Submitted by
Users who Dugg This
Phil Perspective
9369 Followers
Phil Perspective
9369 Followers
subatomicdoc
2537 Followers
David A. LaSpina
557 Followers
citizenblogger
143 Followers
David A. LaSpina
557 Followers
citizenblogger
143 Followers
manlyandyJul 11, 2010
1. Rile up voters by telling them the brown man is coming and you have the solution
2. Get elected
3. Have no solution
4. ?????
5. Profit!
freedomjoeJul 11, 2010
I believe you are referring to their winning Southern Strategy, which they have been employing for a while now - though it takes a new manifestation every cycle. Illegal immigrants = pals around with terrorist = funny middle name = etc
spacem00seJul 12, 2010
Worked for GW Bush in the 2000 primaries.
breadfredJul 12, 2010
Sorry for hijack, link does not work here: youtube link
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TyvlpVax4yI
jgmcgowanJul 12, 2010
Thanks Breadfred
pantone109Jul 12, 2010
the brown man is already here my brother.
Closed AccountJul 12, 2010
The brown man is your brother. When did you forget that?
pantone109Jul 13, 2010
i am a brown man you f**king idiots. :-)
nidstylesJul 14, 2010
Hi brown man. I'm the red man.
tconnect80Jul 12, 2010
And I'll wager the Democrats goes something like this
1. Rile up voters by telling them we are going to change everything
2. Get elected
3. Continue policies
4. ????
5. Profit
Closed AccountJul 12, 2010
So you mean to say that it's pretty much the same from both major parties? I'm assuming that since everyone else jokes about it they also know about this?
Good thing we're not a two party system! I mean, we can just elect someone from a third party that makes sense and would actually try to change things.
Oh wait, the same people that bitch that "both parties" suck are the same ones that refuse to vote for someone from outside the two major parties because it would be a "wasted vote."
If everyone who is displeased with how their party runs s**t would find a third party who matches their views voted for them we'd have some interesting elections.
takamalakJul 12, 2010
I know! Where's our universal healthcare! After Obama was elected, that went nowhere!
glbernsJul 12, 2010
And what about all the investments in green technology that he promised? Reopening a closed auto factory in Detroit to build state of the art solar panels to build the largest solar power plant in Arizona certainly isnt it.
Closed AccountJul 12, 2010
To be fair, I would say that applies more to Obama specifically than to Democrats in general. I mean, neither Al Gore nor John Kerry really played up the hype machine too heavily, and the both suffered for it. People were just like, "What? You're not pump us up with false promises you can't possibly expect to keep? Why should we give a s**t about you?"
fontzepontzeJul 12, 2010
#4. Quit half way through your term.
helixskyJul 12, 2010
Yes, because Obama is just like Bush /s
This is not an either/or evaluation. Just because you did not get 100% of what you wanted does not mean you got 100% of what you did not want. I've had some disappointments with Obama, but he and the Democrats are nothing like the Republicans. A McCain/Palin presidency would have been a worse disaster then the oil spill to the US. Trivialize the distinction at your own peril.
dukeonkledJul 13, 2010
Sadly, lo****ermelon, that is also the same reason the two parties are so large in the first place. The passive ones reside in the big 2, not the third parties. Instead on not voting at all, as you say, most of them "settle" on candidates that they are sure wont do them right but "are a step in the right direction" Not a lot of people who join third parties refuse to vote. They are usually the most adamant and politically active. A step in the right direction would be voting what you believe, as you say, never settling.
Closed AccountJul 12, 2010
That could really be expanded to the Republican strategy in general. All they do is find a few hot-button talking points to get voters riled up. They don't actually have to do anything about those issues once they've gotten people foaming at the mouth and into the voting booths. You'd think that strategy would only work once, and that people would remember how f**king useless the Republicans are, but here's the thing: each new voting cycle, they do it all over again. Voters don't pay attention to what's going on because they're voting based on emotion, not logic.
wentwithoutfoodJul 12, 2010
Is that not the strategy for every political party?
or am I just more cynical than most?
aviddiggeriteJul 12, 2010
And the democrats are useful?
devnulldoodJul 12, 2010
Isnt that what Obama did?
clapsfranciscoJul 12, 2010
LMAO
mrj777Jul 13, 2010
Nope. He's still in office. You can't say someone failed at something they are in the middle of doing. That's like if your friend is pregnant and tells you "its a girl"... you scream to them "slut". Too early to tell, so you just look stupid. Well unless your on the right, then its totally acceptable by your logic. And probably only yours.
devnulldoodJul 13, 2010
Whats your point? I'm not disagreeing with the statement. I'm simply pointing out that Obama got elected because of the same strategy. He spoke against Bush and his administration, brought up the "Hot Topics". Everybody was already sick of Bush and his BS. Obama didn't even give any information about his agenda, he just said "Change".
You cant say that it was his experience that got him elected because he has none. Even Clinton said to Hillary "This guy would be serving our coffee in any other time."
wf80diditJul 12, 2010
I'm still trying to figure out why McCain picked her as his running mate?
1hrsleepJul 12, 2010
Boobs.
cheezinternJul 12, 2010
I figure McCain to be more of a leg man
s73v3rJul 12, 2010
I think its because the RNC actually thought that disenfranchised Hillary supporters would actually come over to the GOP ticket if there was a woman on it. It doesn't matter what that woman's policies were, or how dumb she was, just that having a woman would do the job. Remember, she was announced like a week after Obama received the nomination.
Closed AccountJul 12, 2010
Even McCain doesn't like her. It was his party that chose her.
elranzerJul 12, 2010
Basically the GOP just assumed all of the nation's women were idiots.
cory849Jul 12, 2010
I have a time machine theory. McCain had a time machine. He keeps losing the 2008 election and going back in time to try any crazy s**t he can to see if it will stick. We live in the "It's so f**king retarded, it just might work" Palin timeline. Tough break for us.
tbranch227Jul 13, 2010
OMG life is unfair and time travel makes it worse. You're living proof people! Where's the McCain/Dalai Lama ticket universe? McCain is probably off killing all of the other McCains in the multiverse, so he can gain their power and rule the multiverse prison planet.
Closed AccountJul 12, 2010
They did it for the Hilary votes.
sealaJul 12, 2010
Because "hot" looks are all that matter in a female politician for the Right Wing?
toxicshokJul 12, 2010
I assumed the conversation went something like this
RNC: Derp de Derp de derpity derp
McCain: Herp derp?
RNC: Derp!
McCain: herp derpity derp derp derp? Derp? Herp derp? Derp Palin derp!
RNC: herp
fuzzybeardJul 12, 2010
Because McCain was TOLD to.
smpaisnutrientsJul 12, 2010
They wanted the Hillary votes, not to mention the Christian Right refused to give mccain their endorsement unless they picked a running mate that matched their ideals.
the republican party as a whole has been in the pocket of the Christian right for decades. they simply cannot win an election without pandering to them anymore.
moogleJul 13, 2010
I'd hit it.
mrj777Jul 13, 2010
Maybe he really wanted to lose.
hornyangelJul 31, 2010
If it's hot looks they need, maybe they should run Taylor Swift.
Closed AccountJul 12, 2010
And the fact that about half the population is buying it, hook, line and sinker, should tell you how stupid the average American in reality is.
Any American giving any credence to Sarah Palin is basically telling me they are retarded imbeciles.
ddaydawgJul 12, 2010
No where near half the population is falling for this. The woman has about half the Republican party (at best). So maybe 20% of the US population. The sad part is that she could possibly win the Republican nomination because some many moderates left the party. But she would have zero chance in the general election where the Independents (a lot of who are Republicans who left the party BECAUSE of Palin) rule.
davepaJul 12, 2010
Figure 20% support her and 30% support Obama (yes folks, that is his current approval rating, its actually a little below 30%).
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/daily_presidential_tracking_poll
That's a lot of "imbeciles" out there folks!!!!!!! Half of our country. YIKES!Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
vdubbinJul 13, 2010
Haha! You picked the polling company most associated with Fixed News. Look at a more balanced, unbiased website that looks at all of the pollsters combined and yes folks you will see his current approval rating, 47.1
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_obama_job_approval-1044.html
Anyone can search the internet for any number they like and try to pass it on as accurate information.
nidstylesJul 14, 2010
So people that don't agree with you are automatically stupid... If that's not elitist.
kinneas12Jul 12, 2010
You could almost say she got O'Reilled up!
luckyscofieldJul 12, 2010
She's like if one of the Bush daughters became a political figure. I'm all for the "Mr. Smith Goes to Washington" approach of getting 'new blood' in the white house, but seriously. She does not have a firm grasp on the reality of problems and how to solve them. She's a shock jock for the political world.
xvash2Jul 12, 2010
Actually the Bush daughters aren't COMPLETELY retarded. IIRC One of them is actually somewhat liberal.
Closed AccountJul 13, 2010
wait, I thought you said they are not completely retarded?
weaponsJul 12, 2010
Except she kinda skipped #2 and went straight to #3.
whitegripesJul 12, 2010
I've said this before but I'll say it again. I don't think she really wants to be elected to any office, she just wants the campaign contributions and the publicity that goes along with it.
gotmoobsJul 13, 2010
racist bitch
triumph6Jul 13, 2010
South Park's Underpants Gnomes Yea!
ancientshoesJul 14, 2010
I love your race card straw man, can I subscribe to your politically correct newsletter?
aitoasterJul 15, 2010
Here is that exact approach right here:
http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/03/03/rnc_fundraising
totalhalibutJul 11, 2010
You know this bitch is bad news when even O'Reilly can't stand her bulls**t.
ak666jkJul 12, 2010
I don't think O'Reilly cares, I think he's just a clever troll.
danlowliteJul 12, 2010
Well, purpose served, then. Right? I think we could be better served by more trolls in media than sycophants.
Closed AccountJul 12, 2010
If someone told you "We've got a built in audience and we'll pay you to say things that scare them and piss everyone else off. We'll pay you a LOT." You'd f**king take the money. Hell, I'd tell them I'd do it for half what they offered.
nathanwkJul 12, 2010
cheers to that
jdenzerJul 12, 2010
Troll, agreed. But he does care if Palin gets the 2012 nomination, b/c he knows it would be a disaster for the right. He may hate liberals, but he is not stupid enough to think she can be POTUS.
unclefireJul 12, 2010
How is he trolling? He asked her point blank questions. That is his job. What are your solutions if you were president? Knowing she was going to be on the show, she could have pulled any number of things out as potential solutions-- she didn't. The only thing she said was "secure the border"-- nothing else. And even at that he fed her numbers and things that would need to be dealt with-- she couldn't even come up with a options of "whatever it takes" would be. She didn't say anything about how to deal with those here-- she could have said deport them all. At least that would have been an answer.
nomadofthehillsJul 12, 2010
Did you just create an acronym out of President of the United States?
arxorJul 12, 2010
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/POTUS
Closed AccountJul 12, 2010
nomad... it's been around for awhile.
http://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1CHFX_enUS379US379&aq=f&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=POTUS
tsuruchibrianJul 14, 2010
He's not THAT clever.
willthewayJul 12, 2010
or O'Reilly is a fair and balanced journalist? There's a reason he has been number one for so many years
Closed AccountJul 12, 2010
You don't know what "fair" or "balanced" means.
donaldcapsJul 12, 2010
Fair and balanced journalism doesn't get you number one in the ratings.
