lacrossetribune.com — A 9-year-old boy at St. Stanislaus Elementary School was immediately and indefinitely suspended Thursday night at a school lip-sync fundraiser after mimicking Michael Jackson’s famous groin grab during a rendition of “Billie Jean.”
Feb 4, 2012 View in Crawl 4
salbatrossFeb 4, 2012
Because taking the kid aside and saying "hey that's inappropriate, okay?" would clearly not have been enough.
ninhFeb 5, 2012
They'd have had to explain to him why.
penglustFeb 6, 2012
And he is an uptight, probably christian, repressed d**k h**d who is ashamed of his own wanking off.
Probably anyways.
hapihorsFeb 4, 2012
I was afraid from the headline that he was having a sleep over with Macaulay C.
ageofmasteryFeb 5, 2012
It's a Catholic School, so doing little boys would be ok with them.
weebitFeb 5, 2012
It did not become dirty until an adult said it was. They must have a lot of dirty minds there.
kalvinbFeb 5, 2012
I don't know what's more amazing, that this stock answer to a blatantly sexual act during a song about a baby daddy got submitted, twice, or that it keeps getting modded up.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
redlteutFeb 5, 2012
"We are deeply sorry" said Mr. Pat Bowlin, principal to the school, "maybe next year we will be doing something less risky, like Jesus Christ Superstar, or the Rocky Horror Picture Show."
akronFeb 5, 2012
Why do people send their children to school to learn if the school is filled with idiots? Oh, it's a Catholic school, which means the parents are also idiots.
blacklilyninjaFeb 5, 2012
catholics do not hold a monopoly on idiocy
akronFeb 5, 2012
True
alienmushroomFeb 5, 2012
The people who have the sick twisted mind should be suspended indefinitely, not an innocent kid.
kalvinbFeb 5, 2012
Yeah, cause grabbing your crotch isn't inappropriate at all if you just think about it right. Yes, they over reacted. Yes, it's highly inappropriate. And yes, the kid/parents should have known better.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
penglustFeb 6, 2012
Get over yourself. He was imitating a dance move. It was seen in rehearsal by many others and no one seemed to notice. Then a dick week uptight dip ship let his little bit of power go to his head.
See my wanking comment above.
publikjohn9Feb 5, 2012
St. Stanislaus.
That says enough for me.
ninhFeb 5, 2012
Another school principal riding the pale horse of idiocy.
genepooldesignFeb 5, 2012
People fly off the handle so easily! Whatever happened to stern warnings?
bwiiiFeb 5, 2012
...reserved for the United Nations...
penglustFeb 6, 2012
Unless vetoed by Russia and China. Aren't you so glad we are in bed with China.
debasisgFeb 5, 2012
Never underestimate the stupidity of elementary school administration.
mawdsFeb 6, 2012
The kid mimicking MJ would not have even considered that the actions he was doing was anything remotely sexual. Probably too young to even have this cross his mind yet all he thought he was doing was copying MJ. Now that the Principle has pointed out what he was doing was sexual and the fact that the parents would have to explain this to their child, will probably effect him mentally. It would be a concept alien to him but now he is exposed to this earlier then expected. I mean really it's around early teens we think about such things as we are starting puberty. So this very act may effect his growth as an individual. It may open up things in his mind where he will seek out to better understand. It may effect his sexual development. And all because of a **** of a teacher that singled out something where there was none. Where if he f**king left it alone all would be forgotten and he would grow normally.
Thanks Mr Teacher sir, he is a gold star for you. f**king retard.
penglustFeb 6, 2012
All this made even worse because the "principle" was probably pissed off because he was turned on by it and ashamed.
Stupid wanker.
insomniax2Feb 6, 2012
I had to double check to make sure this wasn't The Onion.
ka5p3rFeb 5, 2012
what he do,tried to molest boys.
drcrankFeb 5, 2012
Oh, the imitation was "mimicking Michael Jackson’s famous groin grab", not the "putting his hands down another 9 year old boy's pants" imitation.
penglustFeb 6, 2012
In other words he was acting like a child and not a priest.
lunarparcelFeb 5, 2012
fta: "immediately and indefinitely suspended... after mimicking Michael Jackson’s famous groin grab during a rendition of “Billie Jean.”
Well, to be honest, Michael Jackson was reputed to have been involved in a number of "famous groin grabs" prompting varying degrees of recrimination.
I guess it would help to know more precisely which form of said groin grab was so employed. One in which this student utilized his own groin, or one in which he utilized the groin of another child.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
icwydFeb 5, 2012
If it involved a priest it would have been OK.
lunarparcelFeb 5, 2012
LOL. Buried by Diggers who weren't even born at the pinnacle of Michael Jackson's fame. Either that, or simply to afraid to confront painful memories of Neverland.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
WabbitslayerFeb 5, 2012
Imitating a child molester and people wonder why he was suspended.
ratsgFeb 5, 2012
+1 Wabbitslayer
How did it ever get this far anyway?
The race of the child in question was not mentioned, but, what parent in their right mind would let their child imitate a known child molester?
This act should have never made it to the school.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.