Submitted by
Users who Dugg This
MikeyMicron
2251 Followers
Russ Smith
18392 Followers
Christopher Wick
1055 Followers
Robin Oakley
216 Followers
mtownFeb 18, 2012
It's like he's doing everything he can to make sure he doesn't win.
And the NBA is evil? Why is that? It couldnt possibly be because there are a it of black people in the NBA, could it, Conservatives? Hmmmmmmm?
crymtyphonFeb 18, 2012
"Basketball" is actually a satanic game invented by the aztecs.
Originaly the losers were sacrificed to Huitzilopochtli
deity-demon of war and black magic.
It was introduced into western civilization through inner-city
drug trafickers to corrupt the children of the benighted,
listless poor.
This was part of the larger plot to destroy
America's foundations of God, Guns, Guts and Baseball.
And you wondered why the so-called current 'President' was
so fond of 'B-ball?' And I wondered why I can't get a job writing
this stuff?
technopunditFeb 19, 2012
Have you applied at Fox News?
crymtyphonFeb 19, 2012
Well, of course I have.
And I passed the first three interviews easy.
My resume was perfect:
A PhD from Bob Jones University (Particle Physics),
with a BA from Oxford, Mississippi in Creation Biology.
In the summer I interned as a baby seal clubber;
in the winter I apprenticed at the Cato Inner City Charity
to give out infected blankets to the homeless.
So inevitably, I was ushered into the Rupert Room.
James Murdoch was there dressed in black leather straps.
A shirtless Roger Ailes held a glowing poker while
Ann Coulter and Bill O'reily argued over a rack of whips.
They turned to me and
[DIGG INTERUPT: incident code: 42A; Unacceptably Silly Content.
parts of this comment have been deleted]
--when the rats chewed through the cords I tied
enough snakes together to make a lasso and rappel down
the side of the skyscraper.
And that's my story.
copernicuskidFeb 19, 2012
your talent is wasted in these comments. you should be writing for the onion or something
graehFeb 19, 2012
god damn.
f**k you.
I can never comment again, anywhere, ever, even youtube, without having your god damned funny as it is witty comment in the back of my mind as the high bar.
Except for this comment.
But, even this comment feels bad :(
OhEddieFeb 19, 2012
I have a feeling I know what the problem was, but first let me ask this, are you blond and do you look good in a short skirt?
caramba421Feb 19, 2012
The Aristocrats!
maximillionteeFeb 20, 2012
You have earned a new follower, my friend!
ghengiskhan1Feb 21, 2012
I hope you never get hired anywhere because then youll probably stop posting such great stuff here and that would suck ballz.
crymtyphonFeb 21, 2012
Lots of compliments, oh leader of the Golden Hord!
And yet, I notice my pay pal tip jar is.. still... empty.
I give the refrigerator box I am living in another
week if it doesn't rain. Then I am giving up
internet commenting and going back to my
old job as a
[DIGG INTERUPT: incident code: UPL: (Unbelievably Pathetic Lie).
parts of this comment have been deleted]
- where the REAL money is.
kanzanFeb 19, 2012
And here I thought the winners were sacrificed.
crymtyphonFeb 19, 2012
Okay; I have though about your statement;
run computer simulations, emailed the boys at Bell Labs,
- and we keep coming to the conclusion that if
you sacrifice the winners, then it's going to be a contest
to stand there quietly.
But the guys at CERN did point out that the scenario
works for political games.
A clever loser becomes rich and famous.
Palin, Newt, Cain, Trump, and Colbert are easy
examples of people making millions by Running To Lose.
It is the sad winners who are placed upon the sacrificial
altar of unwanted attention and unkeepable promises,
- while their beating hearts are cut out by smiling media priests.
kanzanFeb 19, 2012
I was thinking of the Mesoamerican ballgame, not the north American shell/shill game. Further research points to my having been mistaken about the sacrifice.
None of the Republican field appears to be interested in any sacrifice that costs them.
woj1sFeb 20, 2012
""Basketball" is actually a satanic game invented by the aztecs.
Originaly the losers were sacrificed to Huitzilopochtli
deity-demon of war and black magic."
Damnit crymtyphon, I read your first comment and immediately started to respond. It took me a minute to realize your sarcasm. Which, if you think about, is kind of scary since this is usually how "the others" think.
crymtyphonFeb 20, 2012
the "others"?
You... your one of THEM!