Closed AccountJul 12, 2010
"Fair and balanced journalism doesn't get you number one in the ratings."
That's probably the only objection I have to Fox News. They've got the resources to cover real news, and they've got the largest audience. They could easily start being actually balanced and fair in their reporting and become a respectable news source, but they stay the course with their crazy.
propethicJul 12, 2010
fair and balanced journalists don't
a.) throw softball questions
b.) yell over the opinions of others
c.) agree/disagree with the ideas of those he's speaking with
d.) tell somoene invited on the show that they have no right to their opinion, or that they should agree with the host
lordstandleyJul 12, 2010
LOL, it's funny because you probably said that completely serious.
lordstandleyJul 12, 2010
You forgot the /s tag on the end of that statement.
jasvllJul 12, 2010
Wait, I thought O'Reilly was in the 'opinion/pundit' group, not the 'news/journalist' group, and that's why it was 'okay' for him to be biased, unlike the news anchors during the day?
warbickJul 12, 2010
@jasvil
O'Reilly himself says he is in the opinion/pundit group, but others place him as a traditional journalist of sorts.
toxicshokJul 12, 2010
"Cut his mic off!" = fair journalism?
fungoJul 13, 2010
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!
Wait, I should probably read that again.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
willthewayJul 14, 2010
you kids can live in your little bubble, but one day you'll maybe watch his show and see why it is so popular.
caferrellJul 12, 2010
I believe that the neocon faithful, those "news" personalities like Bill O'Rielley, Bill Kristol, Charles Krauthammer et al have decided that Mrs. Palin is going to jump the shark. They fear that her newfound zeal for cutting government spending is in danger of becoming more libertarian and thereby will encompass the sacred military budget.
She has been their darling, but by insinuating that the war in Afghanistan might have to be wrapped up, she is now going to be fed to the dogs.
KingFranklinJul 12, 2010
Hahaha Sarah Palin has less intention of shaking things up in Washington than Barack Obama. She's further from libertarianism than George Bush. She just says whatever it takes to keep herself in the media.
caferrellJul 12, 2010
Don't get me wrong oh regal one.
I do not imply any intelligence on the part of Caribou Barbie, but rather that her cunning has led her to believe that the Tea Party is trending away from support of endless war and therefore her comments are following the trend.
But that is seen by the neocons as treason and Bill O´Rielly was training Mrs. Palin. I am certain that, off-camera, he made his point that the military budget must never, ever be challenged very clear to the ex-beauty contestant.
But although she is not intelligent, she is crafty. If she sees more future with the Tea Party than with the neocons, she will just avoid BillO and the rest of the death-worshippers.
KingFranklinJul 12, 2010
Ah, that I can agree with more. I was under the impression from your first post that you thought her "zeal for cutting government spending" was in some way genuine.
busabladeJul 12, 2010
@KingFranklin
I think you may have something there. She and Michele Bachmann may be the Paris Hilton and Britney Spears of the political world. *Sits back and waits to see the crotch shots*
graphictruthJul 13, 2010
Oh, I could have lived for YEARS without that picture in my head...
Closed AccountJul 12, 2010
You're seeing the beginning of the end of the tea party movement, where the main players go for eachother throats and the movement dissolves in bitterness and incriminations.
caferrellJul 12, 2010
Bill O'Rielly has nothing to do with the Tea Party.
The Tea Party is simply a scream to cut government and to cut government spending. BillO is not on board, Bill Kristol is not on board.
publiclurkerJul 12, 2010
Except those screamers didn't seem to talk too loud when the actual damage was being done. Try finding another lie, you've warn out this one.
linuxpersonJul 12, 2010
"Except those screamers didn't seem to talk too loud when the actual damage was being done. Try finding another lie, you've warn out this one."
Believe it or not, there were people screaming during the Bush years that continue to scream today. Either accept that fact or accept the fact that you are an assumptive assh**e.
homercles337Jul 12, 2010
Bill takes a paycheck from Faux News, by default he is a teabagger. He probably has to do promotional spots for those teabagger events.
peppermintpigJul 12, 2010
There are valid reasons not to support the tea party as it lacks any defining and constant principles. But that doesn't also mean it never had individuals in consistent opposition to fiscal irresponsibility. Most political parties and politicians fall into the trap of being unreliably inconsistent anyhow, so I fail to see why so much is made by trying to stereotype a group then claim it's full of hypocrites when individuals naturally vary in their positions, AND you can readily cite individual politicians in power who daily reveal their hypocrisy by following their track record and campaign promises.
particleman420Jul 12, 2010
"Believe it or not, there were people screaming during the Bush years that continue to scream today."
yes, they were called "Democrats"Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
netantJul 12, 2010
1) Some of you people appear to be deluded about the origins of the "tea party". They received media attention AND funding by the same neocons that put George W. Bush into power. Tea baggers are the media creation of the right wing!
2) The tea baggers were created to astroturf support for Republican candidates. They are like Democrat Liberals. They make noises about "doing the right thing", but then they fall into Democratic party line "when it matters".
3) The "problem" with the tea baggers and the Right is that the tea baggers are as much in the Republican camp as Ben Nelson is with the Democrats. And without a centralized control to "weed out" undesirable representation, the only reasonable alternative to mock them out of existence by showing people their intellect.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
nidstylesJul 14, 2010
Tea Baggers were a branch off of the Libertarian Party. They never had anything to do with Bush. Most of their political motivation's were in support of Politician's such as Ron Paul.
What you people see as the Tea Bagger's now, is just the Media actively discrediting their organization. None of them ever had anything to do with the group.
As an active Libertarian supporter myself, I can assure you Netant, you are speaking out of your misinformed ass.
homercles337Jul 12, 2010
Did you watch the video. Anyone that watches that and defends Palin's intellect is is a dishonest lying sack of s**t.
Closed AccountJul 12, 2010
DavidNiven isn't here defending her either so I think it's safe to say she has lost all support, even by the most hardcore of nut-cases.
illepicJul 12, 2010
I, too, was expecting a DN defense.
cyberdactylJul 12, 2010
Using a derogatory noun for Palin at the same time making an untrue statement (watch the entire clip) and getting 280 diggs is why digg has had no political meaning in 2 years.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
nodakiJul 12, 2010
Disclaimer: I do not support Sarah Palin.
BillO is an expert at trapping people into a narrow focused answer to explain a much larger problem. In this case he obviously has it out for Palin and wants to trap her into saying a dumb answer.
You have 12 million people that are here illegally what do you do with them?
Her answer is to deport them but being trapped in that answer she knows better and has learned to deflect the question. She never gave a full answer or the answer that BillO was looking to trap her with. Deportation is the only possible answer unless you support an amnesty program of some sort. Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
unclefireJul 12, 2010
Those are the only two options-- some form of legalization, deport them or a combination of both.
Deporting illegal aliens is going to continue. We can't just stop any form of enforcement.
Going after 10-20MM illegal aliens and deport them all is not going to work.
gerz1219Jul 12, 2010
O'Reilly normally is an expert at trapping guests, but his approach here was so obvious and elementary that it felt like a father teaching his daughter chess for the first time. He repeated his strawman argument and the hard numbers multiple times so that Palin would have ample time to construct an argument -- any argument -- and seem as though she had a coherent solution to the issue despite obviously not knowing any facts prior to the taping. O'Reilly's visible frustration had little to do with brutalizing an ideological opponent, and everything to do with Palin's inability to say something sensible. In fact, she agreed with the self-contradictory strawman arguments more than once, when she was obviously being prodded to dismiss them as too extremist so she could lay out a more moderate viewpoint.
I used to think she was book-dumb and street-smart, but Palin's inability to read simple verbal and non-verbal cues here has me doubting that assessment.
mxm111Jul 12, 2010
There is another option - create such conditions that illegal immigrants start to leave country by themselves. One thing to do it is to establish system and checks of work authorization. And I mean actually go and check if all the employed workers have proper authorization. If not, then fine the business or even individual who hired them. While I myself do not support it, I think this is the most practical way for those who does not want to have legal path for illegal immigrants.
gerz1219Jul 12, 2010
Well there are a lot of problems with a policy like that. For one thing, there is a powerful pro-business lobby -- generally affiliated with the large argobusiness industry that relies heavily on illegal labor -- that will seek to eliminate or water down any employer sanctions. Aside from that, the sanctions would only matter if enforcement were stepped up to an invasive level, and large and small business owners alike really wouldn't care for that. Even if the sanctions were sufficiently high as to make the hiring of illegals unprofitable in the long run, there'd still be the problem of corruption and selective enforcement; there would be thousands of new inspection agents (all of them armed with guns and fluent in both English and Spanish) and some of them would undoubtedly take kickbacks to give a farm or factory a clean bill of health. It's kind of hard to staff an agency with 10,000 Elliot Nesses and no bad apples. Over the long run the dirty inspection agents would effectively form their own criminal syndicate, deciding who gets to stay in business, who gets shut down, and who gets killed. And then there's the matter of sheer scale; on a practical level, how do you root out 12 million illegal immigrants and deport them?
No easy solutions to this problem, which is why I get so infuriated when idiots like Palin dismiss the most complex policy dilemma in modern American history with a simple "Build a fence and deport them" sneer.
goptrollJul 12, 2010
O'Reilly is a pretty fair guy. Anyone who thinks he is not fair has either never watched him before and only ready about him on the internet, or is fringe left/right. Every time someone tells me he is a conservative I remind them Bill O'Reilly is a huge believe in global warming. That is simply 1 example, I know for sure I have seen many others.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
propethicJul 12, 2010
You have no basis for saying that O'Reilly is a 'pretty fair guy'.
You have never actually seen Bill O'Reilly the individual, what you actually see is Bill O'Rielly OF the factor/foxnews/whatever program he has/is on.
You don't get these jobs by showing who you really are or saying what you actually think, while on camera.
kiddcodeJul 12, 2010
I didn't know it was necessary to deny science in order to be a conservative.
slipperyottterJul 12, 2010
just because you believe in global warming or not does not make you a conservative, or not.
zilpinkyJul 12, 2010
I'm an independent and found the article on politicususa to be very biased and believe it unfairly defames Palin (and I say that as someone who does not support her).
