Submitted by
Users who Dugg This
quirkopatra
1627 Followers
quirkopatra
1627 Followers
Standing My Ground
4850 Followers
Standing My Ground
4850 Followers
David Sullivan
4984 Followers
David Sullivan
4984 Followers
Sandy Landers
709 Followers
Sandy Landers
709 Followers
Closed AccountJul 7, 2010Submitter
I don't know how what this guy was saying doesn't constitute hate-speech. Attacking mixed race couples?
twinklyjesusJul 7, 2010
OBAMA!
Closed AccountJul 7, 2010
Who says it isn't hate speech?
Racism is commonplace all around the world. Racism is hateful and above all retarded regardless of the color of the person spreading it.
Closed AccountJul 7, 2010
Yeah, thanks, I can read. I asked her who says it isn't hate speech.
oxidaneJul 7, 2010
coffee, you sound like some college activist, giving us this cheesy crap about racism. we all know this.
Closed AccountJul 7, 2010
Really? Did you know that quirkopatra is a white supremacist?
therightsideJul 7, 2010
The Department of Justice said it wasnt hate speech. They refused to prosecute.
Closed AccountJul 7, 2010
No, the DOJ did not. The DOJ dropped an investigation it started after a republican poltician claimed panthers had intimidated voters. The _voter intimidation_ investigation was dropped because, as it turns out, no voter had actually complained about being intimidated. The racist video is from a different event in 2009.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
Closed AccountJul 7, 2010
Yeah, people who are scared of reprisals often tell people vocally and publically that they're scared of reprisals. /s
Holder would rather the DOJ pursue hardworking citizens and their duly elected representatives in Arizona, than prevent the BPs from repeating their tactics in the next election.
312139Jul 7, 2010
Hah! When MjCof pulls out the facts, you all disappear.
Closed AccountJul 7, 2010Submitter
I subbed this because it was the first time I had seen it. I thought it was pertinent because this is the actual guy involved in the Black Panther case.
I see people have chosen to attack the messenger.
Closed AccountJul 7, 2010
@notquitePi: Any facts MjCof pulls out smell suspiciously of ass.
312139Jul 7, 2010
@Capt: It took me a while to get the the name referenced in your above post. Clever, I have to admit.
curunirJul 7, 2010
From DOJ attorney J. Christian Adams: "There is a pervasive hostility within the civil rights division at the Justice Department toward these sorts of cases" where blacks are accused of discrimination."
"There's a fair amount of evidence, from this case and others, of a belief that these laws should only be used to enforce the rights of minorities," said Jennifer Rubin.
Kelly: Do you believe that the DOJ has a policy now of not pursuing cases if the defendant is black and victim is white?
Adams: Particularly in voting. In voting, that will be the case over the next few years. There’s no doubt about it.
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5i6PlcZeiW_Nucd6_I72lQV6BEi4QD9GMHAS82
http://www.mediaite.com/online/will-doj-black-panther-case-whistleblower-story-break-mainstream/
atomheartmotherJul 8, 2010
"The DOJ dropped an investigation it started after a republican poltician claimed panthers had intimidated voters."
Actually there were witnesses who said they were intimidated (not to mention video evidence of such), not a "republican poltician" <sic>.
zenmojoJul 7, 2010
Clearly this is the first time a black person has ever been racist! Hence, why this is on the front page of Digg two years after it was said. We must immortalize this in the annals of history as the first and only time a black person has ever said anything racist. Future generations and past will wonder, "What strange maelstrom of incidence and opportunity has coalesced to allow this odd happenstance!? What twist of fate, what subversion of the normal ethical paradigm has taken place for this even to have occurred?"
Yes, we shrink in horror at this groundbreaking instance. And yet, there is a sense of pride that after 400 years we have finally found racism that works in the other direction. Although the probability is slim, perhaps that racism can in some way benefit the entire race and create an institutionalized dichotomy. Or perhaps not. But we can wonder in awe at how one black man managed to say something horrifically racist. We can wonder.
(/s, dumbasses)Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
serinusJul 7, 2010
Well, I saw a similar video from 2008 on fox news just yesterday. Why they're "reporting" on two year old news, I couldn't say.
louiscipher777Jul 7, 2010
they are reporting it now because it is in direct relation to the DOJ deciding not to prosecute these guys for voter intimidation
Closed AccountJul 7, 2010
@Zen: This is a submission by and for the white supremacists of Digg. No one EVER accused white supremacists of being fast on the uptake. They're pretending to be shocked because obviously the fact that there are racist blacks means they're justified in being racist against blacks.
Yeah, I know. No one's ever accused white supremacists of being capable of logic either.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
Closed AccountJul 8, 2010Submitter
MJ...the s**t's not funny. It's libelous. It's akin to "I heard MJ raped and killed a girl..."
It's completely weird to even THINK that I should need to say, "I'm not a white supremacist."
You do NOT know me. You need to prove what you just repeated. PROVE it.
viol999Jul 7, 2010
Watch a white man stand on the street with a bull horn egging white people on to kill blacks and their babies and you'll see how fast he's arrested and charged with a hate crime.
bille3Jul 7, 2010
Swat would have to shoot a white man for this, obviously he would be much to dangerous.
Closed AccountJul 8, 2010
SWAT wouldn't get the opportunity to shoot the man. They'd be lucky to find wet evidence left on the spot.
Closed AccountJul 8, 2010
Nope, no white supremacists here. No sirree.
Closed AccountJul 8, 2010
Keep it up, Mrs. Olsen. You've already been reported for libel.
Closed AccountJul 8, 2010
Oh I don't doubt that, master Carrot. You guys are very quick to report, and you definitely have the sock puppets to make it count.
Closed AccountJul 8, 2010Submitter
Captain - it wants attention and it will only come BACK ... longer and slithery-er than before. I appreciate the effort, though. I'll just cry myself to sleep on the Diggs from the community.
Closed AccountJul 8, 2010
As for number of heads, or stalking for that matter, I don't think you're one to talk. Are you.
Closed AccountJul 8, 2010Submitter
Yes. I am one to talk. This is the only Digg account I have ever had. I recommend having ONE Digg account...because then you are accountable.
MjCoffee
A person who joined Digg on April 30th, 2010
vs.
quirkopatra
A 40 year-old person who joined Digg on April 18th, 2009
billybibbitJul 7, 2010
thats right viol, because white racists are more organized and powerful, and are able to actually carry out the killings with (until recently) very little fear of punishment
Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
thepartystarJul 7, 2010
wut
billybibbitJul 7, 2010
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/0/00/Lynchings-graph.png
bluto36Jul 7, 2010
until recently?
you are an idiot billybidiot
curunirJul 7, 2010
"until recently"
You mean, before any of the people alive today were even born?
toxicshokJul 7, 2010
The graph seems to indicate that lynchings have gone down exponentially. Thus your argument is stupid as are you.
stormwernJul 7, 2010
What was that about the justice department dropping the case?? First real scoop I've ever seen on fox and they walked right past it.
Closed AccountJul 7, 2010Submitter
Look, this dude's every bit as offensive as the Fred Phelps group. There seems to be some tone of resentment because I posted this video. A poster has mentioned downthread that this dude is still spouting off on his college campus.
This guy is advocating a race war. He also happens to be involved in the voter-intimidation case that is currently in the news.
When stories on the Phelps group show up on Digg... Diggers of all stripes say, "This is offensive and terrible."
Just, (instead of trying to say that I must be racist for posting it ... or that this is just to distract from ... blah, blah, blah ....) just WATCH the video and condemn what this dude is saying. And KNOW that he's out there saying it.
312139Jul 8, 2010
You're exactly right; he is every bit as despicable and offensive as Phelps. So when's the last time any of you called for an investigation into his tactics...? The people on both sides of the issue seem to have a different reaction when comparing the two. Somehow, color makes it more or less racist depending on who you ask.
Closed AccountJul 8, 2010Submitter
On one of the most recent Phelps threads I suggested that we ought to be able to do something. It really po'd the "free speech" people. I don't want to censor Phelps, but I think it's wrong that the group should be able to yell at the Obama girls and their classmates. I think there's something wrong when they can get close to funerals.
Now, how many Phelps stories Vs. Black panther stories have made the front page of Digg?
PhreeedomJul 7, 2010
What are these racists working on?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IN5StQAr7n0
Oh yea..they're black. They can't be racist.
Closed AccountJul 7, 2010
Who says blacks can't be racists?
I'm liberal, and I don't say that. Knowing your history I'm damn sure you & your permanent sidekick quirkopatra don't.
You wouldn't be attacking a strawman here, would you?Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
vbullingerJul 7, 2010
"permanent sidekick quirkopatra"
You don't know these two.
Quirkopatra is a fairly mainstream Republican.
Minarchian is a staunch Libertarian.
I'm sure they disagree on a LOT. One thing on which they do agree, however, is small government and that liberals are lame.
strangewillJul 7, 2010
I thought Libertarians were social liberals, and that is what offset them from Republicans.
eikon89Jul 7, 2010
/s
vbullingerJul 7, 2010
I wouldn't call them socially liberal, just socially freedom-oriented, just like economically freedom-oriented. Dems think government should control the economy. Reps think government should control your personal decision. Sadly, they're both creeping into each others' territories on totalitarianism.
strangewillJul 7, 2010
So basically: They're socially liberal, but you have a hang up with the word "liberal".
