Submitted by
Users who Dugg This
Comgen & Dr. Socks' love child
12547 Followers
NewsMeBack
6467 Followers
woods j ransom
836 Followers
AngelWardriver
11953 Followers
Nerd Of NerdsMagazine.com
2376 Followers
Evil Macintrash with a Goatee
708 Followers
MikeyMicron
2251 Followers
mtownSep 15, 2011
At least the Grim Reaper would be honest about his motives and goals.
dsmxSep 15, 2011
Honesty? Well that's him out then.
letsgetreal50Sep 15, 2011
Why is it that the same republican party will fight euthanasia? Can't they make up their minds?
bllasaeSep 15, 2011
Why do the democrats love abortion but hate the death penalty? Can't THEY make up their minds?
bigbert81Sep 15, 2011
Yes, the democrats LOVE abortion. In fact, I don't know what they'd do without it...hmmm...or maybe it's just the way you worded your statement.
Being pro-choice doesn't mean democrats 'love' killing babies.
bllasaeSep 15, 2011
Doesn't matter, there's no way they'd let a law pass that would get rid of abortion, but they love passing bills against the death penalty.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
SonoraDTSep 15, 2011
u don't want abortion to be legal ~but i bet u would complain about paying taxes to take care of the millions of babies that would be born if it was illegal
breadfredSep 15, 2011
The death penalty does nothing for society. It costs more than sticking them in prison, which is also a waste of bloody money by the way but that is a different discussion.
However an abortion (termination of an unwanted pregnancy) stops an unwanted human being been brought up by a mum (and sometimes dad) that did not WANT a baby. They just wanted a f**k and their condom slipped.
Very Christian of you, by the way, wanting to kill fellow humans.
SpycrabingSep 15, 2011
How in the world can you even compare killing someone to preventing life from happening in the first place?
motty32Sep 16, 2011
lazy troll is lazy
iriesouljahSep 16, 2011
If you haven't watched the news lately, parents are beating their children senseless left and right. The last thing we need is more babies coming into the world with irresponsible parents that don't want them, and in extreme cases cause horrible harm to the children!
msagnosticaSep 16, 2011
Lord Voldemort is even better, he's an open racist.
spatula7Sep 15, 2011
Nah, the Reaper is too compassionate to be a Republican.
5urr3al5amSep 15, 2011
new york
anomaly100Sep 15, 2011Submitter
South Carolina.
JustSayNoPartySep 15, 2011
No
anomaly100Sep 15, 2011Submitter
I don't know what he's talking about. Just thought I'd throw a random state out there.
OK, Hawaii for $100 Alex!
JustSayNoPartySep 16, 2011
Sorry, I just don't like South Carolina politics. Hawaii is much more suitable.
mdwstmusikSep 15, 2011
Best quote from the Daily Show regarding this: "The party that started out fearing death panels has become one."
dauntless1Sep 15, 2011
You're getting buried, but the reality is that private insurance companies ARE death panels, and nothing any idiot says will ever change that.
skyislandSep 15, 2011
The original Tea Party, the one at Boston port several years before Lexington was a somewhat peaceful affair.. The people marching to set the chests of tea floating weren't interested in harming the ships that brought the corporate tea but making a statement that corporate influence would not dominate the fortunes and undermine the freedoms in this new land. Of course it wasn't new land to the people displaced but still it was an uprising against the forces of exploitation, the corporate hand.
Contrast that to the Earthly abomination that is the Tea Party today.. The one that takes money from Koch brothers massive oil enterprises and the pushers of wall street power.
The bankers and exploitation going on today in a cavalier enterprise system gone rogue.
Closed AccountSep 15, 2011
"The people marching to set the chests of tea floating weren't interested in harming the ships that brought the corporate tea but making a statement that corporate influence would not dominate the fortunes and undermine the freedoms in this new land."
And people doubt the existence of Revisionist history...Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
paula1849Sep 15, 2011
Thank you. As some one who is proud of her long MA heritage it really bugs me that new "tea party" hijacked that name. I would digg you a million times if I could.
u2canfailSep 17, 2011
That is why we call them Tbags, as in trash.
