And your only evidence for that is that his mother's last name is Greene. Very solid, indeed. By the way, Greene was here father's last name, and according to Wikipedia here mother's roots can be traced to sixteenth century England and Scotland. So her mother is not Jewish, because there were virtually no Jews in England or Scotland at the time. Ergo, even if her father was Jewish, for which there is no evidence, that does not make her Jewish, because her mother was not Jewish. Get it? Didn't think so.
well the pro-iran faction are terror apologists indoctrinated in leftist anti-Americanism so there's not much lower they can go but perhaps all groups can fall down to the smug ignorant level of moral equivalence where you are. The pro-US faction - while not having a spotless perfect history of US foreign policy - is trying to figure out how to stand up to fight for moral reasons and to preserve democracy and liberty. How mentally retarded is that! How much better to be smug and self-righteously ignorant like you and try to play nice with those who defend dictators and terrorists alike?!?!
Good recommendation. Now when a fanatic indoctrinated in genocidal hate is standing in front of you and a schoolbus of children with a bomb strapped on filled with nails and shrapnel dipped in rat poison to cause the maximum maiming and suffering ready to commit suicide in order to murder the most Jews and get 72 virgins, what would you like to negotiate? I guess masimcon doesn't know ANY history of the mideast so is believing all the petrodollar funded propaganda to delegitimize Israel. Here's a little to prevent others from being as smugly ignorant as macsimcon: <a class="user" href="http://digg.com/political_opinion/Bittersweet_Lega">http://digg.com/political_opinion/Bittersweet_Lega</a> ... "Israel's Cabinet met shortly after the war and agreed to return territory in exchange for peace. The Arab League thought differently, however, meeting in Khartoum for its famous summit of the "Three No's" -- no recognition of Israel, no negotiations with Israel and no peace with Israel. Israel's offer to return conquered territory -- before the occupation had been established and before there were any settlements -- was flat-out rejected." "Still, the idea of "land for peace" quickly gained currency as the new international panacea. U.N. Security Council Resolution 242, passed five months after the fighting stopped, reflected the new approach." The historical record reiterates Israeli goal for peace and Arab goal to destroy Israel and regain ALL the land - not just a portion. See <a class="user" href="http://digg.com/politics/Most_of_the_conventional_">http://digg.com/politics/Most_of_the_conventional_</a> ... "It is also often said today that the Six Day War humiliated the Arabs and propelled the region into future rounds of fighting. Yet President Aref of Iraq had prefaced his call to destroy Israel by describing the war as the Arabs' chance "to wipe out the ignominy which has been with us since 1948." It is said that the war inaugurated the era of modern terrorism, as the Arab world switched from a strategy of conventional confrontation with Israel to one of "unconventional" attacks. Yet hundreds of Israelis had already been killed in fedayeen raids in Israel's first 19 years of existence. It is said that the Palestinian movement was born from Israel's occupation of Gaza and the West Bank. Yet the Palestine Liberation Organization was already in its third year of operations when the war began. It is said that Israel enjoyed international legitimacy so long as it lived behind recognized frontiers. Yet those frontiers were no less provisional before 1967 than they were after. Only after the Six Day War did the Green Line come to be seen as the "real" border. Fog also surrounds memories of the immediate aftermath of the war. To read some recent accounts, a more sagacious Israel could have followed up its historic victory with peace overtures that would have spared everyone the bloody entanglements of its occupation of the Sinai, Gaza, the West Bank and the Golan Heights. Or, failing that, it could have resisted the lure of building settlements in the territories in order not to complicate a land-for-peace transaction. In fact, the Israeli cabinet agreed on June 19 to offer the Sinai to Egypt and the Golan to Syria in exchange for peace deals. In Khartoum that September, the Arab League declared "no peace with Israel, no