internetchatradio.com — In a country like Argentina there is a population of 30 million people, compared to the United States´ population of 300 million, this is no great surprise, right. Wrong, today, there exists 35.9 million people in the United Sates living below the poverty line, which by size comparison is an entire nation.
Oct 5, 2006 View in Crawl 4
minuetczOct 5, 2006Submitter
Did you read the article I will be updating the article with sources and references they are all reinforced by government data. The stats show that during reagan and bush señiors and juniers reign, americas poverty level zoomed increased year after year. Is that a coincidence? You attacked my article I WANT TO SEE YOUR DATA. so that we can debate this on your show I challenge you. Claudia Nelson
americaindangerOct 5, 2006
And you think that somehow government data (the people responsible for said data) is supposed to prove it? It's somehow amazing that this "didn't happen" during Clinton or Carter or any other administration that was during a Democrat's presidential term. That's why I say the article is biased. Government data is cooked every year. If the Pentagon can miss $2.3 trillion dollars and not say another word about it, they can certainly do it in other departments.Please cite your sources and we'll investigate it. But I stand by my arguments, as well. Take a look at what and why NAFTA happened and who enacted it. Look at many of the scandals that happened during the past 20-30 years.You're looking for what you want to see to prove your point. And believe me, I don't back any sort of politician, because both sides are corrupted. Am you're most definitely not going to appear on the show, just because you're upset, as I didn't agree with your point of view.I also think it was a tad wrong that you had to comment on your own article.
minuetczOct 5, 2006Submitter
Well of course you would not allow me to appear on your show how about call in and debate or perhaps even better we can debate on neutral ground lets say any radio show that will air this via internet. I am not upset I am asking you for proof of what you are declaring. That government stats lie especially in the case of poverty being increased only while the bushes are in office. I find it funny, that you say you have no interest in protecting bush since all politicans are corrupt. Sounds like a gate keeper to me, is that why your domain is labled gatekeeper. travelers. Be warned I dont take no for answer, be prepared to debate me.
americaindangerOct 5, 2006
My domain is not labeled gatekeeper. I don't even know where you would have gotten that at for gosh sakes. And I'm certainly not some gatekeeper stooge for anyone. I'm doing what I can to find the truth, myself. Just because our "truths" don't mesh is no reason to go screaming for a debate on some Internet radio show. This time you're going to have to accept a no. Sorry.I also don't have to submit proof to you to justify any of my research and opinions based off that research. If you've ever watched the show, we tell people that they shouldn't believe everything they read nor hear, because they need to do it for themselves. And not everything is written down in plain black and white for people to read. The things happening in this world are being done in ways so subtle as to avoid detection. Just think of a puzzle being pieced together here and there until over time the puzzle is complete. That's incrementalism and that's how people in power who have a plan are enacting it.Looking at your past articles, you seem to have an agenda to bash Bush in general, which is fine and you're free to do so. What concerns me is that I don't think you're going back far enough into history and further discussing the root of the problem.If you want to look at one of the main roots that cause poverty and sap the wealth of Americans is to look into the Federal Reserve. Go to www.realityzone.com and pick up a copy of The Creature from Jekyll Island.
americaindangerOct 5, 2006
Ah. I see where you got your "gatekeepers" information from. You looked at your stats and have me obviously confused with someone else, as that domain is in my stats. Good grief.
minuetczOct 5, 2006Submitter
Mainstream media chooses to take tidbits of the truth and twist it to make a lie or like they call it their version of the truth. Our network is based on alternative media the whole truth we all know Bush is responsible for the state america is in today, we all know that bush hears the devil not god in his mind, we just dont all have the courage to say it like Chavez did. But a new era is dawning, an era of truth on a world wide scale. To say Bush is not the problem is to live in denial. I think you wont debate me because apparently, you are afraid of the truth.