dailykos.com— Excellent! Sites violations and laws - several Constitutional violations. Take a poll - at this time 97% agree.
Nov 26, 2006View in Crawl 4
I agree with you. I voted for Clinton the first time, but not the second and haven't voted for a single Democrat since. I also thought impeaching him was a bad idea even though there were alot of things that he did that were much more serious than lying under oath. In a Democratic society, I think that you should support the president whether you agree with him or not. Even the worst president can only be in office for 8 years. At some point, Americans need to find some common ground and quit being so damn disrepectful to our elected leaders and to each other.
theducks As commander in chief ...that means he is a civilian ONLY a civilian can hold the CIC spot so the UCMJ doesn't apply If it did c**tion could have been charged with adultery under the UCMJ
"Therefore, we must simultaneously impeach both of them so that the 3rd person in succession, Nancy Pelosi, would become the next President of the United States."Well, isn't that just a conveniently liberal way to try to seize power. Screw elections, we'll impeach our way into the White House. Brilliant!
This is productive...Vow revenge instead of investigating the law breaking which is part of the Constitution and Congresses jobNOt to mention law breaking is law breaking no matter who does it...No one should be immune
@ZenMojoSo considering Clinton was guilty of lying under oath he should have been impeached? The only valid impeachment was that of Richard Nixon, Johnson and Clinton impeachments were merely political bulls**t as would an impeachment of Bush. If we didn't want him to win, should have run a better candidate than the douchebag Kerry (a shaky economy, unpopular war, and terrible ratings and Kerry still lost... pathetic).Like the old adage, are you going to justify not voting for Communism by voting for Facism? Viable third party (Libertarian *cough*) is the only answer (not that I'm implying either is a facist or a communist).
Yeah, yeah... guess what? IT AIN'T GONNA HAPPEN MOONBATS!You may now go back to fondling your little winkies while you gaze at your Hillary pictures now.
U.S. crimes are well documented. These crimes are becoming audaciously blatant and inexcusable. Globalist rationalize these acts in the name of eugenics/ population control/ for the good of the world. They will continue to do so, so long as we let them. ("peacefully or by force")There are the aggressive globalist: Bush/Cheney PNAC neo-cons.And there are the passive globalist: Pelosi/ Hillary socialists.Different feet, same direction... a New World Order.The U.S. Constitution DOES NOT EXIST in their New World Order.You're either for the Constitution or you're against it. Don't confuse the REAL battle.Not only is pre-emptive invasion a violation of UN treaties (which are Constitutionally binding) Invading under false pretenses (WMD's) is waging /causing a war AGAINST America- by definition, this is treason.
Wow I don't understand you people digging down a lot of good comments. I have to say that seeing the news from Costa Rica 6 months out of the year, I have to agree with impeachment. We were lied to about the initiation of war, we were lied to about 9/11, we are lied to every day on the news that is censored from what is really going on. Wake up people.Here is the real news site....if you can handle the truth,,,<a class="user" href="http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/">http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/</a>
Gosh, what intelligent comment from the right! (British irony) You made the first move by impeaching a president that represented you well on the world stage for fibbing about a BJ! and now you're wining when people want to impeach a president that the world think is a war criminal. It's fine if you don't care what the rest of the world thinks.
Du is covered under the Geneva Conventions as a chemical warfare agent, as these were used in WWI. Impeachment is NOT indictment; it is a process of discovery. People seem to get SO confused. My blog has lots of down loadable attachments on impeachment and how to start a process yourself. www.ladybroadoak.blogspot.com. You can just put impeachment into the search box. There shall be a war crimes tribunal; there has already been one in Japan about Afghanistan in which Bush has been INDICTED and found guilty. The rest of the world will see justice done; what the US needs to do is to get on with IMPEACHMENT in order to clarify the war crimes. We need to be drawing up a list of those ourselves.
dewheadNov 27, 2006
I agree with you. I voted for Clinton the first time, but not the second and haven't voted for a single Democrat since. I also thought impeaching him was a bad idea even though there were alot of things that he did that were much more serious than lying under oath. In a Democratic society, I think that you should support the president whether you agree with him or not. Even the worst president can only be in office for 8 years. At some point, Americans need to find some common ground and quit being so damn disrepectful to our elected leaders and to each other.
