Users who Dugg This
Russ Smith
18390 Followers
NewsMeBack
6467 Followers
Raja Usman Iftikhar
348 Followers
bobosmitor
5469 Followers
Technology Inspired
144 Followers
redstringJun 13, 2011
When propaganda intersects with greed, blood will spill and theft will reign.
And even today GE profits big time from the "war on terrorism".
skywiseJun 14, 2011
And "Green" energy... only one company in the US benefitted from banning incandescent bulbs... GE.
Closed AccountJun 14, 2011
As opposed to the billions of incandescent bulbs they built and sold since their founder, Edison, created the first marketable one over one hundred years ago? The very product that made the company successful? You think that GE, the largest producer of incandescent bulbs in the entire world somehow benefited from decisions it had no hand in whatsoever to stop selling incandescent bulbs? You also think that none of the other companies that create non-incandescent bulbs are not benefiting from the change?
I mean I get that you, like so many right-wing extremists, like making s**t up and could care less if no one believes you outside of your little hate-coven, but stop being silly, Skywise...
skywiseJun 14, 2011
GE is the US' largest manufacturer of fluorescent bulbs. GE was a large contributor to the DNC and Obama's campaign and the GE CEO now sits on Obama's advisory board...
Did GE have a hand in the decision? YOU BETCHA!
I'm sorry your fifth grade education doesn't allow you to understand how these things are related but keep trying! You'll get it eventually!Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
Closed AccountJun 14, 2011
Can I borrow your hat? I don't want my leftovers to get freezerburn.
Of course, all of the legal work that brought about the switchover took place before Obama was president, and of course GE gave more money to McCain, and of course GE is a conservative company that basically created the political career of Ronald Reagan, but why confuse yourself with facts when you can simply parrot whatever Beck dreamed up...
skywiseJun 14, 2011
Lying again Kuppa... tsk, tsk
http://amerpundit.com/2010/08/19/msnbc-parent-company-has-given-democrats-1-1-million-in-2010-cycle/
"According to records filed with the Federal Elections Commission, General Electric — the parent company of MSNBC — has donated more than $1.1 million to Democrats during the 2010 election cycle. In fact, more than 60% of political donations from the corporate giant have gone to leftist candidates. That figure is similar to the 2008 cycle, when General Electric gave 64% of political donations to Democrats."Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
Closed AccountJun 15, 2011
Nope, you're a liar. Here is what General Electric ACTUALLY donated: http://www.ge.com/citizenship/_files/pdf/GE-2010-Political-Contributions.pdf
They always give slightly more to the Republicans in every election season until recently and now give slightly more to the Democratic Party and the presidential election was no different: http://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/toprecips.php?id=D000000125&type=P&sort=A&cycle=2008
Which amounts to nothing considering what the Koch Brothers spent to create the astro-turf GOPTeaparty. The silly wingnut blog you linked to are extremist jokes much like yourself.
But hey, thanks for sharing! It shows you have nothing, fundie...Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
skywiseJun 15, 2011
http://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/toprecips.php?id=D000000125&type=P&sort=A&cycle=2008
So your proof of my lying is to cite a source that says in 2010 GE contributed:
To Democrats:$1,378,310
To Republicans: $899,460
So Democrats got roughly 60% more from GE than Republicans... confirming my statement.
In 2008 GE contributed
To Democrats: $1,783,776
To Republicans: $907,433
Or roughly 65% to Democrats
Confirming my post...
Notice you didn't say anything about GE's contributions to McCain which your link helpfully shows too...
McCain: $100,072
Obama: $513,980
Li-ar...Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
Closed AccountJun 16, 2011
Oh, silly fundie, with your constant lies you make a spectacle of yourself...
1. wanna check your numbers again, champ?
2. 2008 was the year our president was nominated, what year do you think the actual donations for the Presidential election nominations would be made?
3. I already said they always give 60-40 to the side they think is going to win
4. Do your lips move when you read your fairytale storybook in your magic underwear?
Somewhat pathetic, Skywise. I do not remember you be such a Rearden last time I swept the floor with you.
skywiseJun 16, 2011
2008 refers to the 2008 election season.
njdoo7Jun 14, 2011
And new restrictions on coal power plants that obama exempted GE from, less than a month after former GE CEO became one of his economic advisors.
