slashfilm.com— Dreamworks has released 36 new photos from Shrek the Third (ie Shrek 3). Check them out after the jump. As always, click on the images to see the photos at a higher resolution.
Apr 30, 2007View in Crawl 4
They should have stopped at Shriek 2. Seriously. This is going to turn into a Lethal Weapon or American Pie philosophy: 1 was good, two made more $, so why not 14?... Shriek 14... can't wait.
I don't think you get it. It's supposed to be a cartoon. There are CG movies meant to look real (polar express) or ones that have a different artistic style.But the point is, hand drawn animated movies are long gone as far as wide movie releases go. CG movies aren't always meant to be ultra-real for the sake of showing off what computers can do, they have whatever style they have depending on what needs to be accomplished in the film.The people aren't supposed to look real, they are supposed to look like fairytale people.
I was not referring to any sort of "realism", I was alluding to the fact that Dreamworks' human characters appear "lifeless." As in, they don't appear to come alive or be inspired or have any sort of great art direction--as for stylized, I wouldn't go that far. They just look bland. But that's just my opinion.
The only time I've heard JT do any voice acting is in that episode of The Simpsons. All of them were crap, I couldn't tell which one he was but he was definitely crap.
greenlight2001Apr 30, 2007
They should have stopped at Shriek 2. Seriously. This is going to turn into a Lethal Weapon or American Pie philosophy: 1 was good, two made more $, so why not 14?... Shriek 14... can't wait.
Closed AccountApr 30, 2007
I don't think you get it. It's supposed to be a cartoon. There are CG movies meant to look real (polar express) or ones that have a different artistic style.But the point is, hand drawn animated movies are long gone as far as wide movie releases go. CG movies aren't always meant to be ultra-real for the sake of showing off what computers can do, they have whatever style they have depending on what needs to be accomplished in the film.The people aren't supposed to look real, they are supposed to look like fairytale people.
pestilenceApr 30, 2007
When did screenshots become photos?
martianApr 30, 2007
Yes
anonymousguyApr 30, 2007
I was not referring to any sort of "realism", I was alluding to the fact that Dreamworks' human characters appear "lifeless." As in, they don't appear to come alive or be inspired or have any sort of great art direction--as for stylized, I wouldn't go that far. They just look bland. But that's just my opinion.
lnomisApr 30, 2007
Actually, I usually bury those too
pixelvisionApr 30, 2007
The only time I've heard JT do any voice acting is in that episode of The Simpsons. All of them were crap, I couldn't tell which one he was but he was definitely crap.
pureeviljesterApr 30, 2007
didn't cameron diaz threaten to pull out if they didn't let JT do a voice? cause i think they originally said no.
staglMay 1, 2007
i'm starting to see a strange resemblance to video games when i see these "photos". anyone else?
skellenerMay 1, 2007
Shrek - The Turd ??