The BBC could have made up a better excuse than that. Seriously, you lost the tapes. Right, and the dog ate your homework. I guess whomever TOLD the BBC to run with it was pretty high up.Besides, the live feed with the building still standing told me all I need to know......
Actually, from what I have read on the effect of bombs on seismic activity is that controlled demolitions have FAR less seismic activity - due to the staggered nature of the explosions. look it up. of course, you will probally dismiss because you don't understand physicis and therefore the idea doesn't fit with your view of the world.
I can't believe there are people so out of touch with reality that they just let the BBC off the hook, without demanding to know who told them that WTC was going to collapse 30 MINUTES BEFORE IT DID. Has this country gone insane?Look at it like this. If I called my insurance company 30 minutes BEFORE my house caught on fire, to tell them "my house just burned down," WOULD MY INSURANCE COMPANY WANT TO INVESTIGATE ME?Yuh, think?Jesus, I can't believe any American would want to let a foriegn media off the hook, when that media knew that a steel reinforced building was going to collapse 30 minutes BEFORE it collapses (when prior to 9/11 not one single steel reinforced building had ever collapsed due to fire or external damage).Have Americans completely lost their ability to think? If they haven't, then they will want to know who in the h*ll told the BBC that WTC 7 was going to fall (30 minutes before it did).
I'm not sure if you ever watched news on 9/11 - maybe not based on your note. Or perhaps you never watched news coverage in general? Media today barely double checks their facts before rushing off to report. So the fact that they misreported WTC7 coming down and that it actually came down - simple coincidence. . . They reported a lot of OTHER stuff that day that didn't turn out to be true and guess what - everyone forgot about it.
@grovemasterF'n hilarious drone you are dude. "I believe in the ultimate power of the goverment and the impossibility that 12 people can cause such death and destruction. This is such a core belief of mine that in the event of overwhelming evidence I merely see conspiracy upon conspiracy and the entire media, goverment, and western nations are all in on it". . .WTF - you know of all the 100's of pieces of news articles miss-reported that day you hold onto this one? There is so much wrong/unknowing/mistaken on that day . . . of course those other mistakes are ignored - they don't fit your view. Only focus on the mistakes that now, through 20/20 hindsight, prove your tin-foil hated point
@grabercSo you're saying you honestly believe that the BBC reporting that WTC had collapsed (including a qualifying statement on the news ticker at the bottom of the screen, a description of the building including how many floors it had and the statement "you might have heard I was talking a few moments ago about the Salomon building collapsing and *indeed it has*"), half an hour before it actually happened, is nothing more than a coincidence?Of course, you're entitled to your opinion but don't expect any rational, sane person to take you seriously.Personally, although your spelling and grammar is atrocious, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and conclude that you're a semi-intelligent guy who's simply too bewildered to face reality.All the best.
thats some coincidence. From hundreds of reports from multiple sources a lot of them turning out to be either wrong or speculation, BBC stumbles on the one that is OBVIOUSLY false, and magically comes true 20 min later. Must have been God at work on that one.
vabech311Feb 27, 2007
The BBC could have made up a better excuse than that. Seriously, you lost the tapes. Right, and the dog ate your homework. I guess whomever TOLD the BBC to run with it was pretty high up.Besides, the live feed with the building still standing told me all I need to know......
Closed AccountFeb 28, 2007
The Truth Shall Set You Free...And He Who Is Free...Is Free Indeed...<a class="user" href="http://jeremiasx.wordpress.com/2007/02/02/re-open-911-investigation/">http://jeremiasx.wordpress.com/2007/02/02/re-open-911-investigation/</a>
grabercFeb 28, 2007
Actually, from what I have read on the effect of bombs on seismic activity is that controlled demolitions have FAR less seismic activity - due to the staggered nature of the explosions. look it up. of course, you will probally dismiss because you don't understand physicis and therefore the idea doesn't fit with your view of the world.
scotticusMar 1, 2007
Hey tards: one can be anti-Bush and accept that the towers fell because jetliners filled with fuel crashed into them.I'll confess that "Phsyics" isn't my area of expertise... my PhD is in Chemistry.This guy's PhD IS in Physics and he agrees with me: <a class="user" href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/09/060911153219.htm">http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/09/060911153219.htm</a>
billdouglasMar 2, 2007
I can't believe there are people so out of touch with reality that they just let the BBC off the hook, without demanding to know who told them that WTC was going to collapse 30 MINUTES BEFORE IT DID. Has this country gone insane?Look at it like this. If I called my insurance company 30 minutes BEFORE my house caught on fire, to tell them "my house just burned down," WOULD MY INSURANCE COMPANY WANT TO INVESTIGATE ME?Yuh, think?Jesus, I can't believe any American would want to let a foriegn media off the hook, when that media knew that a steel reinforced building was going to collapse 30 minutes BEFORE it collapses (when prior to 9/11 not one single steel reinforced building had ever collapsed due to fire or external damage).Have Americans completely lost their ability to think? If they haven't, then they will want to know who in the h*ll told the BBC that WTC 7 was going to fall (30 minutes before it did).
grabercMar 3, 2007
I'm not sure if you ever watched news on 9/11 - maybe not based on your note. Or perhaps you never watched news coverage in general? Media today barely double checks their facts before rushing off to report. So the fact that they misreported WTC7 coming down and that it actually came down - simple coincidence. . . They reported a lot of OTHER stuff that day that didn't turn out to be true and guess what - everyone forgot about it.
