uniformvelocity.com — A personal religious proclivity does not provide basis for limiting free speech. Recent U.N resolution proposals and a campaign for blasphemy legislation in Ireland, has once again brought to the forefront the ridiculousness of this victimless crime.
May 5, 2009 View in Crawl 4
batfishyMay 5, 2009
LOL
commentpostedMay 6, 2009
These people have clearly never visited digg.
smacksawMay 6, 2009
With all of the death, suffering and distress in Somalia and the Sudan, at least the UN is doing a great job by crushing free speech.What's next, UN? Outlawing laughing because it might offend those with no sense of humour?The UN is one of those things that sounds appealing people in principle, but in practise it sucks. And if you decide to oppose it, the only people you can ally yourself with are those John Birch Society nutters.
clvngodessMay 6, 2009
Well the blasphemy decision comes from--should come from-- the doctrine of the individual religion. Knowing what blasphemy is, is key to understanding how it works. According to the Christian Doctrine, blasphemy occurs when ever we humans assume we know what God means, wants, thinks, etc. In other words, the moment we assume we have any authority about God and then speak or act upon this assumed authority, we are committing blasphemy.
clvngodessMay 6, 2009
Blasphemy is not necessarily the critiquing of a religion. It is the assumption that we know what god wants, thinks, etc, and then acting upon this assumption. It is human arrogance in the ways of god. Many televangelists who talk and act as if they know best what god wants are actually committing the sin of Blasphemy.
Closed AccountMay 6, 2009
Blasphemy- The Victimless Crime.
jhonjhonsunJun 4, 2009