Most true libertarians are fiscally conservative, socially liberal.
vbullingerJul 7, 2010
I get what you're saying, that Libertarians mostly agree with liberals on social issues and conservatives on fiscal issues, but the reason why I didn't include either word (not just a "hang up" on liberal, btw), is that their focus is not on liberalism or conservatism. For example, I'm more of a paleoconservative (as opposed - strongly! - to a neoconservative). That makes me agree with Libertarians a lot. Not all the time, but a lot. And the difference is that I'm looking at issues from a conservative perspective. That's my focus on issues. That usually makes me agree with Libertarians on a lot of things. We agree almost whole-heartedly on the role of federal government and very frequently on economics. When it comes to state and local politics, however, Libertarian ideas seem to fall apart a bit, for me, and I start to disagree with them a little more, and I agree with Republicans more frequently when it comes to state and local politics. Same goes for liberals. You might agree with Libertarians on social matters, but it's for a different reason. Also, liberals are more and more frequently digging into our social lives. Check out the massive circle jerk over on the thread about SF banning pop/soda/Coke in its vending machines. The liberals over there (note that SF is about 142% liberal) on that thread are praising it while the Republicans are hypocritically denouncing it.
http://digg.com/health/San_Francisco_bans_coke_from_city_vending_machines
strangewillJul 8, 2010
Except motive has nothing to do with where you land on the political spectrum.
The government telling you what you can and cannot do in your own life based on a society's moral compass is a socially conservative viewpoint, just because "liberals" support it doesn't make it a liberal idea.
vbullingerJul 8, 2010
^^ That makes sense, too. Bottom line is that Libertarians are always supporting freedom, and that makes me like them a lot more than the two main parties.
So, you're saying that San Franciscans aren't liberal, then? How would you define them?
trizzleatlJul 7, 2010
MjCoffee says what we're all thinking; Minarchian tells it like it is.
black27696Jul 7, 2010
I recently had a class at my college in which the teacher (a black man) said it was impossible for anyone who isn't white to be racist. I'm not taking that out of context, that's literally what he said.
ikorkyiJul 7, 2010
something smells bad
black27696Jul 7, 2010
What?
darkmatter911Jul 7, 2010
I have had blacks tell me the same thing - they can not be racist because they are a minority.
black27696Jul 7, 2010
I was saying "what?" at korky. Not sure what he's asking.
brilo1Jul 7, 2010
There's a large percentage of blacks in the US that hate the ghetto thugs. A good friend of mine is from the hood in Michigan (Benton Harbor) and he just completed and earned his doctorate. He's an intelligent and hard working individual but will be the first to say he's racist when it comes to the ghetto ass n(Insert N-bomb here).
peppermintpigJul 8, 2010
That's a culture clash thing brito1. It's a form of discrimination based on the choices one makes. I'm not implying that discrimination is bad, btw. And technically that's not racism either.
russmeyerJul 7, 2010
I was an extremely poor white kid that had to live in the projects and other neighborhoods where I was the only white kid growing up. I was a lot of fun to get jumped by groups of kids trying to steal my shoes or bicycle or whatever. Who could forget the other people who thought it would be funny to sick their dogs on the cracker boy when he walked by their house on the way home from school. Oh yeah, good times with some people who were definitely not racists. BTW, I cannot stand to hear the work cracker now. I was constantly referred to as a cracker even though I was born in NY. It's no different than calling someone a gentlemen to me.
smotpokerJul 7, 2010
If it makes you feel any better, I am half black and was called a cracker a few times. At others, I was accused of pretending to be half black to be cool.
At any rate, nobody with half a brain can/will honestly deny that minorities can't be racist. These stories piss me off because they just keep stating the obvious and try to use a much smaller problem as an excuse to deny/reject/ignore much bigger ones.
While I've encountered discrimination from blacks, I've probably encountered it more from whites and it was usually exhibited from them in a much more subversive manner and more authoritative positions. There is a big difference in the motivations behind and harm caused by race-based bullying/teasing and the motivations/harm related real racial discrimination. None of the black kids who picked on me directly impacted my education, criminal background, career or pay grade. I don't think I can say the same about the white discrimination I may have encountered.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
smotpokerJul 7, 2010
Whoops, I misspoke towards the end there. I definitely had my formal education affected to some degree - just not to an insurmountable one.
bluto36Jul 7, 2010
hey smot my first school was in an urban setting and i was tortured for being a "half breed"
i was scared to death about moving to the "racist red-neck" country when my dad got a new job.
best thing that ever happened. those racist whites for some reason treated me much better then my brothers and sisters in the city.
themusicstudioJul 7, 2010
smotpoker, this is the second time I've found you've put my exact thoughts in an extremely articulate fashion. I forget what article it was that you commented on the first time, but I just remember reading your comment and thinking "yes!, someone gets it and can explain it!". Same thought crossed my mind again, glanced at the name and what a shock :D
And bluto, I'm too a half breed (was also called it), and I was tortured too by black people. The thing I've noticed though is that while white people seem nicer on the outside definitely, but a lot tend to hold a very subtle grudge against blacks for the "privileged" treatment we get nowadays, whether it be because of what words blacks can say, affirmative action, or the pity blacks receive for having a disproportionate amount of the race in ghettos /prison.
smotpokerJul 7, 2010
@bluto
The school I primarily refer to was in a rural setting and was predominantly black. I've lived in the bible belt most of my life. While I haven't been openly antagonized for my race by whites, as I alluded to in my comment above, I cannot help but assume various forms of institutionalized racism did impact my life in a very negative way.
I have been harassed, abused and lied on by police several times simply for being out and how I look - despite going out of my way to be respectful and at least feigning full cooperation. While race may not have been the primary cause it was almost certainly a contributing one in many cases. At one point an officer referred to me as 'people like you' and I wasn't sure if he said it because of my style, race or to make me hurt my credibility if I reported it in relation to his trumped charges.
I by no means equate racial discrimination/profiling with racial hatred but whichever it was, it has enormously impacted my life in the negative. Yet I fear even suggesting it as a potential factor because so many, (even those in my same age group, dress the same, engage in the same activities, etc) and often assume at that point I must be making s**t up to garner sympathy (when my actual goal is to either explain my current actions or spread awareness of the problem).
In most cases their skepticism is rather justified, especially considering I maintained similar skepticism myself before a majority of my encounters. When most people are rarely stopped and have their respect reciprocated, how can they easily believe how common police misconduct is? However, I realize their skepticism is only justified insofar as they are ignorant of what actually occurs so I choose to try to do something about that ignorance.
Though I am often confronted with suggestions like to just change the way I dress or never go out at night or avoid that part of town, etc, those do not seem like just solutions or even potentially helpful to anyone but myself. Why should one be forced to surrender one of the few freedoms they even have the ability to exercise? And how does such a surrender help those who have even less ability to exercise their freedoms?
IMO, the problems I encountered started with racial hatred decades ago which led many police and whites to claim blacks committed more crimes than they actually did. Over the years, the tainted evidence/testimony they gathered has been used over and over to taint even more evidence/testimony and justify racial profiling practices. Consequently, more kids were raised without fathers, proper discipline or education by jaded parents and fell into the stereotypes they were unjustly accused of. These factors combined to create an establishment which continues to persecute minorities disproportionately and dismiss claims of racial motivation since the tainted evidence (arrest numbers) "justify" racial bias.
It is fortunate that you have managed to get along ok in the south but when you get persecuted by police dozens of times for your 'eccentric' behavior (ie walking on public streets/sidewalks late at night or visiting friends in low-income neighborhoods) perhaps you would feel different.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
smotpokerJul 7, 2010
@TheMusicStudio
Thanks :). Perhaps russ deserves some credit, too. Though I normally want to put some real effort into my comments, it is hard to justify unless the person I'm replying to (or the article I'm commenting on) makes a similar effort. I hope he understands that while I disagree that minorities are equally racist or cause the same [potential] for harm, I do sympathize with his experiences and do not condone any form of bigoted behavior.
If I see something that I consider a misconception or feel I might offer a perspective someone hasn't considered, I feel it is important to try to share it. I don't mean to diminish the point that some blacks have racist tendencies which need to be addressed, only that they tend to have a much less harmful impact overall and cannot be *properly* addressed without solving the problems which caused them to begin with.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
ngoughJul 13, 2010
Every person regardless of color can be racist because racism doesn't stem from race, just ignorance. Historically America had instituted racism into its culture, as a result it would breed a backlash of reverse racism within the same culture, but do not think that racists represent the majority of a race or the American culture. I have a multi-ethnic host of friends, not because of their race but because we hold similar interests and share common ground as people. The moment you throw "race" off the table, you realize you can more clearly judge a man for who he is instead of what you project him to be.
rizzo2008Jul 7, 2010
Black people can't be racist only white males are evil! /s
Closed AccountJul 7, 2010
... a very popular strawman, apparently.
spinningheadJul 7, 2010
Conservatives love to project arguments onto the other side that they think they can win. Its a shortcut to actual debate.
black27696Jul 7, 2010
How exactly is this a projected argument? Liberals have been screaming about racist tea partiers for months. Maybe I'm way off base here but it seems like this black panther is also racist, and protected by a democratic presidency. It's almost like racist can be found anywhere.
spinningheadJul 7, 2010
The argument that only whites can be racist. It is a straw man if ever there was one.
