This is my comment, edited and cross posted at 911Blogger.com:<a class="user" href="http://www.911blogger.com/node/18629">http://www.911blogger.com/node/18629</a>that was goodPart 1 kicks curleys ass- way to stand up for the families- NORAD lied; don't they deserve answers?Part 2- good- Curley admits Zelikow is Bush insider and "arrogant"- mentions Shenon- Jon agrees, notes that Shenon recommended the 9/11 truth movement push his book (source? details- did he elaborate? please reply)Part 3- good- Jon- Bush Admin said no warnings, PDB comes out (it mentions hijackings, surveillance) and the fact that there were 70 active FBI investigations- Sibel Edmonds testified they knew Bin Laden was planning to attack cities with planes- July 10 Condi emergency meeting, left out of Commission Report- whistleblowers; Casazza statement; anonymous whistleblower says they knew the day, target and type (her questions deserve answers but Curley can dismiss this as "hearsay" in his response, in spite of all the other evidence- cuz he's an ass). Curley's response; "he doesn't believe" as it would require too many people to be involved, tries to bring up his terrorist buddy Nico Haupt's creation; LIHOP, which Jon smacks down with pointing out they're labels and he doesn't use them, then goes right into the fact we don't know the reasons 9/11 happened, and since the day that changed everything is being used to justify preemptive war (and undermine the Constitution). Curley's nervous, wouldn't respond, requests to go to closing statements- says (major paraphrasing) if there's a new investigation, if it says Bush wasn't paying enuf attention, and if NORAD lied, and if Tenet should've been fired for not notifying the FBI about Alhmidhar and Alhazmi but if it concluded no officials Let It Happen On Purpose, no controlled demo, no missile at the Pentagon, no Flight 93 shoot down, would Gage stop talking about controlled demolition, would DRG stop talking about VOICE MORPHING, (his buddy) Nico Haupt TV fakery, Killtown voice phony, would they stop doing it? (I don't know- probably not??? Does Curley "know" something? Huh, Curley- do you?)Jon Gold reiterates many unanswered questions, no answers, 9/11's been used for preemptive war.Overall- good- Curley got his ass handed to him- and if you're lurking, Curley, get a clue; there's tons more at:The Facts Speak For Themselves<a class="user" href="http://www.911blogger.com/node/17949">http://www.911blogger.com/node/17949</a> And-The Complete 9/11 Timeline<a class="user" href="http://www.historycommons.org/project.jsp?project=911_project">http://www.historycommons.org/project.jsp?project= ...</a> Keep your buddy Nico Haupt's TV fakery to yourself; you know it's not tolerated over here, loser.
dordnuuv8Nov 26, 2008
This is my comment, edited and cross posted at 911Blogger.com:<a class="user" href="http://www.911blogger.com/node/18629">http://www.911blogger.com/node/18629</a>that was goodPart 1 kicks curleys ass- way to stand up for the families- NORAD lied; don't they deserve answers?Part 2- good- Curley admits Zelikow is Bush insider and "arrogant"- mentions Shenon- Jon agrees, notes that Shenon recommended the 9/11 truth movement push his book (source? details- did he elaborate? please reply)Part 3- good- Jon- Bush Admin said no warnings, PDB comes out (it mentions hijackings, surveillance) and the fact that there were 70 active FBI investigations- Sibel Edmonds testified they knew Bin Laden was planning to attack cities with planes- July 10 Condi emergency meeting, left out of Commission Report- whistleblowers; Casazza statement; anonymous whistleblower says they knew the day, target and type (her questions deserve answers but Curley can dismiss this as "hearsay" in his response, in spite of all the other evidence- cuz he's an ass). Curley's response; "he doesn't believe" as it would require too many people to be involved, tries to bring up his terrorist buddy Nico Haupt's creation; LIHOP, which Jon smacks down with pointing out they're labels and he doesn't use them, then goes right into the fact we don't know the reasons 9/11 happened, and since the day that changed everything is being used to justify preemptive war (and undermine the Constitution). Curley's nervous, wouldn't respond, requests to go to closing statements- says (major paraphrasing) if there's a new investigation, if it says Bush wasn't paying enuf attention, and if NORAD lied, and if Tenet should've been fired for not notifying the FBI about Alhmidhar and Alhazmi but if it concluded no officials Let It Happen On Purpose, no controlled demo, no missile at the Pentagon, no Flight 93 shoot down, would Gage stop talking about controlled demolition, would DRG stop talking about VOICE MORPHING, (his buddy) Nico Haupt TV fakery, Killtown voice phony, would they stop doing it? (I don't know- probably not??? Does Curley "know" something? Huh, Curley- do you?)Jon Gold reiterates many unanswered questions, no answers, 9/11's been used for preemptive war.Overall- good- Curley got his ass handed to him- and if you're lurking, Curley, get a clue; there's tons more at:The Facts Speak For Themselves<a class="user" href="http://www.911blogger.com/node/17949">http://www.911blogger.com/node/17949</a> And-The Complete 9/11 Timeline<a class="user" href="http://www.historycommons.org/project.jsp?project=911_project">http://www.historycommons.org/project.jsp?project= ...</a> Keep your buddy Nico Haupt's TV fakery to yourself; you know it's not tolerated over here, loser.