're going to have to do something about our climate pretty darn soon."Anyone who is buying the crap that man is changing the climate, to the point where if we change our ways, we can REVERSE a trend - will have lots of trouble "putting themselves" in any position to do anything. You are part of the herd. You don't take action, you are given actions to take by "authorities". Thankfully, each day, more and more people begin to question words from those that do nothing but bring fear and misery upon us.The climate gate scandal tipped the resistance too far. Now the EPA has deemed "greenhouse gas" as "dangerous to our health". Talk about timing! Talk about an agenda!Could they be more transparent? Dude, this is nothing more than a new shadowboxing match like "the war on terrorism"
geekeeDec 8, 2009
Nice unbiased "news" from rawstory.
geekeeDec 8, 2009
The CRU scientists gained millions in research funding based on their results. The money issue is on both sides of the debate.
geekeeDec 8, 2009
There are only 4 institutes that track temperature history. It doesn't take a lot of people to throw the science out the window. That said, if the science really is credible, some tranparency will vindicate the scientists in question. The scientific method, when allowed to work properly, will clear up the matter.
eatasandwichDec 9, 2009
All that's required is simple convincing evidence. You don't have it. It has nothing to do with herd mentality, and everything to do with a complete lack of convincing scientific evidence to support your standpoint. You can accuse people who oppose your views as much as you like, it makes no damn difference to the evidence. You have none of any value. End of story.I have nothing to gain from disagreeing with you. I am very much the type of person who would stand against these claims if the evidence was there.I have more right to accuse you of following the herd simply because your evidence is not as compelling as mine. Herd mentality is far more descriptive of what you have.
Closed AccountDec 9, 2009
"tanyone" = "that anyone"sorry!
phazoniDec 9, 2009
Another woman came forward in the Tiger Woods' scandal. Priorities people!
petushokDec 10, 2009
?????? ??????????!