Submitted by
Users who Dugg This
I think I am upnorthgirl
1610 Followers
A Buckigirl
313 Followers
bwiiiFeb 14, 2012
Truth Team today, Stasi tomorrow. The truth will set you free, OR ELSE!
sapana543Feb 14, 2012
Truth team? He could use some truth in his administration. Good thing.
karmashockFeb 15, 2012
... this guy is so orwellian...
austrologiFeb 15, 2012
their office is right across the street from the ministry of plenty
apokalyps2547Feb 13, 2012
Conservatives get all upset when they can't make stuff up with impunity. Let's go through some myths and smears, shall we?
* The whole birther thing, which involves any combination of many lies and falsehoods:
- Obama's Hawaiian CoLB is not legal proof of his place of birth (FALSE)
- Obama isn't a natural-born US citizen because his father wasn't an American citizen (FALSE)
- Obama's Social Security number is fraudulent (FALSE)
- Obama's long-form birth certificate is a fraud (FALSE)
and other variants of these.
* The whole Obama-is-a-secret-Muslim nonsense.
* There was a strange myth a couple years back that Obama was going to ban fishing at many rivers, lakes, and shores. This was 100% fiction.
http://digg.com/news/story/Obama_rules_will_ban_fishing_in_lakes_nations_oceans
* There were quite a few claims in 2008 that Obama was going to pass sweeping anti-gun legislation, including:
- Prosecuting people who use guns in self-defense in their own homes
- Banning the sale of almost all hunting ammunition
- Increases taxes on firearms and ammo by 500%
There were, of course, all FALSE. Unsurprisingly, these same lies are already being repeated for this election season.
* The LIE that Obama used a teleprompter when speaking to a class of 6th graders
http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/photos/6thgrade.asp
* The myth that the KKK endorsed Obama in 2008
These are but a tiny percentage of the myths and lies we've seen in the last few years, each one of them breathlessly repeated by right-wing hacks on digg. THIS is why the Obama campaign has a bunch of people dedicated to clearing stuff like this up: the GOP is a 24/7 smear machine.
concusionFeb 13, 2012
don't forget the death panels and that assh**e Joe Wilson
apokalyps2547Feb 13, 2012
I've gotten as many buries as diggs. I wonder why?
novenatorFeb 14, 2012
Because conservatives hate it when someone actually records their lies and exposes them for what they are: liars. They know you've got them by the balls, so all they can do is bury and run.
FrankLuskaFeb 16, 2012
And the Democrats don't, Both sides cry like a baby. Don't touch me or i'll make a website to let everyone know your touching me.
The Big Government Parties of Babies.
h8f8kesFeb 19, 2012
Sorry Novvy, but you have zero credibility being as everything you have ever written has been fed to you by the 1% who control MMFA. You are simply a tool of the establishment feeding propoganda to the Digg audience to benefit a man like Soros who has collapsed economies for profit. How does it feel knowing that you are his lackey eh?
http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowldc/incest-desk-daily-callers-tucker-carlson-uncovers-media-matters-in-bed-with-white-house-msnbc-and-certain-scribes_b64879
bobcat7407Feb 15, 2012
I dugg you up because you are right on the issues you posted, I much prefer to debate about the facts and I hate it when I get told I believe that garbage and have to defend myself against it. Those issues are trivial and they are what people focus on to distract from the more important issues (both sides do this).
The only one that still is an area of concern to me is the gun control stuff, but that is based on Obama's history before being President and the concern that a second term will give him the ability to follow through with some of his previous thoughts without risk of losing the next election.
isenborgFeb 13, 2012
Now there is a double plus good idea.
karmashockFeb 15, 2012
bingo
He needs to set up a ministry of truth.
exspasticcomicsFeb 13, 2012
Okay- here's the truth...
http://politicalcompass.org/uselection2012
FrankLuskaFeb 16, 2012
Excellent graph.
exspasticcomicsFeb 16, 2012
thanks...
upnorthgirlFeb 13, 2012Submitter
If Colbert has taught us anything, it's how a Super PAc can twist the truth
norman619Feb 13, 2012
And Obama is embracing them. LOL!!!! Oh the hypocrisy....
assassyn360Feb 13, 2012
So if I hit you, you would not retaliate weather through physical force, or legal? He didn't swing first, but he will win the fight.
bluto36Feb 13, 2012
if i spit on you will you spit on me back?
sounds yummy
roddackFeb 13, 2012
Normally you have to pay extra for that
Ouzel7Feb 13, 2012
That was funny. A+ for you.
norman619Feb 13, 2012
LOL!!!
How old are you 10? So it's OK to sell out if the other guy is doing it too? So, as I'm sure your parents ashed you when you were young and stupid, "If the other kids jumped off a cliff would you do it too?"
/face-palmComment is buried, click here to see the rest.
publiclurkerFeb 13, 2012
While cowards like you prefer to attach people who won't defend themselves, the adults know better than to allow lynch mobs like you guys to fester unopposed.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
stevanoskiFeb 13, 2012
You are the prime example of what you just listed.
PyriteGenieFeb 14, 2012
So you're opposed to people like Anonymous, right?
assassyn360Feb 13, 2012
I am 33. And last I checked in my comment history my education exceeds yours by a 4-year degree.
If you recall, you said in response to my, "Go to college" comment, "what for?." I think my financial response was sufficient. So I earn more than you, and exceed your education. Get your weight up, then maybe you can call me stupid high-speed.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
thecashFeb 13, 2012
Yeah, I'd punch you back. I wouldn't, however, go round up a group of mindless thugs to do the hitting for me, while I stood back like a pansy and watched with glee. That's the difference between a man, and a gutless, spineless wonder.
stevanoskiFeb 13, 2012
Ah, the internet tough man
thecashFeb 13, 2012
Ah, the sharp wit of someone who's never thrown a punch in his life.
stevanoskiFeb 13, 2012
Thrown many, have found out in my life that those who talk tough aren't.
ageofmasteryFeb 14, 2012
@stevanoski
I'm sure you've thrown a lot of punches, all of them at women.
FrankLuskaFeb 15, 2012
@ageofmastery, just like a Liberal to say something like that, something so egregious and stupid, nothing to do but act like a child, because that's all you can do.
stevanoskiFeb 15, 2012
projecting again ageo?
truthroxFeb 14, 2012
Obama embraces Super PAC's by necessity, not preference (as most Conservatives do). While you may ignore that distinction, we're all aware that it took SCOTUS Conservative judicial activism to make this circumstance a necessity.
If it rubs you wrong, too bad. Democrat's didn't pour gas on political corruption in this country, Conservative ideologues on the Supreme Court did. They did it under the assumption it would tilt the nation's government squarely in favor of the Conservative movement. It was a political power grab, nothing more.
