Submitted by
Users who Dugg This
Leena Helttula
11666 Followers
Vladimir Bundalo
3158 Followers
Sheryl Hodge
784 Followers
caffieneman
904 Followers
The Nayshun
772 Followers
Thomas Carlson
265 Followers
caffienemanSep 2, 2010
ah yes, the Big Babng theory, I was wondering when that would go obsolete
hurrayforschoolSep 2, 2010
Interesting that someone with that username would point out a spelling error.
cyclozionSep 2, 2010
Bazinga!
flareSep 2, 2010
In before...
Ah damn it!
deathknight13Sep 2, 2010
Nothing in science is sacred. I don't know what to think of this but I am glad that there are always scientists challenging the mainstream.
mouser58907Sep 2, 2010
Yes, hence the word Theory.
yurimxpxmanSep 2, 2010
QFT: "Nothing in science is sacred."
That's why I put my faith in God, not science.. especially not theories. Proven science, OTOH, rocks :-)Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
slapo12Sep 2, 2010
do you realize gravity is just a theory as well? For something to be a theory, it has gone through rigorous testing...
maxxellSep 3, 2010
Not true. Well, not the bit about gravity being a theory, that's true.
But I have a theory that yurimxpxman is an alien. I haven't rigorously tested it yet, but it's still my theory.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
dhracerSep 2, 2010
Who says God isn't the ultimate scientist?
/me is Mormon
jeremiahjwSep 2, 2010
No, of course not, it's *science*!
nitroburnSep 2, 2010
N̷̰̰͙͙̳̝͎̣̹͇͕̞̽̌̇̇͊̓ͥͪ̀ͯͩͪ̑̒ͪ́̏́̚̚O̧͗ͫ̋̅̿̀̿̑̉ͭ̏͜͏̧͔̙̜͉̳͙̙̖̗̣͙͚̼̙͓͈͈
macaddictrSep 2, 2010
Here is another interesting challenge on a common theory. Note the challenges she faces in presenting this idea. Sadly the science community can be just as stubborn as the religious community.
http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/elaine_morgan_says_we_evolved_from_aquatic_apes.htmlComment is buried, click here to see the rest.
myohoSep 2, 2010
Maybe I'm missing something about Environmental Graffiti's culture, but I'd be pissed if I wrote an article and my actual name never got attached to it. Instead, we get a tank-top photo and her birthday. I'm confused. Are we supposed to ask her for drinks, or care what she says about science?Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
jsmithersSep 2, 2010
WHAT'S SAD is how wrong Steven Hawking is. This once great mind has been reduced to spouting the most utter nonsense about how aliens will be mad, bad and dangerous to know, and how God didn't create the universe. Both of which are so radically wrong it's just not funny.
Hawking of course has 'logically deduced' his theories. But they make no sense on so many levels - so many OBVIOUS levels. ETs will in fact be perfectly friendly on the whole, and yes, they'll be humanoid too what's more.
Also, how is Hawking even remotely qualified to pronounce on the nature of God and His works? He's not a theologian. If science does anything, it points TO God, not away from him.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
saint3kSep 2, 2010
There are so many things wrong with what you just said it makes my head hurt. If there are more people like you out there, I weep for the species.
maximatum99Sep 2, 2010
WRONG. Science points to flying spaghetti monster. I have no evidence but I'm right anyway. Deal with it.
People like you make the intelligent theists look stupid.
fattycorpuscleSep 2, 2010
Back of the line, churchy.
thedatabitSep 3, 2010
please tell me you are a great troll?
skizmoSep 2, 2010
> "What if the universe has always existed?"
That would eliminate time. Time exists. This theory isn't gonna fly.
rhawk187Sep 2, 2010
The point of science is to come up with the best explanation for something based upon what we observe. The further from what we can actively observe a prediction is, the most likely it's going to be wrong. So, science is going to constantly get things wrong, it's its nature. That doesn't mean it's not important, or useful, or valuable; it just means people need to remember to treat it like science, not truth.
dmcbrideSep 3, 2010
Science doesn't get things wrong. Part of the scientific method is to confirm your original hypothesis - science is the result of knowledge gained from the scientific method, and is ALWAYS right.