Closed AccountJun 14, 2011
That's one I hadn't heard before, of course it's probably manufactured nonsense as well, but Ill bite. Citation?
skywiseJun 14, 2011
http://washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/2011/02/obama-issues-global-warming-rules-january-gives-ge-exemption-febr
Closed AccountJun 15, 2011
I said a citation which implies it is from a credible source, not a cesspool of lies, hate and nonsense led by one of your HateCoven(tm) kiddo buddies, fundie. I get that without lies you have nothing, and that you will basically believe anyone and anything that agrees with you, but don't you ever get tired of lying, Skywise?
Closed AccountJun 15, 2011
Let me rephrase...
Njdoo, do you have a non-blog, non-fox, non-WND and non-birther-rag source to site?
UncleRuckuJun 14, 2011
missing some
Louis Vuitton During the World War II, Louis Vuitton collaborated with the Nazis during the German occupation of France. The French book Louis Vuitton, A French Saga, authored by French journalist Stephanie Bonvicini and published by Paris-based Editions Fayard tells how members of the Vuitton family actively aided the puppet government led by Marshal Philippe Pétain and increased their wealth from their business affairs with the Germans. The family set up a factory dedicated to producing artifacts glorifying Pétain, including more than 2,500 busts. Petain's Vichy regime was responsible for the deportation of French Jews to German concentration camps.
Bayer. During the Holocaust, a German company called IG Farben manufactured the Zyklon B gas used in the Nazi gas chambers. They also funded and helped with Josef Mengele's "experiments" on concentration camp prisoners.
Siemens. Siemens took slave laborers during the Holocaust and had them help construct the gas chambers that would kill them and their families. Good people over there.
Siemens also has the single biggest post-Holocaust moment of insensitivity of any of the companies on this list. In 2001, they tried to trademark the word "Zyklon" (which means "cyclone" in German) to become the name a new line of products... including a line of gas ovens.
Standard Oil. The Luftwaffe needed tetraethyl lead gas in order to get their planes off the ground. Standard Oil was one of only three companies that could manufacture that type of fuel. So they did.
Closed AccountJun 15, 2011
Standard Oil was busted as a trust and a big part of it was Exxon. Since Standard is no longer around, best to refer to them as Exxon (formally Standard Oil) so that we know what you mean. Otherwise, great work! (dugg up)
vitriolandangstJun 14, 2011
I always wonder what we are building our "military defenses for" -- I mean, who really is the enemy when we have Billion-dollar air craft carriers, and the companies that build them, are setting up factories in China.
What really irks me about the "transnational weapons companies" like GE, and the "thugs for hire" like Blackwater -- is that they can start working for the highest bidder.
So, we spent decades and billions and billions of dollars pushing our military to the cutting edge - and they can just go ahead and sell it to someone else.
What's the point of a CIA and trying to catch spies? What's the point of the war on terror? It's all a bunch of Bulls**t that we pay for, that bankrupts our country, and that only benefits those who sell weapons or need cheap labor.
I used to have a slight, guilty sense of pride at some new weapons system that came out -- now I just think how a predator drone could be used against me. Every new "advance" seems to be just another thing hanging over our heads if we ever get really pissed at how CorpGov treats us.
The "will of the governed" only works if you've got a Democracy that doesn't spy on you.
sniperhareJun 14, 2011
The better our aircraft carriers and weapons systems the less Americans will die and the quicker we can defeat our enemies.
And how is the war on terror bulls**t? Or trying to catch enemy spies? These are people that want to bring harm to our country. Why wouldn't you want to stop them?
Don't be another sheep just blindly following every conspiracy theory or anti government sentiment you find.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
ieatskunkJun 14, 2011
Companies like GE can't just sell to whomever they want. And it is much harder to get away with today.
The goal of the US military is simple: They dont want a fair fight. They want a fight that is heavily skewed in our favor. And I can't say I disagree with it.
theangrymobJun 14, 2011
It's not a new concept. Read "Art of War." You never, EVER want a fair fight.
liv2chillJun 14, 2011
The apes are getting smarter apparently and when we invent AI, we will need a huge army for that. I'd say in the next 10 years we will be at war with either apes or robots or both and our big military budget will pay off.
vitriolandangstJun 14, 2011
WE spend money to produce advanced weapons with private corporations -- those private corporations DO NOT ALWAYS WORK FOR US. That's the point of this topic.