Of course, they never counted on the fact that corporate money could just as easily be used against their cause as any other. Mitt Romney has proven that fact.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
FrankLuskaFeb 15, 2012
"Democrat's didn't pour gas on political corruption"
That's funny, oh the mighty and moral Liberals, they can do no wrong. Liberal's never lie, hope and change has been done and we just haven't realized it yet? The transparency of the white house has come full force and wall street has given more to the right, oh wait, that's wrong, wall gives more to Liberals, Banks give more to liberals, liberals pushed banks to give loans to people they knew could not afford them.
Oh no, no corruption there.
karmashockFeb 15, 2012
I know... chicago is the most corrupt city in the US... don't believe me, ask the FBI. They're dealing with CONVICTED public officials on a consistent basis from that sewer.
And who runs the place? Democrats.
And where did Obama base his political career? Chicago.
I'm not saying he's corrupt... but he built his career in a cesspit. As evidence, when he left to be president the governor of his state tried to SELL his Senate seat. Who does that?
Welcome to Illinois.
And yet these idiots are so brainwashed that they think their party is pristine? Which party had a congressmen that stored bribe money in his freezer? Again... democrat... again... don't believe me... ask the FBI.
Republicans aren't clean either but we've got nothing on those jackoffs when it comes to being slimy. They take it to the next level.
We're sneaky sometimes... lets call that a survival trait. But we're not convicted as often for being outright crooks.
FrankLuskaFeb 15, 2012
"The Windy City", in many ways.
truthroxFeb 18, 2012
I've never suggested Democrat's were incapable of corruption, but history proves they are far less corrupt than their conservative counterparts. We're reminded of this truth ever day.
I'll simply remind you that Liberal SCOTUS justices opposed the Ctizens United decision which unleashed a tidal wave of corruption, while conservative SCOTUS justices voted in lockstep to enable it. It's a shame historical truth eludes so many conservatives as they shed their "crocodile tears".
assassyn360Feb 13, 2012
For he is a great teacher and wise. He is, the Colbert.
peppermintpigFeb 13, 2012
Why do you need to engage supporters? If your ideas are sound you don't go preaching to the choir, you try to make converts.
As if it needs to be said, this is just more political propaganda.
crom99Feb 13, 2012
He's crowd-sourcing his supporters to fight back against Republican propaganda. True, it could be seen as propaganda since the vast majority of the public has, at best, a fragmented view of the big picture, but that's the world we live in today. He wouldn't need this kind of thing if not for the huge amount of conservative blogs and Fox News, who regurgitate their own form of propaganda constantly.
upnorthgirlFeb 13, 2012Submitter
Very aptly put, crom
njdoo7Feb 13, 2012
Then he should have called it the "Anti-propaganda propaganda team."
Democrat propaganda is not truth.
"Propaganda is a form of communication that is aimed at influencing the attitude of a community toward some cause or position."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda
In this case, Obama's propaganda team (orwellian named the truth team) wants to influence potential voters.
crom99Feb 13, 2012
That anyone thinks this is Orwellian is hilarious. It doesn't matter what he calls it, conservatives will wank.
njdoo7Feb 13, 2012
Your partisan-central universe is the only thing hilarious in this thread. Conveniently, it's also the only thing that doesn't matter.
crom99Feb 13, 2012
Partisan-central? WTF are you on about, man?
njdoo7Feb 13, 2012
Not sure if you meant on or about, as the two words don't fit in your question....but I will assume.
What am I on? Reality
crom99Feb 13, 2012
It's a colloquial saying. I'm surprised you haven't heard it before.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=what%20are%20you%20on%20about%3F
The reality is that there's nothing shady about this initiative. If you have evidence to the contrary, please enlighten us.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
njdoo7Feb 13, 2012
Please cite me saying it was shady?
njdoo7Feb 13, 2012
Partisan-central refers to the divide and rule paradigm you adhere to, creating meaningless conflict along party lines, making it easier for those who control politicians to dominate you.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divide_and_rule
karmashockFeb 15, 2012
I have to wonder if you're actually aware of the book. You seem to be and yet not.
In the book, there was a propaganda organization called the "Ministry of Truth."
For just a moment, take your head out of your ass. I know it's bright out. Just for a minute then you can put your head right back up there. If you start a propaganda division called the "truth team" then your opponent is going to make the Orwell reference. That's just automatic. And you're a fool if you make it that easy. You might as well just put a sign on your face that says "kick me."
What's funny is that his supposedly sophisticated "team" didn't realize how badly that would backfire.
These guys routinely make it very clear that they're if anything only moderately more sophisticated then the average American... which makes them less sophisticated then just about everyone that preceded them for the last 100 years.
Where did he get these clowns? They're some of the most clueless twits I've seen in national politics. I expect this kind of senselessness from local politicians... for small towns. Maybe they'd be clever in a town of 10k when running for the city council. But on the national stage for the president? Hilarious. And he's supposed to be the smart one... *laughs until he cries*
It's funny because you're stupid... it's sad because you've somehow become responsible.
crom99Feb 15, 2012
"It's funny because you're stupid"
Oh yeah, well you're a big poopyhead. Neener.
Grow up, dude.
karmashockFeb 15, 2012
Because adults can't observe that other people are mentally deficient knuckle dragging embarrassments?
Hey, I didn't just call you stupid. I wrote a fairly long argument that concluded that you were stupid.
I didn't say you're wrong because you're dumb. I laid out an argument. I only ended with the "your mother dropped you on the head twenty times too often" remark.
I opened in fact by explaining the reference to Orwell which you seem to not fully understand. And then I explained why Obama's advisers or whatever they're calling themselves made a hilariously stupid mistake. And I just built from there.
You made it way too easy. Are you doing it on purpose?
Is this some kind of hipster thing where you're acting like an idiot but it's just ironic? If so, you got me. I didn't see through your layers of feigned idiocy to the underlying joke.
Yes. I am having fun. Sue me.
stuffradioFeb 13, 2012
Democrats have their own kind of propaganda. Anyone has their own propaganda, it's not just Republicans. Democrats also have their own Agenda just like anyone else.
crom99Feb 13, 2012
Of course they do. This is just a clever way to get his supporters involved in the campaign dialog. What we're seeing in these comments are conservatives who are disgusted or offended or enraged by this because they realize it could help Obama. Anything that could help him stay in office = bad, so they're attacking it. The comparison to Orwell's writing is particularly hilarious.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
h8f8kesFeb 13, 2012
A lot of what those of us not in the unthinking progressive machine is exactly Orwellian:
http://www.orwelltoday.com/truth.shtml
crom99Feb 13, 2012
If Obama were filtering all publications and broadcasts with scrubbed information, there might be some basis for comparison. He isn't, so there's not.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
h8f8kesFeb 13, 2012
@crom99: While the President may not be directly involved, there is mounting evidence that the media (TV & internet) has been manipulated for several years by minions of MMFA and funded by billionairres.
