thinkprogress.org — Weekly Standard editor Fred Barnes appeared on Fox this morning to discuss his recent meeting with President Bush in the Oval Office. Barnes said that Bush told him capturing bin Laden is "not a top priority use of American resources."
Sep 14, 2006 View in Crawl 4
geekeeSep 14, 2006
Get a clue.<a class="user" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14726670/">http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14726670/</a>"New video shows bin Laden planning attacks91-minute montage airs on Web site on eve of fifth anniversary"
e3boySep 15, 2006
It's not a priority because it was the Pakistani ISI (secret service) who organized 911. One of the most comprehensive sites out there: <a class="user" href="http://www.cooperativeresearch.org">http://www.cooperativeresearch.org</a>It's NOT a consipracy theory site, it's a complete timeline of 911 events. pre & post. The info was gathered from little known stories barried in the back pages of the main stream media.
goodoldharrisSep 15, 2006
cliffzdude:------------------"We have a good percentage of two billion people who are pissed off at anybody who doesn't bow to their God. They literally want to kill us, really truly are so pissed off that we let our women run around with their faces "naked" that we deserve to be killed."------------------This is total nonsense. A "good percentage" of Muslims do not want to kill Americans at all. Not even close. Open your ears to some different perspectives. Recognize that the sound bytes of extremists do not represent the views of the majority. Listen to what the many moderate Muslims are saying instead of just hating them.
Closed AccountSep 15, 2006
Considering that his fam and Osama's all hang out and play Bridge, is anyone really surprised? I seriously doubt the plan was to ever capture him.
Closed AccountSep 15, 2006
Pelosi was quoted as saying:"Even if he is caught tomorrow, it is five years too late, He has done more damage the longer he has been out there. But in fact, the damage that he has done is done. And even to capture him now, I don't think makes us any safer."Of course the republicans wanted to take her down for this statement even though our President and Vice President have made similar statements. Here on this site we experience liberals ranting about what President Bush said, but no mention of what Pelosi said. Hypocrisy abounds. Politicians are liars and we are divided as a nation because of these liars. People need to examine who they're voting for and vote. Once the election is done, you support the people elected. When the next election comes around, you weigh your choices and do it again. Instead, people just bash our president. He's our president, and until we replace him I will support him. I don't have to agree with him though.
jvillanoSep 15, 2006
4wheel: I was replying to the original poster.
tubatechnoSep 15, 2006
helix....you're taking away the liberals power to misquote correctly...
aceg1357Sep 15, 2006
when the US does catch or kill a major terrorist far left dems say it doesn't' achieve anything. but yet those same far left dems want to catch bin laden and think it will achieve something. i'm sure once the us catches or kills him then they can change their tune again and say it isn't important.
maxdraxSep 17, 2006
Dear George. f**k you from me too. I wish there were a Hell for you to burn in. Maybe you'll die in a rocket attack when freedom-loving nations come to liberate the United States and the World from your tyranny.Funny thing. I'd actually fight against those forces. I'd become an insurgent. I'd kill any foreign soldier by any means at my disposal that sought to occupy the United States. I'd even learn how to make and effectively distribute IEDs.If captured, my hope would be that the foreign invaders would observe Geneva Convention guidelines on torture.
shintaNov 15, 2006
What about you retard liberals and your 9/11 conspiracies hinting at the conservatives for doing 9/11 or the Jews for playing America?