Guards! Guards!
assassyn360Feb 19, 2012
Ah excuse you! The correct term is 'blah' people in the NBA.
crackitjackFeb 19, 2012
The NBA is evil because the player's share some of the profits of the team and the association. In the eyes of the GOP this is socialism.
nmw6Feb 19, 2012
Every professional sports organisation is socialist according to the GOP. They all have unions, the players have a lot of rights governing what their bosses can and can't tell them to do, and the worst performing teams receive a subsidy from the best performing teams.
phpistastyFeb 19, 2012
People buying into the idea that this country was founded on judeo-christian principles still gets me. We've widely exposed this to be false. Most founding fathers were deists and not theists.
The founding fathers: John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison,George Washington
Of those, John Jay was the only orthodox christian, and he proposed that catholics shouldn't be allowed to hold office.
So, Santorum - I will admit this is a Christian nation, when you admit we need to follow the "Judeo Christian" principles the country was founded on - and remove the Catholics who hold office.
History is yet another academic discipline that has been dragged through the mud for religious interests.
juliochavezFeb 19, 2012
Regardless of the religious beliefs of our founding fathers, there is one thing that we can all agree on. America was based on religious freedom. That is, freedom to believe whatever you wish, without persecution. You cannot argue this fact. That's why they wrote it down. Santorum does not agree with this basic tenet of the American experiment and neither do the Hatetheist scum that plague Digg. I pray that no more hate-filled bigots from either side ever again attain an elected position, at least in a nation that was formed to prevent it.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
phpistastyFeb 19, 2012
It is freedom to believe whatever you want to believe without the government interfering - as long as it doesn't violate the civil rights of others. Their goal was to keep people who believe that Gods law > Government law, and Santorum is a person who believes just that.
You keep praying and we'll see how it turns out. In the mean time i'd rather see educated citizens making those changes. (Stop voting for the hate-filled bigots)
pinkfish411Feb 19, 2012
This has not been "widely exposed" to be false. The country was not founded as a Christian nation, no, but that doesn't mean it wasn't founded on principles that were the outgrowth of the Western Christian tradition.
For one, the list of Founding Fathers is far larger than what you've mentioned. There were many more people involved in shaping the country than the few you learn about in elementary school. Many of them were orthodox Christians, some of them even ordained ministers
Most deism at the time was essentially liberal Christianity. It was a type of Christianity that had been stripped of most of its dogmas and reduced to ethics. Deists at the time shared most of the same values that educated evangelical Christians did. Most had great respect for Christian moral teachings--just look at Jefferson and his trimmed-down New Testament.
And yes, Catholics were looked at with suspicion, but this was the case for deists as much as it was for confessing orthodox Christians. It was part of a general fear at the time that Catholicism inevitably entailed split political allegiance, because the spectre of a revived Vatican theocracy haunted the minds of Protestants, deists, and atheists.
EnlightenedDiMeSFeb 20, 2012
Actaully, his list is a little long by who most historians consider the founding fathers. Generally it is Franklin, Jefferson, Adams, Washington, Madison, and Monroe. Two of whom were actual Christians. Open a book and read s**t for yourself instead of regurgitating bulls**t.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
pinkfish411Feb 20, 2012
I've opened plenty of books, assh**e. The "Founding Fathers" generally refers to those who shaped and signed the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, and that list is far larger than the one you provided. Perhaps you could cite some kind of source backing up your silly claim, and give some kind of rational as to why only those men matter, and why nobody else who signed onto the country's founding documents are significant.
You don't even actually address my broader point, which is that the majority of self-identified deists and deist-leaning people at the time were espousing what was basically a liberal, ethically-focused brand of Christianity. To say that they had no interest in Christian values, it takes more than arguing that they didn't all meet the test of theological orthodoxy.
phpistastyFeb 21, 2012
It could just as easily be said that they're formed on deist principles. or just general morality.
Just because there are correlations doesn't mean its derived from Christianitty. In reality our initial legislation covers like what, 10% (estimate) of biblical law? God, creator, jesus and lord can't be found in the constitution, except in the date.. which references the year of the lord. This was just the way to date things,and not a religious notion (was used by secularists as well)
It does explain slavery though - the bible is very specific about that.
pinkfish411Feb 21, 2012
Deist principles were basically progressive, often "secularized" Christian ones, because deism was an outgrowth of late medieval and modern Christianity.