Closed AccountJul 7, 2010
1) Of course blacks can be racist. No one disputes that. A strawman argument is when you misrepresent your opponents views in a way which makes them easy to knock down, for instance when you imply that liberals say that "blacks can't be racists".
2) The existence of black racists doesn't in any way mean teabaggers can't be racists. The racism (or not) of teabaggers is completely unrelated to the racism of other groups; it's simply a red herring.
therightsideJul 7, 2010
So does this one racist black man represent all black men? Does one racist teabagger represent all teabaggers?
black27696Jul 7, 2010
@MjCoffee
1. "Black folks can't be racist! White folks invented that s**t!" - Spike Lee. He's not the only one who has expressed those sentiments either.
2. Who said Tea Partiers can't be racist? I said liberals have been screaming about it. I didn't say it wasn't true. I did, however, say it can be found everywhere, which is true.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2004/sep/18/patterson.culture
spinningheadJul 7, 2010
Oh, well if Spike Lee said it, it must be that all liberals agree with him.
Straw man is still made of straw.
kingnovaJul 8, 2010
"and protected by a democratic presidency."
Can you explain how he was protected by a democratic presidency when it was the Bush administration that passed on criminal prosecution?
This "poor me, the black democrat president is letting this man get away with racism" argument falls flat:
Bush administration decided to file a civil, not a criminal, complaint. In his May 14 testimony before the United States Commission on Civil Rights, Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez said that the Bush administration's Justice Department "determined that the facts did not constitute a prosecutable violation of the criminal statutes" but instead decided to "file a civil action on January 7, 2009." From Perez's testimony:
PEREZ: Moving to the matter at hand, the events occurred on November 4th, 2008. The Department became aware of these events on Election Day and decided to conduct further inquiry.
After reviewing the matter, the Civil Rights Division determined that the facts did not constitute a prosecutable violation of the criminal statutes. The Department did, however, file a civil action on January 7th, 2009, seeking injunctive and declaratory relief under 11(b) against four defendants.
_______________________
Seriously. Two black guys at one polling both brings out the holier than thou, but dozens of racist signs from teabaggers, racist posts from tea party leaders etc. get "you can't paint all tea party members like that!"
Can you step back and look at yourself?
7jbdwJul 7, 2010
White people are racist all the time:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1PPD9eaRKCU
Closed AccountJul 7, 2010
Usually white people who complain that black people can't be considered racist (which no one thinks) are the most racist people. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projectionComment is buried, click here to see the rest.
themusicstudioJul 7, 2010
Here's the subtle disdain for black people that whites have on full display. +68 diggs (and counting) says it all.
deathandtavernsJul 7, 2010
As long as minorities and women make 70 cents to our dollar, I think I can let this one slide
nmrgentlemanJul 7, 2010
Just another one of those racist teabaggers we keep hearing about, I guess. /sarc
Closed AccountJul 7, 2010
At this point it's clear what, for what ever reason, ended up in the oval office. You can't take back the past but you can learn from it.
delphium226Jul 7, 2010
Ah... using 'what' instead of 'who'. So tell us what?
injunjoJul 7, 2010
you know what it's name is.
ghostwoJul 7, 2010
Quit feeding the trolls. It's a 3 day old anonymous profile with 68 comments, mostly of a controversial nature. Obvious troll is obvious.
http://digg.com/users/SadLisa/history/commentsComment is buried, click here to see the rest.
Closed AccountJul 7, 2010
Good call. Blocked her.
boombyeJul 7, 2010
I like how you guys above me are treating this like he's a representative for all black people and that somehow this guy being an idiot justifies tea baggers being racist. Grow up.
digg2point0Jul 7, 2010
Don't interrupt the circlejerk.
They get pouty.
lithdovJul 7, 2010
"it's not cool when anyone is racist regardless of their race"
If that's actually your point, why are you attacking the people saying exactly that (in an admittedly overly-snarky manner)?
crazyeddie041Jul 7, 2010
I love how you can think you're consistent when you accuse everyone of being white supremacists who set up a straw man.
badtzmartinJul 7, 2010
@boombye: It's not that this guy is a representative for all black people. His statements/behavior don't justify racism by anyone. The outrage is that this guy clearly engaged in voter intimidation - he stood outside a polling place in a paramilitary uniform, holding a billy club. And the current administration dropped all charges/investigation against him. The fact that the current president is black has no real bearing on the matter, but to those who want to see a connection, it's too easy.
boombyeJul 7, 2010
No they just want to say "Look at this black guy being a racist, and people want to make a big deal when white people are? what gives?"
boombyeJul 7, 2010
There are a s**t ton of KKK people out there, and I'm sure idiots like this guy out there too, do we need to examine every example of these idiots.
If you want we could focus on each and every individual member of the KKK, but all that would be doing is feeding the troll, just as making a deal out of this individual is. I guess this is a big deal to those who have a single example or two or three or four of a black guy being racist while a half white/half black president is in office (he spent most of his life in the company of his white mother, yet he still gets treated like he's from the hood of chicago even though he just worked out here). It also serves as fuel to keep the tea partiers and racists to go out and say "Look White people are always accused of racism, but how come Black guys get off so easy?" How about nobody should get off easy with this being an idiot stuff.
This guy gets away with saying s**t no different than the KKK does about the people they hate, they're ignored because they're morons and trolls, not because of any of their races.
Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
boombyeJul 7, 2010
The same administration could be investigating these voter intimidations too which their party brought up. http://www.democrats.org/a/2006/11/gop_continues_t.php
But why whine over it, Obama would have won regardless of what this idiot did at a polling place, let's not try to act like this single example compared to numerous examples conducted by the GOP is the straw the broke the camel's back.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
diggforwhateverJul 7, 2010
boombye, you really need to get a life, you apologist freak. Not one single time has the justice department prosecuted the KKK, won and then dismissed the case giving no reason. In this case, the justice department prosecuted, then won the case against the panthers by default. The arrogant assh**es didn't even show up. Then for no stated reason, Holder had the case dropped. Tell me this isn't racial bias. They spent tax payer dollars to try the case, then dismissed it. WTF.
themusicstudioJul 7, 2010
@digg yeaaaaa...honestly I don't even care enough to read the details of what happened to try to argue with you, because NO ONE is arguing that blacks "in general" get off too easy in the court system. I'll call it a fluke, intimidation, whatever it was that got him up is honestly of the littllest concern to me.
You know why? Check out the prison stats of black people compared to anyone, well, I'm sure you know about that already, everyone does.
I am irritated at what you don't mention and try to present though. First off, stop playing dumb. You know the history of the KKK alone is enough to cause that to happen. Do people really need to explain to you how associations affect how people perceive you? Does any human with an IQ over 10 expect a KKK member to get a fair unbiased treatment in court?
Moving on...
Honestly, it's disingenuous to bring up black people getting unfair treatment in court AT ALL. It's like you had a report card filled with F's and an A in remedial gym class, blacking out all the F's, and then going to the principle arguing why you can't make the Dean's List with your grades. Yea ok, I guess if all you looked at was that one grade, you might technically make it, but obviously you've had to of taken other classes (which you failed) and it's deceitful to try to show off that one grade as if it meant anything...It's funny how most people on digg will acknowledge money/status gets you out of jail..and on the average white people tend to..you know..have more money and "arguably" status than the average black guy, and by that logic ummm..on the average...white people UNFAIRLY are NOT going to jail as much as blacks. Now before anyone chimes in with the obvious, clearly however much more white people make won't do much good if all the trials are about murder..but that's a deeper societal issue.
(side note, it's really sad people have to constantly say things like "on average" "generally" etc. just to prevent retards coming in with their personal stories)
curunirJul 7, 2010
Yes, boombye, handing out literature that could be misleading is *EXACTLY THE SAME LEVEL* of offense as donning a para-military outfit and swinging a billy club at voters at the door to a polling place.
No difference at all.
From DOJ attorney J. Christian Adams: "There is a pervasive hostility within the civil rights division at the Justice Department toward these sorts of cases" where blacks are accused of discrimination."
"There's a fair amount of evidence, from this case and others, of a belief that these laws should only be used to enforce the rights of minorities," said Jennifer Rubin.
Kelly: Do you believe that the DOJ has a policy now of not pursuing cases if the defendant is black and victim is white?
Adams: Particularly in voting. In voting, that will be the case over the next few years. There’s no doubt about it.
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5i6PlcZeiW_Nucd6_I72lQV6BEi4QD9GMHAS82
http://www.mediaite.com/online/will-doj-black-panther-case-whistleblower-story-break-mainstream/
isgkJul 7, 2010
I love this... it's so delightfully telling about yourself.
"treating this like he's a representative for all black people and that somehow this guy being an idiot justifies tea baggers being racist."
Smell that, that's the smell of a hypocrite, you are a wonderfully *perfect* example of one. On one hand you bemoan how this people think this racist represents all black people, and in the exact same sentence you generalize all tea baggers.
boombyeJul 7, 2010
Who gives a s**t the tea party is not a race of people, it's a movement of morons. Fact.
smemilyJul 7, 2010
There's a difference between stereotyping based on race (an unchosen attribute) and ideology (which is a chosen attribute).
boombyeJul 7, 2010
Exactly, I stereotype tea parties for their collective ignorance, it is their ideas which they share and bring them together which i bash them for.
it's no where near the same as bashing another race.
it's like talking smack about yankees or red sox fans, it's not like i'm bringing their race into it... Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
blankchequeJul 7, 2010
The teabaggers are a group of willful retards they chose to be stuck on stupid.
