zuzutop.com— .............................the boy has a total of 31 fingers and toes, which outnumber the current world record of 25.
Mar 23, 2010View in Crawl 4
"However, this has never been scientifically proven."Science doesn't work with proofs - that's for mathematics. Science works with evidence. The evidence supports random mutations, we do not observe or measure *any* supernatural interference."For us to evolve to where we are today, in the 14 billions year age of the Universe, let alone the 4.5 billion year age of the earth, we would have to be mutating so much, we couldn't procreate."Unsubstantiated claim. Eminent modern biologists do not agree with you, and with good reason."Deliberate Mutations + Natural Selection + Time = Intelligent Design"I'm curious. Do you believe that an intelligent designer is constantly fiddling with mutations? For *every* species on the planet? All of the time?Can you point to even ONE example of where this has happened and explain how you know that an intelligent designer was involved?(I can give you many references of speciation where a supernatural entity hasn't been involved.)
"Can you point to even ONE example of where this happened and explain how you know that it was random? I know you can answer this, because science follows the evidence - right?"Good point! How do we know anything is random? Because the data fits our definitions of random sampling. ie. there is no discernible pattern. Moreover, if we were to run a computer simulation we would expect the same kind of random spread.But this is kind of missing the point. We know about physics and chemistry. They operate on statistically measurable principles. The world is full of random chance occurrences on an atomic and molecular level. YOU are the one claiming that random processes are driven by divine intervention. YOU are making an additional claim. Can you back it up?Also, thinking about it, if mutations are not random but are 'guided' by a divine hand, how do you explain the fact that most mutations are harmful?"No. I believe we were created a long time ago, and have evolved from that point as originally planned."So, the crux of it is that you don't believe mutations are random but are somehow guided from life's origins. Reality conflicts with this view."I know an Intelligent Designer was involved - because DNA required an Intelligence to encode the information in it."Logical fallacy."Note - before you give examples of speciation where a super natural entity was not involved - first you have to prove the DNA did not require an Intelligence - otherwise - the speciation was designed."No, you are the one making supernatural claims. YOU need to put forward positive evidence that it was the hand of your divine creator, otherwise we're back to natural causes and discovering more about the hypothesis of Abiogenesis.
Closed AccountMar 24, 2010
<a class="user" href="http://www.shortarmguy.com/total10.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.shortarmguy.com/total10.jpg</a>:O
theosterMar 24, 2010
or a new version of the Mini Van...maybe we call it the Articulated Bus...i'll be here til thursday
kotanMar 24, 2010
thought of that too. lol made no sense at all.
Closed AccountMar 24, 2010
Goodness, what's wrong with his eyes?!?
siouxmouxMar 24, 2010
at least he can count up to 31
Closed AccountMar 24, 2010
Evolution in action? No.Pollution in action? Yes.
nitsujMar 24, 2010
"However, this has never been scientifically proven."Science doesn't work with proofs - that's for mathematics. Science works with evidence. The evidence supports random mutations, we do not observe or measure *any* supernatural interference."For us to evolve to where we are today, in the 14 billions year age of the Universe, let alone the 4.5 billion year age of the earth, we would have to be mutating so much, we couldn't procreate."Unsubstantiated claim. Eminent modern biologists do not agree with you, and with good reason."Deliberate Mutations + Natural Selection + Time = Intelligent Design"I'm curious. Do you believe that an intelligent designer is constantly fiddling with mutations? For *every* species on the planet? All of the time?Can you point to even ONE example of where this has happened and explain how you know that an intelligent designer was involved?(I can give you many references of speciation where a supernatural entity hasn't been involved.)
metapwnerMar 25, 2010
Thats Toe-reffic!!!!!
sylxMar 25, 2010
I counted 30 on the x-ray.
nitsujMar 25, 2010
"Can you point to even ONE example of where this happened and explain how you know that it was random? I know you can answer this, because science follows the evidence - right?"Good point! How do we know anything is random? Because the data fits our definitions of random sampling. ie. there is no discernible pattern. Moreover, if we were to run a computer simulation we would expect the same kind of random spread.But this is kind of missing the point. We know about physics and chemistry. They operate on statistically measurable principles. The world is full of random chance occurrences on an atomic and molecular level. YOU are the one claiming that random processes are driven by divine intervention. YOU are making an additional claim. Can you back it up?Also, thinking about it, if mutations are not random but are 'guided' by a divine hand, how do you explain the fact that most mutations are harmful?"No. I believe we were created a long time ago, and have evolved from that point as originally planned."So, the crux of it is that you don't believe mutations are random but are somehow guided from life's origins. Reality conflicts with this view."I know an Intelligent Designer was involved - because DNA required an Intelligence to encode the information in it."Logical fallacy."Note - before you give examples of speciation where a super natural entity was not involved - first you have to prove the DNA did not require an Intelligence - otherwise - the speciation was designed."No, you are the one making supernatural claims. YOU need to put forward positive evidence that it was the hand of your divine creator, otherwise we're back to natural causes and discovering more about the hypothesis of Abiogenesis.
tnoyMar 27, 2010
By the time you finished counting another finger had grown.