Nowhere in that testimony does it indicate pedophilia. A strong sense of privacy? Yes. Could the two be related? Possibly. The point is, there's no proof of sexual misconduct in that testimony. Immediately relating a strong alarm system to pedophilia is just bad science.My Turn:Riddle me this: If someone molested your child, what would you do?a) Beat the s**t out of them, pursue criminal charges, and civil chargesb) Pursue Civil ChargesBoth families chose b. Note that Civil charges are the ones that involve payouts. Coincidence? I strongly suggest you actually USE rationale to answer that one. I look forward to your response.
keonMar 29, 2008
I need to take acid and visit this place. It's OK, I'm too old for Michael.
Closed AccountMar 30, 2008
holy s**t that was in 92?!
thaviMar 30, 2008
The pics should take longer to load, that would make this better
bronxelfMar 30, 2008
They're lovely photos. Empty amusement parts are great subjects, no matter who owns the property.
forumzMar 31, 2008
Nowhere in that testimony does it indicate pedophilia. A strong sense of privacy? Yes. Could the two be related? Possibly. The point is, there's no proof of sexual misconduct in that testimony. Immediately relating a strong alarm system to pedophilia is just bad science.My Turn:Riddle me this: If someone molested your child, what would you do?a) Beat the s**t out of them, pursue criminal charges, and civil chargesb) Pursue Civil ChargesBoth families chose b. Note that Civil charges are the ones that involve payouts. Coincidence? I strongly suggest you actually USE rationale to answer that one. I look forward to your response.
neodorianMar 31, 2008
Hell yeah. Amusement parks are cool but weird defunct ones are cooler.
theboozerApr 23, 2008
Exactly.