I have a feeling we aren't getting the true story of what happened. I don't think rocks are going to damage those trucks, so what's the point of putting the kid in front like that?
Ok so this kid and his friends start throwing rocks at the soldiers. the soldiers catch him and sit him on the hood of the non moving jeep. Kid says he was scared he would get hit by a rock. Now he knows not to throw rocks cause the people on the other side don't like getting hit with rocks. Seems simple enough. It's not like there was any shooting or anything. Sheesh I think the kid got what he deserved, and learned a lesson.
I don't see a problem with this and it pales in comparison to how the Palestinians abuse their own children. Imbuing your child with the belief that to murder Jews is heroic and will earn them a place in paradise is criminal. They also teach them that their lives have no intrinsic value but should be given over entirely to bring about the destruction of Israel. The parents of suicide bombers have parties to celebrate their child's act.
"YOU WANT TO SPEND the rest of your life in a futile debate? Get into a discussion of how the Middle East got to this point, beginning with the ancient Jewish kingdoms, through the Roman occupation, to the centuries during which resident Jews had no real authority in the Holy Land. Move on to the era when Muslim caliphs controlled the region through the dominion of the Ottoman Empire and then to the period of post–World War I British control, following the defeat of the Ottomans. From there go to the United Nations–proposed two-state solution in the mid 1940s through the 1948 war following Israel’s establishment of independence, when the Arabs were bent on pushing the Jews from their new state into the sea. Talk about Jordan’s control of Judea and Samaria (the West Bank) from 1948 to 1967 and Egyptian control of Gaza during the same period. If you haven’t yet come to blows, go over the Six Day War launched by the Arabs against Israel in 1967, which resulted in Israeli occupation of Judea and Samaria, and then try to talk about our own time, when mass murderers routinely ply their trade to a chorus of praise by the Palestinian Authority, the Jordanian queen, and the kept intellectuals and sycophants of the Arab world.""The Allied occupation of Germany and Japan was a legitimate action intended to pacify hostile populations and expunge murderous regimes. Also legitimate was the decision not to end occupation until those former enemies had proven they had abandoned their wretched policies of the 1930s and ’40s and erected democratic structures in their place. Today, the Israeli occupation of Judea and Samaria is also fully justified; it is the outcome of a war prosecuted against Israel. The Israelis must and will remain there until its Arab residents agree to abandon their commitment to destroy Israel. Of course, there’s no indication that the Palestinian Authority dictatorship under Arafat has any such intention. On the contrary, its statements in Arabic (visit www.memri.org for the English translation) reiterate the belief that the whole of what was once the mandate of Palestine, including all of pre–Six Day War Israel, must be a Palestinian-Arab state. The simple principle that the victor in a war brought on by an attack against it has the full right and a moral obligation to pacify the enemy, including occupying territory from which the aggression was launched (and continues to be launched), makes scarcely a dent in the minds of folks who call talk shows, . ..or who trudge off to "peace" rallies. Nor does it influence those who take their cues from the manifestly anti-Israel news reporting on National Public Radio or the opinion pieces in many liberal newspapers and magazines — all of which view Israeli and Palestinian actions in terms of moral equivalence. With press coverage like this, it’s not surprising that Palestinian sympathizers see the Israeli presence in the territories as "occupation" in the most illegitimate sense of the term. Nor is it surprising that they believe the entirety of the so-called West Bank — which is simply the area controlled by Arabs after the ceasefire of 1948 — is Palestinian territory. How quickly they forgot (or perhaps never knew) that the occupants of this land, formerly governed by the Jordanians, were never given the same rights accorded Jordanians and didn’t start referring to themselves as Palestinians until the mid 1960s. To describe this land as "Palestinian territory" betrays an ignorance of history (if knowledge of events occurring in just the last half-century can rightly be called "history"). This land is nobody’s territory, though it is held by Israel for good reason. Its final status and borders were to be determined by negotiation — as recognized by international agreement and reiterated in the Oslo accords. It has become popular over the past year to forget that fact.""But at this point, negotiation to determine the borders of a state run by Palestinians — before they abandon their irredentist fantasies, before they pledge full acceptance of Israel's