SpycrabingSep 15, 2011
Boston Tea Party = "No taxation without representation!"
Tea Bagger Tea Party = "No taxation!"
skyislandSep 15, 2011
Actually, a ticket sporting a corporation for President and the grim reaper as his second in command would suit the Supreme Court's choice for president.
miklkitSep 15, 2011
But what corporation would be the best choice?
Halliburton?
Blackwater?
mickey2010Sep 15, 2011
Roger that, they (tea buggers) are establishing their death panel in a fair way. No insurance you die!!!!
mcfriendlySep 15, 2011
And God forbid you should forget or be unable to make a health care premium payment!
mdwstmusikSep 15, 2011
"I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison and you came to visit me" - Matthew 25:36
Conservative "Christian" values... /s
Closed AccountSep 15, 2011
Beautiful !!
SpycrabingSep 15, 2011
"For the needy shall not always be forgotten: the expectation of the poor shall not perish for ever." - Psalm 9:18
Just thought I'd add onto this. Religious people only want to read what they believe. They skip over things like this.
publiclurkerSep 15, 2011
sounds like one of them librl commies to me!
baynhoundSep 15, 2011
Republicans are also the party of "go" as in "go die". No insurance or cheap insurance, you are out o of luck if you cannot pull yourself up by your own bootstraps.
Republicans song need death panels, they eliminate the poor unfortunate by natural selection.
letsgetreal50Sep 15, 2011
Yet the same Republicans oppose euthanasia. Can't they make up their f**kin minds>
bllasaeSep 15, 2011
Why do the democrats love abortion but hate the death penalty? Can't THEY make up their minds?
miklkitSep 15, 2011
Nobody "loves" abortion. It's one of those sometimes needs to be done whether you like it or not. Like reading your drivel.
Closed AccountSep 15, 2011
Obama funds abortion here and overseas
He is obsessed with killing babies !!!!
JustSayNoPartySep 15, 2011
True. Clearly the anti-christ. Soon, he'll end all life on earth and hop aboard a mysterious space craft being safely whisked away.
laurahoustonSep 16, 2011
Johnny show some common sense for once, please!
it's much harder to eat babies when they are still alive,
gr8socialmediaSep 15, 2011
Colbert is just hilarious!
TheNoizeSep 15, 2011
Why let women have the right to abortion? You can instead:
- Legally force the babies to be born, let them grow up in a broken home, with parents trying to deal with their mistake
- Not allowing them to find jobs due to lack of job creation by the top bracket of billionaires and their corporations
- Force them to a life of financial despair and lead them to criminal activities
- Spend millions having them arrested and then executed!
So much more fun - and so much better for Republican campaigning!
chassupSep 16, 2011
OR--
- Gratefully accept every new human person with joy.
- Allow heterosexual couples with in-tact marriages to adopt and raise unwanted children to be blessings to the world.
- Remove the government hurdles to individual success, jobs and wealth generation.
- Free them from tyranny to enjoy a life of love and the pursuit of happiness.
- Save millions by cultivating a culture of life and civility.
So much better for all Americans.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
u2canfailSep 17, 2011
or pay to watch them die, so you can cheer louder, and in unison! Gladiators of Poor! GOP
anomaly100Sep 14, 2011Submitter
*Grim
cosmicsurferSep 14, 2011
:)
anomaly100Sep 15, 2011Submitter
I jez cant splll rite todae.
tumultuoustSep 16, 2011
Not surprising of a party that is against inoculations and affordable health care for those who can't otherwise attain it.
analogkid1Sep 16, 2011
Stewart and Colbert rule.
msagnosticaSep 15, 2011
The best representative of republicans and the best candidate isn't the Grim Reaper.
Lord Voldemort is far more suitable.
spanqSep 15, 2011
Who's c**k over at Digg do I need to suck to make the most BASIC f**king features of this site work? I have yet to see a single Comedy Central video that's embedded into a submission ever appear and I had to refresh this page half a dozen times to display comments.
