msnbc.msn.com— WASHINGTON - Attorney General Alberto Gonzales said Tuesday that President Bush personally blocked Justice Department lawyers from pursuing an internal probe of the warrantless eavesdropping program.
Jul 18, 2006View in Crawl 4
Tuba, just cause you can't understand it doesn't mean it lacks logic, others must see it, that's why my comments are dugg up and yours are modded down.
The title is a little misleading. The program is still going to be reviewed... I hope.FTA:"Last week, Gonzales said the bill gives Bush the option of submitting the NSA program to the intelligence court, rather than requiring the review."It doesn't help that the sentence I quoted is the last one in the article.A more accurate title would be:"Bush Blocks Spying Probe In Favor of FISA Court Review"I'm opposed to this stupid program, but the title is misleading
@TubaThe current case against AT&T is for them installing the hardware the NSA uses to wiretap every call going through AT&T (Most US traffic hits AT&T at some point or another) Not only has Bush broken the law, he's proven it's intentional by stopping the investigation of his own crimes.
"There was no sexual harassment lawsuit"His perjury was committed in a deposition for the Paula Jones lawsuit. You're trying to shift the focus to his later grand jury testimony in which the subject was not Paula Jones, but rather his sworn deposition in the Paula Jones case. Disingenuous, to say the least.
From Clinton's Wikipedia article:"As a result of allegations that he had lied during grand jury testimony regarding his relationship with Lewinsky, Clinton was the second U.S. President to be impeached by the House of Representatives."Yes that says grand jury, Jones was another matter.
kisstheringJul 19, 2006
Tuba, just cause you can't understand it doesn't mean it lacks logic, others must see it, that's why my comments are dugg up and yours are modded down.
rderveloyJul 19, 2006
The title is a little misleading. The program is still going to be reviewed... I hope.FTA:"Last week, Gonzales said the bill gives Bush the option of submitting the NSA program to the intelligence court, rather than requiring the review."It doesn't help that the sentence I quoted is the last one in the article.A more accurate title would be:"Bush Blocks Spying Probe In Favor of FISA Court Review"I'm opposed to this stupid program, but the title is misleading
corvidaeJul 19, 2006
@TubaThe current case against AT&T is for them installing the hardware the NSA uses to wiretap every call going through AT&T (Most US traffic hits AT&T at some point or another) Not only has Bush broken the law, he's proven it's intentional by stopping the investigation of his own crimes.
smooveJul 19, 2006
"There was no sexual harassment lawsuit"His perjury was committed in a deposition for the Paula Jones lawsuit. You're trying to shift the focus to his later grand jury testimony in which the subject was not Paula Jones, but rather his sworn deposition in the Paula Jones case. Disingenuous, to say the least.
kisstheringJul 19, 2006
@Smooveok, I'll prove it to you<a class="user" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Jefferson_Clinton#Impeachment_in_the_House">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Jefferson_Clinton#Impeachment_in_the_House</a>in the first line of the section titled Impeachment in the House. You should stop trying
kisstheringJul 19, 2006
From Clinton's Wikipedia article:"As a result of allegations that he had lied during grand jury testimony regarding his relationship with Lewinsky, Clinton was the second U.S. President to be impeached by the House of Representatives."Yes that says grand jury, Jones was another matter.
kisstheringJul 19, 2006
trying to call me disingenuous, there's the proof. Ignorant to say the least.
Closed AccountMar 5, 2009
BDS