legitimacy, before they abjure violence and commit to living in harmony with Israel — would be absurd. The United States would never have left Japan and Germany had there been hordes of Japanese militarist kamikazes and Nazi "suicide bombers" tossing themselves into American military camps, apartment buildings housing servicemen’s families, and restaurants and shops patronized by Americans. The "occupation" of Judea and Samaria must continue until their residents begin to act like civilized adults instead of rabid juvenile delinquents routinely employed in the slaughter of innocents. Indeed, this occupation must continue until Palestinians stop teaching their children how to turn themselves into projectile human explosives.People unfamiliar with, say, the redrawing of the European map from the late 19th century to the present (owing to population shifts and war) believe with a passion usually reserved for revealed religion that the 1948 ceasefire line is the result of a settled agreement. They think that "pre-1967 Israel" may try to remain a Jewish state, if those pesky Jews really insist, but the part previously occupied by Egypt and Jordan absolutely must be — and in their minds already is — the State of Palestine.The predominant goal of the Arab dictatorships — and the only one safely expressed — is the total elimination of Israel. "
See <a class="user" href="http://www.thesixdaywar.org">http://www.thesixdaywar.org</a>See also <a class="user" href="http://digg.com/political_opinion/Bittersweet_Legacy_40yrs_since_6_day_war_mideast_peace_remains_elusive">http://digg.com/political_opinion/Bittersweet_Legacy_40yrs_since_6_day_war_mideast_peace_remains_elusive</a>"Israel's Cabinet met shortly after the war and agreed to return territory in exchange for peace. The Arab League thought differently, however, meeting in Khartoum for its famous summit of the "Three No's" -- no recognition of Israel, no negotiations with Israel and no peace with Israel. Israel's offer to return conquered territory -- before the occupation had been established and before there were any settlements -- was flat-out rejected." "Still, the idea of "land for peace" quickly gained currency as the new international panacea. U.N. Security Council Resolution 242, passed five months after the fighting stopped, reflected the new approach."The historical record reiterates Israeli goal for peace and Arab goal to destroy Israel and regain ALL the land - not just a portion. See <a class="user" href="http://digg.com/politics/Most_of_the_conventional_wisdom_about_the_Six_Day_War_is_wrong">http://digg.com/politics/Most_of_the_conventional_wisdom_about_the_Six_Day_War_is_wrong</a>"It is also often said today that the Six Day War humiliated the Arabs and propelled the region into future rounds of fighting. Yet President Aref of Iraq had prefaced his call to destroy Israel by describing the war as the Arabs' chance "to wipe out the ignominy which has been with us since 1948." It is said that the war inaugurated the era of modern terrorism, as the Arab world switched from a strategy of conventional confrontation with Israel to one of "unconventional" attacks. Yet hundreds of Israelis had already been killed in fedayeen raids in Israel's first 19 years of existence. It is said that the Palestinian movement was born from Israel's occupation of Gaza and the West Bank. Yet the Palestine Liberation Organization was already in its third year of operations when the war began. It is said that Israel enjoyed international legitimacy so long as it lived behind recognized frontiers. Yet those frontiers were no less provisional before 1967 than they were after. Only after the Six Day War did the Green Line come to be seen as the "real" border. Fog also surrounds memories of the immediate aftermath of the war. To read some recent accounts, a more sagacious Israel could have followed up its historic victory with peace overtures that would have spared everyone the bloody entanglements of its occupation of the Sinai, Gaza, the West Bank and the Golan Heights. Or, failing that, it could have resisted the lure of building settlements in the territories in order not to complicate a land-for-peace transaction.In fact, the Israeli cabinet agreed on June 19 to offer the Sinai to Egypt and the Golan to Syria in exchange for peace deals. In Khartoum that September, the Arab League declared "no peace with Israel, no recognition of Israel, no negotiations with it." As for Jewish settlements, hardly any were built for years after the war: In 1972, for instance, only about 800 settlers had moved to the West Bank."