Being black is not a choice, it's not a conscious decision to become black.
boombye's comparison is valid.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
isgkJul 7, 2010
I find it hillarious that you guys are willfully admitting to intentionally stereotype a group of people. Multiple people are lining up to basically say "yes I stereotype groups of people... as long as it's not about race then it's all ok". You really should look at what you type, because you sure are looking like bigots to others....
http://www.yourdictionary.com/bigot
big·ot (bĭgˈət)
noun
One who is strongly partial to one's own group, religion, race, or politics and is intolerant of those who differ.
ancientshoesJul 7, 2010
yeah, because it's not like the tea party is about economic conservatism or anything
black27696Jul 7, 2010
The argument is more that the left has been saying the equivalent of racism and favoritism only exists on the right. Here we have an example of outlandish racism on the left, as well as the current administration basically giving the OK to attempt to intimidate people in front of polling places. I'm all for free speech, but standing there holding a weapon isn't the same.
propethicJul 7, 2010
Yup, the 'left' is surely represented by this guy. I'm sure he loves abortion and gay rights as well.
black27696Jul 7, 2010
I didn't say the left was represented by this guy. I said the left constantly acts as though there is never any bias or racism or hatred on their side of things. This individual is one example of many that disprove it. It's on both sides.
It's not hyperbole. It's outlandish racism, from a guy on the left, and it was given a stamp of approval from a government currently controlled by the left.
boombyeJul 7, 2010
He gets away with as much as a KKK member, the reason nobody makes as big of a deal is because we understand that our country has trolls that must not be fed, especially when racists of both spectrum accuse the other of the same argument like children...
"oh it's okay if they do that, but I can't?"..
Nobody has a right to be a fool in such a manner but you're blowing it out of proportion when you say the current administration allows this when it happened before the current administration was even put into the power. In fact Bush was still president on that day. It has nothing to do with the political parties, it is up to the local law enforcement.
Plenty of KKK members say this exact s**t on video camera on documentaries about them or even out loud proudly in public, and while they piss off non-whites, they aren't making these headlines because they're trolls, but when ONE black guy says s**t like this it's gotta be a big deal huh? Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
black27696Jul 7, 2010
RTFA - he had charges against him when Bush was still president, brought against him by the local authorities. As soon as he was in power Obama had Eric Holder let him go and dropped the charges.
boombyeJul 7, 2010
Well what should they be charged with? They didn't assault anyone, and they certainly didn't prevent people from going in, unless they're scared of black people.. All they had to do was stand around to be perceived as intimidating, and to be honest I wouldn't put up with that, I would just walk right in and cast my vote, what are they going to do? So it turns out that they did jack s**t, just stood there and people went in and out as some guy interviewed them outside asking them why they looked so scary at a polling location next to their home. Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
atomheartmotherJul 7, 2010
boombye, had KKK members dressed in white robes done the same thing to black voters at a polling place congress would be in the middle of a six month investigation, and you'd be in the gallery cheering them on.
diggforwhateverJul 7, 2010
So, boombye, what would you charge a white person with that did the exact same thing?
boombyeJul 7, 2010
Here's one example; http://www.house.gov/corrinebrown/press108/pr040816b.htm
jacksombraJul 8, 2010
First
"I didn't say the left was represented by this guy."
Then you contradict yourself
"It's not hyperbole. It's outlandish racism, from a guy on the left"
So what exactly makes him "on the left"? Because only thing i can see that you might be basing such a judgement on is simple fact he is black, because nothing else he says or is known for are “leftist” views. Are you trying to say black people cannot be on the “right”?
If anything, experience of his type has shown me, he would be better classed as the “black right”, interview him anda KKK member on most hot topic subjects (immigration, tax’s, gun control, sexuality so forth) while avoiding topics that touch on black/white race matters and you will probably find they agree across the board
Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
theyarJul 7, 2010
I agree that people need to grow up instead of jumping on the "see they do it too" bandwagon, but at the end of the day everyone ought to acknowledge reality: if a white man stood outside a polling place in military garb and weapons, yelling about killing black people, it would be a worldwide scandal and mountains would get moved because of it.
boombyeJul 7, 2010
Well they don't yell about killing black people exactly, but they do engage in intimidating. Like I said, let's not get all up in arms because this guy did something the KKK does, and then focus on this like it's something unique in our history to have a racist that's not white. Wow should we celebrate now??
Let's see how a group of people conduct themselves at polling locations;
http://www.democrats.org/a/2006/11/gop_continues_t.phpComment is buried, click here to see the rest.
boombyeJul 7, 2010
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/08/16/opinion/16herbert.html
viol999Jul 7, 2010
So you take umbrage to say that the Black Panthers only represent a small minority of blacks and then you claim that all white Tea Party members are racists.
boombyeJul 7, 2010
Okay if it makes you feel better, the people that protest against black people taking over the country from them, should not be using this guy as an excuse for their venom. It's appalling whenever anyone is engaged in this kind of racial bigotry. Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
atomheartmotherJul 7, 2010
"the people that protest against black people taking over the country from them.."
I've not seen any protests on that basis, but perhaps you've got some evidence you'll share which supports that statement.
Closed AccountJul 7, 2010
So I guess you're against affirmative action, NAACP, and other racist social programs?
Of course you're not...
boombyeJul 7, 2010
No I am not, because affirmative action isn't the reason you have no job as much as you tell yourself that, instead of being on the internet bitching about it, you should be working on an alternative like getting a job. Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
bluto36Jul 7, 2010
boombye admits his racism
at a boy!
atomheartmotherJul 7, 2010
boombye, try using your head before you spout off. Whether it's worthwhile or not, the very nature of affirmative action is to promote hiring on criteria OTHER than objective qualifications.
boombyeJul 7, 2010
How does that negate the point that people still assume that they didn't get a job because of another guy's race when it could be something like him being more qualified?
I'm not even addressing bluto's nonsense, if anything employers should be picking people based on their qualifications, but too often someone is complaining that a guy of another race got picked over them because of some AA bs, and it's not like they themselves know the qualifications of that other person, and I think there's a bit more of that set of thinking than there is people getting hired as a result of AA.
Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
atomheartmotherJul 7, 2010
There's no doubt that there are those who blame their being passed over for jobs, school admissions and the like on AA rather than their own shortcomings, but there's also no doubt that there are cases where race-preferential policies have resulted in injustices to more qualified people as well.
in any case, the attack on Cerin was completely baseless.
bluto36Jul 7, 2010
@boombye
"I'm not even addressing bluto's nonsense"
finally you understand how everyone on this thread feels about you.
you could at least say thanks
goweigusJul 7, 2010
it may not be cool
but it can be f**king hilarious
I've often said that there is nothing more funny than racist black people (or non white racists)
ex: The Boondocks tv show, Chapelle Show, etc
boombyeJul 7, 2010
Give me examples of why these shows are considered racist to you?
Closed AccountJul 7, 2010
@boombye
Not sure why you're being buried. I'm curious to know why the OP thinks they're racist. Those shows certainly poke fun at racism, which in and of itself usually isn't considered racism.
goweigusJul 8, 2010
the show supports a lot of racist characters saying racist things about different races
and it is rather 'matter of fact' when it has had some of these things said
I mean the show is racist in the fact that it says a lot of racist things
not racist in that its actually trying to hurt people
Closed AccountJul 7, 2010
to OP,
it's not about them representing the whole black race, it's about what these individuals represent and others like them. the hard truth is, the black community IS more racist than the white community as a whole. there was a black man on C-span who called for the extermination of the white race, among other things. google it. the problem is the black race has been given soo much slack that their crimes against humanity are desensitized to the point where they're untouchable and overlooked while the white race is scolded
and attacked.
there is more white slavery in the world today than there was in the history of the entire USA for black slavery. ponder on that and put yourself in the perspective of reality. it's not that black people want to be treated equal anymore, they want to be treated better than equal.
this is NOT about justification of others being racist. this is about the fact that the black race can be racist, commit hate crimes, commit other crimes and pull the race card, and ultimately get away with it. while one white man can say nappy headed and lose his entire livelihood. Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
boombyeJul 7, 2010
There are entire militant organizations such as the KKK that have been in America for hundreds of years and have hundreds of thousands of members across the country.
So because one guy on CSPAN say stupid s**t, some guy at a polling place does stupid s**t... They somehow represent the entire race? White slavery??? WTF are you on I'm about to die laughing so hard.
There's more slavery of white people today than there ever was of black people?? Then why is it that white people are allowed to have jobs that pay them money?
You know you're a racist when you play victim in this fashion. I am downright calling you a racist, because no sane individual in their right mind would dare claim the s**t you're claiming, not even the KKK would call themselves slaves, they would most likely reject that notion themselves.
you know who's to blame for blacks getting special treatment in most instances? guilty white people who are trying to make up to them for the hundreds of years of oppression they faced, don't go blaming black people for what people felt guilty about.
so because they were slaves, and then white people decide to help better them as a whole as after all they were denied, then they're all of a sudden racist and white people are the slaves?
