88 Comments

• Digg
• Bury

I agree aywwts4, nice image and color scheme on critbuns. I actually dugg this site after discovering it a few months ago. Anyone who went to art school would recognize that it is a wall of the homasote material, and the reference of tacking your work up for a critique. The 'comments' section called crit-isms aren't about his site - if you read about it, you'll find these are some pretty hilarious professor quotes from different colleges. <a class="user" href="http://critbuns.com/crit-isms.html&quot;&gt;http://critbuns.com/crit-isms.html&lt;/a&gt;Um, coldfusion logo? carfreaks logo? Ouch.

• Reply

• Digg
• Bury

that's an incorrect number of web sites, unless this <a class="user" href="http://www.rentersq.com&quot;&gt;http://www.rentersq.com&lt;/a&gt; is included.

• Reply

• Digg
• Bury

Quit digging this s**t.It's nearly every other design in the last 60 featured on every single CSS gallery.Just pick one of those to subscribe to and get at least one new design every day.Now really, quit digging by impulse. Just because you consider yourself an aspiring designer, doesn't mean you should +1 digg for every story that has any mention of design or css.

• Reply

• Digg
• Bury

That is <a class="user" href="http://www.thefwa.com/&quot;&gt;http://www.thefwa.com/&lt;/a&gt;Learn to type URLs; They get angry when you suffix punctuation without leaving a space after the domain.

• Reply

• Digg
• Bury

It requires one extra line in your CSS to keep IE compatibility. Since you'll have to hack your style to make it look correct on IE in the first place I don't see how it would entirely prevent you from using transparent PNGs.

• Reply

• Digg
• Bury

If not the most impressive flash based site on the net, one of them...<a class="user" href="http://www.2advanced.com&quot;&gt;http://www.2advanced.com&lt;/a&gt;

• Reply

• Digg
• Bury

Wow that trillianastra.com site is incredible. I can't count the number of times I've prayed that a site would make me scroll down before I can even do anything.

• Reply

• Digg
• Bury

Yes, but this lacks quality. It's meant only for self promotion and was not made to be beneficial for digg users.

• Reply

• Digg
• Bury

It's really difficult to say these 30 such and such sites are the best when there are hundreds of great new ones popping up all the time. I'm not even sure if all 30 could really be considered '2.0'. Here are three directories that list examples of real 2.0 sites: <a class="user" href="http://www.go2web20.net/&quot;&gt;http://www.go2web20.net/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a class="user" href="http://www.netjaxer.com&quot;&gt;http://www.netjaxer.com&lt;/a&gt; <a class="user" href="http://www.seomoz.org/web2.0/&quot;&gt;http://www.seomoz.org/web2.0/&lt;/a&gt;

• Reply

• Digg
• Bury

You're kidding me right? It must be a joke, got to be because this is not a "MUST SEE." I bet it's some joke cause for a designer point of view, what I see here, these designs, ain't that special at all. I didn't get inspired but deflated by how people can kill design and not go back to basic and be creative and break the mold of mediocrity crap.

• Reply

• Digg
• Bury

Some great web designs there, but nothing very impressive.

• Reply