Many here on Digg were angry (rightfully so) over the DP, there are some that are more than happy to turn a blind eye to the exact same type of behavior when it fit their own political POV.
Of course, simply pointing this out will get someone pummeled.
crom99Feb 13, 2012
@h8f8kes:
If/when some shady information comes to light about this particular initiative, I'll be more than happy to jump on the outrage bandwagon. People are jumping the gun on this one.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
Ouzel7Feb 14, 2012
"While the President may not be directly involved..." MSNBC personalities are visiting the White House. There's an office DEDICATED to supporting Obama online. He's involved alright.
treehugger87Feb 13, 2012
If conservative ideas are sound why do you need a giant propaganda network to distribute lies about any idea not your own? Fox news is political propaganda. This is a campaign strategy to make sure the propaganda fails.
h8f8kesFeb 13, 2012
If progressive ideas are sound why do you need a giant propaganda network to distribute lies about any idea not your own? This is a campaign strategy to make sure the propaganda succeeds.
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2010/07/the_unbearable_whiteness_of_be.html
http://dailycaller.com/2012/02/12/inside-media-matters-sources-memos-reveal-erratic-behavior-close-coordination-with-white-house-and-news-organizations/#ixzz1mHsnzD59Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
novenatorFeb 13, 2012
Ironic to try to call out propaganda by citing AmericanThinker, one of the leading right wing corporate propaganda sites on the internet.
h8f8kesFeb 13, 2012
Is the information accurate? Most of your sources are highly biased novvy, but I guess you have to do whatever it takes to pay the bills right?
norman619Feb 13, 2012
Questionable is his thing. :-P
treehugger87Feb 13, 2012
"George Bush is a slightly advanced chimp" is an accurate statement, but clearly neither fair nor honest. That is what American(non)Thinker is full of - highly biased poop stuck to the wall by people who think nobody will notice that it stinks.
You may continue to run around thinking that sources that don't punch a liberal in the nuts at every turn are somehow "biased", but really you should save your comments for free republican where somebody might actually give a s**t about what you have to say.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
h8f8kesFeb 13, 2012
Hey treehugger, how about a website that puches you in the nuts instead.
"Name calling: This techniques consists of attaching a negative label to a person or a thing. People engage in this type of behavior when they are trying to avoid supporting their own opinion with facts. Rather than explain what they believe in, they prefer to try to tear their opponent down." - http://academic.cuesta.edu/acasupp/as/404.htm
treehugger87Feb 14, 2012
Jesus, hater, do you ever read the posts written by conservatives on this Web site? If you're trying to make the claim that Digg conservatives are using propaganda, you're quote couldn't be more perfect.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
Ouzel7Feb 13, 2012
It seems that the one thing this Novenator is, is an EXPERT on propaganda.
PyriteGenieFeb 14, 2012
Otherwise known more politely as "prevarication."
h8f8kesFeb 14, 2012
Actually, I don't think novvy is smart enough. Seems he and his cronies have been recieving their marching orders from their masters at MMFA.
I venture to guess that with 26 buries ot my comment that David Brock (in between bouts of dodging fictional snipers) is going to call the white house to get me arrested under the NDAA.
Funny how he had rightous indignation over the folks in DP, but is part of a much larger progressive bukkake session.
skywiseFeb 14, 2012
Either of you guys find it curious that on the weekend Obama announces his "Ministry of Truth" that the P2BlogBuryBrigade activitity goes from about 100 diggs per progressive story to 300 and the bury brigade increases 10 fold?
dauntless1Feb 14, 2012
@Those above me
Hi guys! I seem to have misplace my tinfoil hat. Can I borrow one of the dozens you have displayed in this thread alone? Also, are we for or against the Illuminati? I need to know who to root for.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
miklkitFeb 13, 2012
What lies? Do you mean the CBO saying that the stimulus saved jobs? That is the truth you know.
http://www.politicsplus.org/blog/2011/08/31/cbothe-stimulus-saved-jobs/
treehugger87Feb 13, 2012
OMG, there are journalists who don't just do what Murdoch says they should do!
It's about the LYING, stupid.
h8f8kesFeb 13, 2012
OMG!!! There are journolists who don't just do what Soros says they should do!
http://academic.cuesta.edu/acasupp/as/404.htm
FrankLuskaFeb 15, 2012
They sure didn't want to see that.
ybevar1Feb 13, 2012
I can ask you the same thing. See MSNBC, CNN, CBS and ABC.
stuffradioFeb 13, 2012
Democrats have their own giant propaganda network such as MSNBC.
h8f8kesFeb 14, 2012
And MMFA, WaPo, Huffpo, Politicsusa and every blogger out there. Turns out they all pretty much serve the same masters and parrot the same line.
http://www.buzzfeed.com/buzzfeedpolitics/media-matters-war-on-fox-memo
norman619Feb 13, 2012
Brainwashing needs constant maintenance. You know that!
publiclurkerFeb 13, 2012
Says the ignorant bagger who apparently left his brain in the spin cycle for way too long.
norman619Feb 13, 2012
Nice to see the brainwashing took hold well with you.
PyriteGenieFeb 14, 2012
That wash resulted in a half-pair of socks.
h8f8kesFeb 19, 2012
One of those socks was in protective custody.
music2play1Feb 13, 2012
Why do you need to engage supporters? Seriously? Have you never heard of swinging to, activating, or otherwise riling up your base? It's kind of the basic tactic behind political campaigning...Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
peppermintpigFeb 14, 2012
With a "truth team"?
music2play1Feb 14, 2012
Well... When all you encounter from the opposition is lies and slander... and quite frankly, he's only tapping in to what his supporters try to do on their own already. We've been doing it for years, he just put a name on it and is going to capitalize on its already existing strength..Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
h8f8kesFeb 14, 2012
Or use slander to shut up opponents:
http://www.buzzfeed.com/buzzfeedpolitics/media-matters-war-on-fox-memo
peppermintpigFeb 14, 2012
Disliking statist left doesn't make you statist right and vice versa. Marginalizing people who oppose by generalization Is an act of misinformation.
skywiseFeb 13, 2012
So Obama finally got around to creating his Ministry of Truth...
Good for him.
PyriteGenieFeb 14, 2012
"That trick never works." -- Rocket J. Squirrel
heathermgilbertFeb 13, 2012
ATTAAAAAACK WAAAAAAATCH 2.0
u2canfailFeb 13, 2012
http://factcheck.org/hot-topics/
Note the number of Obama questions that are just false rumors, dear.
crunchdiggFeb 14, 2012
it's clear there are professionals being paid to crank out false rumors.
