examiner.com— With H.R. 2159, Congressman Peter King (R-NY) once again tries to give the Attorney General the power to unilaterally deny gun rights based on the mere suspicion of "terrorism."
May 5, 2009View in Crawl 4
The bottom line is that there is NO way to keep guns out of the hands of criminals, without imposing onerous restrictions on people who are NOT criminals.
The Department of Homeland Security should be renamed the "Ministry of Love".After all, their recent actions are resembling more and more like INGSOC.
chadsexingtime ...See what you forget Canada boy is that you are controlled by a oligarchy with the queen at the top of that small group of elites over you. Your guns are taking away to keep your weak ass people in check not to stop criminals. Tell me son how can such a small group of people control such masses? Fear, with no way to protect yourself you are at the mercy of your government. This is the main difference between your country and mine, you see WE
"Thats the attitude that make's america a place I'd never want to live."So what you're saying, if I understand correctly, is that you have a problem with the belief that a person should have the right (and the means) to defend himself when someone threatens to harm him, or take his life? Is THAT what you find so disturbing? And if so, what would you suggest as an appropriate response? That one should do absolutely nothing whatever to fend off his attacker? That he shouldn't even TRY to fight for his life? That he should simply roll over and die -- literally?If that is indeed what you think, I find it more than a little ironic that you would look so askance upon this country, given that there is no shortage of Americans who share your attitude. One need look no further than Digg, as anyone here who regularly reads up on firearms issues can testify.
No, you should be afraid, be VERY afraid. You should give up everything, all your rights, and your first born child. For security. Afterall, they hate us for our "freedoms".
so, who decides??? People like THIS dual citizen assh**e???<a class="user" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJBZZKlvrP4">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJBZZKlvrP4</a>go to 1:16 -From Wiki: The No Fly List, sometimes called the terrorist watch list, is a secret list created and maintained by the United States government of people who are not permitted to board a commercial aircraft for travel in or out of the United States. The list has also used been used to divert away from U.S. airspace aircraft not flying to or from the U.S.[1] It includes at least 1 million names as of March 2009[update].[2] The list – along with the Secondary Security Screening Selection, which tags would-be passengers for extra inspection – was created after the September 11, 2001, attacks.And nobody knows who is on this list, or why they are on it. Sounds like Nazi Germany to me.
Closed AccountMay 5, 2009Submitter
The bottom line is that there is NO way to keep guns out of the hands of criminals, without imposing onerous restrictions on people who are NOT criminals.
secrityMay 5, 2009
It shouldn't have been formed in the first place.
Closed AccountMay 5, 2009
100% agreed.
Closed AccountMay 5, 2009
Never liked Peter King. He creeps me out.
qijiguangMay 5, 2009
The Department of Homeland Security should be renamed the "Ministry of Love".After all, their recent actions are resembling more and more like INGSOC.
1984usaMay 6, 2009
chadsexingtime ...See what you forget Canada boy is that you are controlled by a oligarchy with the queen at the top of that small group of elites over you. Your guns are taking away to keep your weak ass people in check not to stop criminals. Tell me son how can such a small group of people control such masses? Fear, with no way to protect yourself you are at the mercy of your government. This is the main difference between your country and mine, you see WE
thebeggarqueenMay 13, 2009
"Thats the attitude that make's america a place I'd never want to live."So what you're saying, if I understand correctly, is that you have a problem with the belief that a person should have the right (and the means) to defend himself when someone threatens to harm him, or take his life? Is THAT what you find so disturbing? And if so, what would you suggest as an appropriate response? That one should do absolutely nothing whatever to fend off his attacker? That he shouldn't even TRY to fight for his life? That he should simply roll over and die -- literally?If that is indeed what you think, I find it more than a little ironic that you would look so askance upon this country, given that there is no shortage of Americans who share your attitude. One need look no further than Digg, as anyone here who regularly reads up on firearms issues can testify.
mystcnurseMay 19, 2009
No, you should be afraid, be VERY afraid. You should give up everything, all your rights, and your first born child. For security. Afterall, they hate us for our "freedoms".
mystcnurseMay 19, 2009
so, who decides??? People like THIS dual citizen assh**e???<a class="user" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJBZZKlvrP4">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJBZZKlvrP4</a>go to 1:16 -From Wiki: The No Fly List, sometimes called the terrorist watch list, is a secret list created and maintained by the United States government of people who are not permitted to board a commercial aircraft for travel in or out of the United States. The list has also used been used to divert away from U.S. airspace aircraft not flying to or from the U.S.[1] It includes at least 1 million names as of March 2009[update].[2] The list – along with the Secondary Security Screening Selection, which tags would-be passengers for extra inspection – was created after the September 11, 2001, attacks.And nobody knows who is on this list, or why they are on it. Sounds like Nazi Germany to me.