There's also no such thing as "general morality." All moralities have genealogies, and the morality that developed in Enlightenment Christianity and deism was not the morality of other parts of the world (and this was often, sadly, a justification for colonialism, since Westerners thought native peoples were not moral or rational enough to rule themselves). The morality of deism was a morality that was shaped by the centuries-long history of Christian moral theology, and Greco-Roman and Hebrew moral and legal thought before it. Without that history, we have no reason to believe that the modern West and its values would have ever emerged.
The ethical values growing out of the Christian tradition aren't reducible to "biblical law," either. That kind of simplistic thinking is why these sorts of discussions rarely get anywhere. Nobody in their right mind claims that the Constitution is founded on "biblical law." It is, however, founded on ethical and political traditions that would not have been what they were without the particular Christian history that Western Europe had.
leodinFeb 18, 2012
Yup, leave it to ol' Frothy to just go right out and say that anyone who isn't a rabid fanatic isn't a true Christian. It's like, these fundie wackos (I know he's Catholic, and most Catholics aren't fundie wackos, but he clearly is one) seem hellbent on ruining the name of Christianity and driving the religion into the ground. When you launch an attack at any religious person who shows the slightest bit of tolerance, you make the whole religion look bad, and that drives people away from it.
emkaysmithFeb 19, 2012
I LOVE to sit back and watch the Christians call each other names and end up besting each other to a pulp. Can we get Pat Robertson and Cardinal Burke in a catch match?
caramba421Feb 19, 2012
Whatever, you're just jealous cuz you don't get to spend all eternity in Heaven with Fred Phelps.
leodinFeb 19, 2012
lol If you find yourself spending an eternity with Fred Phelps, I think it's a pretty safe bet you didn't make it into heaven.
pbgv23Feb 20, 2012
"Heaven with Fred Phelps" = contradiction in terms.
crymtyphonFeb 18, 2012
Sounds like a variation of the Frances Shaefer argument,
that we are in a 'post-christian' world; where christianity is present
but not relevant.
It requres three distortions:
1) that America was 'founded' by evangelical christians, without the help
of Deists like Jefferson, Washington, Paine, Franklin and Madison, etc.
(sub-form of this is the factless insistence that they were secretly devout Christians).
2) that those who call themselves Christians now, are only Christian
to the extent that they wage culture war against non- believers.
3) That fundametalist Catholics and evangelical protestants,
have the same beliefs.
Santorum's audience has heard it all before;
and is glad to hear it again. It flatters anyone, to be told they are a last,
chosen remnant; upon whose decisions the fate of the world hangs.
And so are we all; in our own way.
kaegroFeb 18, 2012
It's scary how this guy is so close to being the US president. Even if he has no chance, it's still scary.
UncleRuckuFeb 18, 2012
Case in point, Bush was elected for a 2nd term.
People are stupid and behave like sheep in the voting booth.
skews13Feb 18, 2012
What a dips**t. My grandmother was a mainline Protestant. She was a real Christian. She lived the life. She exuded love. As I see it, you're an insult to everything she stood for.
asfinktersezwutFeb 19, 2012
Sad isn't it?
The normal everyday Christians I know are absolutely nothing like these right-wing-nut-jobs. So sad that these people claim to represent Christianity and Conservatism.
So pathetic what the Republican party has become.
analogkid1Feb 19, 2012
2008: "Whether its sensuality of vanity of the famous in America, they are peac**ks on display and they have taken their poor behavior and made it fashionable."
>> He was totally talking about Paris Hilton.
"Rock concerts"? Remember back in the 50's when they were calling rock and roll the "devils" music and Elvis' hip gyrations were too "suggestive" to show on TV?
Sorry, Rick - your speeches would've gone over really well about a half century ago.
Seriously, you republicans want THIS guy as president? Really?
anomaly100Feb 18, 2012
Frothy! Frothy! Frothy! (I'm just trying to support him until he gets nominated)
mtownFeb 18, 2012
I wonder what would happen if you showed up at a rally with "Frothy! Frothy! Frothy!" print on a big sign. I'm sure his "true Christian followers" will just turn the other cheek, right?
spazattack5000Feb 19, 2012
They probably wouldn't get it. In fact they would probably think it's some hip thing the kids say.
atomheartmotherFeb 19, 2012
Right. Instead of what it is...just one more juvenile offering of filth from the "adults" on the left.
leodinFeb 19, 2012
Santorum IS the f**king juvenile offering of filth. It's a f**king insult to the office of the presidency that he's even running. You don't have to like Obama, I'm personally a libertarian who can't stand him, but how f**king dare you try to defend that worthless sack of s**t. Have you no respect for this country? Has the Right become that pathetic, sad, and desperate? The man is the antithesis of everything the Founding Fathers stood for - again, you don't have to like Obama, but what the f**k is wrong with you that makes you think it's okay to s**t on the Constitution so long as your party of choice is the one doing it? f**k YOU!
atomheartmotherFeb 20, 2012
"The man is the antithesis of everything the Founding Fathers stood for..."
