news.yahoo.com — So what if Bush accused Iran of provoking World War III despite the fact that the White House had evidence to the contrary? The president called on US allies to step up pressure on Iran. "The best way to ensure that the world is peaceful in the future is for the international community to continue to work together to say to the Iranians we are goi
Dec 4, 2007 View in Crawl 4
charlotte_webDec 5, 2007
1) We at least have a working relationship with Pakistan2) Pakistan is not a state supporter of terrorism3) We did impose sanctions on Pakistan in an attempt to stop their development of nuclear weapons, but our actions were largely ineffectual because we weren't tough enough... hmmm, what Democrat was president then... I'm trying to remember. IIRC, I think his initials are BC and he loves cigars.4) Once a nation HAS nuclear weapons, it's a whole different ball game, so we've got to play hardball with Iran BEFORE they get them.5) Bush is being verbally aggressive with Iran; that's good. It's communicating to Iran our sincere displeasure, and hopefully is dissuading them from their pursuit.
fredfredricksonDec 5, 2007
The decider?
talenaDec 5, 2007
Momoma, stop your propagandic lies, the Iranian president never said hey would attack Israel, he just said he doesnt like them (who does?).That line is poorly translated by one guy, and every one copied it, it is just not true
Closed AccountDec 5, 2007
firstprimate ,You are right...The problem is the American public are NOT going to ever get to see America's dirty laundry unless they get on the net and search for speeches by Chomsky etc. Our news media is clamped down tighter than a scared clam and NOTHING gets out to the public that they don't want to get out. We do NOT have a free press.(Except for PBS). Rest assured,they would LOVE to kill PBS and the Internet if they could to stop the sheep from getting a clue.
tomvale13Dec 7, 2007
Obama, Clinton, Edwards, or Kucinich appreciate your vote.Whereas Bush stole then abused his.Moron.
c0ldfusi0nDec 8, 2007
Sure. Threatening impeachment has proven much more efficient, has it not?