slyck.com— While the IFPI, MPA and Antipiratbyrån are jubilant over the seizure of ThePirateBay.org, hundreds of other online domains taken off line stand to lose significant business and traffic.
Jun 1, 2006View in Crawl 4
Why is it the Content Nazis can make any accusation and it is taken as truth? Box office and DVD sales have set records 10 out of the last 11 years and yet they claim they lost 2.3 billion dollars. Maybe the the innocent sites brought down by this debacle can claim they lost 1 trillion dollars, not because that is what they actually lost, but because the higher the fictional dollar figure the more incendiary it looks and the more attention it gets from the police and the press.
hey dumbass (yeah you jasqwerty) they didn't do anything wrong, they were in the bounds of the law for their country, think about it for a 1/2 second and your little 1W lightbulb in your head just may flicker and realize something outside of your "box".
@scsikool"application that promotes the sharing of copyrighted material"Define that please.- Online word processor because a user can type in text from the book they are reading to create an electronic copy?- An online, off-site backup service because the clients of the service might backup copyrighted material that they are not supposed to have or copy?- A VOIP service because, even though the bits are just flowing through the server and are not recorded in the service, it could be the audio of a copyrighted work that neither the sender nor receiver have the right to copy?- An FTP server mirror because they don't watch every file that gets posted and downloaded?- A USENET server because we all know newsgroups are for swapping copyrighted material?- A print sales ad aggregation site for people to see the latest sales prices on fresh vegetables that it links to on the store sites because those sales prices are copyrighted?There is currently no law in the US or Swedish that I know of that prohibits "promot[ing] the sharing of copyrighted material." Napster was not defeated in court because of promotion. It was defeated because it stored unauthorized copies of copyrighted material. It infringed. Promoting infringement or simply just providing a means to infringe is not unlawful. No law broken, no case against the promoter.(IANAL so I could be wrong, of course.)
1. Speculation that it was steel, aluminum however has a much lower melting point than steel2. The antenna does not fall first3. Sliced cleanly? have you seen photos of ground zero after the dust settled?4. Explain to me this process... cause google and wikipedia has nothing on it.5. Physics lesson: one side of the building's beams gave way (the impact side) causing it to rotate about the other side. Now when the side that gave way first crashes into the floors below the rotation is stopped. Completely within newtons laws. When a building pancakes it doesn't quite disintegrate, but it did kick up a hell of a lot of dust thus appearing to disintegrate.6. What denial of existence of support columns? Never heard that one beforeI have never heard a single good point from conspiracy theories
It is all really really stupid I buy a CD I go to my friends house trade (or give him a CD) "I am a thief. Yet I am the one that bought the CD, it is mine!. I have the right to do with as I so choose.' I am not RENTING the CD, I am buying the CD. It is MINE. I have the right to do with it as I see fit.The MPA & RIAA are becoming a Little to big for there own good. They forget it is "We The People."You do not go buy a car then if you choose to sell it, you become a thief. Or give it away you become a thief.You paid your money for it , it is YOURS too do with as you choose, to do with it as you choose, be that play it on you are PC, in your car,re mix it, what ever its YOURS!!!.
I agree.And while we are lucky enough to live in a country where personal rights are cherished. Many poor people are forced to live in some type of crazy "corporate police state".These poor people are forced to sign "eula"s which void there legal rights with every install file before they even know what they are allowing on there pcProducts they purchass come with legal addons that make it illegal for them to show it to friends, make a copy for safekeeping, or even resell there property when they grow tired of it.Feel lucky you live in a country, where you personal freedoms are cherished.And when the man comes to take those freedoms, fight.
hodejoJun 1, 2006
Why is it the Content Nazis can make any accusation and it is taken as truth? Box office and DVD sales have set records 10 out of the last 11 years and yet they claim they lost 2.3 billion dollars. Maybe the the innocent sites brought down by this debacle can claim they lost 1 trillion dollars, not because that is what they actually lost, but because the higher the fictional dollar figure the more incendiary it looks and the more attention it gets from the police and the press.
isepicJun 2, 2006
hey dumbass (yeah you jasqwerty) they didn't do anything wrong, they were in the bounds of the law for their country, think about it for a 1/2 second and your little 1W lightbulb in your head just may flicker and realize something outside of your "box".
alanddJun 2, 2006
@scsikool"application that promotes the sharing of copyrighted material"Define that please.- Online word processor because a user can type in text from the book they are reading to create an electronic copy?- An online, off-site backup service because the clients of the service might backup copyrighted material that they are not supposed to have or copy?- A VOIP service because, even though the bits are just flowing through the server and are not recorded in the service, it could be the audio of a copyrighted work that neither the sender nor receiver have the right to copy?- An FTP server mirror because they don't watch every file that gets posted and downloaded?- A USENET server because we all know newsgroups are for swapping copyrighted material?- A print sales ad aggregation site for people to see the latest sales prices on fresh vegetables that it links to on the store sites because those sales prices are copyrighted?There is currently no law in the US or Swedish that I know of that prohibits "promot[ing] the sharing of copyrighted material." Napster was not defeated in court because of promotion. It was defeated because it stored unauthorized copies of copyrighted material. It infringed. Promoting infringement or simply just providing a means to infringe is not unlawful. No law broken, no case against the promoter.(IANAL so I could be wrong, of course.)
marcanJun 2, 2006
More info:<a class="user" href="http://www.911truthseekers.org/modules/smartsection/item.php?itemid=2">http://www.911truthseekers.org/modules/smartsection/item.php?itemid=2</a>I repeat, if someone can explain why and how the official theory works, I'll gladly take it. But given what I've seen in many places, it makes no sense at all.
doddilusJun 3, 2006
1. Speculation that it was steel, aluminum however has a much lower melting point than steel2. The antenna does not fall first3. Sliced cleanly? have you seen photos of ground zero after the dust settled?4. Explain to me this process... cause google and wikipedia has nothing on it.5. Physics lesson: one side of the building's beams gave way (the impact side) causing it to rotate about the other side. Now when the side that gave way first crashes into the floors below the rotation is stopped. Completely within newtons laws. When a building pancakes it doesn't quite disintegrate, but it did kick up a hell of a lot of dust thus appearing to disintegrate.6. What denial of existence of support columns? Never heard that one beforeI have never heard a single good point from conspiracy theories
thunder7Jun 5, 2006
It is all really really stupid I buy a CD I go to my friends house trade (or give him a CD) "I am a thief. Yet I am the one that bought the CD, it is mine!. I have the right to do with as I so choose.' I am not RENTING the CD, I am buying the CD. It is MINE. I have the right to do with it as I see fit.The MPA & RIAA are becoming a Little to big for there own good. They forget it is "We The People."You do not go buy a car then if you choose to sell it, you become a thief. Or give it away you become a thief.You paid your money for it , it is YOURS too do with as you choose, to do with it as you choose, be that play it on you are PC, in your car,re mix it, what ever its YOURS!!!.
georgegadJun 6, 2006
I agree.And while we are lucky enough to live in a country where personal rights are cherished. Many poor people are forced to live in some type of crazy "corporate police state".These poor people are forced to sign "eula"s which void there legal rights with every install file before they even know what they are allowing on there pcProducts they purchass come with legal addons that make it illegal for them to show it to friends, make a copy for safekeeping, or even resell there property when they grow tired of it.Feel lucky you live in a country, where you personal freedoms are cherished.And when the man comes to take those freedoms, fight.