""If it's a 'leaderless jihad,' then I can find something else to do because the threat is over," said Peter Bergen, a senior fellow at the nonpartisan New America Foundation," My response to this statement above and the whole thing on the fight on terrorist since 911 is; well, find something else to do then! Seems like nothing good has come out of all of this. Look at our economy, complete s**tS does Bush even care? Is the question. ahhhhhh!!!!!!!
Actually, I think a "leaderless jihad" is more dangerous and more difficult to stop. On the other hand, I don't think Al Qaeda/terrorism -- organized or not -- would be a threat if we applied ourselves to eliminating its causes: poverty and suppression of civil rights in third world countries coupled with imperialist aggression in same.
nikamarieJun 9, 2008
""If it's a 'leaderless jihad,' then I can find something else to do because the threat is over," said Peter Bergen, a senior fellow at the nonpartisan New America Foundation," My response to this statement above and the whole thing on the fight on terrorist since 911 is; well, find something else to do then! Seems like nothing good has come out of all of this. Look at our economy, complete s**tS does Bush even care? Is the question. ahhhhhh!!!!!!!
siriuslyJun 10, 2008
Actually, I think a "leaderless jihad" is more dangerous and more difficult to stop. On the other hand, I don't think Al Qaeda/terrorism -- organized or not -- would be a threat if we applied ourselves to eliminating its causes: poverty and suppression of civil rights in third world countries coupled with imperialist aggression in same.