I disagree with Imus being fired, because I loved his show and all and all the good he's done for vets, and I agreed with most of his rants, and his use of that I agree wasn't racist but blown out of proportion, in fact he was being sexist if anything when he made comments about them, but people saw his cowboy hat and i would see a lot of people labeling him 'another conservative racist' when he's not even conservative.
You spent your post bashing black people, because you feel that white people are now slaves due to blacks being treated better than they were before the 60s? Seriously..
I'm not going to sympathize for you when you compare yourself to a slave and yet you can say all that freely, on the internet, on a computer, powered by electricity, in your own home. Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
bluto36Jul 7, 2010
you sure have the KKK boogey man chasing you.
why are you stuck in the 20's? the last Klansman in power that i knew of was a Democrat that was all for affirmative action.
why do you think the klan is for affirmative action?
where exactly besides your mind does the KKK have a force of presence?
do you also fear the Templars? or the Berbers? the Berbers were huge into the slave trade, helping to introduce it into Europe from Africa
i think we better watch out for those Berbers... oh and the redcoats they invaded Baltimore and New Orleans... big minority populations in those two towns.
in case you cant tell that was /s cause you are a retard
diggforwhateverJul 7, 2010
boombox, "...and have hundreds of thousands of members across the country." This is what you say about the KKK. Let's do a little comparison.
"T
boombyeJul 7, 2010
I never said they have power, nor am I worried about them, my point is groups like that exist and people don't judge the entire White race based on what those morons do. I also made the presumption that members of groups like that probably wouldn't say they're slaves to another race either, but then again who knows, that could be one of their excuses to say stupid crap. I agreed with him on the Imus thing being blown out of proportion. I only mentioned them in the 4th paragraph, and I'm not putting a blame on whoever came up with affirmative action, just saying it's not something that Black people came up with either to enslave the white man like thatruth101 thinks.
The problem here is that this guy is an idiot, and doesn't reflect an entire race of people, so it's silly when people start using this time to complain about black people or bring up comparisons between white racists and black racists.. There are entire racist organizations out there, and people on the individual level out there spewing crap like this, but we should use those as examples to justify statements such as "oh so when blacks are racist it's okay, but when whites are it's not?"
It's never okay and that's the point and you know it. Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
diggforwhateverJul 7, 2010
Most of the folks here are not saying the whole black race is racist, boombye. I'm certainly not. This is about the New Black Panthers and the Justice Department. The men who intimidated voters in Philly were members of the panthers, committed voter intimidation and were in my opinion, racist pigs. Next, this is about our current Administration. The justice department determined they had a case, spent tax-payer dollars to prosecute, won the case by default, then, the Attorney General, Eric Holder, himself a black man, without comment, dismissed the case entirely. I, for one, want to know if Holder and Obama have a racial bias. Pretty hard to get equal justiice under Federal Law, if they are biased.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
boombyeJul 7, 2010
How does that negate the point that no matter what there are a lot of racists of from every race, from big organizations to individuals out there saying stupid s**t on the street... why do you condemn the race that any of these guys belong to?
I don't understand why this guy is being used as a justification to go after black people and make claims of how whites are being enslaved, or how black people can get away with racism. In reality, lots of people get away with it, it should not be tolerated, but you don't judge an entire group of people or whine about which side has it worse.
Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
diggforwhateverJul 7, 2010
boombye, do us both a favor and clean your ears out, or put on some glasses, or something. I, am not condemning the black race because of these idiots. I am not condemning the black race at all. If a white supremacist showed up at a voting precinct, shouted racial epitaphs to intimidate black voters and was prosecuted for it, then the case was thrown out with no reason, I would have a large question for our justice department. If they were white, I would question whether or not racial bias was involved. In this case, Holder, a black man, dismissed the case after winning, with no statement as to why. I want an answer from Holder to see if racial bias is involved. He owes that to all American citizens.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
boombyeJul 7, 2010
Okay if people want to debate about what Eric Holder then, they should specifically single him out, but they shouldn't keep using this whole "oh so it's only okay if black people are racist huh?" crap because they know it's not okay.. It's a bit sensationalist thatruth101 says s**t about white people being enslaved you know what I mean?
boombyeJul 7, 2010
Also sorry about that, I'm mostly focused on what thatruth said, so I was too slow to get your point.
diggforwhateverJul 7, 2010
I'm not thatruth101, boombye, and I am debating about the possible racial bias of Eric Holder, the Attorney General of the United States, and I have singled him out. You keep responding to me as though I am all white people. Isn't that a little hypocritical on your part?Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
Closed AccountJul 8, 2010
first of all boombye, there IS more white slavery in the world than there was black slavery in the entire history of the USA, Im talking by numbers of individuals alone. when I say the world, I mean the whole world, not just your little corner of it. hell the global sex trade has more white slaves on its own, that's not even including slave labor. just because you don't see it doesn't mean it doesnt happen. this is what makes you ignorant.
you dont see the black race or any black individual scolding these black men for their crimes and preaching about the need to eradicate the white race. however, you will see white people scold other white people for being racist. the black community will only subscribe and back what they perceive helps the black community and only the black community. they're like sheep for these things.
the fact that a black man can go on c-span and spout things like the need to eradicate the white race without any consequences shows the status quo. if it had been a white man, he would be attacked at every turn from every angle.
we even have ALL black schools in this country, which should be illegal. even worse, these black colleges actually lowered the passing grade scale to ensure more students would pass. we have organizations that are created and operate solely to help the black race and no other. open your eyes, if it was the other way around many white people would be jailed and fined or worse.
mlk fought for black kids to go to the same schools as white kids, and today black kids have the highest drop out rates and the lowest grades.
it's not about equality anymore, its about preaching equality while pushing for inequality for every other race but the black race.
taylorsplJul 7, 2010
We know he's not the representative for all black people because he's not Jesse Jackson.
boombyeJul 7, 2010
Thanks for your display of ignorance, it's idiots like you who fuel the moron in this video.
Should we go over the list of people who have claimed themselves to be speaking out for the White Race? No because they, along with Jackson are just opportunists. Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
boombyeJul 7, 2010
Also I remember when people tried to make a big deal out of this during the elections when everyone supported Obama trying to used this as justification for why we should not trust or elect anyone associated with the black race or anyone that resembles the guy in the video who has not been proven to be protected by anyone just because some guy on youtube says so in a voice over.
He's exercising his free speech rights the same way the KKK does when they say the same s**t about non-whites and their babies and all the other stuff you'd hear them say in a documentary or videos of them at their rallies. Just a dumb ass saying dumb s**t that nobody really wants to acknowledge or accept, just like those KKK guys who people just ignore.
Honestly, Non-Whites don't spend their day and night trying to call attention to racist movements and organizations and what they say, because those people will say that s**t all day and night it isn't even worth spending all your life and effort to bring notice to them when everyone knows they exist. Why bother to keep feeding trolls you know?
This guy is probably happy because he pissed off a bunch of white people, so pat yourself on the back for giving him attention and attributing it to the black race or obama or say he was protected by the current administration that wasn't even in power back then...
What if the officers let him do his thing because they wanted to make a representative out of him?
Ask yourself this, what if a liberal officer had this far right racist white guy spewing tea party crap and making threats at people at a polling location, he could either have the guy arrested or he could just record the guy and have him up on youtube to make the rest of the right look bad... Do you think stuff like this doesn't happen? I'm not using it as an excuse, just saying it's on the officers for not making the call, the guy doing the voice over is doing just that, doing a voice over. There are no facts that this person is protected by anything other than free speech.
More examples of voter intimidation and/or free speech being used to piss people off
http://www.democrats.org/a/2006/11/gop_continues_t.phpComment is buried, click here to see the rest.
keggerbmbJul 7, 2010
Imma kill me some crackas today. In my mothaf**kin' chili, son. In my mothaf**kin chili.
sergeantawesomeJul 7, 2010
You're going to kill Scott Tenorman's parents, and put them into chili?
keggerbmbJul 7, 2010
I could eat crackas WITH crackers!
vbullingerJul 7, 2010
Is that from something? I dugg it up for the funny, but is that from something?
keggerbmbJul 7, 2010
South Park
vbullingerJul 7, 2010
I don't... that's not a reference to the Scott Tenorman episode... right? I mean, what character said that?
keggerbmbJul 7, 2010
It's because Cartman killed Scott Tenorman's and used their bodies to make chili, then had Scott eat the chili. :P
vbullingerJul 7, 2010
But... I don't recall him saying anything about crackers/as and swearing/talking all ebonics, etc.
I own that season of South Park, I know of the episode. I just don't see how the comment makes any sense.
keggerbmbJul 7, 2010
OH if you're talking about my original post, no that's just some stupid s**t i thought up. I thought you were referring to SergeantAwesome's post
vbullingerJul 7, 2010
^^ Dugg for da truff!
luciferactualJul 7, 2010
I don't understand what those words mean. I'm too white. ;)
Closed AccountJul 7, 2010
Recommend good website
http://www.nike-alliance.com
Discount activity 40%discount
Supply . Air Jordan Shoes.All kinds of goods.
Fast Shipment.5-7 days you can receive your order product.
No min order request.You can order only one product
Free Shipping.The price on our website are including everything.
Let me introduce CHAOYUE. CHAOYUE is CHINA registered company, we are located in CHINA and Australia, website is
http://www.nike-alliance.com
nike-alliance,Inc. We are the best online dealer,about all kinds of nike.run retailing and wholesale trade wordwidely for years. Free Shipping And Customs,Super Sale Off Retailing,With 1Week Delivery to your door.