recognition of Israel, no negotiations with it." As for Jewish settlements, hardly any were built for years after the war: In 1972, for instance, only about 800 settlers had moved to the West Bank." *<a class="user" href="http://jewishworldreview.com/jonathan/gurwitz06050">http://jewishworldreview.com/jonathan/gurwitz06050</a> ... "No one had ever heard of the "occupied" Gaza Strip or the "occupied" West Bank before June 10, 1967. Not because there hadn't been occupations in both places. Of course, Egypt had occupied Gaza and Jordan had occupied the West Bank since 1948. And if there had been any inclination on the part of the Arab world to create even the rudiments of a Palestinian state, it might have occurred at any time in the preceding 19 years. " "But as with so much else, you have to ignore history — and the facts — to buy into the belief system that constitutes the mythology of anti-Zionism. Attributing the Palestinian-Israeli conflict to the Israeli occupation, pretending that no other occupation came before it, is far easier than explaining the unanimous Arab rejection of the 1947 U.N. partition plan and the failure of Arab leaders to pay more than lip service to Palestinian statehood." "You simply can't reconcile the explicit repudiation of a two-state solution and the jubilant calls in 1947 — and again in the days leading up to the Six Day War in 1967 — for the annihilation of the Jews with any notion of Arabs and Jews living together in peace. " "You can't claim Islamic extremism is a reaction to Israeli occupation if you know that the Muslim Brotherhood — the ideological grandfather of all jihadist groups — started in Egypt two decades before the founding of the modern state of Israel or that Muhammad ibn Abd al Wahhab made a pact with Muhammad ibn Saud two centuries earlier that entrenched a radical interpretation of Islam in the Arabian Peninsula. " "And you can't possibly blame Israeli policies for fueling violence in the Middle East if you know about the dozens of regional conflicts that have inflicted tens of millions of casualties on the Muslim world and have nothing to do with Palestinian self-determination — in Algeria, Ethiopia, Somalia, Sudan, Lebanon, Yemen and Afghanistan; between Morocco and Algeria, Egypt and Libya, Libya and Chad, Syria and Jordan, Iraq and Kuwait, Iran and Iraq. " "But a fair reading of history isn't kind to anti-Israeli fabulists. So to make the mythology believable by the gullible and the willfully ignorant, history must begin in 1967 and the Israeli occupation must be the root of all Middle East evil. But the Israeli withdrawal from the Gaza Strip in 2005 and the tragic degeneration of Palestinian society that followed has rendered this fantasy ultimately obsolete. " <a class="user" href="http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/06/palestine_t">http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/06/palestine_t</a> ... <a class="user" href="http://www.terrorfinance.org/the_terror_finance_bl">http://www.terrorfinance.org/the_terror_finance_bl</a> ... www.SixDayWar.org <a class="user" href="http://72.166.46.24/boston/news_features/other_sto">http://72.166.46.24/boston/news_features/other_sto</a> ... <a class="user" href="http://www.somebodyhelpme.info/mideast/History_of_">http://www.somebodyhelpme.info/mideast/History_of_</a> ... <a class="user" href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/media/pdf/BigLies.pdf">http://www.frontpagemag.com/media/pdf/BigLies.pdf</a> <a class="user" href="http://www.ononefootbook.com/OnOneFoot.pdf">http://www.ononefootbook.com/OnOneFoot.pdf</a> MEDIA BIAS: <a class="user" href="http://theaugeanstables.com/">http://theaugeanstables.com/</a> & <a class="user" href="http://seconddraft.org/">http://seconddraft.org/</a> As for the anti-Israel spam trying to paint ISRAEL as racist maybe you should learn about racist countries like Saudi Arabia (where Jews can't enter) or Jordan (where it is illegal to sell land to Jews) or to Palestine (see <a class="user" href="http://www.zionist.com/2007/03/21/palestine-jews-n">http://www.zionist.com/2007/03/21/palestine-jews-n</a> ... and <a class="user" href="http://www.emetnews.org/weblog/why-must-an-arab-pa">http://www.emetnews.org/weblog/why-must-an-arab-pa</a> ... The only ethnic cleansing is in the OPENLY STATED genocidal goals of the charters of the PLO the PA Hamas and Hezbollah - not Israel. Poor smug and self righteous and doesn't have a clue.
