rawstory.com — In The New York Times today, Hillary Clinton received a primary endorsement from the paper, however, the paper seemed to have revised some of its supportive statements issued in the lead up to the Iraq war.
Jan 25, 2008 View in Crawl 4
jaytek13Jan 26, 2008
It amazes me how many of you only read the headline then add your comment... Just FYI, the article has nothing to do with Hillary or her campaign. It only has to do with the NYT's previously saying they supported the use of force and now saying they disagree with Hillary's vote for the use of force.But, it's par for the course for Digg's anti-Hillary crowd. Any excuse they can make up to lie and slander her will end up getting dugg up, while the truth gets dugg down. And people here have the nerve to call her campaign tactics dirty...
Closed AccountJan 26, 2008
Jon Stewart . . . ??? Right.
exgopJan 26, 2008
I don't think Fox News "news reporting" outright lies. Many people confuse the function of a news commentator and news reporter.
chaosmotorJan 26, 2008
@rarsonWhereas "rightism" only allows /companies/ to be dependent on the government, and the people can go f**k themselves.
zenmojoJan 26, 2008
No it's not. Why do you think so many Democrats hate Hillary Clinton? We're equal-opportunity self-righteous bastards.
rarsonJan 26, 2008
Are you simple? It's not imposing on anyone's rights. All the Fairness Doctrine required was to allow some air time, not necessarily even equal air time, for presenting the opposing position. NOT having the Fairness Doctrine is ALLOWING companies to trample the rights of others by allowing them to buy up all the TV stations and only air what they want people to hear. This is why news today is a complete joke. Broadcast TV serves the public interest and should be required to live up to that standard.
rarsonJan 27, 2008
News isn't supposed to be an opinion. It's impossible for consumers to dictate the market when every station is in the hands of a small group of individuals that own practically everything. They simply bought out the competition.
origamironinJan 28, 2008
Look up the case of Akers vs. Fox regarding Monsanto's use of Bovine Growth Hormone. Fox News won a court case using the argument that it was legal for them to report an outright lie as news.