youtube.com— Rick Sanchez does the research and finds that Israel violated the terms of the ceasefire first by killing 6 Gazans on November 4. Shouldn't media outlets check the facts before running with a story?
Jan 6, 2009View in Crawl 4
Wow. Are you seriously trying to discount what he says because it was read off of paper. That is pathetic. Israel doesn't have the moral hi-ground here and needs to admit it. Period.
" How pathetic that Sanchez was pointing and reading from a highlighted printout?"I was about to say the same, CNN's technology went backwards in time. They no longer have programmers to actually do nice reports like they used to do. At least zoom in, like 99% of the other stuff CNN does, but they are still hiding the truth from those reports. There is way more than he just said.
I'd like to say because it's an obvious lie that completely ignores the many things Hamas did before Nov 4, but simple facts like that wouldn't stop Digg from promoting something anti-Israel.
First, your blanket statement is inaccurate. Second, even in such possible instances, Hamas does nothing to stop them but in fact encourages terrorism of all kinds against Israel and even provides direct support. If your terrorist activities are supported by Hamas and you even receive supplies and logistical support from them, you're a Hamas terrorist. Third, rockets aren't the only problem. The construction of tunnels used by terrorists to get into Israel to kidnap and murder are also a major issue. Fourth, I'd like to see your reaction if you were in Israel's shoes - and not some stupid idealized statement of what you "think" you would do, but what you actually would. I highly doubt your response would be to just "take it" again and again as your neighbors unapologetically proclaim their unswerving dedication to your destruction and act to that end while the rest of the world yawns and tells you to just let them be.
ecko3rJan 7, 2009
could not agree more with all of you
ciaran036Jan 7, 2009
Venuezuela has also expelled their Israeli ambassador.
abuabdallahJan 8, 2009
same story, but you're right: more people will understand the significance of using the term ambassador than envoy. :)
silvbirdJan 9, 2009
Letter to MP's:<a class="user" href="http://silvbird.livejournal.com/4800.html">http://silvbird.livejournal.com/4800.html</a>
okcomputer1982Jan 9, 2009
Wow. Are you seriously trying to discount what he says because it was read off of paper. That is pathetic. Israel doesn't have the moral hi-ground here and needs to admit it. Period.
markus9Jan 10, 2009
Is there like a zionist memo you receive with this information in it. I'm seeing the same text from all you zionist trolls.
mohamedmansourJan 10, 2009
" How pathetic that Sanchez was pointing and reading from a highlighted printout?"I was about to say the same, CNN's technology went backwards in time. They no longer have programmers to actually do nice reports like they used to do. At least zoom in, like 99% of the other stuff CNN does, but they are still hiding the truth from those reports. There is way more than he just said.
elgubrushJan 10, 2009
This account has been closed by the user
glynthJan 13, 2009
I'd like to say because it's an obvious lie that completely ignores the many things Hamas did before Nov 4, but simple facts like that wouldn't stop Digg from promoting something anti-Israel.
glynthJan 15, 2009
First, your blanket statement is inaccurate. Second, even in such possible instances, Hamas does nothing to stop them but in fact encourages terrorism of all kinds against Israel and even provides direct support. If your terrorist activities are supported by Hamas and you even receive supplies and logistical support from them, you're a Hamas terrorist. Third, rockets aren't the only problem. The construction of tunnels used by terrorists to get into Israel to kidnap and murder are also a major issue. Fourth, I'd like to see your reaction if you were in Israel's shoes - and not some stupid idealized statement of what you "think" you would do, but what you actually would. I highly doubt your response would be to just "take it" again and again as your neighbors unapologetically proclaim their unswerving dedication to your destruction and act to that end while the rest of the world yawns and tells you to just let them be.