imgsrc.hubblesite.org— It is so huge, that there is even a warning on the page before!File Download WarningYou are attempting to access an image with an extremely high resolution. Please read this before you continue.
Jan 25, 2006View in Crawl 4
@truepatriot"its just 200 people who seem to really like old ass pics that are shiny and re submitted."guilty as charged i guess. but I don't your 50cent analogy translates to digg. Isn't the point of digg that people read or view a link, decide if it's good, then digg it? And if enough people decide the same then it's promoted to the homepage?
I really don't know what the big advanced warning! is all about. Is this 1996 with your internet connection like cold molasses or 2006 where it takes less than fibve seconds? Hey dude; I'd dump AOL if I were you.
for all you people who work at nasa, or wanna use a pic from their site, stop using f**king jpegs...the compression sux...may as well be 1280x1024 with all the artifacts and noise.Barring that it still does look nice...I just wish people would stop putting gigantic images on their site that use lossy compression; if your reason to make it big is to gain image quality then don't use compression, this image with 25% fewer pixels without compression would be faster to download _AND_ look better than this.still don't get it...jpeg+gigantic image = waste of pixelstiff + semi-gigantic image = truely amazing..and yes their are other image formats that will work
ledaveeJan 25, 2006
@truepatriot"its just 200 people who seem to really like old ass pics that are shiny and re submitted."guilty as charged i guess. but I don't your 50cent analogy translates to digg. Isn't the point of digg that people read or view a link, decide if it's good, then digg it? And if enough people decide the same then it's promoted to the homepage?
cohman2001Jan 25, 2006
5 seconds on 8mbps motorola canopy!
4815162342Jan 26, 2006
showed up instantly when i clicked on link.
edtoJan 26, 2006
download the dual screenie version at:<a class="user" href="http://x003.uploaderx.net/x/2003-24-a-full_jpg.jpg">http://x003.uploaderx.net/x/2003-24-a-full_jpg.jpg</a>
x00xJan 26, 2006
I really don't know what the big advanced warning! is all about. Is this 1996 with your internet connection like cold molasses or 2006 where it takes less than fibve seconds? Hey dude; I'd dump AOL if I were you.
cronos1388Jan 26, 2006
Fits perfectly on my 6031x4456 resolution monitor.
klbclemJan 26, 2006
for all you people who work at nasa, or wanna use a pic from their site, stop using f**king jpegs...the compression sux...may as well be 1280x1024 with all the artifacts and noise.Barring that it still does look nice...I just wish people would stop putting gigantic images on their site that use lossy compression; if your reason to make it big is to gain image quality then don't use compression, this image with 25% fewer pixels without compression would be faster to download _AND_ look better than this.still don't get it...jpeg+gigantic image = waste of pixelstiff + semi-gigantic image = truely amazing..and yes their are other image formats that will work