*<a class="user" href="http://jewishworldreview.com/jonathan/gurwitz060507.php3">http://jewishworldreview.com/jonathan/gurwitz060507.php3</a>"No one had ever heard of the "occupied" Gaza Strip or the "occupied" West Bank before June 10, 1967. Not because there hadn't been occupations in both places. Of course, Egypt had occupied Gaza and Jordan had occupied the West Bank since 1948. And if there had been any inclination on the part of the Arab world to create even the rudiments of a Palestinian state, it might have occurred at any time in the preceding 19 years. ""But as with so much else, you have to ignore history — and the facts — to buy into the belief system that constitutes the mythology of anti-Zionism. Attributing the Palestinian-Israeli conflict to the Israeli occupation, pretending that no other occupation came before it, is far easier than explaining the unanimous Arab rejection of the 1947 U.N. partition plan and the failure of Arab leaders to pay more than lip service to Palestinian statehood.""You simply can't reconcile the explicit repudiation of a two-state solution and the jubilant calls in 1947 — and again in the days leading up to the Six Day War in 1967 — for the annihilation of the Jews with any notion of Arabs and Jews living together in peace. ""You can't claim Islamic extremism is a reaction to Israeli occupation if you know that the Muslim Brotherhood — the ideological grandfather of all jihadist groups — started in Egypt two decades before the founding of the modern state of Israel or that Muhammad ibn Abd al Wahhab made a pact with Muhammad ibn Saud two centuries earlier that entrenched a radical interpretation of Islam in the Arabian Peninsula. ""And you can't possibly blame Israeli policies for fueling violence in the Middle East if you know about the dozens of regional conflicts that have inflicted tens of millions of casualties on the Muslim world and have nothing to do with Palestinian self-determination — in Algeria, Ethiopia, Somalia, Sudan, Lebanon, Yemen and Afghanistan; between Morocco and Algeria, Egypt and Libya, Libya and Chad, Syria and Jordan, Iraq and Kuwait, Iran and Iraq. ""But a fair reading of history isn't kind to anti-Israeli fabulists. So to make the mythology believable by the gullible and the willfully ignorant, history must begin in 1967 and the Israeli occupation must be the root of all Middle East evil. But the Israeli withdrawal from the Gaza Strip in 2005 and the tragic degeneration of Palestinian society that followed has rendered this fantasy ultimately obsolete. ""For those of us who seek an honest reconciliation between Israelis and Palestinians and peace between Jews and Arabs — and, not least, among Arabs and Muslims — hope must triumph over experience. That hope is predicated first and foremost on an honest reading of history, a mutual recognition of humanity and a calendar that begins before June 5, 1967. "* <a class="user" href="http://www.jewishworldreview.com/0507/tobin053007.php3">http://www.jewishworldreview.com/0507/tobin053007.php3</a>"Had Israel been defeated, then the oft-repeated threats of extermination of both the State and her people by Arab leaders such as Egyptian President Gamal Abdul Nasser and Palestinian leader Ahmed Shukairy, might well have been fulfilled." "We are told, ad nauseum, that the "occupation" is the reason for the ongoing conflict. Yet in 1967, Israel's dominion was limited to the exact boundaries that we are told are the only solution to the conflict. The world of June 3, 1967, was one in which not a single Jew lived in Judea and Samaria, nor in the eastern part of Jerusalem. No Jew prayed at the Western Wall, or could even visit any Jewish historic or religious site in the West Bank. ""The war's anniversary ought to bring to mind the fact that the issue then is largely the same as it is today. There is not a shekel's worth of difference between the rhetoric and the goals of Hamas, Al Qaeda, or that of the leadership of Iran and that of the pre-'67 war Arab and Muslim world." "Compare the Jews of Sederot, who are subjected to missile attacks from Gaza today, and those slain by cross-border terror attacks that emanated from the same area prior to June 1967. The only difference is that prior to the Oslo peace accords and Israel's complete withdrawal from the territory in August 2005, we could still harbor illusions about the willingness of the Palestinians to embrace a chance for peace. "
The bottom line is no one cares about the Palestinians...they are completely on their own. People have played jews to be the biggest victims in the world...and the jews are going to fight tooth and nail to keep that title because it brings so many benefits to them.Only ignorant idiots would think throwing rocks leads to terrorism. These are kids, they have no life, nothing to do...they don't have cosy little coffee shops and safe playgrounds to go to paid by US tax dollars in Israel. Man..I've never seen such stupidity and ignorance from both jews and jew lovers. You guys have blind folds on that are 2 feet thick.Oh and you whiners who say for Palestianians to stop killing israelis??? LOL...dont' make me laugh...out of 5000 katusha rockets fired...2...THAT'S 2 jews were killed with a 9 month period...compared to 800 palestinians...so can you repeat your sentence again about who should stop killing?If any of you have the balls to go to Palestine and see a 6 month old baby with it's head splattered opened and body parts three feet away from it, then maybe I'll have more respect for you...until then, stop lying and stop whining you pieces of s**t.