CalTjaderFeb 13, 2012
TEAM NEWSPEAK
barackalypseFeb 14, 2012
America has always been at war with Afghanistan.
ferretmanFeb 14, 2012
Interesting.
Woodrow Wilson did this with his "4 Minute Men", who were trained to show up at public locations,meetings, etc. and give 4-minute speeches expounding on how wonderful he was.
They weren't persuasive either. We now call such efforts "propaganda".
barackalypseFeb 14, 2012
Go figure, another Nobel Peace prize winning progressive with the same ideas, just 90 years sooner. Though I guess in Wilson's defense the war he got us into actually had some good reason for American involvement and he never ordered an American citizen assassinated without a trial.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
barackalypseFeb 13, 2012
How much do I get for ratting out my family and neighbors?
bluto36Feb 13, 2012
double plus point of course
PyriteGenieFeb 14, 2012
Whoa, whoa, whoa there! Don't go making any official calls until you get your official brown shirt to identify you as a bona fide member of the Ministry of Truth!
kcast985Feb 14, 2012
lol I guess the economy being basically dead still is going to be one of the lies that the truth team MUST destroy. His assault on the constitution will be 2nd.
odkinFeb 13, 2012
Are they all outfitted in union-made brown shirts?
ghengiskhan1Feb 13, 2012
If Obama had a decent record of success instead of a long history of failure he wouldnt need these fake "truth teams" to defend him.
This is pure propaganda. There are propaganda teams. Nothing more. Nothing less.
How will these truth teams spin the truth about the trillion dollar per year budget deficits under Obama? How about his 1.3 trillion dollar deficit budget he just submitted to congress? How about the additional 4-5 trillion dollars in debt we have now? How about the forclosures? The bank bail outs? The illegal wars? The patriot act being renewed? How will he spin all the expansion of the police state? The high unemployement rate?
This dude is an epic failure and he NEEDS propaganda teams to lie to you so youll vote for him again so he can continue to be an epic failure. Why would you vote for someone with a history of failure like this? It makes you a loser too.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
u2canfailFeb 13, 2012
Because of this kind of GOP chain letter crap:
http://factcheck.org/hot-topics/
ghengiskhan1Feb 13, 2012
LOL. Really? Those topics are so insignificant.
Sure, there are PLENTY of lies said about Obama. They are just outright lies.
The significant issues, however, are not mentioned in your link. The significant issues that matter to people when they vote are not mentioned in your link. A counter to any of the questions I posed in my first comment are no where to be found in your link. Strange.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
monkeywithgunFeb 13, 2012
"Sure, there are PLENTY of lies said about Obama. They are just outright lies."
Like the ones you just slipped in. Who bailed out the banks? Who started the illegal wars?
randomfaceFeb 13, 2012
I wouldn't bring up illegal wars considering what went on with Libya.
Ouzel7Feb 13, 2012
It looks like it's going to be Syria, too, soon.
truthroxFeb 13, 2012
What's "illegal" about bringing long overdue justice to a dictator with American blood on his hands?
The beauty of that intervention is that we simply empowered Libyan's so they could fight on a level battlefield which had once been tilted against them. Qaddafi's death was a consequence of his actions against the Libyan people, not ours alone.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
h8f8kesFeb 14, 2012
@truthdox: That asshat cheney used that same argument. At what point do we stop bombing others to enhance BP's bottom line?
peppermintpigFeb 14, 2012
Obama has been party to bailouts by voting in the affirmative as a senator.
treehugger87Feb 13, 2012
If the Right would not resort to propaganda, there would be no need for organizing supporters to call out the lies.
I think there is a more than fair argument that the deficit was the fault of the Bush administration's failed economic policies that also led to massive foreclosures (including billions of dollars of illegal and overly aggressive foreclosures) and the bank bailouts. You can argue that Obama's military interventions were illegal wars, but the Authorization for Use of Military Force of September 11, 2001 says otherwise.
The Patriot Act being renewed is pretty unforgivable. Too bad the track record of all of the Republican candidates (except Ron Paul) is that they support the Patriot Act.
You have some balls using "epic failure" on Obama after the 8 years the rest of us spent making the case for what an epic failure Bush was, and begging you not to vote for him.
Here's what I'm begging for this time. Attack Obama on the things he's actually done. There is plenty there. There is plenty of room for us all to agree (the Patriot Act, for one) and make a real difference. If all we do is bicker, we all lose.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
ghengiskhan1Feb 13, 2012
Whoa whoa whoa there sparky. I never voted for Bush so I would agree with your assessments of him and your criticizims of him.
I agree with you. We should always stick to facts when discussing policy. Any "attacks" on Obama should be about his recorded record (period). Leave the birth certificate muslim mancurian candidate bulls**t alone.
This is my problem: As bad as Obama has been. As bad as Bush was. I do not seeing us replacing Obama with anyone any better. That just f@#king SUCKS! That this is the best we can do. It infuriates me that we have such incompetence and corruption in positions of power and waiting to take those positions of power.
treehugger87Feb 13, 2012
I was about to go into a rant about your being yet another Digg Conservative claiming that they never voted for Bush, but I remember you're not exactly popular with that crowd, too, so I believe you.
I couldn't agree more that this country is in terrible shape in terms of corruption. The only candidates we are going to be allowed to vote on are guaranteed to suck ass because they've spent so much time kissing ass to the corporations.
ghengiskhan1Feb 13, 2012
Pretty much, yep. Sucks to be us.
partrowFeb 13, 2012
"I was about to go into a rant about your being yet another Digg Conservative . . ."
Because that is your and others' typical kneejerk liberal reaction. Did you have the text prewritten from long ago so you could just copy and paste?
h8f8kesFeb 14, 2012
Ridicule is man's most potent weapon. It is almost impossible to counteract ridicule. Also it infuriates the opposition, which then reacts to your advantage." ~ Alinsky
treehugger87Feb 14, 2012
You guys are the ones who bitch about the deficits day in and day out while completely ignoring the fact that it was the conservative President who got us into the mess in the first place.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
miklkitFeb 13, 2012
You want the truth? You can't handle the truth.
What have the republicons done in the last 400+ days? They have created not one single job.
http://digg.com/newsbar/topnews/in_400_days_the_gop_has_created_0_and_tried_to_kill_7_4_million_jobsComment is buried, click here to see the rest.
ghengiskhan1Feb 13, 2012
Its a very poor state of affairs when the best you can do (not you specifically, but Obama--the guy youre defending) is claim that you do not suck quite as bad as the opposition. Isnt that awful?
That seems to be Obama's strategy: I dont suck as much as the republicans do. He might even be right. But does it help to not suck as much as the group that really sucks? No, it does not help. We need leadership that doesnt suck! Dare we hope for some leadership that is not even on the side of sucking but is actually on the side of competence?