If you watch O'Reilly's show often you will see that he consistently tries to get the people he interviews to answer questions in full and not beat around the bush. What politicususa interpreted as palin being uninformed and getting "humiliated" is in fact the same thing O'Reilly does on almost ALL his interviews - which is grill for specifics. Palin's answer of “whatever it takes" was not stupidity or cluelessness on her part, but rather a smart and intentionally vague response that appeals to the large block of immigration reform people without pissing anyone off by getting down to the specifics of how you are going to deal with all the problems that are going to have to be dealt with - such as what to do with the millions living/working here already. SHE WAS PLAYING POLITICS. Watch other interviews by O'Reilly or any hardball interviewer... politicians beat around the bush INTENTIONALLY because they don't want to alienate potential voters. For example: probably almost everyone in America would agree that immigration reform and controlling our borders is important and necessary, however, NOT everyone will agree on how to do that or what to do with all the illegals already here. So “whatever it takes" appeals to the probably 85+% of Americans who believe something needs to be done without losing large portions of those potential voters by getting too specific. O'Reilly has seen that a thousand times and pushed for more info (like he always does) and was able to get a little bit more out of her, but again, it's all about votes.
If you believe that Palin is an idiot and that her vague responses in that interview were because she had no clue about anything, then fine. However, keep in mind that your opinion in that way is a biased one and that it is just as much - if not more - plausible that she was playing politics and trying to appeal to voters. That being the case, I think this article's implied stupidity and cluelessness on her part is unprovable and everyone should recognize this article as biased (because it is) and take the defamatory remarks against Palin in stride with the article bias in mind.
Again, I would not vote for Palin if she ran for president, but I hate it when people take biased articles at face value. So be informed. :)Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
cockyjeremyJul 12, 2010
The only reason he's trashing her is because he knows she's so stupid she could never beat Obama in an election. It's not that O'Reilly suddenly gives a s**t. He just wants to make sure a Republican wins. If he thought Palin had a chance in hell of beating Obama he wouldn't care how stupid she sounded, he'd go along with it.
propethicJul 12, 2010
Every quote/spoken word/action made by politicians and people on T.V. are INTENTIONAL.
You would have to be extremely naive to think they say things on camera without the intended prupose of eliciting the reaction that they want.
poogy21Jul 12, 2010
Dam it! I can't Digg more than once!
sarcasteakJul 12, 2010
Did any of you people who digged this comment actually watch the interview? Bill could have done much more grilling than he did... he was supporting her while trying to correct her at the same time...
kkeutJul 13, 2010
she's a former VP candidate, he's a tv personality. if she had any real brains, qualifications or knowledge, she wouldnt need correcting from some tv personality.
remy1985Jul 12, 2010
Candidates get nominated for waving the party flag, but its the centrists that get elected. Republicans know this, Bill knows this, and in order for the Republican party to be taken seriously they need to have a broad median voter range. Palin running in 2012 would secure a win for Obama.
mantiskungfuJul 13, 2010
Stay classy TotalHalibut.... and the rest of you libtard sheep digging for this douche.
slezzzterJul 13, 2010
I don't like Palin, but I also don't like Obama, my opinion is invariably drowned out by the dumb-masses. What am I to do?
Closed AccountJul 13, 2010
Grow a brains, moran.
keflerJul 13, 2010
Go USA!
Closed AccountJul 11, 2010
Nothing she couldn't do herself
freedomjoeJul 11, 2010
I would pay to see her interviewed by rachel.
woodsjransomJul 11, 2010
OOOO that would be deeeelicious for sure. I am not going to school this summer we can only hope gurlfriend. The idea would kind of make me lose my religion for a minute and declare more than a hot damn!!!
freedomjoeJul 11, 2010
I'm afraid if Palin can't do Beck or O'Reilly, the chances of her going on Rachel are NIL. Of course, her followers don't seem to grasp why this is a problem. If she can't handle a network she WORKS for, let alone MSNBC, how exactly would she deal with American citizens who don't agree with her, let alone foreign leaders?
Oh, that's right! She'd sic the Dept of Law on them like she said she would. That would take care of any nasty questions:-)
iclavdivsJul 12, 2010
I'd pay to watch her make out with rachel maddow.
netantJul 12, 2010
@iclavdivs
Can two bull dykes get it on with each other? I dunno. Any lesbians care to offer a first hand perspective?
elcadJul 14, 2010
@netant
They are not called bull-dykes because they spout bulls**t.
And for a first hand perspective you would have to ask a bull-dyke, not just any lesbian?
cariboubarbiespJul 12, 2010
The liberal "gotcha" media elite has done it again, this time infiltrating the safe confines of Fox News, where I used to be treated with respect until this rabble-rouser O'Reilly starting praying at the altar of Barack Hussein Obama.
Look, in order to clear the air, these are my feelings about immigration:
- We must secure our borders by locking up the most valuable books in this very important national chain (like The Constitution, The Bible, The Declaration of Interdependence, and others).
- We must kick out anyone who looks like they might be related to someone who might have known someone who came to this country illegally.
- We must make this an officially English-speaking, Christian nation, to prevent Spaniards, atheists, and Muslims from thinking they'd have an easy time living under Real American rules.
- We must get rid of those pesky death panels that Barack Obama has set up as part of "health care reform."
netantJul 12, 2010
What the f**k is wrong with the diggers here? Can't they detect satire when they read it???
cariboubarbiespJul 12, 2010
Apparently Digg has been overrun with Godless liberals who can't detect satires, just like you said, even though they are beautiful, Godly semi-precious stones.
ebcreasonerJul 13, 2010
Nah, just lame.
Closed AccountJul 11, 2010
Mama Grizzlies? I thought she was pig with lipstick or something.
seltaeb4Jul 12, 2010
Mama Grisly.
quadeJul 12, 2010
More like a cougar.
*meow*
lhugheyJul 12, 2010
That can't be true. Pigs are very smart.
romantictireJul 14, 2010
Rule 34.
greenroom628Jul 11, 2010
wow...o'reilly basically lofted softballs at her and she still swung and missed. how can people listen to her "solutions" when she has no concept of what the issues really are?
i get the idea that she just has a bunch of buzz words that she likes to throw in whenever possible, like, "conservative", "ronald reagan", "constitution", "real 'mercians" and then calls it a day.
damn you, mccain, for bringing her to everyone's attention.
freedomjoeJul 11, 2010
Every time I see him (every Sunday, without fail) I wonder how the moderator can help from screaming, "curse on you!"
Closed AccountJul 12, 2010
If she can't finish a term of governor in a s**thole state what makes people think she could handle being in the white house?
I mean, she already wrote every attack ad against herself. "Sarah Palin: Couldn't do 4 years as Governor, do you really want a 2-year president?"
malman4Jul 12, 2010
If we could only have one now.........
burbankmarcJul 12, 2010
Alaska is pretty nice...
root45Jul 12, 2010
Yeah, don't call it a s**thole state. It's not a bad place to live.
thesprunkJul 12, 2010
What about Alaska makes it a s**t hole state?
s73v3rJul 12, 2010
Yeah, s**thole state is going too far. I will say its probably a less complex state to govern, for lack of a better term, than some of the more populous states, like NY, CA, TX.
badgerbusJul 12, 2010
Yeah, there's nothing wrong with Alaska, but as far as a staging ground for a presidential candidate it's less than ideal.
The entire state has a population that is much less than most major cities. Take San Francisco, it has over 300,000 more people in it than Alaska does, has a more diverse population in therms of ethnicity, income levels, immigration status (not just legal vs illegal, but legal, illegal, student visa, temp. work visa, perm resident aliens...).
With this in mind, the mayor of San Francisco has had much more real work experience than she has, despite the fact that she's been a governor.
honukaiJul 13, 2010
Except hes gay. They're not electable to a national office.
pcghostJul 24, 2010
"Except hes gay. They're not electable to a national office."
Has anyone told Barney Frank this? He's gonna be pissed!
piieerrrreeJul 12, 2010
I love the part where she says that she wants to save the country's kids from the dangers that are menacing the country, but doesn't mention the oil spill.
shazoocowJul 12, 2010
Damn you or thank you? The woman is made out of solid comedy gold and she's practically a human highlighter for all the intense incompetence of the "teabag" crowd and the political pandering of their leaders.
badgerbusJul 12, 2010
Stupid people listen to her because she tells the what they want to hear, in an interesting way, though I'm sure not on purpose.
Have you ever tried to explain something complicated to a stupid person, they get mad at you because you aren't explaining it so they can understand it, but it's inherently complicated, so it's not your fault at all.
That's Sarah Palin, she seems to think that the entire worlds of economics and politics should be easy to explain, and the only reason anyone makes anything complicated is to try to make people like her feel stupid.
She takes that idea to the stupid masses and gives s**tty explanations that make no sense to people who don't know any better, then they assume she's super-awesome because she's finally leveling with them about politics instead of trying to make it sound complicated.
The problem comes in because these issues are complicated. It's all well and good to say "build a wall on our border" but this isn't the same as putting up a new fence in the backyard. You don't just bop down to Home Depot ask for assistance building a wall that can't be tunneled under, gone over, or blasted through.
toxicshokJul 12, 2010
and she seems to turn Ronald Reagan into this mythological figure who wanted exactly what they want and hated exactly what their enemies want. Forget that Reagan signed several important arms control treaties, or that he gave amnesty to illegal immigrants, no only a communist would suggest doing those things, not our hero Reagan.
netantJul 12, 2010
I'm still thinking about all the nuns that were raped and killed because Reagan funded the Contras, and all the crack/cocaine that came into America via Ollie North, Reagan's right hand boy.
badgerbusJul 12, 2010
It's not just her who has turned him into a mythical figure; the entire right wing is remembering his as far more than a normal man.
The funny thing is that, when it comes to anything positive he may have done the man was large and in charge, running the show, for anything negative he all of a sudden becomes a "hands off president" who just lets people do their jobs and doesn't know anything about trading weapons for hostages in Iran.
trashyamericanJul 13, 2010
anyone who associates themselves with a piece of s**t like reagan isn't getting my vote
dreadpirateJul 13, 2010
You have to be 18 years old to vote. Based on your behavior and demonstrated lack of education here on digg, I'm guessing you're 16, at best. Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
mantiskungfuJul 13, 2010
Kind of like Libtards tossing out words like:
-Kill Bush
-Universal Health Care
-Big Business
-Welfare
-Wall Street
-Social Justice
-NAACP
-Inclusivity
-Fairness
-Diversity
-Dialogue
-Tax the "Rich" (Rich -> +$60k/year)
-Meaningful dialogue
-Empowering each other
-Engaging each other
-Community
-Pay their fair share
-The poor
-Africa
-GLBT
F#ck I could go on for ages....
