So, let me get this strait, were arrogant for developing to the (gasp) standards, but IE is fine and dandy going about breaking standards wherever they care too? Basically all IE does is make my job harder. Case in point I recently re-did our internal trouble ticket submit page. Designed in FF and tested on everything BUT it it worked great, and weighed in at 24K, after applying all the work-arounds and fixes for IE, its just over 32K. I for one can't WAIT for something besides IE to become dominant again, then MS might start careing about standards.
xmuskratFeb 23, 2006
If arrogant means follow standards, then yes: I don't develop for IE.
creepingdeathFeb 23, 2006
So, let me get this strait, were arrogant for developing to the (gasp) standards, but IE is fine and dandy going about breaking standards wherever they care too? Basically all IE does is make my job harder. Case in point I recently re-did our internal trouble ticket submit page. Designed in FF and tested on everything BUT it it worked great, and weighed in at 24K, after applying all the work-arounds and fixes for IE, its just over 32K. I for one can't WAIT for something besides IE to become dominant again, then MS might start careing about standards.
creepingdeathFeb 23, 2006
"on everything BUT IE" even.. My kingdom for an edit button ;)
kyriakosFeb 23, 2006
not developing for IE (or at least making sure it works in IE) is retarded considering the percentage of people using it as their main browser.