Sub-human? Listen to yourself....you put your belief in one stupid book and think that's it...you're as dillusional and f**ked up as the any other religious freak. You know...since the Palestinians are suffering so much, I hope that IF there is a God...he make's life in Israel a living hell for the next millennium and on. You f**kers don't deserve peace and comfort...you deserve to live in fear and hell.
Blah blah blah...you idiots were never supposed to be there...f**k what book written by jews in the past said......Why don't you assh**es stop taking money from all over the world and THEN try and survive...yeah...I didn't think so. You wouldn't last for a freakin day.
fallacy of moral equivalence for the lose.the reason why this act is wrong is that it breeds more discontent and division against the israelis. the ONLY chance for peace these people have is to wipe out one side utterly or to find a way to coexist. these actions committed by these soldiers simply do not help the cause in the latter case.
vinividiviciMay 10, 2007
I have a feeling we aren't getting the true story of what happened. I don't think rocks are going to damage those trucks, so what's the point of putting the kid in front like that?
Closed AccountMay 10, 2007
stfu zionist
junglist313May 10, 2007
Ok so this kid and his friends start throwing rocks at the soldiers. the soldiers catch him and sit him on the hood of the non moving jeep. Kid says he was scared he would get hit by a rock. Now he knows not to throw rocks cause the people on the other side don't like getting hit with rocks. Seems simple enough. It's not like there was any shooting or anything. Sheesh I think the kid got what he deserved, and learned a lesson.
phairphairMay 10, 2007
I don't see a problem with this and it pales in comparison to how the Palestinians abuse their own children. Imbuing your child with the belief that to murder Jews is heroic and will earn them a place in paradise is criminal. They also teach them that their lives have no intrinsic value but should be given over entirely to bring about the destruction of Israel. The parents of suicide bombers have parties to celebrate their child's act.
queenstarshaMay 10, 2007
irv, actually no. they're fighting a bunch of thirteen year olds throwing rocks.
Closed AccountMay 10, 2007
Title of the story says: "The day Israel used a boy aged 13 as a human shield""The" day? more like "A typical" day.
cjwrightJun 16, 2007
"YOU WANT TO SPEND the rest of your life in a futile debate? Get into a discussion of how the Middle East got to this point, beginning with the ancient Jewish kingdoms, through the Roman occupation, to the centuries during which resident Jews had no real authority in the Holy Land. Move on to the era when Muslim caliphs controlled the region through the dominion of the Ottoman Empire and then to the period of post–World War I British control, following the defeat of the Ottomans. From there go to the United Nations–proposed two-state solution in the mid 1940s through the 1948 war following Israel’s establishment of independence, when the Arabs were bent on pushing the Jews from their new state into the sea. Talk about Jordan’s control of Judea and Samaria (the West Bank) from 1948 to 1967 and Egyptian control of Gaza during the same period. If you haven’t yet come to blows, go over the Six Day War launched by the Arabs against Israel in 1967, which resulted in Israeli occupation of Judea and Samaria, and then try to talk about our own time, when mass murderers routinely ply their trade to a chorus of praise by the Palestinian Authority, the Jordanian queen, and the kept intellectuals and sycophants of the Arab world.""The Allied occupation of Germany and Japan was a legitimate action intended to pacify hostile populations and expunge murderous regimes. Also legitimate was the decision not to end occupation until those former enemies had proven they had abandoned their wretched policies of the 1930s and ’40s and erected democratic structures in their place. Today, the Israeli occupation of Judea and Samaria is also fully justified; it is the outcome of a war prosecuted against Israel. The Israelis must and will remain there until its Arab residents agree to abandon their commitment to destroy Israel. Of course, there’s no indication that the Palestinian Authority dictatorship under Arafat has any such intention. On the contrary, its statements in Arabic (visit www.memri.org for the English translation) reiterate the belief that the whole of what