GTFOH you hypocritical POSs.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
malexJul 13, 2010
It's kinda amazing how little sense you make.
jbiggamerJul 13, 2010
libtard is almost as good as republiclown...
badgerbusJul 13, 2010
Don't mind the OP, he just can't stand the fact that there's no room for liberal-bashing in this conservative on conservative action.
lars5Jul 13, 2010
they weren't exactly softballs, but right off the bat she's trying to dodge the questions because she obviously has nothing informed to say on the matter. hell she couldn't even spin it like a real politician. hopefully enough of that fox base saw it and understood what was happening, so we don't have to put up with her absurdity anymore.
kanojo1969Jul 14, 2010
You have to feel at least a bit sorry for McCain. In a lifetime of political office, he's failed at becoming president, and his most noteworthy achievement has been bringing Palin into the public sphere along with all the tea-party ignorance-fueled dribble that goes along with her.
Where would the Tea Party, the birthers, etc be right now if Sarah had never been his running mate? Somehow I can't imagine they would be as well known.
timedalkatJul 11, 2010
Always entertaining. Bravo.
cosmicsurferJul 11, 2010
Sistah Sarah, that woman is an idiot
maxell101Jul 11, 2010
And now her co-worker at fox sees that too. Comedy gold.
frccJul 12, 2010
Agree, but I saw a typical Bill O interview with interruption and changing the questions mid-answer. More interrogation than anything else.
Nothing new. Didn't see humiliation or anger but it's clear some people want to see it so they do.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
rushikuJul 12, 2010
Oh, I dunno...Sarah's usual s**t-eatin', "I-can't believe-I'm getting-paid-to-do-this", smirk had been replaced with a look of utter confusion and anger.
If you listen closely while Bill is explaining that fact that closing the border and roundin' up them there varmits isn't going to address the issue of what to do with said varmits, you can hear the penny drop as Sarah realizes that Bill has asked an actual question that will require an answer instead of the "tough talkin'" she had prepared.
abk0110Jul 12, 2010
You have to start answering before someone can interrupt your answer.
otabJul 12, 2010
That woman(in particular) really belongs to the f**king kitchen. And she should make me a sammich,coz she is worthless.
kaegroJul 13, 2010
Better be a good sandwich too
iamacyborgJul 13, 2010
Seriously. Someone need to put my dick in her mouth.
srs2000Jul 11, 2010
I guarantee you that she looked down at her hand to read the term "case study."
Want to bet that she would have said "uh huh" or "yes" to any numbers that O'Reilly said?
Anyone else catch where she is 100% against letting any of the illegals stay... until she says that "We can't make it easy for them...." insinuating that she has some path to stay in her mind.
rwhitisissleJul 12, 2010
It's frightening when O'Reilly is actually having to defend the civil liberties of illegal immigrants by flat out telling Palin that "we can't starve these people to death."
netantJul 12, 2010
Eating is not a civil liberty. Its an implied human right to be alive.
propyneJul 13, 2010
We take the responsibility to take care of other humans.
badgerbusJul 12, 2010
He was totally leading her at that point, she didn't know what the hell he was talking about.
That whole thing about making them register, she was just like 'wtf, I better just say yes'.
Looks like the gloves are coming off a bit, she's going to find out just how softball that Katie Couric interview really was.
evarecessJul 12, 2010
All of them!
abk0110Jul 12, 2010
It was like a video from http://www.jakeandamir.com/
shapedyJul 13, 2010
Wow, yes. I never thought about it like that. So true. Except she has no likability whatsoever.
abk0110Jul 13, 2010
I spent soo much money on securing the boarder last night?
How much money?
Like, 50 trillion dollars.
That's not a realistic number.
I spent... like, what's a normal amount.
I don't know, maybe a few bil-
I spent a few billion on securing the boarder last night. I got sooo wasted.
robdiggityJul 11, 2010
I said it before and I stand by it: if we just stop saying her goddamn name, she will go away.
It's like she's Beetle Juice.
freedomjoeJul 11, 2010
She does seem eerily like Beetle Juice.
chongoJul 13, 2010
Not as charming... more like Otho
clvngodessJul 11, 2010
Nice f**king model!
marx2kJul 12, 2010
*honk honk*
dagnabbitJul 12, 2010
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gOf8Kl4Mvv4
Closed AccountJul 12, 2010
Sarah Palin Sarah Palin Sarah Palin
Sorry, couldn't resist!
Closed AccountJul 12, 2010
She's going to take you as her bride now.
equesardorJul 12, 2010
She's going to come up behind you and slit your throat with her candy cane hook!
gsm54321Jul 12, 2010
Or Freddy Kruger.
shutthefrntdoorJul 12, 2010
If you can get her to say her name backwards, she will go back to her dimension.
Closed AccountJul 12, 2010
Parah Salin Parah Salin Parah Salin
Fingers crossed, hope it works!
sodaman300Jul 12, 2010
Actually, backwards would be Nilap Haras.
You just switched the letters on her given name and her surname.
shutthefrntdoorJul 12, 2010
exactly! And she has to say them. Which means you have to trick her into saying it somehow.
redraven9Jul 12, 2010
Nilap Haras
Nila P Haras
Neil P. Harris
.....
dephextwinJul 13, 2010
I shat bricks.
clyentnineJul 12, 2010
And yet there's a conspicuous lack of Harry Belafonte at her rallies...
diggrageJul 12, 2010
Alaska Alaska Alaska.
dlan4327Jul 12, 2010
F**K YOU! BEETLEJUICE IS AWESOME!
iwantawiiJul 12, 2010
Everybody stop!!!!! We've already said his name 2 times now.
gehringerJul 12, 2010
Beetlejuice.
mcnerdJul 12, 2010
She's not a danger right now. She won't be elected for anything. Fewer people take her seriously than ever before. And her fundraising ability is a nuisance but it's nothing compared to the vast corporate sums that are currently being collected for use in 2010 GOP campaigns (a result of the recent SCOTUS ruling).
So as long as that's the case, I'd rather not forget about her. She's the quintessential example of a horrible trend in American politics. A "Joe the Plumber"-style candidate; an open anti-intellectual who coasts purely on personal charisma and the promise that her "common sense" will solve all the country's problems. And a crazy fundamentalist to boot.
We need her to keep running around looking stupid, being eviscerated on talk shows. Because those who don't remember history are doomed to repeat it, and she is the best lesson we've ever had on the subject.
robdiggityJul 12, 2010
I agree with the detail of what you say, but disagree thematically. I say as long as puppet shows like this continue we all are deprived of the chance to really learn if there are any quality people out there. Yes I get that junk food sells, but if we don't start getting healthy at some point...
mcnerdJul 12, 2010
Personally I think the 24-hour news cycle ensures that we'll hear everything that the news agencies can possibly be bothered to report. If we don't hear about a hot new candidate then it's not because it was obscured by wall-to-wall Palin coverage: it's because they don't think we're interested, and they probably wouldn't have bothered reporting it even on a slow news day. From this perspective, stories like this are perhaps a symptom rather than the disease.
Bill O'Reilly's time in particular is limited enough that this doesn't really hold, but the more he wastes his time the better off we'll all be.
Anyway I think we can agree to disagree; I certainly understand where you're coming from.
hutch619Jul 12, 2010
"Betelgeuse"
808atheistJul 12, 2010
Beetle Juice
Beetle Juice
Beetle Juice
entroperJul 12, 2010
Baytul Geiss
Baytul Geiss
Baytul Geiss
jtheiJul 13, 2010
Betelgeuse
Betelgeuse
Betelgeuse
And there he is, shining brightly in Orion's armpit.
cwhite545Jul 12, 2010
That's the typical Digg attitude that thinks if you bury anything bad about O and the dems, it never happened.
beesknees21Jul 12, 2010
Beetle...... Drink. WTF is juice?
invaderprotosJul 13, 2010
Ah, well I attended a community college, I'm a graduate of a small country high school, I plan to travel quite extensively, I lived through the Bush administration and have had better times since then. I've seen PALIN SPEAK ON TELEVISION ABOUT A HUNDRED AND SIXTY-SEVEN TIMES, AND SHE KEEP GETTIN' FUNNIER EVERY TIME I HEAR HER!
raidy11moonJul 13, 2010
You win the internet today
Closed AccountJul 13, 2010
You're on 666 diggs. I'm not going to dig or bury you.
Closed AccountJul 13, 2010
Doh! You got dugg up. 687 now.
renokbJul 13, 2010
Biggie Smalls, Biggie Smalls, Biggie Smalls
lynusborgusJul 13, 2010
well played.
matt43Jul 11, 2010
Wow... that's a great little window into her brain. I actually liked Bill there for a minute.
freedomjoeJul 11, 2010
Yeah, it's scary when you can see the little train chugging full speed ahead, confident and sure, until it's derailed by reality and suddenly you hear the screeching halt of all mechanisms and then the train gets mad. Yikes.
Closed AccountJul 12, 2010
wow. couldn't have said it any better.
Closed AccountJul 12, 2010
It was hilarious. Bill was leading her on.
"Yes Bill, I'll do that...and yeah, I'll do that....and I'll do that too Bill..."
"OK, good, but what about this then??"
"OK, I'll make it easier for you Bill, we'll just deport them all.....can we talk about Mama Grizzlies now??"
digg2point0Jul 12, 2010
The little trainwreck that could.
lancertJul 12, 2010
Couldn't...
digg2point0Jul 12, 2010
Oh no... she definitely can trainwreck.
seltaeb4Jul 12, 2010
No, her ear canal is a great little window into her brain.
Through it, you can see another little window directly opposite, the light pouring through in abundance.
davenp0rtJul 12, 2010
Bill O'Reilly is definitely a dick and I don't agree with his politics, but he's a sharp guy and isn't going to let a dumb bimbo rub s**t all over his political party. I'm betting that he knew she didn't know what she'd say without someone feeding her lines, so he made her make up policy as she went.
digg2point0Jul 12, 2010
Except for all the times that he let the dumb bimbo rub s**t all over his political party when it was getting them votes in the primaries.
konhachiJul 12, 2010
What brain?
mxm111Jul 12, 2010
It is difficult not to like Bill, when you compare him with Sarah, or with Hitler...
It all depends on the point of reference.
Closed AccountJul 12, 2010
Godwin'd by MxM.
Also, I am of the belief that Hannity and Beck are on FOXNews simply to make O'Reilly look sane.
maddoktor2Jul 11, 2010
Gotcha Media!
maxell101Jul 11, 2010
You betcha!
gr00verJul 12, 2010
*wink*
evilregisJul 12, 2010
I thought it was the lamestream media now. And honestly, the thought of this f**king ridiculous "Mama grizzly" schtick taking off (which it will) is enough to make my head spin.
ptfoeJul 12, 2010
whatever it takes
maxell101Jul 11, 2010
I'm learning a lot about Digg lately. If an article isn't buried they don't start their clusterf*ck? Then when it's buried they storm in. I may leave Digg soon. They can keep it if they're planning to turn it into a Freeper sh!thouse.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
wildJul 12, 2010
I am probably leaving digg soon, but because of new.digg.com, not because of the freepers. They are predictable and sort of amusing to watch.