Theories can, and are, wrong fairly consistently. Is this what you meant? Treat it like a theory and not a science?
fyngyrzSep 6, 2010
No. You have this hugely wrong. Science is a method, not a collection of what you think are facts. We have high confidence in theories when we can't falsify them after giving it serious effort; we have even higher confidence in them when they interlock. But that *still* doesn't mean they're perfect metaphor for what is going on, or minimum metaphor, or that other things we are presently unaware of aren't *also* going on. Science is the best method we know of for building an interlocking, sensible metaphor for how the universe works, but the primary reason for that is that science *does* allow for being wrong, and can completely change its path when that becomes apparent. You remember when electrons, neutrons and protons were "the" building blocks? Yeah, well, turns out, not the case. There are building blocks for them, too. Remember when flight was 'impossible'? Remember when flying faster than the speed of sound was 'impossible'? Remember when enumerating the genome was 'impossible'? Remember when a computer beating a human at chess was 'imposible'? Remember when ol Marvin Minsky of MIT said that neural nets had no future, weren't extensible? Yeah, whoops. Wrong. And so it goes. And that's *why* we can trust science. It's not about dogma. It's about finding working metaphor in an amazingly complex world.
archercreditSep 2, 2010
Oh you mean the big bang "THEORY". Of course it could be wrong, it is a theory. Just like almost everything in science, it isn't proven. This shouldn't even be a question.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
yage2006Sep 3, 2010
The Big Bang Theory though is a scientific theory much more valid then this guys Notions because its not really a Theory unless it can be tested and withstand attempts to be falsified.
This guys "idea" of a alternate theory is not being well received though so I would not take it to the bank.
geogeerSep 2, 2010
What about entropy?
fyngyrzSep 6, 2010
Yeah, metaphor... that subject is just fading off into random disarray.
uv0001Sep 2, 2010
Version 4 has made Digg obsolete, that much I do know.
hasahugedigSep 2, 2010
considering how we only know, at best, 4% of what's out there. I'm not surprised at all.
teamsandwichSep 3, 2010
I like my babngs small personally
taaybSep 3, 2010
There is no answer. The Big Bang Theory never really explained the origins anyways. You could always ask "how did that go there" without an explanation. There is no answer.
maxxellSep 3, 2010
No, the answer is "God did it."
But you're not allowed to ask "How did God get there?"
fyngyrzSep 6, 2010
"Big bang doesn't explain it" does not equal "there is no answer"
We do not know now, and we may never know, in fact, given the distance in time and space we are from the events we imagine took place, but that *still* doesn't mean there isn't a perfectly reasonable answer.
...and the God thing... that's for childlike minds. Leave that alone. You can't fix it.
Closed AccountSep 3, 2010
Where are all the Reddit stories?
yage2006Sep 3, 2010
I am always glad to see the scientific method in action however the scientific community's reaction to this guys theory has not been very favorable.
phrawghSep 3, 2010
Let there be light.
yurisrevengeSep 3, 2010
HOW CAN A FICTIONAL TV SHOW BE WRONG?
Johny29Sep 3, 2010
no no.. this will be true, according to me and as we have read in the books (sucking books... :p)
phenolicSep 4, 2010
I thought the baby Jesus created the universe with his magic Lite-Brite.
virinchiAug 2, 2011
Sub: Big-Bang does not Inspire
Space Cosmology groups must ponder -Origins and Dimensional Nature
Cosmology Vedas interlinks- science, Philosophy, Nature and beyond -is the religion
Search together-one will find cosmology Definition
BOOKS BY VIDYARDHI NANDURI [1993-2011]-
http://vidyardhicosmology.blogspot.com/