PyriteGenieFeb 14, 2012
Nor should they. It's not their job to do so.
treehugger87Feb 14, 2012
Funny. I thought that's what they ran on in 2010 - a promise to create jobs. It will be good to be rid of the empty suits with their failed promises. 2013 is going to be a good year (for you, but you're still going to spend your time complaining).Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
FrankLuskaFeb 15, 2012
Yes, promise this, promise that, from both sides, the fact remains, their job is to protect jobs, not give them away with failed trade agreements, with destructive regulation, with failing infrastructure, etc..
This shows you where both major parties stand, and it's not with America or the people.
When people stop listening to what either side is going to do for THEM, and are more concerned with what is best for all of us, nothing will change. Obama, Romney, Sanitarium, etc aren't going to do a damn thing for us. There are people who care, these people will never be elected because neither side gives a damn about anything but themselves, America will have to self destruct before people wake up. History proves this correct, but it will probably be to late.
ferretmanFeb 14, 2012
@mik - ....and the Dems have not passed a single budget.
Wonder which is more irresponsible? The failure that isn't actually a *task* delegated to Congress in the Constitution, or the one that IS?
statetheobviousFeb 14, 2012
So, when Obama says he is going to close Gitmo, will they call him a f**king liar?
When Obama says he won't hire lobbyists will they call him a f**king liar?
When Obama says he will cut the deficit in half in 4 years, will they call him a f**king liar?
When Obama says he won't raise ANY taxes on people making less than $250,000 will they call him a f**king liar?
No? None of that? Then that's not a 'truth team'. They are just f**king liars themselves.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
evildeadashFeb 14, 2012
Paradox: Similar to circular reasoning, a paradox is a logical statement or group of statements that lead to a contradiction or a situation which (if true) defies logic or reason. Typically, however, quoted paradoxical statements do not imply a real contradiction and the puzzling results can be rectified by demonstrating that one or more of the premises themselves are not really true, a play on words, faulty and/or cannot all be true together. But many paradoxes, such as Curry's paradox, do not yet have universally accepted resolutions. The word paradox is often used interchangeably with contradiction.
elitebmoFeb 13, 2012
Truth Team or Secret Police? YOU DECIDE!
stevanoskiFeb 13, 2012
As Obama pursues his Dictators hp you could well be right.
norman619Feb 13, 2012
"Obama campaign launches "Spin Team" -
Fixed
njdoo7Feb 13, 2012
That's not Orwellian enough for me!
I personally think they should have called it the "anti-propaganda propaganda team"
You cant really get more Orwellian than that.
njdoo7Feb 13, 2012
Never mind, "truth team" is pretty Orwellian, more so than my example.
h8f8kesFeb 13, 2012
Truthspeak now that the collusion in between MMFA and certain websites is compromised?
http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowldc/incest-desk-daily-callers-tucker-carlson-uncovers-media-matters-in-bed-with-white-house-msnbc-and-certain-scribes_b64879Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
h8f8kesFeb 19, 2012
Massively buried without comment. Good thing I have an alias or the brown shirts, er I mean truth team, would show up at the door and give me a gold star to wear.
ybevar1Feb 13, 2012
This is the start of what will be a ruthless attack campaign on any republican who has a chance to beat him.
Pres. Obama - please defend your record and tell me exactly how the policies you have put in place in the last 3 years make me better off. Oh wait... You can't b/c your record stinks and you have inflated our debt by an additional $6 Trillion.
Thanks.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
skews13Feb 13, 2012
He can't run on his record? LMFAO. Is that the newest bullsit talkingpoint you losers are using now? He can absolutely run on his record, and a successful one it is. Republicans on the otherhand with a record of now doing nothing for 3 years, and with a Congress polling at 9%, the same career Republicans that supported the failed policies that brought us the great recession, can do nothing but run from their's. They've now been reduced to pushing the same failed social agenda that even Republican women in the party are running away from. Here's a clue for you: Try a narrative of normalcy.
ybevar1Feb 13, 2012
I am the one LMFAOing right now. Good record??
You guys rail Bush for adding so much to the debt but can't criticize Obama for adding more than bush in less than one term.
Thank God for the Republicans in congress, remember how they wiped the floors with the Democrats in 2010? I smell a repeat for this Fall.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
skews13Feb 13, 2012
I'm glad you will always have the memory of the 2010 elections. Hold on to them tight now. It's all you're going to have after November.
ybevar1Feb 13, 2012
I will be one of the millions who voted for Obama in 2008 that will vote against him in 2012.
Obama and his cronies can defame the GOP nominee all they want, but the American people will not be stupid enough to vote for a President that runs away from his record in office.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
concusionFeb 13, 2012
brilliant strategy ybevar, the steak was a little over done, so go plunk yourself a turd from the toilet because you were disappointed.
ghengiskhan1Feb 13, 2012
You will not be alone in your abandonment of Obama. Intellectually honest people cannot continue to vote for this loser and failure. The problem is, intellectually honest people cant vote for a republican either.
Its really terrible how the game is rigged that way.
peppermintpigFeb 14, 2012
concusion is demonstrating how you electrify your support base.
PyriteGenieFeb 14, 2012
Bookmarked for January 2013 fun and frolics.
music2play1Feb 13, 2012
Dem's Lampoon Bush for adding to the debt with things like tax cuts for the wealthy, who don't deserve or need them. Endless funding for 2 directionless illegal invasions, and excessive military spending.
Not for things like fixing our health care system and attempting to invest in infrastructure and green energy like President Obama has done.
Butter > Guns
ybevar1Feb 13, 2012
infrastructure and green energy is not for the federal gov't to get involved in. The constitution does not give the gov't that power.
Solyndra and Fisker Automotive turned out real well...Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
mikelanghorstFeb 13, 2012
If not the govt, then who. Who invested to create the internet? Oh yea DARPA
concusionFeb 13, 2012
If every investment was won you're name would be bernie madoff. Get real dummy.
ybevar1Feb 13, 2012
@concusion
First of all, I expect the geniuses in DC not to invest in a company that buys expensive talking robots with a gov't loan.
That is not the issue though. The issue is should the gov't be giving TAXPAYER money to private industry? If you believe in the constitution that made this nation great, the answer is no.
I am sick and tired of government taxing the hell out of me for programs I will never benefit from (SS and medicare) and using my hard earned money to invest in failing companies and infrastructure in states I don't live in.
peppermintpigFeb 14, 2012
Arguments like this...
"Because if the government never does it, nobody will have the incentive to do so."