was once the mandate of Palestine, including all of pre–Six Day War Israel, must be a Palestinian-Arab state. The simple principle that the victor in a war brought on by an attack against it has the full right and a moral obligation to pacify the enemy, including occupying territory from which the aggression was launched (and continues to be launched), makes scarcely a dent in the minds of folks who call talk shows, . ..or who trudge off to "peace" rallies. Nor does it influence those who take their cues from the manifestly anti-Israel news reporting on National Public Radio or the opinion pieces in many liberal newspapers and magazines — all of which view Israeli and Palestinian actions in terms of moral equivalence. With press coverage like this, it’s not surprising that Palestinian sympathizers see the Israeli presence in the territories as "occupation" in the most illegitimate sense of the term. Nor is it surprising that they believe the entirety of the so-called West Bank — which is simply the area controlled by Arabs after the ceasefire of 1948 — is Palestinian territory. How quickly they forgot (or perhaps never knew) that the occupants of this land, formerly governed by the Jordanians, were never given the same rights accorded Jordanians and didn’t start referring to themselves as Palestinians until the mid 1960s. To describe this land as "Palestinian territory" betrays an ignorance of history (if knowledge of events occurring in just the last half-century can rightly be called "history"). This land is nobody’s territory, though it is held by Israel for good reason. Its final status and borders were to be determined by negotiation — as recognized by international agreement and reiterated in the Oslo accords. It has become popular over the past year to forget that fact.""But at this point, negotiation to determine the borders of a state run by Palestinians — before they abandon their irredentist fantasies, before they pledge full acceptance of Israel's legitimacy, before they abjure violence and commit to living in harmony with Israel — would be absurd. The United States would never have left Japan and Germany had there been hordes of Japanese militarist kamikazes and Nazi "suicide bombers" tossing themselves into American military camps, apartment buildings housing servicemen’s families, and restaurants and shops patronized by Americans. The "occupation" of Judea and Samaria must continue until their residents begin to act like civilized adults instead of rabid juvenile delinquents routinely employed in the slaughter of innocents. Indeed, this occupation must continue until Palestinians stop teaching their children how to turn themselves into projectile human explosives.People unfamiliar with, say, the redrawing of the European map from the late 19th century to the present (owing to population shifts and war) believe with a passion usually reserved for revealed religion that the 1948 ceasefire line is the result of a settled agreement. They think that "pre-1967 Israel" may try to remain a Jewish state, if those pesky Jews really insist, but the part previously occupied by Egypt and Jordan absolutely must be — and in their minds already is — the State of Palestine.The predominant goal of the Arab dictatorships — and the only one safely expressed — is the total elimination of Israel. "
cjwrightJun 16, 2007
See <a class="user" href="http://www.thesixdaywar.org">http://www.thesixdaywar.org</a>See also <a class="user" href="http://digg.com/political_opinion/Bittersweet_Legacy_40yrs_since_6_day_war_mideast_peace_remains_elusive">http://digg.com/political_opinion/Bittersweet_Legacy_40yrs_since_6_day_war_mideast_peace_remains_elusive</a>"Israel's Cabinet met shortly after the war and agreed to return territory in exchange for peace. The Arab League thought differently, however, meeting in Khartoum for its famous summit of the "Three No's" -- no recognition of Israel, no negotiations with Israel and no peace with Israel. Israel's offer to return conquered territory -- before the occupation had been established and before there were any settlements -- was flat-out rejected." "Still, the idea of "land for peace" quickly gained currency as the new international panacea. U.N. Security Council Resolution 242, passed five months after the fighting stopped, reflected the new approach."The historical record reiterates Israeli goal for peace and Arab goal to destroy Israel and regain ALL the land - not just a portion. See <a