JustSayNoPartySep 15, 2011
Finally, someone mentioned this issue. Lately, it's almost impossible to get comments to post.
publiclurkerSep 15, 2011
but on the bright side, when they do post, you get at least two of them.
u2canfailSep 17, 2011
or 3 or 5 or 10, depending on how many times you tried to post
andmarharSep 16, 2011
Start with mine
blankmikeSep 15, 2011
Canadian mirror please. Or at least the air date.
barackalypseSep 15, 2011
Finding the Republican candidate is easy, all you need is someone who is:
1. Not Obama
2. Not Bush
3. Not insane
I think that leaves you with Ron Paul.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
anomaly100Sep 15, 2011Submitter
Ron Paul's campaign manager just died penniless, uninsured with pneumonia leaving his family in debt for hundreds of thousands. Perhaps he should reconsider his views on health care.
barackalypseSep 15, 2011
Personal debts and health issues should not be the basis for public policy. Its either your body and your responsibility, or its someone else's responsibility and someone else gets input on the choices. You can't have it both ways.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
barmatSep 15, 2011
f**k ya let 'em rot in the streets.
barackalypseSep 15, 2011
No, more like the proverb "you pays your money and you takes your choice". Your phrasing is an underhanded way of indicating a negative result and trying to portray society as responsible for the outcome of free choice.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
JonathonFishenatorSep 15, 2011
>society as responsible for the outcome of free choice.
Sorry if some of us give a f**k about our fellow man.
breadfredSep 15, 2011
barackalypse: I could agree with you were it not that private health care is more expensive than public healthcare. Health insurance is one of these areas where it is more financially viable to provide everyone with total healthcare than only a smaller proportion of the population. Indeed, if you have private healthcare you can get DECLINED after paying in for 20 years due to some kind of exclusion clause. So you pay more, get less cover, and are not even sure if you get the help you need when you actually require it.
I am happy to pay for my NHS cover.
JustSayNoPartySep 15, 2011
I agree with Ron Paul as a choice. I disagree with the way you frame this. If we see a system bankrupting millions and leaving millions uninsured, it's beyond an issue of 'being responsible for your own body'. It's an issue of getting the system itself under control.
cold0008Sep 15, 2011
Ron Paul is insane. He's a libertarian ideologue that doesn't recognize the complexities of reality. He has absolute faith in the free market and charity, and refuses to acknowledge its failings. Granted he is better than many of his opponents, but the dude is crazy.
barackalypseSep 15, 2011
Reality is only complicated when you inisist on tinkering with it. We started with a Government that did almost nothing and we became the richest nation on Earth before there was a central bank, and without an income tax, without Government health care or Government retirement plans (that all started coming into existence in 1913, we were the wealthiest nation on Earth by then).Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
leonard2Sep 15, 2011
Typical whack-job. Don't like their policies, brand them insane.
cold0008Sep 15, 2011
if you honestly believe charities will pick up a hundred thousand dollar medical bill for cancer treatments, you are not living in this reality. The same goes for the gold standard not resulting in damaging deflation.
Taking any set of ideals to their logical extreme is crazy, be it libertarian or socialist.
vbdonSep 15, 2011
You miss the point. Hundred thousand dollar medical treatments are not in infinite supply. Giving one away to someone who could have but refused to pay for insurance denies it to someone who did sacrifice and buy insurance. Why should the child of parents who buy health insurance be denied treatment in favor of an indolent assh**e?Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
JonathonFishenatorSep 15, 2011
>Giving one away to someone who could have but refused to pay for insurance denies it to someone who did sacrifice and buy insurance.
And how exactly are people going to afford the most expensive health care on the planet? did you see the poverty reports?
JonathonFishenatorSep 15, 2011
>Giving one away to someone who could have but refused to pay for insurance denies it to someone who did sacrifice and buy insurance.
And how exactly are people going to afford the most expensive health care on the planet? did you see the poverty reports?
cold0008Sep 15, 2011
That's the system that is in place now. If you are dying, you will get treatment even though you cannot pay for it and healthcare is not in short supply in the country.