(Seriously,where else can you watch teabaggers scream at the top of their lungs while the rest of the world walks by without caring. Besides their protects, I mean.)
marx2kJul 12, 2010
Checked new.digg.com .... what the.... what is this.... am I on... is this facetwitterbook? Whaaaaat the f... this is awful... oh god.... OH GOD...
wildJul 12, 2010
^^^Yea, some of us have received alpha invites, but apparently anyone with a digg account can log in. I think the slow roll-out is to prevent any one submission about it from reaching the front page to be honest. I've yet to see any digger commenting how much they love the new direction.
sneakyninjaJul 12, 2010
I love the new direction!
Closed AccountJul 12, 2010
Is there a site like what Digg was supposed to be when it was launched? By that, I mean tech/geeky news. I'd love a digg-like site that was mostly techy without all this political crap.
Reddit is too "LOL WE KNOW ABOUT 4CHAN" for me.
wildJul 12, 2010
[Is there a site like what Digg was supposed to be when it was launched?]
If you find it, let me know. And if anyone wants to start one, you have from now until new.digg.com goes Alpha to get ready for the exodus.
Closed AccountJul 12, 2010
What happened to all the digg clones from when digg first came out? There's gotta be something else like this out there.
spyriousJul 12, 2010
@lolwatermelon
digg.com/settings/topics /s
In seriousness though, I think that new.digg.com, event though it looks like it's taking stylistic cues from facebook, is more in the vein of what you're looking for as well. It seems like you can customize it very easily in the "My News" section, where you only get stories from people your following and subjects your interested in, but you can always go to the "Top News" feed to get it all.
Closed AccountJul 13, 2010
spyrious, my problem isn't with the subjects on digg, it's that the FOCUS is no longer on the technology side of things.
Also, it's full of chantards. I'd kill for a site like Digg was when it first came out.
bossm4nJul 12, 2010
Then leave. What exactly are you whining about? On any given day, the Digg front page is filled with liberal garbage and propaganda just like this--status quo. Today is no different. I guess that's not good enough for you; you prefer to silence anyone who disagrees with your POV, or just paint them all with some alleged demeaning name like "freepers". I'm no fan of Sarah Palin, but the attention you idiots give her while the Democrats continue their inept 4 year reign of destruction in Congress is pathetic. Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
Closed AccountJul 12, 2010
Yeah, that was true a couple of years ago. Nowadays the diggertarians and freepers have a permanent stranglehold on Digg.
marx2kJul 12, 2010
"Then leave. What exactly are you whining about?"
graphictruthJul 13, 2010
Conservadigg! From the people that bring you Conservapedia!
Closed AccountJul 13, 2010
What "liberal garbage and propaganda"? The video only showed Fox News, O'Reilly, and Palin.
Just because something's putrid, doesn't automatically make it liberal lol
Closed AccountJul 12, 2010
Oh NOES! Freepers on digg? God forbid!! They don't agree with my worldview so I'm gonna take my marbles and run away. Ah, REAL hope and CHANGE!Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
novenatorJul 13, 2010
I think we should show them the same "tolerance" they show dissenting viewpoints by calling them fags, n*&&#rs, traitors, etc. What's your FreeRepublic account again?Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
milsorgnJul 12, 2010
lol wtf are any of you talking about
novenatorJul 13, 2010
This article was likely resurrected. The right wing nut jobs have been using off site organizing to artificially remove progressive stories from the upcoming section of Digg for many months now (ie. censoring digg). Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
ramfire98Jul 12, 2010
Welcome to freedom of choice.
novenatorJul 13, 2010
Speaking of freedom, how American is the censorship you regularly engage in on Digg.com? You do it so much, you should move to China.
Closed AccountJul 13, 2010
How many articles have you dugg down novenator? You know what? Nevermind. I don't care...this is so stupid I dignified your response by even writing this much.
mrj777Jul 13, 2010
So leave. I'm pretty sure the site will survive without your glowing endorsement.
seltaeb4Jul 12, 2010
Sarah Palin Humiliates Sarah Palin Everywhere.
yahnJul 12, 2010
What does Sarah Palin's mouth and vagina have in common...
They both spew out retarded s**t....
sunspots22Jul 13, 2010
Low blow...
brainscapeJul 12, 2010
How much proof do we need to show that this milf is a bimbo.
jowsleyJul 12, 2010
gilf my friend, gilf.
twinklyjesusJul 12, 2010
You think Pelosi or Reid are less of bimbos than she is? They just have better handlers.
80centjackJul 12, 2010
You're bringing up other people to try to distract from the obvious truth: Sarah Palin is an idiot.
maddoktor2Jul 12, 2010
Another deflection FAIL for Twinkles The Clown.
twinklyjesusJul 12, 2010
No, both you partisan hacks, all these politicians, regardless of affiliation, are empty suits, just like the nightly news reporter on your local tv affiliate. They just read what they are told to read, and like a car salesman, tell you what ever they think you want to hear, so you'll vote for them.
George Bush the first: "No new taxes"
Bill Clinton (to UAW before election): "I will not sign NAFTA" (two months later...history)
And so it goes. Meanwhile, f**kfaces like you two sit around making noises about her, and your beloved messiah can't get a word out without sounding like a stammering idiot, unless he has a teleprompter. You just don't want to see it.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
dynamojoeJul 12, 2010
I can't stand either of them.
tk0680Jul 12, 2010
O'Reilly surely wins for at least having a brain.
Bill-O: "Alright Governor, always a pleasure talking to you."
Bill-O (silently): "Bahahahahahahahahaha"
bewareofthecowJul 12, 2010
Bill has moved closer to the middle of the political spectrum in the last 2 years than any of those other yahoos @ faux news. It is somewhat scary that Bill is now becoming the voice of reason on that station.
lars5Jul 13, 2010
or are those yahoos just moving further right?
Closed AccountJul 12, 2010
That's because Hannity is moving even further right, while Beck is moving toward the insane asylum.
digg2point0Jul 12, 2010
Palin outlived her usefulness.
All that's left now is to pick her apart for the next sheep's temporary benefit.
stormwernJul 12, 2010
Her usefulness?
digg2point0Jul 12, 2010
Why to be a folksy, down-home, soccer mom from REAL America who loves guns!
(Read: To play conservative voters like a cheap piano)
cedexJul 12, 2010
Porn?
tiduJul 13, 2010
comedy
jceezJul 12, 2010
She did that before she was born.
davecachiaJul 12, 2010
It didn't look that bad. It could have been a lot worse if she was a member of a political faction O'riley doesn't support.
lancertJul 12, 2010
It didn't look too bad because O'Reilly held back. Pure and simple. He even lobbed her the answers (he wanted to hear) in the questions.
She's making far too much money and getting far too much media exposure for her to run for president. It's much easier to arm chair quarterback someone else's attempt to clean up from the Bush era...
Closed AccountJul 12, 2010
Even if she ran, I don't see her getting past any kind of primary. She has her hardcore supporters, but the average republican doesn't really care for her.
Lets say that she does get the republican endorsement, she already f**ked herself over by resigning half way through her term as governor. She doesn't have the ability to be in charge of a single state for a full term, how could she be in charge of an entire country for one?
fuzzzwuzzzJul 12, 2010
He was basically holding her her hand and walking her through the interview. That's pretty embarrassing.
darkmatter911Jul 12, 2010
What a f**king moron. Why do people keep giving her any airtime or attention. Just let her disappear back into the woodwork.
smedrickJul 12, 2010
But she's HILARIOUS
seltaeb4Jul 12, 2010
And has BEWBIES
cntlscrutJul 12, 2010
...back into the tundra.
Fixed it. :)
shutupflandersJul 12, 2010
I like how it says "Sarah Palin: Fox News Contributor", directly on the screen. I guess they're not trying to hide their bias anymore.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
weierstrassJul 12, 2010
She was hired as a Fox News Contributor after she resigned the governorship. It's no secret.
shutupflandersJul 12, 2010
So she's an actual paid employee now?
jamdoggJul 12, 2010
Because she's so unbiased./s
ccb0x45Jul 12, 2010
Yes she is a paid employee.
mnocketJul 12, 2010
You can't be serious. You're surprised that a network hired an ex-politician to give news commentary? EVERY network, broadcast or cable, does this! Why are you surprised that FOX does it too? Do you think MSNBC doesn't? More likely, you just had a knee-jerk reaction to criticize FOX without stopping to think for a minute about whether they were behaving differently than everyone else - kinda like the "FAUXNews Buried" mentality.
artworkz918Jul 12, 2010
shutupflanders makes Palin look smnart with posts like that
spacemanspiff22Jul 12, 2010
And yet a decent number of people still digg him up. Amazing...
dankbuddzJul 12, 2010
Fit those jabs when while you still can.
artworkz918Jul 12, 2010
lol then my damn fingers type "smart" wrong....oh the irony
danj484Jul 12, 2010
She's contributing to Fox News by being on the show, is she not?
mrj777Jul 13, 2010
I'm a middle of the road guy politically and hate Palin. Usually love everything against her, but I am saying this comment is too much. I mean if she dug ditches and it said "Sarah Palin: Ditch Digger" I wonder if people would draw some comparison to how she was digging herself into a hole? Its her job man. They listed her by a job title. I think the material that left her mouth is a far larger issue.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
seltaeb4Jul 12, 2010
Thirty years from now, we will have another name for Sarah Palin:
Emily Latella.
Closed AccountJul 12, 2010
"Nevermind."
enantiodromiaJul 12, 2010
"Hey folks... what iz all dis we've bean hearing about violins in the schools? well, why shouldn't we allow violins in schools?"
kaiosamaJul 12, 2010
Conservatives revel in ignorance and general anti-intellectualism.
I'd imagine her approval rating amongst the hillbilly base rose up a few points following this appearance.
weierstrassJul 12, 2010
There are plenty of conservative intellectuals.
smemilyJul 12, 2010
The conservative base, by and large, then.
weierstrassJul 12, 2010
Just don't ignore the mass of dumb liberals.
sirmitchellJul 12, 2010
Smemily,
That's like me saying the liberal base is nothing but pot smoking hippies.
dankbuddzJul 12, 2010
Sure, they're just mostly wrong, that's all.
path411Jul 13, 2010
Oh it's generalization time!
All Muslims are suicide bombers.
All Canadian's are potheads.
All Black people are gangstars.
All Gay people are gay.
All Asians do math gud.
All Indians do tech support.
All Germans are Racist.
Are there more I'm missing?
fordsvt1Jul 13, 2010
All Canadians ARE potheads, dude.
kaegroJul 13, 2010
I have to agree with the Canadian thing.
