Submitted by
Users who Dugg This
FesteringStump
147 Followers
NewsMeBack
6467 Followers
ONOLAST CARD
3682 Followers
Thomas Hogan
3 Followers
Jan in Colorado
7723 Followers
liscombcJun 23, 2011
And so it begins.
thickapeJun 23, 2011
I plan to boycott all chesse and raspbery danishes and burn all of my copies of Hamlet.
rudegarJun 23, 2011
I think Holland, France and Italy are more known for cheese then Denmark is
and Hamlet is about as danish as Mars attacks is Martian :P
thickapeJun 23, 2011
Thank you for your reply. You may be right. Cheese Danish is what I meant to convey and not cheese as a general category of foodstuff. I cannot say I have ever seen a Danish Cheese. I was referring to Shakespeare's play "Hamlet". Hamlet was the Prince of Denmark in the play. The play takes place in Denmark. Most of the characters are Danes. One of the famous quotes from the play is, "Something is rotten in the state of Denmark." Perhaps you are thinking of a different Hamlet of which I am ignorant.
RalphusOneJun 23, 2011
Absurd, fearful, fascist approach. "Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." BF
templedogJun 23, 2011
Harry's police proposal: Force Danish police to eat a bucket of donkey dicks, stream event on Internet.
JonathonFishenatorJun 23, 2011
First the drug reversal, and now this? NOTE TO SELF: Do not go to Demark.
rudegarJun 23, 2011
I'm danish and first time I ever heard the police being a mayor political factor
I mean I'm sure that "Danish police proposal: bigger salaries for the police"
murxJun 23, 2011
Of course enforcing 'internet laws' requires more and special trained police forces - and because of their excellent expertise and knowledge of the internets they could easily get jobs elsewhere - so the gouvernment has to pay them higher then the free market to do their job!
See, it is completely like you said.
badguy001Jun 23, 2011
No.
Closed AccountJun 23, 2011
And so it ends...
foodfactscomJun 23, 2011
So it begins!
rotfoxJun 23, 2011
The problem is that even if you put a face to every computer or connection the one's that are doing the harm will be able to circumvent the restrictions you have implemented and probably lash out harder that before.
In the end this would only harm the end user not help. Just a pipe dream of someone hopeful for an easy fix for a large problem.
tao52nycJun 23, 2011
My counter proposal: Ban Danish police.
rclearymakegudwaifuJun 24, 2011
Trollface.jpg / Trapcard.jpg
#Winning
Immu I'm sure you'll make a good waifu as well.I know your papa trained you right.;-)
Thanks for playing!(And failing) Phaggot. ;)
dusanmalJun 23, 2011
Both from the perspective of cyber-security and social studies Internet anonymity is basic requirement for free speech on the Internet. You can't have one without the other even theoretically (cyber-security) while practically for countries that do not have US-Constitution-like protection of free speech one can't rely on "benevolent Government" not to interfere.
So, Danish Police wants to ban free speech on the Internet. Progressive ideas in practice.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
darkphenoxJun 23, 2011
A Progressive idea is to have LGBT equality, a Totalitarian idea is to ban free speech. This is a bipartisan issue, trying to blame one side over an other is petty.
mihaibugaJun 23, 2011
True , but think of it this way . Some people don't want their opinions known because of fears of repercussion (you all know ,power changes hands and laws become extinct) . So why force people to be fearfull when they can rejoice internet freedom ? Seems to me your paid by the government to give this comments .. and what about the diggs? you got friends "digging" for you ? your private little secret ?Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
isaac7719Jun 23, 2011
What are you even talking about? Are you saying darkphenox is paid by the government to be on digg as some kind of puppet? Are you high on cocaine right now?
isaac7719Jun 23, 2011
"Progressive ideas in practice."
This is not a "progressive" idea. No progressive would support this, and if a self-proclaimed progressive does, then they are not really a progressive. But it's nice to know you're not above labeling anything and everything bad with the name of a philosophy you disagree with, regardless of whether it even makes sense or not.
That's some real intellectual honesty and integrity right there. /s
johnnysoftwareJun 23, 2011
Hmmm well, how well would that work in totalitarian regimes or surveillance societies?
Stuff the government is not supposed to lose and we have to protect gets stolen/sold all the time from the government. We like to think it is a reliable keeper of information. But recent events have told us it is anything but.
Unfortunately, we probably could have trusted it awhile back to not breach public privacy firewalls and escrowed information but news of the past year makes that seem pretty unlikely.
Probably better to just sit back, to wait and see if the government reforms itself. China, US, all several hundred of them - not just one of them. After that happens, it is a good discussion to kick around ideas over.
Here's the deal: every professional wants his/her job to be easier to do. Do they all want to do it better, more accurately, with less or no collateral damage? That does not seem to be the case.
At this point, we cannot protect our physical borders and keep mass-murdering gangsters from the third world out. Lets stick to basics.
Most of these hacks announced in the news wind up getting traced back to severe deficiencies in custom and off-the-shelf software products. Getting the bad software out and getting less dangerous software created to replace it will make us thousands of times safer.
Plus, as we have learned, keeping maniacs out is far more effective than depriving them of anonymity. Sometimes, they just do not care or - they have stolen someone else's identity.
screwkevinJun 23, 2011
Internet proposal: Ban Danish police
timedalkatJun 23, 2011
How about "no"?
trythinking1stJun 23, 2011
If you can't trust the Danish police to come up with sound suggestions for the future of the internet, who can you trust?
rclearymakegudwaifuJun 23, 2011
Sounds great! Can't wait until it reaches America!
trythinking1stJun 23, 2011
it already has, Dave
immunofortJun 23, 2011
You've failed the entire concept of transitive theory. Strong pseudo-intellectual. Go read a book and stop frequenting /b/. You might learn something. Your balls might finally drop as well.
sidconnarJun 23, 2011
I have never understood the obsession with anonymity. If you are choosing to do something, you ought to be willing to put your name to that action, and have it be remembered. Of course, this applies doubly to governments and police - if they choose to investigate your Internet activity, you should be easily be able to track down which officer did it, what he or she did, when it was done, and for what purpose.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
ninhJun 23, 2011
I dare you to travel to China, go to an Internet cafe, criticize the Chinese government and put your name on it.
laurahoustonJun 23, 2011
because on the internet its not just the good guys who want to know your name and where you live.
I think all businesses, companies and banks included should be banned from any online storage or use of anyones personal info or tracking people online.
The times of selling 'mailing lists' should not be extended to online anything.
isaac7719Jun 23, 2011
"If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear"
Let's just succumb to the higher powers because, lo and behold, they always know whats right. Be a good little follower, dont ask questions, and stay in line!
Do I need the /s?
mihaibugaJun 23, 2011
Instead of taking the correct path of revised govermental workings and exposing mischief, why not choose the more easy path .....
darkphenoxJun 23, 2011
This is a proposal not a law, or legislation, this is some police saying this would make their job a lot easier, doesn't make it right but you are acting like the Danish government is implementing this when they are not (yet anyways, but as of right now they are not).