3n1gm4Sep 15, 2011
I believe the term is "cash payment" and then bankrupcy, works 75% of the time everytime
The_SovereignSep 15, 2011
I don't understand; the way your post reads, you seem to be implying that disliking someone's policies and then overreacting by calling them "insane" is bad, but in the first sentence you appear to be calling someone insane because you disagree with his post.
That's...Insane.
miklkitSep 15, 2011
That is the very definition of teabagger.
leonard2Sep 15, 2011
Your a liberal. You wouldn't know what the definition of a decent person is. It's beyond your scope.
leonard2Sep 15, 2011
Nice spin.
maxell101Sep 15, 2011
I was for Ron Paul until his voter base was infested with nut jobs. Now I'm not so sure. If the most extreme voters want him in office I have to rethink my support of him.
leonard2Sep 15, 2011
Obama's voter base is totally infested with with nut-jobs but yet people support him. Forget about who supports who and vote your conscious. I support RP.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
JonathonFishenatorSep 15, 2011
You mean moderates and centrists, then dems/liberals due to there not being a liberal president.
JonathonFishenatorSep 15, 2011
You mean moderates and centrists, then dems/liberals due to there not being a liberal president.
JonathonFishenatorSep 15, 2011
You mean moderates and centrists, then dems/liberals due to there not being a liberal president.
beforesputnikSep 15, 2011
Don't let someone else decide your vote for you. Find out as much about each candidate as you can (through their voting record preferably) and decide for yourself.
anomaly100Sep 15, 2011Submitter
Sound advice.
TheNoizeSep 15, 2011
"1. Not Obama
2. Not Bush
3. Not insane"
Hillary Clinton came to my mind - but what do I know? I'm only educated.
vbdonSep 15, 2011
Liberals can't seem to understand why it is unjust to take health care away from a child whose parents have paid for it, and give it to a freeloader who preferred to spend his life's income on sex, drugs, and rock and roll.
Better yet, Liberals think they can sell their ignorance as a campaign issue to gain votes from voters who pay for their health insurance and are watching their costs go up 40% because of the freeloaders that Obama is adding to the system.
No wonder Obama loses support every time he makes a speech. Now all liberals are following his lead.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
SpycrabingSep 15, 2011
Um, what about the people who were born into poverty (like me) and DON'T waste their money on sex and drugs etc etc? My father died when I was 10, and that left my mom with his debt, her college debt, his funeral costs, raising me and my brother, AND paying rent for the s**tty apartment we lived in. We had to go on Medicaid, and my mom didn't have health insurance for a while, and not because my mom is a "freeloader," but because the circumstances that were thrown our way. We can't afford not to have health care, because my mom has diabetes, and my brother has brain damage and could need care in the future. I'm guessing you were brought up in a family where none of what I mentioned was an issue.
Try paying bills, taxes, mortgage and a f**k load of other expenses and have someone try to take away the only safety net you have in case something happens. You would feel differently.
digadigaSep 15, 2011
You do not understand the conservative libertarian mindset. To the conservative libertarian it is your mom's fault for choosing to marry a weak specimen, therefore she should be saddled with his debt. Libertarians abhor the idea that it is societies responsibility to bail out others from their bad choices or circumstances. Personal responsibility is the cornerstone of everything in their minds.
I know several, including one who chose to live in Beaumont, then gladly accepted all that government $ when his house was destroyed by Hurricane Rita. Apparently personal responsibility is only for "those other people" to some.
anomaly100Sep 15, 2011Submitter
I hope you don''t mind. I just blogged your comment.
http://freakoutnation.com/2011/09/15/republicans-eat-their-own-more-red-states-uninsured-recipients-of-welfare/
Good luck to you:-)
SpycrabingSep 15, 2011
Don't mind at all :)
anomaly100Sep 15, 2011Submitter
Someone submitted it to digg. I linked it to your account. Prepare for the onslaught of feigned outrage. Grrr! Roar! And all that buggery...
SpycrabingSep 16, 2011
I was born prepared.
breadfredSep 15, 2011
vbdon - do you actually earn your own money? Or do you free load on your parents?
anomaly100Sep 15, 2011Submitter
Aha! I think I just answered that for him. See my comment above. You gotta love these 'Freeloading' Republicans...