How exactly do you come up with that nonsense?
"makes you think it's okay to s**t on the Constitution"
Or than nonsense?
And uhhh... f**k you too.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
UncleRuckuFeb 18, 2012
Religion easily has the greatest bullsh!t story ever told. Think about it. Religion has actually convinced people that there's an invisible man living in the sky who watches everything you do, every minute of every day. And the invisible man has a special list of ten things he does not want you to do. And if you do any of these ten things, he has a special place, full of fire and smoke and burning and torture and anguish, where he will send you to live and suffer and burn and choke and scream and cry forever and ever 'til the end of time...But He loves you. He loves you, and He needs money! He always needs money! He's all-powerful, all-perfect, all-knowing, and all-wise, somehow just can't handle money! Religion takes in billions of dollars, they pay no taxes, and they always need a little more. Now, you talk about a good bullsh!t story. Holy Sh!t! George Carlin
Most of the stories in the Bible were taken from older Egyptian, Babylonian, and Greek mythologies.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MeSSwKffj9o
eastversewestFeb 19, 2012
O how we all miss George. A visionary he was.
technopunditFeb 19, 2012
Great president, or The Greatest President?
eastversewestFeb 19, 2012
Carlin! Not the "fortunate son" or fortunate father.
jimfeetFeb 19, 2012
Thanks for saving me the trouble. 1000 diggs to you.
juliochavezFeb 19, 2012
You are so devoid of knowledge of Christianity, you are like a caricature of a typical Hatetheist. Go back in your hole, you sad, ignorant bigot.
countess666Feb 19, 2012
where exactly is he wrong? please enlighten me.
manicpedanticFeb 19, 2012
My understanding is that the "official" Christian explanation of Jesus' birth and life is that the devil invented all the other, eerily similar creation myths that happen to have many of the same details as Christ's (born under a star, resurrected after death, etc...) in an effort to discredit the supposed "true" stories of Jesus' origin.
It's hard for me to believe that someone could put forth that idea (the similarities were all part of an elaborate plan by the devil!) and actually be taken seriously by people, but here we are... Then again, I believe there was an article on Digg around the time when Harold Camping was making his (most recent) prediction about the date the world would end that discussed why people who fervently believed him would not simply abandon those beliefs after Camping's prediction proved to be hilariously wrong. I can't remember the explanation, so I'll just assume that keeping the faith, in spite of evidence to the contrary, is the result of some kind of psychological problem.
I hope you are now sufficiently enlightened!
leodinFeb 19, 2012
Yeah, I feel the exact same way about Santorum. He makes a mockery of the Christian religion, and it's shameful that he thinks he has anything to do with Christ's teachings.
EnlightenedDiMeSFeb 20, 2012
I think you are actually devoid of knowledge.
Period.
jpurdyFeb 18, 2012
"as I see it" - that says it all. From where his head is, he doesn't see anything very well.
Mainline Protestantism is in fine shape, the social fascists of the extreme right are the real problem. Consider how much damage they've done to the Republican party and are trying to do to our nation and our Constitutional rights.
We wouldn't have idiots like Santorum, Perry and Bachmann running for office if not for the activist fanatics who make up the bulk of their supporters.
technopunditFeb 19, 2012
Actually, I don't give a Mitt.
EnlightenedDiMeSFeb 20, 2012
I like to think of his head, jammed in traffic on the Hershey Highway, awash in a sea of frothy anal sex biproduct.
johnnysoftwareFeb 19, 2012
From the synopsis, he sounds as bad as the Taliban. Taliban in Afghanistan banned soccer, movies, and music that they banned all of those things.
According to news reports, they were so incensed by the sound of little boys laughing, that they executed some for that.
It's strange, but I don't remember the "American Taliban" from a few years back espousing so many Taliban-beliefs as Santorum actively promotes.
- anti-Christian
- anti sporting events
- anti music
eraptorFeb 18, 2012
Since Santorum chose to "go there", he should be reminded of the Vatican's economic development "achievements" in Latin America and Europe. That's ANYTHING but a record of success.
