Wow. I actually clicked through to check the Smashing Magazine article, and of the first five wallpapers in this SmashingApps submission, only one was in the SM article. And considering the SM article had about three times as many examples, I thought 1 in 5 was pretty low, so I didn't bother going any further. And how is 63 diggs in 4.5 hours spam?
karaborsaOct 11, 2009
All of them exists in a SmashingMagazine article: <a class="user" href="http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2008/12/10/50-most-amazing-dual-screen-desktop-wallpapers/" rel="nofollow">http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2008/12/10/50-most ...</a>And, 63 diggs in 4.5 hours for this entry, somebody please stop this SPAM. BURIED!...
amyvernonOct 12, 2009
Wow. I actually clicked through to check the Smashing Magazine article, and of the first five wallpapers in this SmashingApps submission, only one was in the SM article. And considering the SM article had about three times as many examples, I thought 1 in 5 was pretty low, so I didn't bother going any further. And how is 63 diggs in 4.5 hours spam?
karaborsaOct 14, 2009
Believe me, it is nothing original:<a class="user" href="http://www.instantshift.com/2009/07/16/115-amazing-dual-screen-wallpapers-to-spice-up-your-desktop/" rel="nofollow">http://www.instantshift.com/2009/07/16/115-amazing ...</a><a class="user" href="http://www.hongkiat.com/blog/70-beautiful-dual-monitors-desktop-wallpapers/" rel="nofollow">http://www.hongkiat.com/blog/70-beautiful-dual-mon ...</a>Just make a Google search with dual screen wallpapers and you'll see the same ones in lots of posts.And, yes, I call an un-original, duplicate content as SPAM.