(nike-alliance).(com)
ghjhjkComment is buried, click here to see the rest.
Closed AccountJul 7, 2010
I LOVE NIKE TOO
devil45Jul 7, 2010
Stay classy, angry black guy.
Closed AccountJul 7, 2010
Gee, why can't he move up in society? He seems to have such an industrious mindset...
potchi79Jul 8, 2010
The man, obviously.
maxvivianJul 7, 2010
Whenever any instance of minority racism pops up on the internet, people are quick to jump in and go "OH YEAH BUT THEY CAN'T BE RACIST RIGHT? TYPICAL BS SOCIETY HURP DURP".
I don't know who has been going around saying "black people can't be racist" but anyone who buys into that is obviously a moron. I've never heard anyone say this in a serious way, and I really don't think it is any sort of popular opinion among minorities or otherwise. I wont deny that there are obviously different standards (see: Chappelle's Show), but anyone who says black people (or minorities) can't be racist is an idiot or a crazy person, and you should treat them as such.
black27696Jul 7, 2010
There are a lot of people, both prominent and just every day Americans that will say people of color can't be racist. I've heard it from a black teacher for a racism class in college, I've heard it from other students. It's an idea that's been around for a long time.
stanssJul 7, 2010
I understand the point you are making, but it is definitely a stretch to say "people" go and say that. If you look on any comments list on digg from an article regarding some issue of racism or minorities, no one actually says that. In fact, the only people who say that are people who use it with sarcasm, or people who say that people say that. I am serious, look at this article. How many people have gone out and said that?
Also, I want to address the usage of the phrase "black people can't be racist". That phrase stems from historians and sociologists who use any -ism to represent an *unequal power structure*. In studying society as a series of institutions (aka where there is a power distribution), both historians and sociologists note that blacks tend to be on the lower end of the power spectrum. The funny thing is, academics say "black people can't be racist" not because they want to shove it in people's faces, but because they like say, according to [our academic] definition of racism, black people can't be racist. But it isn't as simple as that".
HOWEVER, the use of the word racism outside of academia (aka in common usage) is more like the definition of *prejudice*. It is redundant and short-sighted to view the creation of society in terms of just hate, hence the academic definition (racism) and separate definition for hate related feelings (prejudice)
If you look up the words on dictionary.com, you'll see that, under racism, it reflects both the academic and the similiar-to-prejudice definitions, while prejudice is... well, just prejudice
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/racism
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/prejudice
factorof13Jul 7, 2010
He's CIA.
vbullingerJul 7, 2010
Cointelpro. Makes sense. Like Hal Turner. It would also explain why he isn't in prison.
ysaricJul 7, 2010
(a) We don't really know why the case was dropped.
(b) This guy wasn't exactly attracting a big crowd with his sidewalk speech.
He seems clearly racist, but I'm not seeing anything there that makes me think throngs of people are signing up to follow him, or even listen to his message. Just seems like a nutjob. Protip: They're out there.
black27696Jul 7, 2010
I'm sure the fox link will get buried, so here:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38046920/ns/us_news
mrfuntimeJul 7, 2010
Would you be saying the same about a KKK member dressed in his white garb?
ysaricJul 7, 2010
Saying the same what? That we wouldn't have any more or less information about why a case was dropped? That it doesn't look like throngs of people are signing up to follow him or listen to him? That he's just a nutjob?
kylereJul 7, 2010
Bigoted Black Dude is the same as KKK white dude, both deserving of a .45 in the frontal lobe.
russmeyerJul 7, 2010
Words are words. This "Black Panther", the KKK, Louis Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam all say some hateful things, but that doesn't mean we should go around saying they deserve to be hurt or worse. Move over to England if you don't enjoy the Bill of Rights.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
kylereJul 7, 2010
Shouting, "Fire!" in a crowded theater is not protected speech, move to England if you did not bother learning civics.
taylorsplJul 7, 2010
Screw that. He deserves dick cancer so he can't reproduce.
frostekJul 7, 2010
f**k you! We don't want your rejects!
- England.
PS - Send them to Somalia, like keggerbmb suggested. Seems fair.
vegetablelambJul 7, 2010
I'd rather lock them in a room, pump them full of Ecstasy and make them watch buddy movies.
linuxpersonJul 8, 2010
As history has shown, hate is not an effective way to combat hate.
andyb747Jul 7, 2010
Q: What do you call a black guy in a tree with a briefcase?
A: branch manager.
luciferactualJul 7, 2010
bwaaahahahhahahahahhaha!
astitiousJul 7, 2010
That new Panther leader must be an agent provocateur. The FBI has used them for decades to incite protest groups to carry out illegal actions. The government fears men like Martin Luther King Jr and Malcolm X, because they question the foundation of tyranny, but this knuckle-head only scares the masses and makes the jack-booted thugs in government seem necessary.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
mickman17Jul 7, 2010
Hope you enjoyed your crazy flakes for breakfast - because you sure are spewing out the crazy now.
hetmanJul 7, 2010
MLK was a good person. Malcolm X advocated hate and violence. That is something I cannot tolerate.
astitiousJul 7, 2010
Malcolm X had a change of heart, and thats when he was killed.
lioozherJul 7, 2010
Malcom X was assassinated after he changed many of his previous beliefs and began to work with other civil rights leaders. From Wikipedia:
"After leaving the Nation of Islam, Malcolm X became a Sunni Muslim and made a pilgrimage to Mecca, after which he disavowed racism. He traveled extensively throughout Africa and the Middle East. He founded Muslim Mosque, Inc., a religious organization, and the secular, Pan-Africanist Organization of Afro-American Unity. Less than a year after he left the Nation of Islam, Malcolm X was assassinated while giving a speech in New York."
hetmanJul 7, 2010
It reminds me of senator byrd. Yea he might have changed his tune after he left the kkk. That does not change the fact he spent the majority of his earlier life preaching hatred, violence and racism.
therightsideJul 7, 2010
"Samir Shabazz (Black Panther in video) must be an agent provocateur." Because there is no way a black person could actually be racist.
astitiousJul 7, 2010
Because he is protected by the DOJ. Anyone can be a racist.
uv0001Jul 7, 2010
As long as it's not Ritz crackers they're killing. Those things are delicious.
vegetablelambJul 7, 2010
i don't know man, I could downright slaughter some Ritz of onion dip is available.
murrayc1968Jul 7, 2010
What about Crackers who stay at the Ritz?
jargonscottJul 7, 2010
*thump thump*
PUTTIN' ON THE RITZ!!!!
vegetablelambJul 7, 2010
"What about Crackers who stay at the Ritz?"
If the time comes to go cannibal and I've got a hot-tub full of onion dip....
aretines78Jul 7, 2010
http://img371.imageshack.us/i/putinontheritzhz6.jpg/
delphium226Jul 8, 2010
@Aretines78
f**king LOL!
nsechoesJul 7, 2010
I spoke with a PETA representative and he said he's happy as long as the Panthers don't harm any Animal Crackers.
vbullingerJul 7, 2010
Seems appropriate:
http://www.break.com/usercontent/2006/10/1/mitch-hedberg-on-ritz-crackers-160243
longstockingsJul 7, 2010
Jacobs Cream Crackers with brie and butter.
darqchildJul 7, 2010
So he's racist? Lots of people are racist. Lets stop talking about whether ir
luke1h7Jul 7, 2010
Because this gives white people a chance to be racist without hiding it.
therightsideJul 7, 2010
Because black people hide it so well...
ardenlinogeJul 7, 2010
Because minorities and democrats are openly racist and nobody ever calls them on their s**t. Repugs are always called on the carpet and lose their jobs for it, but it seems to be perfectly all right for the PC and politically protected groups to do exactly what they attack others for doing.
ShovelbabyJul 9, 2010
This isn't just any racist man. This man was involved in a voter intimidation case that was dismissed because the federal justice department instructed it. On Tuesday, a former justice attorney (who quit because of how the case was handled) testified before the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights as to how the federal justice department instructed them to drop not only the abandoned the voter intimidation case for racial reasons, but also instructed attorneys in the civil rights division to ignore any cases that involve black defendants and white victims. Of the voter intimidation case, the justice said " If the actions in Philadelphia do not constitute voter intimidation, it is hard to imagine what would, short of an actual outbreak of violence at the polls."
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/jun/25/inside-the-black-panther-case-anger-ignorance-and-/print/
mbtriaJul 7, 2010
There are always some malformed and twisted individuals who believe that have the intellectual and moral grace of what ever power runs their delusional world. Protection for this individual, and protection for other malformed and twisted individuals who would seek to do him harm, is an unfortunate obligation of society. And for those who seek to make the provision of the protection a racial issue, let me remind you that the racial roles are most often reversed. KKK and American Nazi Party members, to name just two of many groups, often require (and demand) similar protections.
Yeah this man is demented. In an ideal world we shouldn't have to pay to protect him. But we pay the police to protect us from a number of more or less demented individuals. This one is just another one.
emkaysmithJul 7, 2010
Speaking as a Southerner, . . . reducing the redneck population isn't racism. It's common sense, for the common good. And it would free up some of those double-wides.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
homercles337Jul 7, 2010
Damn, the conservatives sure are an easily frightened bunch. Do you hide under the bed after you wet it?
bossm4nJul 7, 2010
So you're okay with this? I guess you'd be okay with a white dude wearing a hood and robes saying, "kill darkies", especially if a Republican president intervened and blocked criminal proceedings against said person?