This American would GLADLY choose Protestant Christian/secular economic success over the economic/social policy positions HE champions on behalf of the Vatican.
pinkfish411Feb 19, 2012
Most of Santorum's policies actually have little in common with the Vatican. The Vatican's economic policies tend to be quite a bit to the left of the Republicans'.
ereneeFeb 19, 2012
silly. you can't excommunicate Protestants.
publiclurkerFeb 21, 2012
Well, he can, it's just that the protestants don't really care.
deborahdianeFeb 19, 2012
I glad that they are publicizing how narrow Santorum's thinking is. He is certain that his beliefs are right and everyone else's are wrong.
casf1bFeb 19, 2012
Funny, that's how you think too.
mupi42Feb 19, 2012
We're gone from the world of Christians? HUZZA!
casf1bFeb 19, 2012
And we have you instead?
scabnabbitFeb 19, 2012
'...Rick Santorum, a devout Catholic, warned about the dangers of “the NBA” and “rock concerts,”...'
This guy's lost in the '80s.
rockyoumonkeysFeb 19, 2012
Whoa, when did Santorum get more power than the pope?!!
Clearly he doesn't need to be president, he's apparently now the leader of the entire Christian world. Next thing you know he'll be declaring himself Jesus.
CrescentSkies_2Feb 19, 2012
And God doth said "I respect atheists more than I respect this bastard..."
naumaddFeb 20, 2012
And there needs to be a war on those americans - and those human beings - whose love of their "god" takes precedence over treating their fellow human beings with respect, i.e., a personal policy of non-interference in the lives of others. Traditionally, christians of whatever variety you wish to name have allowed their love of their "god", their prophet, their favorite book to justify all manner of disrespect toward other human beings and other ways of life. Human history and american history are rife with examples both old and new. In the name of a genuinely civilized culture, such behavior must come to an end. If you use your religion to justify horrible behavior toward other human beings, you are more savage than human, albeit a religious one.
laurahoustonFeb 20, 2012
no, even though these politicans want to bring back the crusades it's disrespectfull to all religions.
Religion should be out of Gov totally or we will end up with more passionate-emboldened nut-cases, like the norway cristian crusades shooter and the 9/11 muslim suicide nutters.
moonriderFeb 20, 2012
Santorum is a megalomaniac theocrat with an obsessive desire to rule the world as dictator so he can make EVERYONE live by his twisted vision of how life should be lived. Far as I'm concerned, he should take a very long walk off a very short pier (which pier is built in very deep and frigid water).
gimiesomeFeb 20, 2012
“He say's he's a Christian....But he is not as Christian as I am, And everybody knows that God only favors His children that have a good credit rating and a 3.6 religious rating or above.” IfIonlyknew
mikeoxbiggFeb 20, 2012
God, Obama's campaign manager must just be LOLing his ass off whenever news like these break.
nmw6Feb 19, 2012
Hmm, remember when JFK was about to become the first Catholic president and people were worried that he might secretly take orders from the vatican? Rick Santorum believes in EXPLICITLY taking orders from the vatican and no one sees a problem with that...
laurahoustonFeb 19, 2012
Sanatorum insults religions, it's a shame he can't keep his religious insults out of politics.
mlabudaphotosFeb 19, 2012
He will claim or has, that his words were taken out of context, and while he's at it, stay out of my social affairs, I like rock music and concerts.
GentlemanGhost542Feb 19, 2012
spewing blasphemy Santorum? no surprise there.
shows how out of touch you are
deborahdianeFeb 19, 2012
I glad that they are publicizing how narrow Santorum's thinking is. He is certain that his beliefs are right and everyone else's are wrong.
CornermanFeb 19, 2012
Just when I thought he might have a chance at being a good nominee, he turns around and says that. Every nom is officially crazy and the world will end this year... Just kidding about the world ending hopefully.
technopunditFeb 19, 2012
He said it four years ago, Einstein.
eastversewestFeb 19, 2012
And his stance should change?
CornermanFeb 19, 2012
Oops, didnt read the 2008 part, but still it's the first time I have read what he stated. And no it does not change my stance nor should it.
naumaddFeb 20, 2012
And there needs to be a war on those americans - and those human beings - whose love of their "god" takes precedence over treating their fellow human beings with respect, i.e., a personal policy of non-interference in the lives of others. Traditionally, christians of whatever variety you wish to name have allowed their love of their "god", their prophet, their favorite book to justify all manner of disrespect toward other human beings and other ways of life. Human history and american history are rife with examples both old and new. In the name of a genuinely civilized culture, such behavior must come to an end. If you use your religion to justify horrible behavior toward other human beings, you are more savage than human, albeit a religious one.
scholan2Feb 20, 2012
Laypersons cannot excommunicate people.
gimiesomeFeb 20, 2012
No one on this planet has the authority to do that.