Another ignorant idiot who doesn't read any of the previous comments showing he clearly wants the only existing Jewish state destroyed and doesn't understand the Islamist theological roots of his politics. But don't let that effect the smug self-righteous tone of those regurgitating the leftist apologia for terrorists.
artemusSep 25, 2007
Since when did Bill Gates become a "media mogul"?
noze8Sep 25, 2007
Yah for 2 terms worth.....
wpi97Sep 25, 2007
And your only evidence for that is that his mother's last name is Greene. Very solid, indeed. By the way, Greene was here father's last name, and according to Wikipedia here mother's roots can be traced to sixteenth century England and Scotland. So her mother is not Jewish, because there were virtually no Jews in England or Scotland at the time. Ergo, even if her father was Jewish, for which there is no evidence, that does not make her Jewish, because her mother was not Jewish. Get it? Didn't think so.
wpi97Sep 25, 2007
This is a matter of transliteration. I have seen it spelled both ways, just like Hannukah vs. Channukah.
cjwrightOct 9, 2007
well the pro-iran faction are terror apologists indoctrinated in leftist anti-Americanism so there's not much lower they can go but perhaps all groups can fall down to the smug ignorant level of moral equivalence where you are. The pro-US faction - while not having a spotless perfect history of US foreign policy - is trying to figure out how to stand up to fight for moral reasons and to preserve democracy and liberty. How mentally retarded is that! How much better to be smug and self-righteously ignorant like you and try to play nice with those who defend dictators and terrorists alike?!?!
cjwrightOct 9, 2007
Good recommendation. Now when a fanatic indoctrinated in genocidal hate is standing in front of you and a schoolbus of children with a bomb strapped on filled with nails and shrapnel dipped in rat poison to cause the maximum maiming and suffering ready to commit suicide in order to murder the most Jews and get 72 virgins, what would you like to negotiate? I guess masimcon doesn't know ANY history of the mideast so is believing all the petrodollar funded propaganda to delegitimize Israel. Here's a little to prevent others from being as smugly ignorant as macsimcon: <a class="user" href="http://digg.com/political_opinion/Bittersweet_Lega">http://digg.com/political_opinion/Bittersweet_Lega</a> ... "Israel's Cabinet met shortly after the war and agreed to return territory in exchange for peace. The Arab League thought differently, however, meeting in Khartoum for its famous summit of the "Three No's" -- no recognition of Israel, no negotiations with Israel and no peace with Israel. Israel's offer to return conquered territory -- before the occupation had been established and before there were any settlements -- was flat-out rejected." "Still, the idea of "land for peace" quickly gained currency as the new international panacea. U.N. Security Council Resolution 242, passed five months after the fighting stopped, reflected the new approach." The historical record reiterates Israeli goal for peace and Arab goal to destroy Israel and regain ALL the land - not just a portion. See <a class="user" href="http://digg.com/politics/Most_of_the_conventional_">http://digg.com/politics/Most_of_the_conventional_</a> ... "It is also often said today that the Six Day War humiliated the Arabs and propelled the region into future rounds of fighting. Yet President Aref of Iraq had prefaced his call to destroy Israel by describing the war as the Arabs' chance "to wipe out the ignominy which has been with us since 1948." It is said that the war inaugurated the era of modern terrorism, as the Arab world switched from a strategy of conventional confrontation with Israel to one of "unconventional" attacks. Yet hundreds of Israelis had already been killed in fedayeen raids in Israel's first 19 years of existence. It is said that the Palestinian movement was born from Israel's occupation of Gaza and the West Bank. Yet the Palestine Liberation Organization was already in its third year of operations when the war began. It is said that Israel enjoyed international legitimacy so long as it lived behind recognized frontiers. Yet those frontiers were no less provisional before 1967 than they were after. Only after the Six Day War did the Green Line come to be seen as the "real" border. Fog also surrounds memories of the immediate aftermath of the war. To read some recent accounts, a more sagacious Israel could have followed up its historic victory with peace overtures that would have spared everyone the bloody entanglements of its occupation of the Sinai, Gaza, the West Bank and the Golan Heights. Or, failing that, it could have resisted the lure of building settlements in the territories in order not to complicate a land-for-peace transaction. In fact, the Israeli cabinet agreed on June 19 to offer the Sinai to Egypt and the Golan to Syria in exchange for peace deals. In Khartoum that