grabercMar 3, 2007
@grovemasterF'n hilarious drone you are dude. "I believe in the ultimate power of the goverment and the impossibility that 12 people can cause such death and destruction. This is such a core belief of mine that in the event of overwhelming evidence I merely see conspiracy upon conspiracy and the entire media, goverment, and western nations are all in on it". . .WTF - you know of all the 100's of pieces of news articles miss-reported that day you hold onto this one? There is so much wrong/unknowing/mistaken on that day . . . of course those other mistakes are ignored - they don't fit your view. Only focus on the mistakes that now, through 20/20 hindsight, prove your tin-foil hated point
groovemasterMar 5, 2007
@grabercSo you're saying you honestly believe that the BBC reporting that WTC had collapsed (including a qualifying statement on the news ticker at the bottom of the screen, a description of the building including how many floors it had and the statement "you might have heard I was talking a few moments ago about the Salomon building collapsing and *indeed it has*"), half an hour before it actually happened, is nothing more than a coincidence?Of course, you're entitled to your opinion but don't expect any rational, sane person to take you seriously.Personally, although your spelling and grammar is atrocious, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and conclude that you're a semi-intelligent guy who's simply too bewildered to face reality.All the best.
mreguyMar 7, 2007
@ thenikThis is not about YOU, DUMBASS, it's about the truth. This isn't a fcuking contest. Grow up.
quakeeSep 1, 2007
thats some coincidence. From hundreds of reports from multiple sources a lot of them turning out to be either wrong or speculation, BBC stumbles on the one that is OBVIOUSLY false, and magically comes true 20 min later. Must have been God at work on that one.
Closed AccountDec 3, 2007
Cheapest and the best data recovery service in the world.<a class="user" href="http://www.advanceddatarecovery.co.uk/">http://www.advanceddatarecovery.co.uk/</a>Hard Drive Recovery* All Makes & Models* 48 Hour Turn-Around* Cheapest in UK<a class="user" href="http://www.advanceddatarecovery.co.uk/harddriverecovery.html">http://www.advanceddatarecovery.co.uk/harddriverec ...</a>Raid Recovery* Raid 0,1, 5 & 10* All Raid Servers* Quickest in UK<a class="user" href="http://www.advanceddatarecovery.co.uk/raidrecovery.html">http://www.advanceddatarecovery.co.uk/raidrecovery ...</a>Laptop Data Recovery* All Laptops & Notebooks* 48 Hour Turn-Around* Cheapest in UK<a class="user" href="http://www.advanceddatarecovery.co.uk/laptoprecovery.html">http://www.advanceddatarecovery.co.uk/laptoprecove ...</a>Mac Recovery* All Mac Systems* 48 Hour Turn-Around* Cheapest in UK<a class="user" href="http://www.advanceddatarecovery.co.uk/MacRecovery.html">http://www.advanceddatarecovery.co.uk/MacRecovery. ...</a>Call 0800 075 0720 (Free Call Number)Anthony O'Haresupport@easyrecovery.netsales@easyrecovery.net___________________________________________________________EASY RECOVERY IRELAND<a class="user" href="http://www.easyrecovery.ie/">http://www.easyrecovery.ie/</a>Hard Drive Recovery * All Makes & Models * 48 Hour Turn-Around * Cheapest in Ireland<a class="user" href="http://www.easyrecovery.ie/harddriverecovery.html">http://www.easyrecovery.ie/harddriverecovery.html</a>Laptop Data Recovery * All Laptops & Notebooks * 48 Hour Turn-Around * Quickest in Ireland<a class="user" href="http://www.easyrecovery.ie/laptoprecovery.html">http://www.easyrecovery.ie/laptoprecovery.html</a>Raid Data Recovery * Raid 0,1 & 5 * All Raid Systems * Cheapest in Ireland<a class="user" href="http://www.easyrecovery.ie/raidrecovery.html">http://www.easyrecovery.ie/raidrecovery.html</a>Mac Recovery * All Mac Systems * 48 Hour Turn-Around * Cheapest in Ireland<a class="user" href="http://www.easyrecovery.ie/MacRecovery.html">http://www.easyrecovery.ie/MacRecovery.html</a>Support Center: 0044 2890 961976Anthony O'HareFor more information: sales@easyrecovery.ieFor support updates: support@easyrecovery.ie___________________________________________________________Senpai IT Solutions is a fast growing company with an expanding IT development team. We specialize in software, web, and database development, cryptography, corporate design, and Flash animation. We deliver our solutions to small businesses, corporate customers, financial institutions, and government organizations.<a class="user" href="http://www.senpai-it.com/">http://www.senpai-it.com/</a>SEERVERS<a class="user" href="http://www.senpai-it.com/dedicated_servers.php">http://www.senpai-it.com/dedicated_servers.php</a>SOLUTIONS<a class="user" href="http://www.senpai-it.com/tech.php">http://www.senpai-it.com/tech.php</a>PROJECTS<a class="user" href="http://www.senpai-it.com/projects.php">http://www.senpai-it.com/projects.php</a>ABOUT US<a class="user" href="http://www.senpai-it.com/about.php">http://www.senpai-it.com/about.php</a>CONTACT<a class="user" href="http://www.senpai-it.com/contact.php">http://www.senpai-it.com/contact.php</a>Dedicated Servers?69: 2.8GHz, 2GB RAM, 800GB HDD | ?99: 2.8GHz, 4GB RAM, 800GB HDD | ?229: 3.0GHz, 6GB RAM, 1.5TB HDD<a class="user" href="http://www.senpai-it.com/dedicated_servers.php">http://www.senpai-it.com/dedicated_servers.php</a>Security & CryptographyAttack feasiblisity and security analysis | System security implementation | Remote hands service for your server<a class="user" href="http://www.senpai-it.com/tech.php#crypto">http://www.senpai-it.com/tech.php#crypto</a>E-CommerceDevelopment of web shops | Development of financial software | Development of e-paymet systemsE-Commerce