Closed AccountJul 7, 2010
And if this were a Tea Party representative, your opinion would be...?
janincoJul 7, 2010
There would be gnashing of teeth and a demand for their arrests and all Tea Party participants would be labeled as terrorists...heck, they have already done that!
ardenlinogeJul 7, 2010
Being neither a liberal or a conservative and belonging to neither the demos or the repugs I can honestly say I call racism where I see it. If this were that fat retard Rush Limpbutt I would be openly denouncing him as I have always done. However when its a minority that is openly racist the PC crowd springs up to shield him/her from any criticism at all. Political Correctness, supported by the left, protects certain specific groups and demonizes only a handful, those being, whites, men, and christians, luckily I'm only two of those.
The Hypocrisy of the right was clear and evident when dubya was in power and I stood with the left against him and his administration. Now that the tool obamo is in the office, the hypocrisy is mainly from the left. Who blindly refuse to see it, just like the repugs did. Wake up smell reality.
homercles337Jul 7, 2010
Where is his corporate backing? One racist guy with a megaphone on South St in Philly does not make a corporate backed, media endorsed, blinded, clueless, historically ignorant, racist movement of angry white old people. Apples and oranges. The two have opposite sides of racism and anger in common--thats it.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
Closed AccountJul 7, 2010
Oh, that's right -- the Black Panthers are just a grass-roots movement with no financial backing from anyone.
(Which reminds me, I *still* haven't gotten a check for any of my TP work. I'm starting to wonder about this whole 'corporate backed' rumor I keep hearing about.)
thepartystarJul 7, 2010
I'm not afraid.
anixmanderJul 7, 2010
That's because you have a brain.
And aren't afraid to use it.
limaboneJul 7, 2010
This just in...extremists on both sides of any given *ism debate are a-holes and don't represent the vast majority of people who can be found somewhere in the middle.
d0kken_Jul 7, 2010
This is the new face of racism in America. Greasy faced, garbage breathed. nappy headed, borderline homeless mandingos.
blankchequeJul 7, 2010
Sounds like you're at the forefront of tackling this controversy d0kken, please do tell how you break down race barriers?
Oh, sorry, my bad, thought you had something relevant to say.
rujtuJul 7, 2010
Ugh, so much hypocrisy . . . can't breath.
stanggt3Jul 7, 2010
OMG OMG OMG Where is that gentlemen Al Sharpton on this one?????
Oh...he only comes out and talks when he wants to, but ignores everything else.
lunchbox37Jul 7, 2010
Really? You want Sharpton to talk about this _racist_ man and you're using the word 'fagot?'
Are you high, or just incredibly stupid?
stanggt3Jul 7, 2010
Clearly you have a long way to go in understanding sarcasm.
timmyftwJul 8, 2010
I'm pretty sure his reply was: Stupid.
errdayimhustlinJul 7, 2010
Lol, this guy has balls.
spinningheadJul 7, 2010
"The Obama administration took office amid widespread allegations that the Bush administration had politicized the civil rights division. Reports by the Government Accountability Office and the Justice Department’s inspector general found that enforcement of certain anti-discrimination laws dropped significantly, and that political appointees systematically steered career jobs to conservatives in violation of civil service laws. "
The man carrying the club was prosecuted.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/07/us/07rights.htmlComment is buried, click here to see the rest.
ftx437Jul 7, 2010
He was, and a default judgment was issued, but when it came time for sentencing the DOJ dropped the case..
jthesaintJul 7, 2010
Did you read your link? The guy was prosected under the Bush administration, was convicted, but then had all charges dropped by the Obama administration for what appears to be racially motivated reasons.
mantiskungfuJul 7, 2010
This will get buried in no time. It doesn't fit Digg's agenda of seeking the truth. /s Hope and Change folks.
hetmanJul 7, 2010
It has been on the front page for the last hour. The only thing that is going to push it off the front page is upcoming stories. Which appears to be happening. Do you have any other complaints.
mantiskungfuJul 7, 2010
Yeah if these were white male racist teabagging GOPers this would be the top story on every news station tonight and on the front page of every paper in the country. I guarantee there wont be a peep about this anywhere other than here.
coloneljessupJul 7, 2010
LOL @ leftist apologists!
"It's not hate speech, it's frustration!"
"It's not racism, a little "thinning out" of the herd would be beneficial to us all!"
"White guilt is right wing fallacy!"
"It's natural for blacks to hate whites!"
HA! I love digg sometimes, simply for the chuckles!
hetmanJul 7, 2010
Who is apologizing. It is racism but it is nothing I have not seen from a white or mexican person. Strangely enough due to the fact that I do not hang out with many asians or indians. I have not seen a lot of racism out of those two groups. Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
sealinkJul 7, 2010
Have you ever tried to date an Asian girl without her mother's approval? There's plenty of racism there.
Closed AccountJul 7, 2010
What apologists? I mean, I see a lot of the usual right wing idiots with their "the white man is losing the country" bulls**t, but why would anyone defend this?Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
Closed AccountJul 7, 2010
Hi ColonelJessup. Protip. Normally when you are criticizing the tendencies of a certain group (in this case you cite "digg"), it's customary to make sure that the words used within quotations have actually been uttered within the group forum that you are critquing. Otherwise, you come across as a blathering idiot with a pocket full of strawmen. Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
sirtwitchalotJul 7, 2010
It is racism, it is hate speech, it is deplorable, and it is his right as a US citizen to express his views - even if I don't agree with them.
Unless he makes a specific threat against someone, he hasn't violated any law.
rizzo2008Jul 8, 2010
except he was about to go to jail and then the justice department dropped their case in late 2008 for no apparent reason.
yage2006Jul 8, 2010
Maybe try not to be so polarizing in your comments. Most everyone I know is left leaning but things this guy is a racist piece of s**t.
14justiceJul 9, 2010
Come on, Yage, if this guy was white, and saying those things about blacks, the outrage would be deafening. Where is the outrage from your "left leaning" friends?
yage2006Jul 10, 2010
Thing is if he was white and saying those things he would just be another white nazi and be ignored.
The outrage is there. I personally hate all racists.
banderwockyJul 7, 2010
Meh, no different than any of the hate speech you hear from some idiot running their mouths about white power, or any other racism. These guys usually get theirs.
fishloreJul 7, 2010
LOL, I love the liberal circle jerk apologists. I expect nothing less from this place. Defend racists when they have a D in front of their name and make charges of racism against people with R in front of their name. Keep making excuses for despicable behavior based on a letter. Pathetic, close minded, idiots.
Closed AccountJul 7, 2010
I'm starting to think you don't know what a circle jerk or apologists are. Can you not read? Nearly every comment above you has conceded that this guy is obviously racist. The only thing I see people really defending are the ludicrous attempts to somehow link this idiot to Obama. Yes the charges were dropped but without knowing the facts of the case we're engaging in pure speculation. I'm not an Obama supporter but if you can't see the glaring propaganda attempt the video makes then you can aim that "pathetic, close minded, idiot" comment right back at at yourself.
ardenlinogeJul 7, 2010
On the issue of racism you are correct the left does exactly that. However on other issues the right will shield and defend their own for doing the exact same thing they condemn the left for doing.
ardenlinogeJul 9, 2010
Hated by kool-aid drinkers on both sides. I'm doing it right.
netmongerJul 7, 2010
These guys may be racist.. but trying to link Obama to them - just because they're both black - is racist as well..
javandiverJul 7, 2010
"Before any penalties could be handed down — and after Obama appointed Eric Holder to run the Justice Department — charges were dropped against everyone but Samir Shabazz. The court prohibited him from displaying a weapon within 100 feet of any Philadelphia polling place through 2012"
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38046920/ns/us_news
Sounds like a slap on the wrist for a felony to me.
boombyeJul 7, 2010
Well why go after Obama and not Eric Holder or the Judge in that case?
ardenlinogeJul 7, 2010
Telling the truth is in no way discrimination, its the truth. Just because it doesn't fit into your political world view does not make it any less the truth.
ftx437Jul 7, 2010
For those using the defense that he doesn't represent all black people...
The KKK doesn't speak for all white people, yet you leftist seem to think that they do..
Or that anyone who speaks out against our pres is a racist. Get off your high horses.
vegetablelambJul 7, 2010
"The KKK doesn't speak for all white people, yet you leftist seem to think that they do.."
Actually we don't. Not at all.
boombyeJul 7, 2010
You're right they don't, but making up excuses about how black people are taking over the country or are getting away with racism here like it's on an institutional level or something is outlandish as some people have tried to claim. Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
yage2006Jul 8, 2010
Allot of leftist people are white to dumbass.
I think the only people who think the KKK represents white people are in that video.
gardimusJul 7, 2010
As a white guy, I will admit it, hes on to us!
blankchequeJul 7, 2010
Gee, you're really bummin' me out, bringing me back to a time when I owned land and people - Louis C.K.