floorman56Nov 27, 2006
theducks As commander in chief ...that means he is a civilian ONLY a civilian can hold the CIC spot so the UCMJ doesn't apply If it did c**tion could have been charged with adultery under the UCMJ
lebaigeNov 27, 2006
"Therefore, we must simultaneously impeach both of them so that the 3rd person in succession, Nancy Pelosi, would become the next President of the United States."Well, isn't that just a conveniently liberal way to try to seize power. Screw elections, we'll impeach our way into the White House. Brilliant!
closedcaptionNov 27, 2006
This is productive...Vow revenge instead of investigating the law breaking which is part of the Constitution and Congresses jobNOt to mention law breaking is law breaking no matter who does it...No one should be immune
scorchedearthNov 27, 2006
chimpeach
schuderNov 27, 2006
@ZenMojoSo considering Clinton was guilty of lying under oath he should have been impeached? The only valid impeachment was that of Richard Nixon, Johnson and Clinton impeachments were merely political bulls**t as would an impeachment of Bush. If we didn't want him to win, should have run a better candidate than the douchebag Kerry (a shaky economy, unpopular war, and terrible ratings and Kerry still lost... pathetic).Like the old adage, are you going to justify not voting for Communism by voting for Facism? Viable third party (Libertarian *cough*) is the only answer (not that I'm implying either is a facist or a communist).
chip53Nov 27, 2006
Yeah, yeah... guess what? IT AIN'T GONNA HAPPEN MOONBATS!You may now go back to fondling your little winkies while you gaze at your Hillary pictures now.
thelastprophetNov 28, 2006Submitter
U.S. crimes are well documented. These crimes are becoming audaciously blatant and inexcusable. Globalist rationalize these acts in the name of eugenics/ population control/ for the good of the world. They will continue to do so, so long as we let them. ("peacefully or by force")There are the aggressive globalist: Bush/Cheney PNAC neo-cons.And there are the passive globalist: Pelosi/ Hillary socialists.Different feet, same direction... a New World Order.The U.S. Constitution DOES NOT EXIST in their New World Order.You're either for the Constitution or you're against it. Don't confuse the REAL battle.Not only is pre-emptive invasion a violation of UN treaties (which are Constitutionally binding) Invading under false pretenses (WMD's) is waging /causing a war AGAINST America- by definition, this is treason.
Closed AccountNov 29, 2006
Wow I don't understand you people digging down a lot of good comments. I have to say that seeing the news from Costa Rica 6 months out of the year, I have to agree with impeachment. We were lied to about the initiation of war, we were lied to about 9/11, we are lied to every day on the news that is censored from what is really going on. Wake up people.Here is the real news site....if you can handle the truth,,,<a class="user" href="http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/">http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/</a>
wowfactorDec 17, 2006
Gosh, what intelligent comment from the right! (British irony) You made the first move by impeaching a president that represented you well on the world stage for fibbing about a BJ! and now you're wining when people want to impeach a president that the world think is a war criminal. It's fine if you don't care what the rest of the world thinks.
qweszJan 22, 2007
see more :<a class="user" href="http://www.qwesz.com">http://www.qwesz.com</a><a class="user" href="http://www.qwesz.com/articles-directory">http://www.qwesz.com/articles-directory</a>
ladybroadoakDec 7, 2007
Du is covered under the Geneva Conventions as a chemical warfare agent, as these were used in WWI. Impeachment is NOT indictment; it is a process of discovery. People seem to get SO confused. My blog has lots of down loadable attachments on impeachment and how to start a process yourself. www.ladybroadoak.blogspot.com. You can just put impeachment into the search box. There shall be a war crimes tribunal; there has already been one in Japan about Afghanistan in which Bush has been INDICTED and found guilty. The rest of the world will see justice done; what the US needs to do is to get on with IMPEACHMENT in order to clarify the war crimes. We need to be drawing up a list of those ourselves.