September, the Arab League declared "no peace with Israel, no recognition of Israel, no negotiations with it." As for Jewish settlements, hardly any were built for years after the war: In 1972, for instance, only about 800 settlers had moved to the West Bank." *<a class="user" href="http://jewishworldreview.com/jonathan/gurwitz06050">http://jewishworldreview.com/jonathan/gurwitz06050</a> ... "No one had ever heard of the "occupied" Gaza Strip or the "occupied" West Bank before June 10, 1967. Not because there hadn't been occupations in both places. Of course, Egypt had occupied Gaza and Jordan had occupied the West Bank since 1948. And if there had been any inclination on the part of the Arab world to create even the rudiments of a Palestinian state, it might have occurred at any time in the preceding 19 years. " "But as with so much else, you have to ignore history — and the facts — to buy into the belief system that constitutes the mythology of anti-Zionism. Attributing the Palestinian-Israeli conflict to the Israeli occupation, pretending that no other occupation came before it, is far easier than explaining the unanimous Arab rejection of the 1947 U.N. partition plan and the failure of Arab leaders to pay more than lip service to Palestinian statehood." "You simply can't reconcile the explicit repudiation of a two-state solution and the jubilant calls in 1947 — and again in the days leading up to the Six Day War in 1967 — for the annihilation of the Jews with any notion of Arabs and Jews living together in peace. " "You can't claim Islamic extremism is a reaction to Israeli occupation if you know that the Muslim Brotherhood — the ideological grandfather of all jihadist groups — started in Egypt two decades before the founding of the modern state of Israel or that Muhammad ibn Abd al Wahhab made a pact with Muhammad ibn Saud two centuries earlier that entrenched a radical interpretation of Islam in the Arabian Peninsula. " "And you can't possibly blame Israeli policies for fueling violence in the Middle East if you know about the dozens of regional conflicts that have inflicted tens of millions of casualties on the Muslim world and have nothing to do with Palestinian self-determination — in Algeria, Ethiopia, Somalia, Sudan, Lebanon, Yemen and Afghanistan; between Morocco and Algeria, Egypt and Libya, Libya and Chad, Syria and Jordan, Iraq and Kuwait, Iran and Iraq. " "But a fair reading of history isn't kind to anti-Israeli fabulists. So to make the mythology believable by the gullible and the willfully ignorant, history must begin in 1967 and the Israeli occupation must be the root of all Middle East evil. But the Israeli withdrawal from the Gaza Strip in 2005 and the tragic degeneration of Palestinian society that followed has rendered this fantasy ultimately obsolete. " <a class="user" href="http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/06/palestine_t">http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/06/palestine_t</a> ... <a class="user" href="http://www.terrorfinance.org/the_terror_finance_bl">http://www.terrorfinance.org/the_terror_finance_bl</a> ... www.SixDayWar.org <a class="user" href="http://72.166.46.24/boston/news_features/other_sto">http://72.166.46.24/boston/news_features/other_sto</a> ... <a class="user" href="http://www.somebodyhelpme.info/mideast/History_of_">http://www.somebodyhelpme.info/mideast/History_of_</a> ... <a class="user" href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/media/pdf/BigLies.pdf">http://www.frontpagemag.com/media/pdf/BigLies.pdf</a> <a class="user" href="http://www.ononefootbook.com/OnOneFoot.pdf">http://www.ononefootbook.com/OnOneFoot.pdf</a> MEDIA BIAS: <a class="user" href="http://theaugeanstables.com/">http://theaugeanstables.com/</a> & <a class="user" href="http://seconddraft.org/">http://seconddraft.org/</a> As for the anti-Israel spam trying to paint ISRAEL as racist maybe you should learn about racist countries like Saudi Arabia (where Jews can't enter) or Jordan (where it is illegal to sell land to Jews) or to Palestine (see <a class="user" href="http://www.zionist.com/2007/03/21/palestine-jews-n">http://www.zionist.com/2007/03/21/palestine-jews-n</a> ... and <a class="user" href="http://www.emetnews.org/weblog/why-must-an-arab-pa">http://www.emetnews.org/weblog/why-must-an-arab-pa</a> ... The only ethnic cleansing is in the OPENLY STATED genocidal goals of the charters of the PLO the PA Hamas and Hezbollah - not Israel. Poor smug and self righteous and doesn't have a clue.
cjwrightOct 9, 2007
Another ignorant idiot who doesn't read any of the previous comments showing he clearly wants the only existing Jewish state destroyed and doesn't understand the Islamist theological roots of his politics. But don't let that effect the smug self-righteous tone of those regurgitating the leftist apologia for terrorists.
ptanonimoJun 3, 2008
can't dotoo funny
commandojoeFeb 19, 2009
The country that would most likely be the first target of an Iranian nuclear weapon...