class="user" href="http://digg.com/politics/Most_of_the_conventional_wisdom_about_the_Six_Day_War_is_wrong">http://digg.com/politics/Most_of_the_conventional_wisdom_about_the_Six_Day_War_is_wrong</a>"It is also often said today that the Six Day War humiliated the Arabs and propelled the region into future rounds of fighting. Yet President Aref of Iraq had prefaced his call to destroy Israel by describing the war as the Arabs' chance "to wipe out the ignominy which has been with us since 1948." It is said that the war inaugurated the era of modern terrorism, as the Arab world switched from a strategy of conventional confrontation with Israel to one of "unconventional" attacks. Yet hundreds of Israelis had already been killed in fedayeen raids in Israel's first 19 years of existence. It is said that the Palestinian movement was born from Israel's occupation of Gaza and the West Bank. Yet the Palestine Liberation Organization was already in its third year of operations when the war began. It is said that Israel enjoyed international legitimacy so long as it lived behind recognized frontiers. Yet those frontiers were no less provisional before 1967 than they were after. Only after the Six Day War did the Green Line come to be seen as the "real" border. Fog also surrounds memories of the immediate aftermath of the war. To read some recent accounts, a more sagacious Israel could have followed up its historic victory with peace overtures that would have spared everyone the bloody entanglements of its occupation of the Sinai, Gaza, the West Bank and the Golan Heights. Or, failing that, it could have resisted the lure of building settlements in the territories in order not to complicate a land-for-peace transaction.In fact, the Israeli cabinet agreed on June 19 to offer the Sinai to Egypt and the Golan to Syria in exchange for peace deals. In Khartoum that September, the Arab League declared "no peace with Israel, no recognition of Israel, no negotiations with it." As for Jewish settlements, hardly any were built for years after the war: In 1972, for instance, only about 800 settlers had moved to the West Bank."*<a class="user" href="http://jewishworldreview.com/jonathan/gurwitz060507.php3">http://jewishworldreview.com/jonathan/gurwitz060507.php3</a>"No one had ever heard of the "occupied" Gaza Strip or the "occupied" West Bank before June 10, 1967. Not because there hadn't been occupations in both places. Of course, Egypt had occupied Gaza and Jordan had occupied the West Bank since 1948. And if there had been any inclination on the part of the Arab world to create even the rudiments of a Palestinian state, it might have occurred at any time in the preceding 19 years. ""But as with so much else, you have to ignore history — and the facts — to buy into the belief system that constitutes the mythology of anti-Zionism. Attributing the Palestinian-Israeli conflict to the Israeli occupation, pretending that no other occupation came before it, is far easier than explaining the unanimous Arab rejection of the 1947 U.N. partition plan and the failure of Arab leaders to pay more than lip service to Palestinian statehood.""You simply can't reconcile the explicit repudiation of a two-state solution and the jubilant calls in 1947 — and again in the days leading up to the Six Day War in 1967 — for the annihilation of the Jews with any notion of Arabs and Jews living together in peace. ""You can't claim Islamic extremism is a reaction to Israeli occupation if you know that the Muslim Brotherhood — the ideological grandfather of all jihadist groups — started in Egypt two decades before the founding of the modern state of Israel or that Muhammad ibn Abd al Wahhab made a pact with Muhammad ibn Saud two centuries earlier that entrenched a radical interpretation of Islam in the Arabian Peninsula. ""And you can't possibly blame Israeli policies for fueling violence in the Middle East if you know about the dozens of regional conflicts that have inflicted tens of millions of casualties on the Muslim world and have nothing to do with Palestinian self-determination — in Algeria, Ethiopia, Somalia, Sudan, Lebanon, Yemen and Afghanistan; between Morocco and Algeria, Egypt and Libya, Libya and Chad, Syria and Jordan, Iraq and Kuwait, Iran and Iraq. ""But a fair reading of history isn't kind to anti-Israeli fabulists. So to make the mythology believable by the gullible and the willfully ignorant, history must begin in 1967 and the Israeli occupation must be the root of all Middle East evil. But the Israeli withdrawal