Make a lot of assumptions about a fictional entity and pretend that people who call themselves government are not also human beings. Somehow it's acceptable to forcibly take people's money when people calling themselves government say that the government says it should be done.
music2play1Feb 13, 2012
the point is, ybevar1, even if you aren't driving on the roads that are being repaired, the goods you consume are travelling on them. Social Security is money that gets fed directly back in to our economy through property rentals, services paid for and the money that gets paid to health services workers. Medicare protects everyone, a healthier America is better for everyone, period. (We are the only f**king industrialized nation in the world who hasn't figured this one out yet...)
If you are mad about investments, why not end useless and detrimental agriculture subsidies that only benefit a handful of mega corporations?
The point is, when the country is doing well as a whole, we all do better individually. Investments in infrastructure and health benefit everyone. In case your shallow world view hasn't quite computed this yet, it's all connected.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
FrankLuskaFeb 15, 2012
And we also haven't figured out yet that we run a loss on Medicare, SS is so far behind inflation it may never catch up, and other countries run a sovereign wealth fund to negate inflation and some actually make a profit for their retirees. We are indeed behind the times.
We all know why subsidies are not done away with, people would throw a fit for having to pay 6 - 7 dollars a gallon for gas and 30 - 40% more for food, plus, you can't trust the government to stop taking that money in taxes. They would want to keep the money to spend on other wasteful things.
Infrastructure indeed is in a sorry state, with thousands and thousands of bridges needing replacement, roads needing maintenance and new ones need building.
Just look at Oklahoma, when they spent a massive amount on infrastructure, they reaped the benefits for years. When they stopped spending on these projects, their economy went down the tubes with it.
The single best and most cost saving thing we could do for health care, is to stop eating crap food, I went to Walmart yesterday to get some popcorn, something i don't normally do, but well over 80% of the people in there were severely overweight. Most women weighing well over 200 Lbs, some may have weighted 250+. We are what we eat.
music2play1Feb 13, 2012
Here's his record; Bitch.
http://whatthef**khasobamadonesofar.com/
http://www.barackobama.com/
On the above, scroll to the bottom on the left and find a topic under "Obama's Record" Seems fairly substantial to me...
treehugger87Feb 13, 2012
I'll take Obama's record over the bulls**t talking point that Obama has to defend his record. The ones who need to defend their records are the obstructionist Congressional Republicans who are going to get voted out this election.
ybevar1Feb 13, 2012
HAHAHA, so this is the first election in US history where the President gets a pass on his record...
Obama and his administration get credit for killing Bin Laden and giving us 8.3% unemployment, but its not their fault they added 6 Trillion to the debt in less than one term or that the housing market hasn't made the slightest bit of a recovery under his administration. Soon you will figure out a way to blame fast and furious on someone else too.
At what point can you and your hyper-partisan friends start to see anything as Obama's fault? 3 years clearly isn't enough, please enlighten me.
A vote for Obama in 2012 is a vote for more debt and more government involvement in everyday life. Take the rest of your treehugger buddies to Scandinavia and have your socialism there.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
treehugger87Feb 13, 2012
Obama's record is not what you think it is. I think Obama has plenty of faults, but the stuff that you are angry about is ALL the fault of the previous president and obstructionists in the Congress.
Take the rest of your small government ideologues and move to Somalia - it's EXACTLY what you've been dreaming of.
ybevar1Feb 13, 2012
The only place I dream of is America the way it is meant to be governed - with as little federal gov't involvement as possible.
It is really amazing Obama taught the constitution years ago, he really has no understanding of what powers the federal gov't has.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
eraptorFeb 13, 2012
If this is your vision for America, then you're tragically delusional. Chinese/Indian/Brazilian SOE's (aka State Ownd Enterprises) are killing the U.S. on trade and it's NOT because they are economically "superior".
While people, like you, insist we abandon our trade protections, you ignore the existence of trade protections and predatory business practices by U.S. trading "partners". The result? A SIGNIFICANT deterioration of U.S. economic strength/vitality AND our quality of life.
STOP attacking your fellow Americans and aim your rhetorical "guns" at the nation's REAL adversaries/enemies...GLOBAL TRADING "partners" who cheat to win the ongoing trade "competition".
ybevar1Feb 13, 2012
@eraptor
Those countries are by no means economically superior, they manipulate their currencies and have a lower standard of living, which makes it cheaper to do business there.
I am afraid unless corporate taxes are lowered and unions loosen their grip a little bit, manufacturing is dead in this country.
I work for a importer of textiles. Dalton, GA was the textile manufacturing capital of the world at one point. Today there are empty factories and rampant unemployment. If my company decided to continue producing goods there, we would have been out of business a long time ago.
The CEO at my company has said that union labor there is far too costly and the corporate tax rate is too high to even consider producing goods there anymore.
At the end of the day, we cannot dictate the way other countries govern themselves or tell them what their minimum wages shoud be.
The only thing the US can do is make it easier for us to compete on a global scale, and I don't think this administration or the one before it have done nearly enough to make the business climate here more favorable than abroad. I would LOVE to see a one time tax 'holiday' for companies to re-patriate their assets abroad.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
treehugger87Feb 13, 2012
Somalia has "as little federal gov't involvement as possible", which means that warlords and their small armies control certain territories and the people are about as free as fish caught in a net.
ybevar1Feb 13, 2012
@treehugger87
Once again a liberal takes something to the complete extreme. Saying Somalia is a good place to go to if you want little gov't involvement really shows you have confidence in our states to govern themselves as the constitution outlines.
The states are free to establish whatever kind of health care system, education system, welfare system etc. as they want. If the federal gov't would step away, the states would have the power to better serve the people.
Federal gov't solutions are one size fits all remedies that usually do not work.
concusionFeb 13, 2012
states rights were important back when the constitution was written because people were traveling on horses. Please explain to me why you conservatives hate the federal government but love the state government!! wooo state government!! states rights!! so a lunatic fringe states like texas and arizona can teach their children the earth was created in 7 days and bring up a legion of dumb s**ts, who just repeat what the person before them said, and never bother to think for themselves.
ybevar1Feb 13, 2012
@concusion
It is quite simple why conservatives are for states' rights.
Because Washington DC does not know what my needs are. They should be busy worrying about national security, currencies, foreign affairs etc.
This country was built on states' rights b/c every state would be different. I am better represented on a state level than I am at a federal level. My governor knows what the people in my own state want and need, the President does not.
This is a government for the people, and this rampant federal involvement does not represent the people best.
eraptorFeb 13, 2012
@ybevar1,
I'm familar with the manufacturing devastation you're describing. I experienced it through numerous family members and friends who were impacted directly when the textile industry in North Carolina collapsed.
It appears you recognize the same predatory trade practices I do. However, we differ on what has caused the problem.