Just more black nationalism sensationalism. No different then the any KKK, or Neo-Nazi scumbag.
boombyeJul 7, 2010
I tried pointing that out, someone tried to play a numbers game with me over which group has more members, Black Nationalists vs KKK as if it was some contest.. I'm being buried into oblivion for saying each group sucks and individuals belonging to either race spewing racist crap don't represent their entire race, while I'm getting crap from people whining about how black people get away with this s**t and it's unfair, and one guy even had the nerve to say that white people are being treated like slaves in this country.
basalcellbosskJul 7, 2010
This is the best the !right have got.
A single instance of a crazy black dude. This is their justification for the tea party racism, their fear and hatred of 'the other'.
This is the best argument they have. Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
charlie55Jul 7, 2010
i am genuinely curious, is it ok if i call this man a gentlemen? to be fair, he did just advocate ethnic murder, so it seems like perhaps name-calling would be ok.
hetmanJul 7, 2010
Using a racist term even against a racist is not going to help solve any problems. It will only make them worst.
thepartystarJul 7, 2010
No it's never okay to say that word but we should just let him and his crazy friends kill us and our children...it's only fair.I'm not worried though because I will assume this isolated incidence of hate is directed at the Democrats....ya know since they were the slave drivers in America and their membership constituted the majority of the KKK.
bossm4nJul 7, 2010
The story is not merely about some crazy racist black dude, it's about the Obama administration obstructing justice.
artworkz918Jul 7, 2010
single instance?
kingnovaJul 7, 2010
Can you point to another from that day?
artworkz918Jul 7, 2010
who said we're talking about just that day?
dreadpirateJul 7, 2010
@BCB - So you're fine with someone spouting this kind of nonsense outside of a polling station on election day? That's part of what this whole thing is about. Or are you once again not bothering to actually look at the whole story?
kingnovaJul 7, 2010
Um. I'm pretty sure he (poorly) pointed out that one incident out of millions of polling places is REALLY reaching. Talk about desperately trying to play the race card.
Meanwhile in California a Republican registration leader was convicted of actual fraud involving thousands of Democratic voters.
Why aren't you outraged over that since it involved MANY more people?
artworkz918Jul 7, 2010
meanwhile ACORN was registering millions of dead and non-existant people to vote democrat and shredding the registration cards of those that wanted to register (R)
why aren't you outraged over that since it involved MANY more people?
boombyeJul 7, 2010
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/08/16/opinion/16herbert.html
dreadpirateJul 7, 2010
@Kingnova - Is it reaching if that incident was not prosecuted for obviously political reasons? Are civil rights laws only supposed to apply to whites when they are oppressing (or attempting to oppress) blacks? This is about the rule of law and making sure that the same laws apply to everyone.
But because the democrats are involved and because it is a set of black defendants, the case gets dropped and gets very little news coverage.
kingnovaJul 8, 2010
"Is it reaching if that incident was not prosecuted for obviously political reasons? "
What the hell are you talking about, DreadPirate? What obvious political reasons. The BUSH ADMINISTRATION decided to make it a civil, not criminal issue:
Bush administration decided to file a civil, not a criminal, complaint. In his May 14 testimony before the United States Commission on Civil Rights, Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez said that the Bush administration's Justice Department "determined that the facts did not constitute a prosecutable violation of the criminal statutes" but instead decided to "file a civil action on January 7, 2009." From Perez's testimony:
PEREZ: Moving to the matter at hand, the events occurred on November 4th, 2008. The Department became aware of these events on Election Day and decided to conduct further inquiry.
After reviewing the matter, the Civil Rights Division determined that the facts did not constitute a prosecutable violation of the criminal statutes. The Department did, however, file a civil action on January 7th, 2009, seeking injunctive and declaratory relief under 11(b) against four defendants.
________________________
So are you saying the Bush admin sent it to civil instead of criminal for purely political reasons?
Seriously. You people are so f**king stuck on trying to find some way to make Obama a racist, you don't even f**king know the basic facts about the case.
blankchequeJul 7, 2010
What the f**k are you talking about?
It's not a liberal or conservative thing. Quit trying to paint it as such.
Closed AccountJul 7, 2010
These guys are f**king stupid. The answer to racism is not more racism and hate. And what's this talk about "freedom"? Last time I checked only free people can stand in the middle of the street and make a fool of themselves over a loud speaker. They're no better than the KKK. Worse even.
nodakiJul 7, 2010
I don't know why anyone would be intimidated by that skinny little dude with a big mouth. I am guessing he is skinny because it takes so much energy to be so pissed off.
rcknshdwJul 7, 2010
That or he just got done hitting the crack pipe.
Oh, it's bad to generalize about people on the internet? Sorry /s
ardenlinogeJul 7, 2010
Explain Rush Limbuagh then.
charlie55Jul 7, 2010
breaking news, some gentlemen is crazy! not fascinating.
cautionJul 7, 2010
This guy should be doing local weather. That would be awesome.
Closed AccountJul 7, 2010Submitter
Tonight, a front of crackers is coming through. There will be cracker pressure and it'll rain crackers!
sipsyrupJul 8, 2010
Cracker flood warning is now in affect for surrounding areas.
lunchbox37Jul 7, 2010
Wait, a Black Panther said something racist?!
HOLY f**kING CRAP! Why is this not on the cover of the New York Times?!
/s
abelard3Jul 7, 2010
FOX NEWS IS TRYING TO MAKE WHITE PEOPLE SCARED AND MAKE FOR MORE RACISM. Don't let them do it to you.
gumphlumphJul 7, 2010
The Klan have been preaching this kind of hate against blacks for decades, but one crazy black guy does it and everybody is up in arms. A black man can't even walk the streets in the back woods of Georgia without some cracker pulling over, picking a gun of the rack in the back of his truck and leveling his sights on him. No, it's not fiction, it's fact, just that the press doesn't talk about it anymore, but it happens all the time. Racism on either side is a disgrace.
allforthelulzJul 7, 2010
Spoken like someone who's never been in any backwoods, or probably even Georgia.
Here in the south, black people f**k with you on a daily basis. Thats just the way it is. They are THE single most racist group of people i've ever met. I've been threatened, run off the road, and insulted.
People say that the south is SO racist, yet all the racism i've seen here has been black people. Probably not the kind of racist they were talking about...
ardenlinogeJul 7, 2010
I experience anti-white racism in Texas, Oklahoma, and CALIFORNIA. It's not just the south.
allforthelulzJul 8, 2010
Love how all the people who disagree with us don't have the balls to comment. These are first hand experiences, not he said she said.
ShovelbabyJul 9, 2010
Not just any crazy man. This crazy man was involved in a voter intimidation case that the federal justice department instructed to drop, even though it was an open and shut case according to a local justice official who quit because of this case.
Closed AccountJul 7, 2010
Someone has their 60s black revolutionary cliche levels turned up too high.
lilhelperJul 7, 2010
Remove him from the gene pool. please...fast..
murrayc1968Jul 7, 2010
I am SICK of black people crying the "poor black man blues". Seriously, man, it's 2010 for Christ's sake.
So black people had/have it tough. Boo-f**king-hoo. EVERY race in EVERY culture has had a s**tty hand dealt to them at one point or another whether it be a black on the plantation, a jew in the desert, an oriental on the rail-road, or a gentile fighting for his life in a roman coliseum.
You know what the difference is between blacks and everybody else who had it tough? The rest of us got over it and moved on. How many jews or asians have you seen on the street pan-handling? NONE! Everybody has figured out that there will ALWAYS be people who don't like you, but you still have to get your s**t together and pull your weight in society.
Nothing f**king irritates me more than a ni##er whining and belly-aching with his hand out, but there are THOUSANDS of immigrants who emigrate to North America every year who make something of themselves. These people come struggling against the language barrier, culture barrier, and racist barrier, and the STILL manage to life comfortably whether they are running a convenience store, or saving someone's life in the operating room.
Go father yet another neglected kid, Tyrell.
blankchequeJul 7, 2010
Look up the term Eugenics, and how it has been applied to African-Americans.
Look up the word "Genocide" and consider the differences between A Native American "reservation" and an African-American "Ghetto".Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
ardenlinogeJul 7, 2010
Don't forget the white christian europeans enslaved by the thousands to the africans and muslims. Barabary pirates and all that. Oh wait whites and europeans are supposed to be the bad guys aren't they.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
blankchequeJul 7, 2010
I guess you forgot the Romans. An entire civilization built by slaves.
sealinkJul 7, 2010
You're a credit to your race, boy.
/s
randall814Jul 7, 2010
If you hate white people so much, go back to Africa (where civilization started, so don't think less of me for saying it) and live life there. I look forward to emails from your king.
ardenlinogeJul 7, 2010
Question. If man is supposed to be descended from africans, why are there more asians than africans? Not being a smart ass or anything I just don't get it.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
pogcowJul 7, 2010
i love this stupid response at least 1 person has to say it "if you hate _______________ then go back to ________ pick a subject/race in first box and a country in second box... i guess its a automated im a retard response.. Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
pinchduckJul 7, 2010
The most amusing thing about racism and bigotry is that it's so inclusive. All races have racists and bigots.
ardenlinogeJul 7, 2010
Exactly.
yage2006Jul 8, 2010
Every race has their share of ignorant s**t heads.
But some more then others.
2612Jul 7, 2010
so glad we're post-racial now.
twwixJul 7, 2010
Kill Whitey!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pxs6s8wTKgk&feature=related
ardenlinogeJul 7, 2010
not funny no matter who says it. Replace whitey with any other group you like and see if its still funny.