from the Gaza Strip in 2005 and the tragic degeneration of Palestinian society that followed has rendered this fantasy ultimately obsolete. ""For those of us who seek an honest reconciliation between Israelis and Palestinians and peace between Jews and Arabs — and, not least, among Arabs and Muslims — hope must triumph over experience. That hope is predicated first and foremost on an honest reading of history, a mutual recognition of humanity and a calendar that begins before June 5, 1967. "* <a class="user" href="http://www.jewishworldreview.com/0507/tobin053007.php3">http://www.jewishworldreview.com/0507/tobin053007.php3</a>"Had Israel been defeated, then the oft-repeated threats of extermination of both the State and her people by Arab leaders such as Egyptian President Gamal Abdul Nasser and Palestinian leader Ahmed Shukairy, might well have been fulfilled." "We are told, ad nauseum, that the "occupation" is the reason for the ongoing conflict. Yet in 1967, Israel's dominion was limited to the exact boundaries that we are told are the only solution to the conflict. The world of June 3, 1967, was one in which not a single Jew lived in Judea and Samaria, nor in the eastern part of Jerusalem. No Jew prayed at the Western Wall, or could even visit any Jewish historic or religious site in the West Bank. ""The war's anniversary ought to bring to mind the fact that the issue then is largely the same as it is today. There is not a shekel's worth of difference between the rhetoric and the goals of Hamas, Al Qaeda, or that of the leadership of Iran and that of the pre-'67 war Arab and Muslim world." "Compare the Jews of Sederot, who are subjected to missile attacks from Gaza today, and those slain by cross-border terror attacks that emanated from the same area prior to June 1967. The only difference is that prior to the Oslo peace accords and Israel's complete withdrawal from the territory in August 2005, we could still harbor illusions about the willingness of the Palestinians to embrace a chance for peace. "
dancantoneOct 18, 2007
Jesus dude...get a grip!
Closed AccountMar 8, 2008
The bottom line is no one cares about the Palestinians...they are completely on their own. People have played jews to be the biggest victims in the world...and the jews are going to fight tooth and nail to keep that title because it brings so many benefits to them.Only ignorant idiots would think throwing rocks leads to terrorism. These are kids, they have no life, nothing to do...they don't have cosy little coffee shops and safe playgrounds to go to paid by US tax dollars in Israel. Man..I've never seen such stupidity and ignorance from both jews and jew lovers. You guys have blind folds on that are 2 feet thick.Oh and you whiners who say for Palestianians to stop killing israelis??? LOL...dont' make me laugh...out of 5000 katusha rockets fired...2...THAT'S 2 jews were killed with a 9 month period...compared to 800 palestinians...so can you repeat your sentence again about who should stop killing?If any of you have the balls to go to Palestine and see a 6 month old baby with it's head splattered opened and body parts three feet away from it, then maybe I'll have more respect for you...until then, stop lying and stop whining you pieces of s**t.
Closed AccountMar 8, 2008
Sub-human? Listen to yourself....you put your belief in one stupid book and think that's it...you're as dillusional and f**ked up as the any other religious freak. You know...since the Palestinians are suffering so much, I hope that IF there is a God...he make's life in Israel a living hell for the next millennium and on. You f**kers don't deserve peace and comfort...you deserve to live in fear and hell.
Closed AccountMar 8, 2008
Blah blah blah...you idiots were never supposed to be there...f**k what book written by jews in the past said......Why don't you assh**es stop taking money from all over the world and THEN try and survive...yeah...I didn't think so. You wouldn't last for a freakin day.
zer0nixJul 17, 2008
fallacy of moral equivalence for the lose.the reason why this act is wrong is that it breeds more discontent and division against the israelis. the ONLY chance for peace these people have is to wipe out one side utterly or to find a way to coexist. these actions committed by these soldiers simply do not help the cause in the latter case.
everlast88Dec 31, 2008
thats the problem, they're jews
xalaitiJan 2, 2009
fake 100% !!!
jerrycanFeb 19, 2009
yes
jerrycanFeb 19, 2009
Can't we just kill them all?