I don't need to go into theory -- just relay the facts. We have to wonder WHY we spend a few billion on an Air Craft Carrier -- who is it for? If it's for a large rival like China -- why are we in debt to them, and allowing corporations with sensitive security information to create financial entanglements -- especially IN LIGHT OF THIS TOPIC OF MAJOR CORPORATIONS WORKING BOTH SIDES OF WW II!
I contend, while acknowledging that there are plenty of well-meaning people in our military and security agencies, that our security and military functions MOSTLY to secure profit margins for international corporations and banks. Read the book; "Confessions of an Economic Hitman" and of course "Disaster Capitalism." I don't see anything in the past 10 years to make me think that we've done anything for US security in a meaningful way -- and because I KNOW you won't bother to read those two books before proclaiming how we need all this "security" and shiny weapons, let's go through a quick index of some of the issues:
***
1) We are just the Enforcers
The dollar is backed by the ability of our military to inflict damage on any country that DOESN'T back the dollar. Iraq and now
***
2) Follow the Money
Money is really what ALL of this is about -- and beyond war-profiteering, our "security" agencies, are often merely the hatchet men for corporations. Note the CIA involvement in Chile during the Nixon era to procure cheap copper for AT&T and to put in place the Pinochet regime. The support of the Contras in Latin-America, was really a brutal Union-Busting campaign.
If we DO NOT OWN America, then what are we defending? The Supreme Court made "freedom of speech and right to representation" a new right for Corporations -- money now is their "free speech" and they can "donate" to campaigns. And these donations are coming from foreign companies in record volumes.
Then we should ALSO look at who is influencing candidates and our trade policy on the US Chamber of Commerce which is mostly comprised of Transnational Corporations who MAKE money on outsourcing jobs. They have been vigorously working AGAINST efforts to curtail outsourcing;
http://www.economyincrisis.org/content/us-chamber-outsourcing
They've also been caught red-handed trying to engineer the destruction of progressive-minded journalists
***CONTINUES***
vitriolandangstJun 14, 2011
3) Privatized Thugs
In Desert Storm the Bush administration was criticized for not sending enough troops to "secure the peace" once the battle was one according to the well respected "Powell Doctrine" (1 troop per 25 people in the population). And we saw a near civil war in that nation for years -- and I'm not going into my theory right now that it was designed to fail from the outset to procure Production Sharing Agreements for oil companies,… what I'm saying, is that the Bush administration then outsourced this job to Blackwater -- and we had more Mercenaries in Iraq than we had troops. And they've been sited for "thrill kills" and trading drugs with the Taliban. Regardless of the behavior of a "few bad apples" -- the concept of our military paying 10X more for people not loyal to the USA is scary. Many of these people were recruited from fascist regimes like Pinochet's in Chile. They may not bite the hand that feeds them, as long as we are the one doing the feeding, right?
***
3B) In the "That Didn't Take Long" Department
I note that Eric Prince (the CEO of Blackwater), is already contracting with Dubai for use of his mercenaries; http://www.thenation.com/blog/secret-erik-prince-tape-exposed
As long as Dubai and US interests Coincide (mostly it seems, with outsourcing military, oil and drug trafficking financial arrangements), I suppose they aren't "THE ENEMY". Whatever that means.
***
4) Stupid or Evil?
9/7/2001; the NSA had been spying Domestically in a comprehensive manner since about a month after the Bush administration took office. On Friday 9/8/2001, Rumsfeld stated that the Pentagon had "lost track of $2 Trillion." On Monday, 9/11/2001, NORAD was conducting 3 mock preparedness drills with Dick Cheney regarding "planes crashing into buildings". In 2008, the number of people employed by Homeland Security, CIA, NSA, and about a thousand other "security" related agencies is around One Million. This is called "adding more hay to the needle in the haystack problem."
What am I trying to say? You've got people who are either, criminally irresponsible, or just criminal who got LOTS MORE MONEY AND POWER rather than a boot in the ass. If none of these agencies can clean house or corruption -- how can they defend us against a REAL threat? If NORAD or the Pentagon cannot detect airplanes in the USA (which I call BS), then they COULD NOT HAVE DEFENDED US AGAINST THE USSR.