/Canadian.
mykonos08Jul 12, 2010
Roger Scruton being one of my favorites
sealinkJul 12, 2010
The Religious Right revels in ignorance and general anti-intellectualism.
Fixed.
I've met plenty of conservatives that are more Barry Goldwater-esque that can have reasonable debates until we agree to disagree about the direction we think the country should take. Ridiculing intelligent people with other points of view is not the way to reach consensus.
Ridiculing morons with talking points, however, is just good clean fun.
moogleJul 13, 2010
Thank you.
juliochavezJul 13, 2010
Negative. I'm from the hills and I've even played in a jug band. ( I love bluegrass ) I don't vote for morons, however. I'm not sure how you define hillbilly but I don't think they all vote for simpletons. If by hillbillies, you mean conservatives ( those who would actually align themselves with today's "conservatives" ) then yeah, I guess you could be right but it would be redundant to say so, given that definition.
by the way, my token appeared invalid - Digg - you need someone to help you iron out some of your s**t or what?
moogleJul 13, 2010
You're obviously kidding me, right?
bluehouseJul 12, 2010
It was refreshing to see Bill push for real answers from her. She just wanted to spout on about how there is a huge problem instead what she would do to fix it
artosrcJul 12, 2010
The golem is turning on its master. I am enjoying this.
pintomp3Jul 12, 2010
Her answer to "How many troops would you send to the border?" sounds awfully familiar to her answer to "Which newspapers do you read?"
stuffradioJul 12, 2010
I read as many as I need to!
betteroffedJul 12, 2010
"All of them, of course!"
What a f**kin' moron.
beratebirthersJul 14, 2010
You don't understand her plan. She's for a return to the draft and putting them all on the border.
sky0001000Jul 12, 2010
For O'Reilly, I don't think that constitutes humiliation.. He was pretty easy on her considering she still wasn't able to give a single real answer.
therealsirnateJul 12, 2010
This account has been closed by the user
andywartholJul 12, 2010
I agree. The headline exaggerates.
sky0001000Jul 12, 2010
Yep. Damn that bitch is dumb.
troyfoleyJul 12, 2010
When he said "President Palin" I pooped a little.
hermitninjaJul 12, 2010
I pooped a bunch. And I threw up in my mouth.
caramba421Jul 12, 2010
I s**t all over myself, then vomited in my lap. My secretary came in the room, and smelling the puke and s**t, started throwing up herself. I got all turned on by this, and just started f**king her in the ass right there in the pile of s**t/puke.
A client, who was in my office at the time asked,
"What's your act called?'
To which I replied, "I call it the Aristocrats!"
rudegarJul 12, 2010
I like how you are sitting and reading digg and wathing online videos from fox, with a client in the room :)
createthefutureJul 12, 2010
Halfway through your second sentence, I was hoping for an Aristocrats joke. I left satisfied :)
redraven9Jul 12, 2010
LIKE A BOSS
amaoicanJul 13, 2010
A+++ Would vomit again!
Closed AccountJul 12, 2010
I pooped in my mouth, and then vomited s**t.
arizonaicedteaJul 12, 2010
She's like a deer caught in a headlight. I almost feel bad for her. Almost.
wassamattaJul 12, 2010
not a direct response - just a direct link since politico is acting up.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6dlZwM-eZkA
marx2kJul 12, 2010
<conservatives>
The only reason you mock her is because you're afraid of her. SARAH 2012!!!
</conservatives>
grymusJul 12, 2010
Only thing I fear is Zombie Bruce Lee.
enantiodromiaJul 12, 2010
hah! thread winnar!
+100 Internets
lukeag10Jul 12, 2010
Just when I started thinking I might be able to stay alive during the zombie apocalypse, you throw this curveball at me...
lancertJul 12, 2010
We ARE scared of her. She's a complete ditz. Pure and simple.
coffeedemonJul 12, 2010
People should be scared. Does anyone really want this moron with their finger on the button?
moogleJul 13, 2010
I read "Want to finger her and her button."
mdellingJul 12, 2010
As a conservative, I'm inclined to think that the only reason you mock her is because she's retarded. That and you're (justifiably) terrified of how completely she would screw things if she ever got into office. Heaven help us if that day ever comes.
osko2052Jul 12, 2010
Can't be any worse than what we have in the White House right now.
moogleJul 13, 2010
No intelligent conservatives actually support Palin. The GOP is a party, and just because we're ideologically conservative does not automatically make us affiliated with the party in any way. Honestly, how is the Republican Party even considered conservative anymore? They're not preserving Republican Virtue or any Classical Liberal values.
dukeonkledJul 13, 2010
@osko: Yes it can.
jimv1983Jul 13, 2010
yes marx2k you are right. I am afraid of Sarah Palin. Everyone should be scared at the thought of having someone as bat s**t crazy as Sarah Palin being president.
lowe0Jul 13, 2010
I'm not scared of Palin; I'm scared of her followers. They don't like people like me and they're well-armed. "First against the wall when the revolution comes" could easily turn out to be more than a snarky Douglas Adams reference.
generalobviousJul 12, 2010
The bigger question is: "What the f**k is going on?"
Why would O'Reilly do that to his own kind?
wakkyweedJul 12, 2010
#1. He's a ratings whore.
#2. He's in the Republican's pocket. The more intelligent members of the Republican party know that Palin is more of a liability than an asset.
marx2kJul 12, 2010
Then why would Fox offer her a contract?
toxicshokJul 12, 2010
see answer 1
trashyamericanJul 13, 2010
heh, intelligent members of the republican party.
malexJul 13, 2010
Don't laugh, Trashy. The people running the show at the GOP aren't stupid. They're cynical, manipulative, bastards who would sell out their own families to rile up the base (I'm looking at you, Rove) but they aren't stupid.
vitriolandangstJul 12, 2010
So he can appear "neutral" to the Libertarians who think Sarah is an idiot but still vote the same way as the Tea Baggers.
As long as they lead everyone to the same decisions -- it doesn't matter how they get there. This is a science, after all.
frccJul 12, 2010
Neither party wants to secure the boarder or end the wars. Bill O and the rest of the media whores can either read the teleprompter or find a new job.
aaronpdxJul 12, 2010
Gotta love making broad claims with no evidence to back them up just to seem like you're the informed one and we're all sheep. You're not impressing anyone. The best you're generally going to get is rolled eyes and a bury.
flanativeJul 12, 2010
Bill just led the horse to water.
seltaeb4Jul 12, 2010
. . . but couldn't make it think.
fuzzzwuzzzJul 12, 2010
So is she a horse, a grizzly, or a pig now?
boneheadfarkerJul 12, 2010
See you guys! I told you Horsebearpig was was real! I'm super serial...
tk0680Jul 12, 2010
It fell in and drowned.
jeffdabeatJul 12, 2010
You know, O'Reilly is conservative in so many ways, but what separates him from the over dramatic republicans and even these Tea Partiers is that he isn't conservative just to make money or to make headlines. He isn't so separated from the world that he can modify his views. He knows he isn't there to put Palin in office, he is there for his viewers. He gives them what they need to hear.
I don't agree with O'Reilly on everything, but he is one commentator I can respect.
seltaeb4Jul 12, 2010
Sarah Palin: Pinhead or Patriot?
mykonos08Jul 12, 2010
a patriotic pinhead?
marx2kJul 12, 2010
lol and thats why O'Reilly is a moron
fuzzzwuzzzJul 12, 2010
He's probably the sanest person on Fox News. That's not saying very much, but it's something.
gibbonsbeardJul 12, 2010
Yeah, my fox news zealot father thinks O'Reilly is a liberal so that says a lot
killamockingbrdJul 13, 2010
Shep Smith anyone? Or did he finally leave?
Closed AccountJul 12, 2010
What the f**k are you talking about? He's in it 100% to cash in. He shows up, yells about things that scare the core FoxNews demographic (under-educated males), invites someone with a different opinion on, yells at them, calls them names, refuses to let them talk, cuts them off, ends the segment, says some scary words, cashes his paychecks.
He doesn't deserve respect. Unless, of course, you're the kind of person who says inflammatory s**t and you also want to get paid for it.
That being said, I respect Billy for getting paid to yell at people on TV.
artworkz918Jul 12, 2010
hillarious! make up things so you can mock what you don't understand..
the core FoxNews demographic (under-educated males)...?
their demographic is made up up of very successful, educated business men and women and entrepreneurs
FAILmelon is your new nameComment is buried, click here to see the rest.
marx2kJul 12, 2010
"their demographic is made up up of very successful, educated business men and women and entrepreneurs"
Oh! So that's why Beck is hawking gold at them!
funkeepickleJul 12, 2010
I can't believe that this sort of thing works on so many people. But then again it did work for the Republicans during the healthcare debate. Be so obstructionist, move the level of discourse so far to the right to make the healthcare plan LOOK like a radical liberal idea while conveniently ignoring the fact that it ended up being almost exactly what the Republican "alternative" plan was during the Clinton era.
Same thing here. O'Reilly hasn't gotten anymore sane. It's just now he's surrounded by even crazier people (Beck and Palin), making him look more moderate, more reasonable. If you don't believe me then go watch some of his shows, you'll realize he hasn't changed at all.
netantJul 12, 2010
Thank you. I thought I was the only digger here who could express their opinion of the Obama Health Insurance Reform Act.
And to carp again into infinitum, the public option could have been passed with the same "reconciliation" process used to pass that craptastic bill.
moogleJul 13, 2010
Yeah, come on people. Bill O'Reilly might be rude, but he is by no means a "moron." I am confident that he's more articulate and intellectually inclined than most of the asstards who roam Digg and basically downvote and upvote just to fit in with the rest of the average, adolescent internet sentiment.
Just because he disagrees with you and needs better interpersonal skills does not make him a "moron." You should be able to TELL from the way he speaks and writes that he's a very capable and intelligent person. And if you can't, you're probably a "moron" yourself.
iamagr8guyJul 12, 2010
Palin on her worst day could make better decisions than that Idiot that is in there now. Liberals must not care about the future of America. They just cannot see that he is just a puppet with no leadership ability "Hope and Change". What a lie!!! Even I bought into this imitation of hope. What a mistake.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
orion846Jul 12, 2010
"Palin on her worst day could make better decisions than that Idiot that is in there now"
if you truly believe that you need your head examined
cntlscrutJul 12, 2010
Stop. Just stop. Also, I'll be confiscating your internet card now. Hand it over.
ipoodJul 12, 2010
Wow...
justan0th3rfaceJul 13, 2010
urast00pidguy
kiwibombJul 13, 2010
Bad Troll! Get back under your bridge!
mrj777Jul 13, 2010
Your screen name false advertised you. And decent human that can read is already aware is a marketing campaign with no substance, just financial backers that make her pander the worst filth imaginable. If she had brain cell one in her head she'd admit her party would destroy the people they claim to help.
stolemybikeJul 13, 2010
Hahahaha.