Our business/economic troubles AREN'T created by high corporate taxes OR unions. Evidence of this may is found in the fact that MOST corporations don't pay statutory tax rates. They pay FAR less than stautory rates. Hell, most of them pay no federal taxes at all.
As for the impact of unions, private sector unions are a mere shadow of their former selves and haven't existed in the textile industry for DECADES. That's why the textile industry relocated from the Northeast to the South (i.e., to pay nonunion wages). You should know, CEO's always complain about unions because it's the only element of society/business capable of ensuring workers are paid and treated fairly (they have a direct conflict of interest on the subject). The significant gap in U.S. wealth disparity would NOT have been possible without devastating the union movement first. While I recognize that some unions have overstepped their bounds in the past, so TOO have executives. Take a good look at the growth of their pay packages over the past 30 years if you don't believe me. There's NO way in Hell that today's executives are worth THAT much more than the executives who founded and built most of the U.S. corporate world.
The cost advantages foreign competitors currently enjoy is DIRECTLY linked to SIGNIFICANT subsidies FROM their governments in addition to currency manipulation, lower cost of living, local ownership requirements, intellectual proiperty theft/reverse engineering and ongoing trade protections in THEIR countries.
The solution to the problems we are discussing is NOT another tax holiday/repatriation exercise. The solution lies in reforming our tax AND trade laws so companies are prohibitd from gaming countries/markets/workers against one another. It's time to restore tariffs so we can EQUALIZE market differentials and RESTORE FAIR TRADE. It's the common sense solution.
Respectfully, if we adopted the solution your CEO favors, it would only prove to be a short-term bandaid that would fix NOTHING but HIS bottom line/incentive. It would do absolutely NOTHING for the country OR you.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
ybevar1Feb 13, 2012
@eraptor
Your assertion that most corporations pay little to no income tax is correct for the largest companies out there. A company like mine which is family owned and employs under 100 people does not have that luxury. We pay the full amount (around 39%).
I can tell you that profits we make abroad would be disastrous to re-patriate.
Sometimes liberals have trouble drawing the line between massive corporations and small to medium sized businesses. It is small business that employs 70% of the nation's workforce.
corporations can handle themselves, some have acquired insane amounts of wealth. Small business however, is severely hurting in this country.
eraptorFeb 13, 2012
@ybevar1,
Here's some well written "food for thought" on the subject at hand:
WSJ article on SOE’s (Feb. 3rd, 2012)
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204662204577198833989249406.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_RIGHTTopCarousel_2
NYT article on Apple’s manufacturing process:
(note: pay particular attention to the portion which discusses glass manufacturing and the Chinese government subsidies which made that Chinese plant possible).
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/46091572/ns/business-us_business/#.TxxxaRzQuEM
In addition to this material, consider the fact that China dedicates 9% of it's GDP to it's infrastructure while the U.S. dedicates less than 2%. Conservatives are determined to reduce that 2% investment even further.
Now, I don't know about you, but I recognize an economic disaster in the making. It's why I fight "tooth and nail" against the economically destructive agenda currently championed by U.S. conservatives. This country and our children/grandchildren deserve FAR more than THAT from elected officials or ANY political movement for that matter.
eraptorFeb 13, 2012
@ybevar1,
First, you need to know I'm a politically independent capitalist. When I take issue with anything, more often than not it's on solid economic/financial grounds. I've always found political ideology to be a dangerous distraction from economic common sense.
Second, small business interests in the U.S. aren't hamstrung by government, they are hamstrung by anti-competitive regulations/policies legislators insert at the behest of large corporations. Large corporations don't want small businesses to become a competitive threat and they pull out all of the stops to prevent it. If you think the U.S. Chamber of Commerce represents "your" interests in DC, I've got some (underwater) land for sale in Florida. How do I know this? I've seen how DC operates behind the "curtains of power".
Third, I seriously doubt your company's effective tax rate is 39%. For 2012, the top indivdual tax rate is 35% (for income in excess of $388,350 ONLY). The corporate tax rate varies depending upon income with the top tax rate at 35% (note: 39% ONLY applies to corporate taxable income BETWEEN $100,000 and $335,000, then drops below that rate before AND after that "cresting" point).
The rates I just quoted are STATUTORY only. EFFECTIVE tax rates are what one ACTUALLY pays after considering tax deductions, credits and beneficial tax treatment (i.e., offshoring profits). You've indicated that your "small business" employer offshores it's profits. This means it is paying a MUCH lower effective tax rate than you assume. Take it from someone who is more than a little familiar with the tax games involved.
Finally, think hard before you jump on the conservative bandwagon. Obama has done FAR more for small business interests in the U.S. than conservatives have. He has attempted to ease capital access (i.e., small business lending bill), lowered their tax burdens and eliminated regulations where it makes sense. Contrast that with Congressional Conservatives who have stonewalled every effort he's made on behalf of small business. Hmm...I wonder why? Could it be they ONLY represent the interests of MAJOR corporations? In a word...YES!!!!! Don't take my word for it, look at nonpartisan news accounts on the subject and the Congressional record of proposed legislation over the past 3 years.
OPEN your eyes and ears! Political action is ALWAYS a more accurate reflection of whether any politician represents your interests or not. Conservative media is paid to deceive and manipulate the electorate, nothing more. Rupert Murdoch has admitted as much over a "hot mic".Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
FrankLuskaFeb 16, 2012
@ eraptor, He might stop if you will acknowledge that both parties are to blame, that your party is not morally, ethically superior to anyone else, as you say, STOP attacking your fellow Americans and aim your rhetorical comments at those who are in and have been in power. The two major parties.
bluto36Feb 13, 2012
it is ALL their Fault
ALL their Fault
all of it their fault
none of it Obamas fault, none of it.
FRANKLIN RAINES?
Raines works for the Obama Campaign as his Chief Economic Advisor.
TIM HOWARD?
Howard is a Chief Economic Advisor to Obama under Franklin Raines.
JIM JOHNSON?
Johnson was hired as a Senior Obama Finance Advisor and was selected to run Obama's Vice Presidential Search Committee.
none of it is Obama's faultComment is buried, click here to see the rest.
miklkitFeb 13, 2012
This is the pile of crap that got dumped in Obama's lap by you cons. This is your legacy.
http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-the-day-bush-policies-deficits-2010-6Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
bluto36Feb 13, 2012
here is some truth;
Franklin Raines - was a Chairman and Chief Executive Officer at Fannie Mae. Raines was forced to retire from his position with Fannie Mae when auditing discovered severe irregularities in Fannie Mae's accounting activities. Raines left with a "golden parachute valued at $240 Million in benefits. The Government filed suit against Raines when the depth of the accounting scandal became clear.