What 9/11 highlights, is that if you BELIEVE the administration that they did not foster the 9/11 attack -- then obviously, they are too busy losing money and doing stupid things that America has not been safe for a long damn time. And when you look at how huge the Security apparatus has become -- it LOOKS LIKE THE BEGINNINGS OF A POLICE STATE. The U.S.S.R. had every other neighbor spying for the Communist Party -- and you know, that's been a program that is starting with WalMart workers right now! No, I'm not kidding; http://www.alldeaf.com/current-events/85219-walmart-joins-forces-homeland-security-spy-you.html
***
5) War is a Racket
And the Bush/Cheney defense Contractor war profiteering list;
KBR
Carlysle Group
Haliburton
American Enterprise Institute (backdoor funding for shills)
Etcetera, etcetera...
>> I do NOT want to turn this into a Book Report tracking down everything that stinks with these arrangements and our former Presidents in the Bush Family and other Nixon-era stooges.
Here is one article talking about a part of the issue;
http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-6099303-7.html
vitriolandangstJun 14, 2011
6) Privatizing our Military and Weapons
Is there really a US Defense industry --or merely an international Pretense; Many of the transnational corporations that produce our advanced weaponry, are building or have built plants in China. But I'll save myself some time googling all the holding companies and cross-licensing deals that allow companies to have feet in both camps and just highlight a FUTURE PROBLEM with the outsourcing of nuclear weapons.
Nuclear weapons maintenance and production is under the DOE (United States Department of Energy). They contract this out to another agency, the NNSA; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NNSA. The NNSA actually just provides oversight, and have outsourced most of the actual operations to private companies. They keep track of contractors and designers and the OST (Office of Secure Transportation) which moves the weapons.
General Dynamics Corporation; they are in the weapons business. They build Trident Nuclear subs.
Rockwell International; the core of the nuclear weapons industry.
General Electric; operates a plant in Florida that makes neutron generators for nuclear bombs -- and well, they are EVERYWHERE in the military and produce everything from re-entry vehicles to common troop hardware.
The Boeing Company; contracts for the air launched cruise missile, the MX missile, the Minuteman missile, and stealth technologies.
United Technologies Corporation; engines for missiles. Have "consulting arrangements" with; Alexander Haig, Robert H. Malott, Chairman and CEO of FMC Corporation, William I. Spencer, retired President of Citicorp and Charles W. Duncan Jr., current Citicorp Chairman and CEO John S. Reed.
Westinghouse Electric Corporation; involved with nuclear propulsion systems and fuels.
Northrop Corporation; contracts for MX missile guidance systems.
TRW Corporation; researching a new method of producing weapons grade plutonium using lasers.
UNC Resources; operates the N-reactor to produce plutonium for nuclear bombs.
AT&T; through its Western Electric subsidiary manages the Sandia National Laboratories on a no fee no profit basis.
Monsanto Corporation; Monsanto manages the Mound Facility in Miamisburg Ohio for the Department of Energy. The DOE is not answerable to the President or Congress (by the way) -- so there is perhaps ZERO oversight with regard to elected representatives (such as they are).
The Bechtel Company; this is where it gets interesting.
***
7) The Worst for Last
"In February 2004, Pakistani scientist Abdul Qadeer Khan confessed top selling nuclear secrets to Iran, Libya and North Korea. I the years since then, we have learned a great deal about the challenges presented by transnational, privatized nuclear proliferation." This story traces back to Bechtel and the Bush administration itself.
http://www.iaea.org/OurWork/SV/Safeguards/Symposium/2010/Documents/PapersRepository/2012749789382198030766.pdf
The Bush administration was also implicated by an FBI whistleblower Sibel Edmunds, where she speaks about Dennis Hastert's working for Turkey and translating Arabic communications corroborating the A Q Kahn / Bush connection. Regardless of whether you believe one whistleblower or not who has ruined her life to try and speak up -- Dennis Hastert now makes 7 figure a year "Consulting" for Turkey. Why is this not beyond the pale even if it were legal?