Wait, you were being serious?
spinky342Jul 13, 2010
Your s**t's all retarded.
jakobrowningJul 12, 2010
She reminds me of a female Michael Scott.
Closed AccountJul 12, 2010
haha isn't he leaving the show?
How fitting.
fordsvt1Jul 13, 2010
You forget that, behind the idiocy, Michael was one of the best paper salesmen at D-M. She can't even do that much right.
jakobrowningJul 13, 2010
agreed
osabr22000Jul 12, 2010
"You have no idea what you're talking about, do you?"
~Anton Chigur
bonestampJul 12, 2010
Take whatever you were going to spend on troops and spend it on getting the fence done faster.
seltaeb4Jul 12, 2010
Around Wasilla; it will protect us, the Canadians, and the Russians..
bonestampJul 12, 2010
lol. I'd like to believe the rest of Wasilla is much more tolerable.
lightinggodJul 12, 2010
Build a ten foot fence, create a market for eleven foot ladders.
bonestampJul 12, 2010
There are lots of fences that people don't dare climb.
newerakbJul 12, 2010
clearly the solution is to just make a twelve foot fence
bonestampJul 12, 2010
I think the point is that if you have a fence you're going to put razor wire on top of it, you're going to make it electric, you're going to have motion sensors on the other side. It makes it a pain in the ass to climb and if someone does make it over then at least we know where to send the helicopter.
lightinggodJul 12, 2010
@BoneStamp
We could probably get copies of the blueprints for the Berlin Wall pretty cheap....
factorof13Jul 12, 2010
..............................................................
....................................░▒▓▓▓▒░.....
..........................░▒▒▓▓▓▓█████▓▓▓▒▒▒▒░.....
..........▒▓▓▓▓▓███▓▓▓▓▓████████████
.......▒▓▓▓▓▓█████████████▓▓▓▓▓███.
.....▓██▓██████████▓▓▓▒░..░░░▒▒▓▓███
.....██▓███▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒▒░░░▒▒▒▒▒░░▒▒▓██▓
.....████▓▒▒▒▒░░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▓██
.....███▒░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▓███
..▒██▓▓░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▓▓██
...▒██▓▒░░░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░░░▒▒▒▒▓▓▓████
......▒█▓▒▒▓▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▓█▓▓▒▒▒░▓▓▓█
........░█▓▓▓▓▓██▓▓▒▒▓▓███▓▓▒▓▓▓▒░▒▓▓▓
..........▒▓▓▓▓██▓▓▓▒▒▒▓▓▓▓▓█▓▓▒▒▒░▒▓▓▓
............▓▒▒▒▒▒░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░▒▒░░▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▒▒▒▓▒░...
............░▒░░░░░▒▓▒▒▒▒▒░░░▒░░▒▒▒▒▒░▒▒▒▓▓░.▓▒...
..............▓▒▒▒░▒▓▒░░░▒▓▓▓▒░▒▒▓▓▒░░▒▒▒▒▒▓▒▓▒.......
.............▒▓▒░▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒▓▓▓▓▒▒▓▓▓▓▒....▓█▒......
..............▒▓▓▒▓▓▒░▒▓▒░....░▓▓▓▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒▓█▓......
...............▒▓▓▓▓▓▒▒▒▒▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓██▓..........
.................▓▓▒▓▓████████▓▒▒▓▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░...F**KIN' THING
.................▓▓▒▓▓███▓▓█▓▓█▓▒▓░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░.........SUCKS!....
.................▒▓▒▓▒▒▓▒...▒░..▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░.../.............
...................▓▒░▒▒▒.░▒░░▒▓▓▒▒▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒▒...............
..................▒▓░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒░.░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░.▓▓......................
.....▒▓▓█████▓░▒▓▓▒▒▒▒░░░░▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▒.....▒▓██▓░..............
███████████▒▒▓▒▒▒▒▒░▒▒▓▓█▓▓▒▒...........▒███████▓▒░
███████████▓..░▓█████▓██▓▒░.................▒███████████
███████████▓░.......▒▓▓▓▓██▒....................░████████████
████████████▒..............▒████▓░................▒▓███████████
████████████▒............░████▒.▓▒.............░.░████████████
███████████▓░...........░▓▓▓█▓░.░░.................█████
………..’, ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ,,--~~--,, ; ; ; ; ;,--------,, ; ,--~, ; ; ,,-~, ; ;,--,,;,,-~~-,, ; ; ; ; ; ;’,………………..
…………| ; ; ; ; ; ; ,-‘’ . ,,--,, . ‘-, ; ; ; ;| . ,-,, . ‘, | . . | ; ;’-, . .\,,/ . ./’-,,--, . ‘, ; ; ; ; ; ; ‘-,………………
…………| ; ; ; ; ; ; | . .,’ ; ; ;’, . .| ; ; ; | . .’-‘ . ,-‘ | . . | ; ; ; ‘-, . . .,-‘ ; ;,-‘ . ,-‘ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ‘-,…………….
…………’, ; ; ; ; ; ;’, . ‘-,__,-‘ . ,’ ; ; ; | . .|\ . .\ . | . . |___ ; ;} . . / ; ; ;’----‘ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;’-,……….
………….| ; ; ; ; ; ; ;’-,,_ . ._,,-‘ ; ; ; ; |__| .\__\ ;|_____/ ; ;/__/ ; ; ; ; (¯) ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ‘-
…….......’, ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;¯ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ‘
boozedrinkerJul 12, 2010
You didn't have to splice the owl "O RLY" into that.
factorof13Jul 12, 2010
And you didn't have to comment.
Although, if determinism is correct, then I actually DID have to splice O RLY into that picture and you DID have to comment.
mrjufrowJul 12, 2010
O Reilly?
captzomborgJul 12, 2010
................................................________
........................................,.-‘”...................``~.,
.................................,.-”...................................“-.,
.............................,/...............................................”:,
.........................,?......................................................\,
......................./...........................................................,}
...................../......................................................,:`^`..}
.................../...................................................,:”........./
……….…..,’ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;__ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ‘-,’
…….……,-‘ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;,-‘’¯: : ’’-, ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; _ ; ; ; ; ;’,
…….…..,’ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;| : : : : : :| ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ,-‘’¯: ¯’’-, ; ; ;’,
…….….,’ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ‘-,_: : _,-‘ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; | : : : : : :| ; ; ; |
….……,’ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ¯¯ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;’-,,_ : :,-‘ ; ; ; ;|
….…..,-‘ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ,,-~’’ , , , , ,,,-~~-, , , , _ ; ; ;¯¯ ; ; ; ; ;|
............░▒░░░░░▒▓▒▒▒▒▒░░░▒░░▒▒▒▒▒░▒▒▒▓▓░.▓▒...
..............▓▒▒▒░▒▓▒░░░▒▓▓▓▒░▒▒▓▓▒░░▒▒▒▒▒▓▒▓▒.......
.............▒▓▒░▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒▓▓▓▓▒▒▓▓▓▓▒....▓█▒......
..............▒▓▓▒▓▓▒░▒▓▒░....░▓▓▓▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒▓█▓......
...............▒▓▓▓▓▓▒▒▒▒▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓██▓..........
.................▓▓▒▓▓████████▓▒▒▓▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░...SARAH PALIN
.................▓▓▒▓▓███▓▓█▓▓█▓▒▓░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░.........SUCKS!....
.................▒▓▒▓▒▒▓▒...▒░..▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░.../.............
...................▓▒░▒▒▒.░▒░░▒▓▓▒▒▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒▒...............
..................▒▓░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒░.░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░.▓▓......................
.....▒▓▓█████▓░▒▓▓▒▒▒▒░░░░▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▒.....▒▓██▓░..............
███████████▒▒▓▒▒▒▒▒░▒▒▓▓█▓▓▒▒...........▒███████▓▒░
███████████▓..░▓█████▓██▓▒░.................▒███████████
███████████▓░.......▒▓▓▓▓██▒....................░████████████
████████████▒..............▒████▓░................▒▓███████████
████████████▒............░████▒.▓▒.............░.░████████████
███████████▓░...........░▓▓▓█▓░.░░.................█████
………..’, ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ,,--~~--,, ; ; ; ; ;,--------,, ; ,--~, ; ; ,,-~, ; ;,--,,;,,-~~-,, ; ; ; ; ; ;’,………………..
…………| ; ; ; ; ; ; ,-‘’ . ,,--,, . ‘-, ; ; ; ;| . ,-,, . ‘, | . . | ; ;’-, . .\,,/ . ./’-,,--, . ‘, ; ; ; ; ; ; ‘-,………………
…………| ; ; ; ; ; ; | . .,’ ; ; ;’, . .| ; ; ; | . .’-‘ . ,-‘ | . . | ; ; ; ‘-, . . .,-‘ ; ;,-‘ . ,-‘ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ‘-,…………….
…………’, ; ; ; ; ; ;’, . ‘-,__,-‘ . ,’ ; ; ; | . .|\ . .\ . | . . |___ ; ;} . . / ; ; ;’----‘ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;’-,……….
………….| ; ; ; ; ; ; ;’-,,_ . ._,,-‘ ; ; ; ; |__| .\__\ ;|_____/ ; ;/__/ ; ; ; ; (¯) ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ‘-
…….......’, ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;¯ ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ‘
Closed AccountJul 12, 2010
OK, you got me. Well played.
Closed AccountJul 12, 2010
We'll rape her live!
andywartholJul 12, 2010
That's George Bush Sr. , Not Mr. O!
jack416Jul 13, 2010
The O Rly Factor...
Closed AccountJul 12, 2010
The entire GOP agenda is stated in her last sentences.
I seriously hate this woman. The fact that she is even taken seriously by such a large group of people is a strong testament to our broken education system.
Thinking Palin is a good candidate for politics is the easiest way to tell me that you are a complete idiot.
Closed AccountJul 12, 2010
Seriously. Half my relatives are southern conservatives. We joke around with each other about crazy the others political views are. Bush could not fail in their eyes. But even to them, Palin is bats**t crazy and completely void of thought.
skybarkJul 13, 2010
I'm a moderate conservative and I absolutely hate her guts. Why wont she go away?
moogleJul 13, 2010
Ah, so they were the few remaining conservatives who were handing Bush approval ratings at the end of his term... when he was virtually rejected by both the conservatives and the liberals.
stackeredJul 13, 2010
Well think of Palin as an idiot filter... she'll just suck up the moron votes so that they don't count at all and nobody gets hurt.
eminn3mJul 13, 2010
True, unless the country gets so polarized that the more intelligent republicans think she's better than giving Obama a second term.
stackeredJul 13, 2010
In this case see: Idiot Filter page 1.
boozedrinkerJul 12, 2010
People bitch about O'Reilly all the time, but I honestly think he's one of the few completely honest people in the world - like him or hate him, he tells you what he really thinks and doesn't give a f**k. He doesn't pander to any one person or group.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
Closed AccountJul 12, 2010
thats the huge problem.... when he has a guest on his show and the guest is making excellent points that go against oreilly, he cuts them off and starts with the name calling.....
bring out the infamous PINHEAD
cuervoman914Jul 12, 2010
let's not get all crazy here man
Closed AccountJul 12, 2010
Please.
