sixrevisions.com — Here’s a collection of 10 powerful – yet easy-to-implement — AJAX effects to supplement your web page’s interface. These were picked using a “bang for your buck” methodology; meaning that these effects were chosen specifically because they provide high-impact effects with very little effort in installing and using them.
Mar 18, 2008 View in Crawl 4
sn0wmis3rMar 19, 2008
I think mootools gets more credit than it deserves, those tooltips, the forms, reordering tables, no big deal, you can do all that with scriptaculous/prototype and for tooltips use prototip (a tooltip library build on scripcatulous/prototype)
tikal2kMar 20, 2008
That's probably the real "Fanciness Factor" trick here: how to artificially boost the Diggs on your submitted article. Bots, perhaps? PERL?
dariusmarchApr 3, 2008
Warning: Fanciness Subjective
fallenrayneApr 14, 2008
@cremate (stupid digg comment system)You are slightly retarded. MooTools is a JavaScript library, .NET is a server side framework. You do realize the difference between the two, right? You do realize you could use MooTools with .NET, right? Also you do realize that a lot of the major corporations, who tend to hire decent programmers that probably have more 'enterprise' experience than you, use JavaScript libraries like MooTools, jQuery, ExtJS, YUI, and Dojo? Before you try and pass yourself off as some expert programmer be sure you actually know about the technology you are trying to dismiss. JavaScript libraries != frameworks, unless it is something like ExtJS, which is then a client side framework that works in conjunction with a server side language/framework to build web applications (i.e. .NET with VB.net or C#).
youtubelineApr 15, 2008
We need more people to point out it's not AJAX, in case someone missed it<a class="user" href="http://www.youtubeline.com">http://www.youtubeline.com</a>
cremateJun 26, 2008
BTW. AJAX is front end and backend.... Javascript being purely frontend. Also, why would you use Mootools with .net when they have AJAX Extensions?