JustSayNoPartySep 15, 2011
How about we take health care away from a child whose parents 'don't have insurance'? After all, that child is most likely a 'freeloader'. Damn freeloading kids. I had no idea that people not having insurance were largely drug addicted sex maniacs. Thanks for the clarification.
By the way, costs have not been skyrocketing due to the Obama plan. Costs have been skyrocketing for a long time due to many other reasons.
Obama is evil blah blah liberals are all freeloaders blah blah. Too mindless for me.
yurmutha412Sep 15, 2011
This is basically the liberal form of the death camp argument. No one thinks clearly around death so it's easy to get people riled up, but we need to make decisions about when death and quality of life no longer intersect. Waiting more than a month for a coma victim doesn't make a lot of sense. The odds of survival get cut in half every day they stay in a coma. How many millions should we spend on one patient in a coma who doesn't have insurance and is therefore a ward of the state? How many poor children could we vaccinate for that millions of dollars that got spent on a person whose odds of survival were next to nil? Let's stop the rhetoric from both sides and make rational decisions about health care.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
barmatSep 15, 2011
That's right throw them in a f**king oven to heat the homes of rich people.
vbdonSep 15, 2011
It would finally provide them with a purpose.
yurmutha412Sep 15, 2011
No, we'll let the Democrat death camps use them for renewable energy.
breadfredSep 15, 2011
yurmutha - look at countries where they have nationalised health care. Than look at your own country. You can buy hankies at Amazon.
yurmutha412Sep 15, 2011
We have nationalized health care for old people and it works like crap. It's costing us 500 billion per year on top of the taxes collected and annuities paid. Why would I want that for the rest of the population? It would completely bankrupt the country. We can bring down the cost of health care by using health savings accounts and tort reform, then people won't have to let their insurance expire because it will be affordable. That's the part the Democrats don't get. People go without it because it's not affordable.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
breadfredSep 16, 2011
NO, YOU don't get it. I pay less you do (that is, if you pay for health insurance) AND I will NEVER get refused treatment.
But, YOU rather have a system as you have where you pay more and get less cover.
JustSayNoPartySep 15, 2011
Actually, I'm betting Liberals would agree with you. Yes, the healthcare system must get much better focused on efficacy of treatment.
yurmutha412Sep 15, 2011
I wish that were true, but politicians know it's an emotional hot button and they use it to get votes from both sides of the fence.
JustSayNoPartySep 15, 2011
We really must read between the lines much better with politicians. You mention a reason I don't support Socialized Medicine. There is so much that can be corrected in our system without running to Government healthcare.
davidg11Sep 15, 2011
Ha ha ha ha ha...so funny that Republicans want people who kill other adults and children to die by execution. Ha ha.
Backward Republicans.....
I'm not sure why liberals think we would/should be disgusted that those who KILL people be killed.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
SpycrabingSep 15, 2011
It's not that. It's that no government should have the right to take a life away. If the person is stabbed in jail, that's social justice. An organization claiming lives is wrong, whether the person is a serial killer or not. A government should not have that right, considering they've murdered innocent people before.
Is it worth the risk of killing a possibly innocent person?
barmatSep 15, 2011
Just like it says in the Quoran "An eye for an Eye". Sharia Law in America.
chilidogsSep 15, 2011
It amazes me how little you horrifying kooks are bothered by the fact that some of those people are innocent.
"In 2008, the Texas Forensic Science Commission agreed to investigate the case. The panel’s review was interrupted several times over the last two years, however, and continues today. In 2009, an arson expert hired by the commission issued a report finding that experts who testified at Willingham’s trial should have known it was wrong at the time. Days before the expert was set to testify, however, Gov. Rick Perry replaced key members of the panel, delayed the investigation for months."
http://www.innocenceproject.org/Content/Cameron_Todd_Willingham_Wrongfully_Convicted_and_Executed_in_Texas.php
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/23/opinion/23coates.html?_r=2&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss
maxell101Sep 15, 2011
They do not care.
JonathonFishenatorSep 15, 2011
How christian of them. Seriously, christians are f**king blood thirsty. That's why they came up with hell.