He was/is biased. Very biased.
It wasn't until the likes of Beck and Limbaugh seeing a demographic to make money off of that they started to surpass O'Reilly.
In comparison to those fools and Palin, he seems rather sane and logical.
But again, IN COMPARISON to those fools.
In reality, he's as biased as every other Fox News talking head.
Closed AccountJul 13, 2010
I still think he is largely just set in his ways. Every now and then he'll do something I have absolutely have to respect (like paying the legal fees when the westboro baptists sued a soldier's father). But for the most part I think he is a hack that has the conservative, 60+ year old demographic on lock because he spouts 1950's style social-non-progress.
Even a broken clock is right twice a day.
ddraigJul 12, 2010
"American Citizens that are here legally" -- I love that line hah.
Crikey what a thicko
unclefireJul 12, 2010
Isn't it amazing how the concepts of "American Citizens" and "Legal Immigrants" are often used interchangably?
Closed AccountJul 12, 2010
Yes. Brilliant wording.
As opposed to all of those 'American citizens' who are here illegally?
She makes high school journalism students look super intelligent.
boozedrinkerJul 12, 2010
Watch Democrats say that this is a sure sign of the end of the GOP and Conservative politics.....but they are going strong in spite of having a majority in congress and STILL not being able to pass their own bill because they are so ridiculous.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
fredfredricksonJul 12, 2010
What bills are so ridiculous? I always like how people like you make these general statements and then don't have any idea what it is you're actually speaking out against.
cuervoman914Jul 12, 2010
but sarah still is dumb, so f**king dumb
faskippyJul 12, 2010
She gave answers, she said exactly what she thought should be done. I don't see why, just because you don't like her, you have to twist it and say she didn't. Did you hear "troops to border", "register", "deport", "no free pass", etc? Did you hear her say we should do what Reagan tried to do, but correctly? I did. Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
avooJul 12, 2010
O'Reilly was giving her most of the answers! Every question was constructed as "Will you do *this*?" "Yes, exactly." She just kept confirming whatever O'Reilly said.
"Whatever it takes" "Yup," "Do we make them register? Yes we do!" The only thing she said that O'Reilly hadn't already said was that we should make the issue simple, instead of as Bill was rightly saying, that it was complicated.
14justiceJul 12, 2010
But it's not complicated, AVoo. If they're illegal, don't let them in; if they -are- in, send them back.
Just because you're saying it's complicated doesn't make it complicated.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
hallo2uJul 12, 2010
deporting 13 million people isnt simple
faskippyJul 12, 2010
I disagree.
unclefireJul 12, 2010
He was feeding her answers and she still f'd it up.
By agreeing to "making them register" she basically agreed to an amnesty program.
mikeoxbiggJul 12, 2010
Exactly! I can very much respect an intelligent, well-thought out argument conservative/republican argument but this is a bumbling child! She's great at spouting off "take back America! Reward citizens" catch-phrases that speak to the trailer park demographic but those are NOT answers.
She was content to repeat those things until her five-minutes ran out but found herself taken aback by being asked LEGITIMATE logistical questions. From that point on she just stutters and grabs on to ANYTHING the man says. "Register them?....Yes, yes Bill, exactly, we're gonna register them!"
I've seen 8th grader BS better oral presentations in my days.
If you delude yourself in thinking that this was in any way a sustainable political platform, I truly question your cognitive functions.
faskippyJul 12, 2010
Oh, I know she's wanting to avoid saying it out loud, like the plague. Each and every single politician does, because they want to sound just close enough to their party's guideline to keep those votes, and not too extreme so that any on the sidelines might get thrown their way. But, she did bring up Reagan's attempt, so that tells you something. Honestly, she (and any politician) is only as good as the best idea her advisors have. Well, maybe not the best idea, but the best one they're willing to put before the public. She may be transparently pawn piece sometimes, but the other end of the spectrum looks much worse to me. Hell, we're living the nightmare that came from doing nothing.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
grayf0xxxJul 12, 2010
Anyone have another link? It's not working for me.
grayf0xxxJul 12, 2010
Ah there it goes, up and working!!
admdrewJul 12, 2010
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6dlZwM-eZkA
vitriolandangstJul 12, 2010
Does Sarah actually need Bill's help for this?
Her popularity is due to her moronic ideas. IF she started making sense, she'd be a fricken' Socialist in their eyes.
kataharJul 12, 2010
Mirror?
admdrewJul 12, 2010
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6dlZwM-eZkA
fyberopticJul 12, 2010
How disappointing. I hate both of those people, but nothing said in that video could be seen by the people watching it on Fox News as "humiliation". Anyone who has seen Sarah Palin in any interview or live setting knows that she stumbles around for words like this. She's a moron regardless of where. But many conservatives still somehow consider her competent, so this was just more of the same, with her saying what they want to hear, and they'll continue to eat that s**t up.
The scary part is that she really does have a chance of winning. Especially when a democrat has already been in office, because Americans are fairly dim-witted, and when they see problems, they immediately associate them with the current president/party, even if it's not their fault, or the fault of the previous president/party. But then they'll elect another bunch of clowns like that in there anyway who caused all the problems to begin with, and give them 4-8 years to make a bigger mess, then change parties around again come following election time. A shame there's no way to test people for political competence before letting them vote.
msles59130Jul 12, 2010
Actually, something like 70% of Americans associate the problems we are having with the republicans still, based on all recent polling.
I don't think she can win the presidency, although maybe the rep. nomination is not out of bounds. A LOT of republicans really hate her, and the independents thinks she is a twit and the Dems are terrified she will cause WWIII within 21 days with her ignorance.
pkraus109Jul 13, 2010
Rep here she is irrelevant her only purpose (sad that she has one) is to appeal to the shallow end of the republican gene pool. I hate that she is even given a mic let alone that we still talk about her here. Come 2012 she will not get the nomination. She cost us the election (rightly so i wouldn't want her in line to take over if mccain had died) we won't let her do it again.
taketheleapJul 12, 2010
1. Tell people they have problems (some very real, some imagined/created).
2. Tell them you have "the solution".
3. Promise them jobs, money, wealth and "their nation back".
4. Provide very little specifics as possible.
5. Get elected.
It worked for the National Socialist party, so hey, why shouldn't Palin give it a shot? (No, I'm not calling her a Nazi, it's simply that her presumed strategy has an eerie resemblance to 1932.)
fuzzzwuzzzJul 12, 2010
Does a parenthetical downplay count as a loophole to Godwin's Law?
danj484Jul 12, 2010
Godwin's Law is absolute. It has no loopholes.
gh0st037Jul 12, 2010
You have basically outlined every political campaign. This "strategy" is as old as democracy itself.
Closed AccountJul 12, 2010
Not where I come from, no it doesn't. It's unrecognizable in fact.
Just because your country has a s**tty political and social system, do not think this is valid everywhere.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
enantiodromiaJul 12, 2010
to be fair, it is as old as Democracy itself. try reading about ancient Athens some time.
malman4Jul 12, 2010
worked for obama
nainsellJul 12, 2010
Obama made so many specific promises that there's a website that keeps count of them, you bloody imbecile.
elbowgeekJul 12, 2010
This is the strategy of just about every political campaign ever. Typically towards the end of the previous incumbent's term the voters have come to realize just how bad that incumbent has been. Unfortunately the mass of men have very short memories and listen to any schmuck who gets up on a podium and makes noise about how they will be different and make their lives better.
Wash, rinse, repeat, groundhog day, etc.
jceezJul 12, 2010
6. Quit 1/2 through your term.
fleetlordatvarJul 12, 2010
You know what the difference is? The Nazis ramped up the German economy, eliminated unemployment, and restored their nation's status as a world power. Granted, they also incited race hatred and then ran the country into the ground. But if you gave everything over to the GOP, they'd skip the whole "repair economy/solve unemployment/rejuvenate America" part and go straight to the "racism/press-national-self-destruct-button" part.
So what I'm saying is Sarah Palin is worse than the Nazis because she's also a f**king retard.
graphictruthJul 13, 2010
Yep. It's unfair to Hitler to make the comparison.
Mussolini?
fuzzzwuzzzJul 12, 2010
I hope she runs in every election ever. Watching her try to debate is the best comedy TV can offer.
cntlscrutJul 12, 2010
*wink*
Classic!
Closed AccountJul 12, 2010
Think how many campaign shows she can do when she teams up with Tina Fey, making twice as many appearances as any other politician and you will not notice the difference between Sarah and "Sarah"
jack416Jul 13, 2010
Don't scare me.
mindhazedJul 12, 2010
BUHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
the2989Jul 12, 2010
My buddies and I made a drinking game out of her vs Biden.
aarons2000Jul 12, 2010
direct: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6dlZwM-eZkA
Closed AccountJul 12, 2010
Thanks for the youtube link, youtube mobile is amazing on my iphone and the story link would not open for me.
4dfxJul 12, 2010
Thanks, the linked page didn't load for me.
asforonedayJul 12, 2010
Thanks. For some reason, the site linked refused to load. I refreshed it four or five times before giving up, hah
aarons2000Jul 12, 2010
No need to thank me. Just pay it forward.
nmoulanaJul 12, 2010
I was just about to say we need a mirror up in this bitch.
bonesy17Jul 13, 2010
Much appreciated. Thank you.
Closed AccountJul 12, 2010
I saw this bitch on tv the other day. She was preaching for the "real" women, conservative women of course, because non conservative women arent real women, just like I'm not a real american.. Sarah Palin is the biggest phony on the planet, I wish someone would follow her everywhere and call her a phony.
elbowgeekJul 12, 2010
Indeed the word "real" is a not-so-subtle racist inference.
fordsvt1Jul 13, 2010
"No true Scotsman" is an intentional logical fallacy, an ad hoc attempt to retain an unreasoned assertion.
She's alllll about the unreasoned assertions, let me tell ya.....
aschwartzJul 12, 2010
look everybody, she is a phony. a big fat phony..
kibblesnbittsJul 12, 2010
Holden Caulfield, where are you?
fuzzybeardJul 12, 2010
Add a marching band of vuvuzelas!
tbranch227Jul 13, 2010
It amazes me how many people have been caught up in her act. I can't look at her and think that there's any real value having her in any public office.
brilo1Jul 12, 2010
At least she's hot and stupid instead of just stupid.
sweetbeanJul 12, 2010
If you think she's hot, you have low standards...
7ajiJul 13, 2010
"hot" ??
brilo1Jul 13, 2010
I'd hit it.