wired.com— A Wyoming bank sent an e-mail containing sensitive customer data to the wrong Gmail account, and now wants Google to reveal the identity of the account holder
Sep 22, 2009View in Crawl 4
I like when I receive the occasional personal email that have obviously been mistakenly sent to me. A CPA was sending me a client's tax info for a long time. Every couple weeks for over six months. Nothing too interesting. I finally sent the CPA an email and it stopped. I'm also regularly invited to get togethers in Australia. Those people seem like they know me so well. It's strange. I wonder what they think about their friend never replying?
The definition of paranoia is "unreasonable fear", retard. Clearly it is reasonable to be cautious if businesses are allowed to pull this kind of crap on random innocent people.
bigviSep 22, 2009
I wonder if the lawyers who protect us are free too?
philzoneSep 22, 2009
I like when I receive the occasional personal email that have obviously been mistakenly sent to me. A CPA was sending me a client's tax info for a long time. Every couple weeks for over six months. Nothing too interesting. I finally sent the CPA an email and it stopped. I'm also regularly invited to get togethers in Australia. Those people seem like they know me so well. It's strange. I wonder what they think about their friend never replying?
trick07Sep 22, 2009
BFD. How is that the problem of the recipient? What did the recipient do? The recipient is not obligated to respond to the bank at all.
alienmushroomSep 23, 2009
GO F**K YOURSELF.
logicslayerSep 23, 2009
Why was this information not encrypted? Especially being sent to an external "free" email account. Google should countersue.
azulyaSep 26, 2009
I'd start a class action lawsuit against them for gross negligence. And save the e-mail as court evidence.
azulyaSep 26, 2009
The definition of paranoia is "unreasonable fear", retard. Clearly it is reasonable to be cautious if businesses are allowed to pull this kind of crap on random innocent people.
amadeus2490Oct 9, 2009
Throng what?