theginblog.com — Guillermo Habacuc Vargas had 2 children catch this dog. He paid the kids for this. He then chained the dog and used the dog as ?art?. He told everyone not to feed this dog. The dog died in the gallery. He calls himself an artist. I call him an animal abuser.
Oct 18, 2007 View in Crawl 4
acelyOct 19, 2007
I'm so glad and surprised people dugg you up.
crestfallOct 19, 2007
Uh, no it wouldn't. There is a huge difference between disability and hubris.
manyakuOct 20, 2007
Making a spectacle out of suffering is unconscionable. Part of me still hopes that this is a cruel hoax. If not, curse him and the modern art culture that created him, all the way back to the New York Armory Show of 1913. O tempora! O mores!
shokdoktorOct 20, 2007
"People manipulate non-humans to their own purposes all the time"That does not make it right.
explnxOct 22, 2007
You act like you don't care about humans when a comment supporting the death penalty for a human who hasn't even commited murder gets 500+ diggs.
juckmanOct 22, 2007
Yes... I don't care about humans... what a great assumption you made there. My ignorance tolerance stops right there.
drumgurlyNov 4, 2007
everything about that man is wrong
randydruidNov 13, 2007
Assuming it is not a hoax, it should be observed that the artist "told people not to feed the dog". Unless he locked them out or guarded the dog around the clock, the observers were complicit in the death of the dog. That may be the message.