VabMediaJun 14, 2011
Exxon rockefeller and the nazi painting titled Profits of War
http://corporatecorruption.wordpress.com/2010/03/23/profits-of-war/
novenatorJun 13, 2011
Let's not forget that the Bush family fortune was made by helping the Nazis out too: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/sep/25/usa.secondworldwar
Maybe their just trying to balance it out, since the Koch family fortune was earned by helping Stalin and the authoritarian nationalists: http://www.alternet.org/story/146504/
kleon777Jun 14, 2011
Are you stupid? the Bush family is not a global busines. did you even read the article?
UncleRuckuJun 14, 2011
Money connections between Bush Republicans and Osama bin Laden go way back and the political and economic connections have remained unbroken for 30 years. And what appears to be a "new" alliance with Pakistan is merely a new manifestation of a decades-long partnership in the heroin trade.
vitriolandangstJun 14, 2011
After bankrolling Buckenwald, Prescott Bush helped the Nazis transfer funds through banks AFTER THE WAR was over. He was cited by FDR -- a slap on the wrist.
What amazes me is that they never got thrown in prison for Treason.
kasha34Jun 14, 2011
Didn't Pete Seeger get his start singing songs that covered for Stalin?
boo1Jun 14, 2011
I didn't know Stalin had any top ten hits.
kasha34Jun 14, 2011
Good one. Not Stalin cover songs. Songs that covered for Stalin.
Actually, they were songs designed to DISCOURAGE the U.S. from joining in WW II when Stalin and Hitler had a pact. Then, when Hitler reneged on the pact and started attacking the USSR...Presto! Suddenly Seeger's songs were all FOR us joining the war. So we could help save the USSR from the Germans.
This is well documented.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
Closed AccountJun 15, 2011
Well documented like the President of the United States of America's birth certificate? Kasha, you never fail to entertain, you silly little fascist!
liv2chillJun 14, 2011
The bush family was good at networking though
miklkitJun 15, 2011
Why did no one mention the Koch family? You know, the family funding the teabaggers and the John Birch Society.
http://unknownjournal.wordpress.com/2010/10/06/%e2%96%bc-report-the-kochs-their-nazi-past-american-oil-the-foundation-of-republican-ideology/
nygenxerJun 15, 2011
No mention of Prescott Bush either...
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/sep/25/usa.secondworldwar
hakaddictJun 14, 2011
You guys are Nazis man, you guys are f**king Nazis!
Closed AccountJun 15, 2011
He really wanted that cookie-dough....
bluenose2Jun 14, 2011
The right wing and their money. Things may have progressed, but those with coin now,the Koch brothers come to mind,would love to have a modern day Adolph.
zimiller35Jun 14, 2011
How could the US Government not punish the Ford family for building tanks for the German war machine?
http://thethursdaycrew.wordpress.com/
sadiakomalcomJun 14, 2011
ooh, coca cola and kodak run by nazis :(
nygenxerJun 15, 2011
Did we forget about George W. Bush's grandpa, Prescott Bush?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/sep/25/usa.secondworldwar
Closed AccountJun 15, 2011
As much as I would love to forget him, his evil spawn (and grand-spawn and great-grand-spawn) have made it nearly impossible... Hopefully, one day, they will be behind bars so we can begin to forget and get on with the work of repairing all that those bastards have destroyed...
Closed AccountJun 15, 2011
those still alive, that is...
ferdiyanto89Jun 14, 2011
how it happened, and how how to solve ...
A man sail, using the ship from paper??????
http://digg.com/news/entertainment/uniquely_german_artist_frank_bolter_makes_ship_from_paper_and_use_it_to_sail_just_a_blog
david4041Jun 14, 2011
While not a global business at the time, don't forget about teenager George Soros' cooperation with the Nazis.
Closed AccountJun 14, 2011
Actually, that is a filthy lie spewed by the renowned liar and slanderer Glenn Beck...
Think of thinking for yourself much?
david4041Jun 15, 2011
Have you seen Steve Kroft's interview of Soros on "60 Minutes"? Soros admits posing as a Christian and helping the Nazis in the confiscation of Jewish property.
Maybe you should think for yourself and stop drinking the Kool-Aid.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
Closed AccountJun 15, 2011
No, dumb ass, nothing like that happened. He posed as a Christian to try to escape NAZI internment as his parents had pleaded with him to do. Once captured and interred, much like millions of others, he was used as a slave-laborer by the NAZIs and forced to help them as did most who the far-right German occupiers held in their camps. You are a sick f**ker for even insinuating that a survivor of the far-right German death-camps was actively a sympathizer for saving their own life by working as slave labor and you should be ashamed of yourself, you bastard.
