quantumbiocommunication.com — A new theory has string theorists and general relativists scratching their heads, Chapline sees a future that might just offer an alternate explanation of what happened during the Big Bang, when the universe was created.
Dec 8, 2005 View in Crawl 4
monkenstickDec 9, 2005
"Chapline says that ordinary matter would break apart because the protons and neutrons in the matter would disintegrate. Further, Chapline says black holes do not really exist. Instead, he proposes that the mass of compact astrophysical objects consists of the same dark energy that makes up 60 percent of the mass of the universe.""?When I came up with this idea, people just thought I was crazy for many, many years. But in ten years, this will be the orthodox belief. This explanation of dark energy stars will help explain dark matter. This could profoundly change our whole view of the universe.?""article by greg chapline"an article about yourself by yourself, proclaiming profound breakthrough?pretty dodgy I say. no digg
matteosDec 9, 2005
I mean "hear"... Damn
thephilomathDec 9, 2005
wenham, I ask for proof as well. and sometimes that goes against what the majority believes, sometimes it doesn't.<a class="user" href="http://xxx.arxiv.org/ftp/astro-ph/papers/0503/0503200.pdf">http://xxx.arxiv.org/ftp/astro-ph/papers/0503/0503200.pdf</a>There's a better explanation of the theory, for those that are worried about the articles credibility.
forbesbingleyDec 9, 2005
"I still say our universe was started by a black hole in another universe, tearing a hole into our empty universe and populating it with all the garbage it ingested."I don't think it works that way, unfortunately.Our universe wasn't some empty parking lot waiting for matter & energy to be poured into like a jelly mould.The mass expansion of matter & energy 'are' the universe, beyond which we know not what .. or at least have a very tenuous grasp of.I believe Professor Stephen Hawkin [yes, that weird-looking guy into the motorised wheelchair] said something like the universe is infinite, but it also has boundaries...
forbesbingleyDec 9, 2005
Anyway, the search is over.All of the dark matter & energy have been found down the back of my settee, along with the missing ball-point pen, the loose change and the boiled sweet covered in fluff...
baaadbartDec 9, 2005
While his theory is controversial, he isn't a quack. He didn't he write that article himself and then refer to himself in the third person. It seems to me he pasted the article into his blog (which shows him as the author) but the article originates here: <a class="user" href="http://www.llnl.gov/pao/news/news_releases/2005/SF-05-04-03.html">http://www.llnl.gov/pao/news/news_releases/2005/SF-05-04-03.html</a> . Here you can see that in fact Anne M. Stark wrote the article.
kzintiDec 9, 2005
"High temperature superconductivity is an example of quantum critical behavior. Chapline said that plutonium may be another example of an earthly quantum critical system; indeed it is the only example of a pure element that displays quantum critical behavior."Does anybody have any idea what this refers to? What does plutonium "do" that's as exotic as superconductivity? Please explain using small, simple words - I'm no physicist.