PengelFeb 20, 2012
I look forward to the upcoming election. We hope US allies do not get ex-communicated as well. =)
deborahdianeFeb 19, 2012
I glad that they are publicizing how narrow Santorum's thinking is. He is certain that his beliefs are right and everyone else's are wrong.
ferencofbudaFeb 19, 2012
Santorum, (or Sanatorium, as I call him, because that's truly where he should be), is sounding more and more like the false prophets that the Bible warned would appear from time to time. Except, he isn't even a wolf in sheep's clothing, just naked wolf, for all to see, and be totally disgusted thereby. I begin to think that what Jesus called a "wolf" in his day, we would call a psychopath, or sociopath, today.
koreyaustexFeb 19, 2012
This is brilliant, the Republicans think they are going to win? In the words of Ash, "I've got news for you pal, you ain't leadin' but two things, right now: Jack and s**t... and Jack left town."
analogkid1Feb 19, 2012
Attention all mainline protestants: Santorum has insulted you all. I'm sorry...insulted *y'all*.
You can't, in good conscience, vote for someone who has blasphemed against all mainline protestants. And you can't honestly call yourself a good christian and vote for a Mormon cult member, should Romney get the nod.
And clearly you won't be voting for Obama...
So, the only thing you can do come voting day is stay home.
nmw6Feb 19, 2012
Its scary that a possible future president (at least in theory) reviles a large segment of the population and considers them not "real" Americans. What are we then Mr. Santorum?
emkaysmithFeb 19, 2012
Here in south Louisiana, I'm surrounded by Catholics (at least nominally), and that includes all my conservative in-laws -- and I have yet to hear *any* of them say anything good about Santorum. Of course, they're all wishing Jindal would run. . . .
marcglezFeb 19, 2012
That's why I would vote for Romney over Santorum. There has to be clearly a separation of church and state.
SANTORUM IS ANOTHER IDIOT LIKE BUSH
promusicApr 7, 2012
Rick Santorum Stars in an 80's New Wave Video :http://digg.com/news/politics/rick_santorum_stars_in_an_80_s_new_wave_video
brianearpFeb 29, 2012
Rick Santorum, Birth Control, and "Playing God" http://blog.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk/2012/02/rick-santorum-birth-control-and-“playing-god”/
profmnaimFeb 21, 2012
Looked a personal opinion of a person counts himself ideal among the Christian ism of Judas following or a Judo-Christian.
FrankLuskaFeb 20, 2012
That Bastard.
klassenburgerFeb 19, 2012
i'm actually thrilled to hear a religious person in the spotlight actually be honest.
the protestants don't like the catholics either. none of this is surprising to me.
mlabudaphotosFeb 19, 2012
He will claim or has, that his words were taken out of context, and while he's at it, stay out of my social affairs, I like rock music and concerts.
strongwingsFeb 19, 2012
How about Santorum ends his chance with these things by giving the votes to the last man standing *COUGH* Ron Paul *COUGH* and hopefully all the democrats that see Obama's not going to cut it.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
kaegroFeb 19, 2012
Santorum is as good a candidate as Ron Paul. And that is a very sad thing...
strongwingsFeb 19, 2012
Care to list why you think so? I really am curious. Thanks!
ancientshoesFeb 19, 2012
thinkprogress.org...nuff said
anglosaxongalFeb 19, 2012
LM AO!!! Proof satan is throwing out honest GOD-fearing people! Excellent! Resist satan and he shall FLEE!
angrycat70Feb 19, 2012
Hey republicans: this Scrotorum assh**e ain't gonna fly.
I would rather vote for O'bumble than "Frothy Mix".
roguegeniusFeb 19, 2012
Good. Do so.
kcast985Feb 19, 2012
Sweaty black people running up and down a wooden court. Yeah Santorum that means cultural rot. Don't get mad cuz your daughter's pussy gets wet when she sees sweaty basketball playersComment is buried, click here to see the rest.
clitniblr036Feb 20, 2012
Exactly. She is on them like a white girl on an NBA player.
crymtyphonFeb 20, 2012
That was dull.
Stupid; loathsome and cowardly too, granted.
But mostly dull.
I wonder if anyone ever said that evil was mostly banal and dull?
Meh.