Do you ever tire of blathering bulls**t?
david4041Jun 15, 2011
Again, have you seen Steve Kroft's interview of Soros on "60 Minutes"?
david4041Jun 15, 2011
I guess not.
Closed AccountJun 16, 2011
Consider looking at the transcript from the actual 60 minutes site and not the one off of the right-wing terrorist nonsense blogs you haunt and you will see that the edited transcript they use was debunked the minute it was trotted out. Just one more right wing embarrassment...
I won't be shocked when you lie about it, but if you actually read and see you have believed a load of bulls**t all of this time, I will know you are just a windbag regardless of what nonsense you spew.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
david4041Jun 16, 2011
kuppajava:
Right. Soros' own fu*king word debunked. /s/
Unlike you, I actually saw the interview.
What flavor Kool-Aid are you drinking today? Soros has spent at least $1 million supporting left wing media (e.g. Media Matters). I guess he is getting his money's worth.
Closed AccountJun 21, 2011
"...And the build-e-burgeez ann da lluumanottee maad heem doo eet! SoShoLeezm NAZZEEZ KENYA!"
get a life, lying wingnut, no one believes the bulls**t you dream up...Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
Closed AccountJun 16, 2011
classic right wing nonsense debunked. hilarious...
mikerbowmanJun 14, 2011
Damn, that's pretty scary :P
dragonashuJun 14, 2011
true, very true.
babushakilJun 14, 2011
awsum post!
nick516Jun 14, 2011
hey http://urldata.info contains a site report about businesspundit.com. businesspundit.com is currently the 19,464 biggest website in the world According to alexa. URLdata.info estimate this domain/URL receives about 58,394 page views per day and a Google pagerank "7" which earns the owner about $78 per day and gives the site an overall value of $167,811 USD. The server is currently hosted in United States and links to this network IP address 98.129.212.7.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
Closed AccountJun 14, 2011
Just a little political spin and sucker fish believe anything except the truth.
identityamethJun 14, 2011
The first two companies arn't surprising at all. If you look at some of the company logos they are like modified swastikas like chase and general electric.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
barackalypseJun 14, 2011
Buried for missing IBM, without whose computing power the Holocaust would have been less efficient, and Hugo Boss, without whose stylish fashion the Nazi's may have been as badly dressed as the other Nations in the war.Comment is buried, click here to see the rest.
immunofortJun 14, 2011
IBM didn't exactly work with the Nazi's, it's just a distorted version of the actual facts that don't accurately represent reality.. IBM owned a subsidiary that was based in Germany, and it was them who worked with the Nazis. So the Subsidiary had the experience and knowledge that would help the Nazi's kill millions of people. The subsidiary would really have had no choice. Do you think the Nazis would be like "Oh you don't want to help us? Thats Ok then"
vitriolandangstJun 14, 2011
thanks for posting that immunofort,
I'd always heard it as "helped the Nazis" -- but indeed, if you are a subsidiary STUCK in a country at war -- you DO what they say or you die -- and besides, those were Germans working at that company...
There is a bigger threat today, however, with the ability of corporations to pass their trade secrets to these subsidiaries and profit from both sides in the war.
Our government is so corrupt, I'm sure many are bribed even now to look the other way -- although, bribery from Transnational corporations is NOW LEGAL according to the Supreme Court who put no limit on "corporate free speech"-- rights.
A LOT of these military functions should NOT be in the hands of private corporations in the first place -- much less operations that are global.
Today, IBM, GM and GE are less US corporations than ever.
blackwing602Jun 14, 2011
"you DO what they say or you die"
Why is dying not an option?
dannyhirtlerJun 14, 2011
@barackalypse They mentioned IBM in the opening paragraph as one of the obvious 3 companies people tend to know about
deathray2kJun 14, 2011
Actually, they specifically didn't include the most well-known ones, and mentioned what IBM and Hugo Boss did in the article.
Way to read.
Closed AccountJun 15, 2011
The costumes portrayed at the beginning of the article were Hugo Boss designs and were referenced. It is the very first thing you see if you click.
Do you ever even THINK of looking at the article before you comment?