Tim Howard - was the Chief Financial Officer of Fannie Mae. Howard "was a strong internal proponent of using accounting strategies that would ensure a "stable pattern of earnings" at Fannie. Investigations by federal regulators and the company's board of directors since concluded that management did manipulate 1998 earnings to trigger bonuses. Raines and Howard resigned under pressure in late 2004. Howard's Golden Parachute was estimated at $20 Million!
Jim Johnson - A former executive at Lehman Brothers and who was later forced from his position as Fannie Mae CEO. Investigators found that Fannie Mae had hidden a substantial amount of Johnson's 1998 compensation from the public, reporting that it was between $6 million and $7 million when it fact it was $21 million." Johnson is currently under investigation for taking illegal loans from Countrywide while serving as CEO of Fannie Mae. Johnson's Golden Parachute was estimated at $28 Million.
0bama in bed with the criminals responsible for this mess and rewarding them
FrankLuskaFeb 15, 2012
Blaming one side for what both sides do will never get you brownie points except from the ones who fail to look at ALL the causes.
Worked great so far?
atomheartmotherFeb 13, 2012
Anyone recall the "Ministry of Truth" in Orwell's 1984? Yeah, me too.
BTW, what happened to AttackWatch?
publiclurkerFeb 13, 2012
They are still keeping an eye on the likes of you, so better stay under your rock kid.
atomheartmotherFeb 13, 2012
Well aren't you the good little boot-licking totalitarian drone.
stevanoskiFeb 13, 2012
HE IS!
bluto36Feb 13, 2012
oh publictard has his place assured in the new people's palace
stevanoskiFeb 13, 2012
Ah, the guards "little" friend.
h8f8kesFeb 13, 2012
Intimidation? Are you a member of the thought police lurker? The name fits.
atomheartmotherFeb 13, 2012
I'm sure he'd like to be, but even Plouffe would never hire such a blithering idiot.
barackalypseFeb 13, 2012
Its still there and part of their three part strategy. AttackWatch defends the President against "false attacks", another site examines claims Republicans make about their own records, and the third cheer-leads all the things Obama has done.
atomheartmotherFeb 13, 2012
Oh I see...well s**t, it beats actually governing.
icwydFeb 13, 2012
Yeah, I know! We used to have a free press that was capable of doing this but since laws that have been made, over the last 30+ years, that has completely been broken so I can see why someone would do something about getting the truth out there. Can't just count on Comedy Central to do that.
bluto36Feb 13, 2012
well they thought they could count of Comedy Central but then they realized Tosh.0 and SouthPark get more viewers then the Daily show
Ouzel7Feb 13, 2012
America made such a mockery of Attack Watch ... recognizing that it WAS Orwellian that it seems they are going to re-label it something else and hope we didn't notice.
bluto36Feb 13, 2012
they have such a good peice of 0bama protection ready to roll it would just be such a shame not to unleash it on regular everyday Americans.
icwydFeb 13, 2012
"re-label it something else and hope we didn't notice"
Bwhahahahahahaha!
Ouzel7Feb 14, 2012
Have a party. The rest of America thinks you are creepy.
icwydFeb 14, 2012
You of all people talking about re-labeling something. Wow Quirk, I should know how dense you can be. Thought maybe you found a brain somewhere while you were gone.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
Ouzel7Feb 14, 2012
This Quirk person must have been AMAZING! People seem pre-occupied thinking this person has reappeared.
How many posters have been called Quirk now? I know Twinkly Jesus and some others have been labeled 'Quirk."
It seems like a legacy.
icwydFeb 14, 2012
No, just a turd that can't be polished. Was ALWAYS capitalizing WORDS. Really ANNOYING person, you were/are.
PyriteGenieFeb 14, 2012
Ouzel: You don't hit the big time until they think you're Mollydog.
icwydFeb 14, 2012
I almost forgot about the really big nose. God it's huge!
atomheartmotherFeb 14, 2012
It's time for your graham crackers & nap, icwyd.
KapsiotFeb 13, 2012
The liar in chief launces a "truth team" - ha!
stevanoskiFeb 13, 2012
LOL, what is this the 4th attempt at controlling the media?
treehugger87Feb 13, 2012
Fighting back against LIES as a campaign strategy is not an attempt to control the media.
bluto36Feb 13, 2012
hahahaha
ya sure and Joseph Goebbels was fighting the lie
nice one
elitebmoFeb 13, 2012
hey true story, the media is owned by like 5 people.
rudegarFeb 14, 2012
but he's still a shape-shifting lizard right ?
http://www.security-faqs.com/are-the-british-royal-family-shapeshifting-lizards-stop-sgentlemening-at-the-back.htmlComment is buried, click here to see the rest.
deborahdianeFeb 15, 2012
Its about time. I'm getting a little tired of those old, rehashed emails that keep going around claiming that Obama didn't exist until 10 years ago, he doesn't have a passport, he's a secret Muslim, etc. Idiots! They are all idiots!
h8f8kesFeb 19, 2012
Please stop sending those e-mails. They are getting in the way of the Cialis spam. Thanks.
miklkitFeb 13, 2012
This is an old site. He has done a lot more lately.
http://whatthef**khasobamadonesofar.com/
What have the disloyal opposition done?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/28/AR2010092806143.htmlComment is buried, click here to see the rest.
bluto36Feb 13, 2012
AttackWatch.org!!!!!!
sick the bad boys on em!!!
stevanoskiFeb 13, 2012
again?
publiclurkerFeb 13, 2012
Must suck to always have your betters on your ass there, boy.
stevanoskiFeb 13, 2012
? "...on my ass.." Why you always concerned about my "nuts" and my "ass"? Sigh, again the stalking has commenced. I'm not turned that way pubi, not that there is anything wrong with your lifestyle choices, just don't expect to include me in them.
Ouzel7Feb 13, 2012
he lurks in yer pubes
FrankLuskaFeb 15, 2012
Maybe he is in with giai242, they both seem to like those things, maybe they are just trying to turn people their way.
miklkitFeb 13, 2012
Here is what you have done in the meantime. Zero jobs for you.
http://digg.com/newsbar/topnews/in_400_days_the_gop_has_created_0_and_tried_to_kill_7_4_million_jobsComment is buried, click here to see the rest.
chassupFeb 13, 2012
The English translation of the Kenyan word "truth" is "lie."
deborahdianeFeb 15, 2012
Its about time. I'm getting a little tired of those old, rehashed emails that keep going around claiming that Obama didn't exist until 10 years ago, he doesn't have a passport, he's a secret Muslim, etc. Idiots! They are all idiots!Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
deborahdianeFeb 15, 2012
Its about time. I'm getting a little tired of those old, rehashed emails that keep going around claiming that Obama didn't exist until 10 years ago, he doesn't have a passport, he's a secret Muslim, etc. Idiots! They are all idiots!Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.