mass.gov — "Whoever willfully blasphemes the holy name of God by denying, cursing or contumaciously reproaching God, his creation, government or final judging of the world or by cursing or contumaciously reproaching Jesus Christ or the Holy Ghost, or by cursing or contumaciously reproaching or exposing to contempt and ridicule, the holy word of God" ...
Feb 1, 2007 View in Crawl 4
miseseanFeb 2, 2007
Altotus: if you had a clue what you were talking about, you might speak sense. As it is, you don't understand atheism. Atheism is non-belief in existence, not belief in non-existence. No "faith" involved.
zonk3rFeb 2, 2007
I like what Andy Rooney said on 60 Minutes a while back: "For every new law you make you should repeal an old one". Sounds like a fair trade to me.The more laws you make, the more criminals you have.
carcrazyFeb 2, 2007
Filed under "Unconstitutional Connections Between Church and State". But, I must admit, I like it.
pwneFeb 2, 2007
I am a strong believer in Christianity (Protestant), and this is completely wrong. I personally feel that what you believe is what you believe, the government can't change it. This goes against everything America stood for at one point in time.
brstilsonFeb 2, 2007
"Well since atheists are generally intelligent,"So you would classify all the idiot teenage daddy-didn't-love-me-gothic-punk "atheists" out there as intelligent? Believing in something blindly is never intelligent, regardless of how correct or incorrect the actual belief is.
ryannumberoneFeb 8, 2007
Jesus H Christ!!!
cryptographixApr 10, 2007
I was also told this law isn't enforced anymore. It makes me wonder why it's still there. What is the point of having a law that is not enforced? <a class="user" href="http://atheistmovement.blogspot.com/">http://atheistmovement.blogspot.com/</a>
skater4christ13Feb 5, 2008
This really goes against Freedom of Religion, and I believe people should be able to believe what they want, I just really don't believe people should blaspheme God.
glassagateDec 30, 2008
I'm quiet sure that it was passed because men were jealous thatwomen were being pleased by someone other than themselves.Here's a hint: try a cucumber. Let's see if someone can outlaw those.
adison500Jun 15, 2010
No person shall be convicted of an offence under this section for expressing in good faith and in decent language<a class="user" href="http://benetton.fragrancess.us" rel="nofollow">http://benetton.fragrancess.us</a>
Closed AccountJun 19, 2010
i agree with you <a href="www.wholesaleworlds.com">www.wholesaleworlds.com</a>