iangoddard.net — This scientifically site debunks fox(which doesn't take for much thinking to debunk something on fox) program about the photos being fake. If you still think the Apollo moon then read this site debunks it.
May 29, 2006 View in Crawl 4
technopunditMay 29, 2006
Anybody can tell the photo of Neil Armstrong standing on the grassy knoll is obviously faked.
nymphetamineMay 29, 2006
The only thing that sucks about this whole moon landing is that the only way we'll ever really know if they did land on the moon is if they do it again, or if they start taking people up there just to prove that they were there. And I still don't get why if we went there back in the 60s, why haven't we been there since? Technology is waaaay advanced now, so what's up? Too busy? Not enough $$$? Still working on the new faked moon landing footage?
thexenoMay 29, 2006
Watched the Penn and Teller take on this on their show, Bulls**t!. Not only was it funny, but they totally blasted all that flag waving crap, and showed the nutjobs that perpetuate this conspiracy poop. Torrent the episode, it's pretty good, goes over JFK and 911 too. But yeah, seriously, we landed on the moon. Get over it.
philarcandMay 29, 2006
This site has @ badastronomy has even more information on the subject<a class="user" href="http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html">http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html</a>very interesting read!extract : Kaysing's exact words in the program are ``Any human being traveling through the van Allen belt would have been rendered either extremely ill or actually killed by the radiation within a short time thereof.''This is complete and utter nonsense. The van Allen belts are regions above the Earth's surface where the Earth's magnetic field has trapped particles of the solar wind. An unprotected man would indeed get a lethal dose of radiation, if he stayed there long enough. Actually, the spaceship traveled through the belts pretty quickly, getting past them in an hour or so. There simply wasn't enough time to get a lethal dose, and, as a matter of fact, the metal hull of the spaceship did indeed block most of the radiation.
kovaxxMay 29, 2006
NASA is planning to go back in 2018. This is no secret and has been in the works for a while. Such a mission would be the 7th human landing on the moon.<a class="user" href="http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/exploration/mmb/index.html">http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/exploration/mmb/index.html</a>
chosenone_Jun 28, 2006
I don't know where I stand on this issue, although the government has lied about many other events. The one thing I just can't figure out are these clips (www.moonmovie.com) where they show photos with multiple lighting angles from the moon (Video Sample 1) and the astronauts' depressed attitudes at the post-flight press conference (down the page).People, I urge you all not to hold onto any conclusions you might have on anything, for we are all imperfect by design. The world is a pyramid of information where there always seems to be another level perspective you haven't figured out. There is the world itself and there's the mental image every person has about how the world is, but the image can never be the world itself. You must strive to not confuse the two in an effort to better understand what the world really is.Probably any association you have about what heaven or hell is like can be found on this diverse biosphere that has 6 billion (how do they count everyone?) persons just like yourself, running through their lives, 24/7. Most humans die before they're even born and the majority of the world resides in third world countries. What's your image of what it's like to live poor in *any* country?My image of the world is that energy is the same thing as consciousness, which takes many forms and forms the material world. Everything is aware of itself at some level, no matter how inanimate it is:"[David Bohm is a University of London physicist who is one of the world's most respected quantum physicists] At the Berkeley Radiation Labratory Bohm began what was to become his landmark work on plasmas. A plasma is a gas containing a high density of electrons and positive ions, atoms that have a positive charge. To his amazement he found that once they were in a plasma, electrons stopped behaving like individuals and started behaving as if they were part of a larger and interconnected whole. Although their individual movements appeared random, vast numbers of electrons were able to produce effects that were surprisingly well-organized. Like some amoeboid creature, the plasma constantly regenerated itself and enclosed all impurities in a wall in the same way that a biological organism might encase a foreign substance in a cyst.* So struck was Bohm by these organic qualities that he later remarked he'd frequently had the impression the electron sea was "alive."^"In 1947 Bohm accepted an assistant professorship at Princeton University [...] and there he extended his Berkeley research to the study of electrons an metals. Once again he found that the seemingly haphazard movements of individual electrons managed to produce highly organized overall effects. Like the plasmas he had studied at Berkeley, these were no longer situations involving two particles, each behaving as if it knew what the other was doing, but entire oceans of particles, each behaving as if it knew what untold trillions of others were doing."* Hiley and Peat, "Quantum," p. 3^ John P. Briggs and F. David Peat, "Looking Glass Universe" (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1984), p. 96.From Michael Talbot's "The Holographic Universe," (HarperCollins Publishers, Inc., 1992), p. 38*****Lotsa interesting stuff out there, go and try to figure it out. Just always remember that you don't remember, you should know that you don't know. Thrive in imperfection and have a good trip, see you later!
bitcloudJun 28, 2006
The lighting on those moon photos do more to prove we went than didn't.Working on a set, I can say that it would be *extremely* difficult to light a stage in that manner, and with enough light to illuminate the body with splashback light without illuminating the ground.The moon is pretty much the only place you could get that sort of lighting. (unless they build a sound stage yknow... in orbit.. /tinfoil)
bitcloudJun 28, 2006
Furthermore, the two "identical images" short of being proof we didn't land, actually demonstratably provide a stereoscopic pair that when viewed in the right way show a 3D scene that could never have been a sound stage. (it also demonstrates the distance the camera has moved, placing the lunar lander out of the shot)
chosenone_Jun 28, 2006
How exactly do such appearances of multiple light sources happen naturally on the moon? I seriously don't understand...This is a tour-de-force over the arguments in an attempt to refute, make your own conclusions and research :)
kevinhaneyJun 29, 2006
And they put a reflector on the moon to shine back lazer light so they could track the position of the earth and how fast it rotates, and they still use it even TODAY!