progressivenation.us — On September 19th our nation celebrated Constitution Day, which marks the anniversary of its signing in Philadelphia by 39 of the 55 men who helped draft it. For decades the date passed unremarked until the late Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia sponsored legislation requiring all recipients of federal funds to do something, anything, to celebrate the worlds oldest written constitution of a nation still in effect. After some initial groaning, the grantees have gotten into the swing of things, and now a thousand flowers bloom about the Constitution each year in mid-September.
Never before has the Constitution gotten more lip service than today. The Tea Party, in particular, has made the Constitution its personal political slogan. But rather than seeking to grapple with the Constitutions inherent conflicts, as the framers themselves did, these sunshine pseudo-constitutionalists want true believers in their agenda, not honest inquiry about constitutional principles.
I encountered this phenomenon recently in the bookstore at George Washingtons Mount Vernon Estate, when an elderly lady was shown a copy of my most recent book on the Constitution and introduced to me as its author.
She eyed me skeptically. Do you believe in the Constitution? she asked. Maam, I explained, Ive been writing about the Constitution for almost 30 years. I try to explore all sides of the issues in my book.
She clearly wasnt satisfied. But do you believe in the Constitution?
I got the feeling that I was supposed to clap my hands and incant three times, I do believe in the ConstitutionI do, I do, I do believe in the Constitution.
I may not believe what you believe about the Constitution, I replied, but I do try to understand it.
This latter-day version of constitutional triumphalism is both historically inaccurate and deeply flawed. Only when we as citizens can appreciate the all-too-human compromises and contingencies embodied in our nations charter can we paradoxically appreciate its radical achievements for its time. As Yale Law professor Akhil Reed Amar wrote: The adoption of the Constitution was the most participatory, majoritarian, and populist event the Earth had ever seen. And yet it allowed slavery and required a long series of amendments to approximate the bulwark of liberty we celebrate on this day.
The Constitution is a compact for citizens, not a bumper sticker. We serve its purposes best by wrestling with its meaning, not blindly following a pied piper like Glenn Beck. His dirty little secret is that he is exactly the kind of demagogue that the framers feared most, and they limited the structure of government to keep such babblers out of power.
By Linda R. Monk, J.D.
Original Article: Linda R. Monk, J.D.: The Constitution Is Not a Bumper Sticker The Huffington Post
Related Posts:Conservatives vs The Constitution, Make Up Your MindsThe Constitution According to Mr PotatoeHead, Dan QuayleOrly Taitz Smacked Down: Birther Lawsuit DismissedConstitutionally, promote the general welfare should include health careRob Kall: Specter Uses Teabaggered Health Care Town Hall to Court Progressives, Finesse Sestak
Sep 19, 2010 View in Crawl 4
cosmicsurferSep 19, 2010
Constitution Day 2010 - The only protection; the only salvation it has this day is that it falls on a SUNDAY and Congressional exceptionalists aren't in session trying to rewrite it.
But the tiny minority represented by them are busy trying to justify their hate for her as they sit around planning for their next attack.