avi.alkalay.net — ...the standards process director had to analyze the audio recording of all the meeting, review some facts, review again all 63+2 comments produced by the technical group about the ECMA specification, and conclude that a NO for OOXML is the correct position for Brazil in ISO Fast Track process.
Aug 24, 2007 View in Crawl 4
Closed AccountAug 25, 2007
I would gladly take your job biyotch. Its Sad that you Americans no longer stand for ideals but bend over to give corporates easy access to your ass. While American Senators are give the proverbial blow job to MS its up to other nations to fight this stupid format.
meneerrAug 25, 2007
Well, actually part of India is pretty f**king corrupt. They still have slaves. Not by the government or in the cities. But half the people working on the land, growing our tea, coffee and cacao have this kind of contract: "work or i'll kill you, leave and i'll kill your family". Certain organisations are actually free-ing these people. But they too have to bribe the government to actually send some 'cops' or 'troops' to clean out such an area. The big f**king corporations just buy the cheapest. Even when they know that price means slave labor was involved. So let's just assume Microsoft is well capable of bribing the right people to make this happen.
atomic1fireAug 25, 2007
And since the document format is openthey could reconfigure it to their needs and just release the changes under whatever license the format is under
hairypoterAug 25, 2007
So, I guess it is NOOXML!
niallabrownAug 25, 2007
Why is this under the Linux section? Linux users already know OOXML is a bad thing. Start putting this sort of thing under more general computer categories so that the general public can be exposed to them.
Closed AccountAug 26, 2007
What about free market and latins in america ?
phntmAug 26, 2007
shouldn't category be microsoft (and not *nix)?