Here we go. Keep in mind, this is not tonemapped in any way. The colors look very saturated, but that is the way they looked on the single exposures. This is basically just me taking the virtual scissors and cutting out only the good sections and putting them on top of each other to make one image. Cut out the higher exposure for the sky and bushes, slap it on top of the darker image, etc.<a class="user" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/41172766@N02/3794844282/sizes/l/in/photostream/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/41172766@N02/37948442 ...</a>
mebbinSep 11, 2009
Awesome
youareretardedSep 11, 2009
Finally someone who knows how to do HDR right!Too many times have I seen really good pics just ruined by over doing the whole HDR thing.
hello888Sep 11, 2009
They ARE overdone.
danegleesacSep 11, 2009
Dugg for all being on one page
mogebierSep 12, 2009
Yeah, those are nice.Too many people like to make their HDR photo's look like cartoons or drawings.
palehorse864Sep 12, 2009
Here we go. Keep in mind, this is not tonemapped in any way. The colors look very saturated, but that is the way they looked on the single exposures. This is basically just me taking the virtual scissors and cutting out only the good sections and putting them on top of each other to make one image. Cut out the higher exposure for the sky and bushes, slap it on top of the darker image, etc.<a class="user" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/41172766@N02/3794844282/sizes/l/in/photostream/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/41172766@N02/37948442 ...</a>
youareretardedSep 12, 2009
That may be true but I don't think that is the purpose of HDR images.