77 Comments
- maximilen, on 12/04/2008, -2/+70These stills are simply taken from the HD-quality trailer on the apple site... Watching the actual trailer with the high quality sound will make your particulars go more blue, trust me. :) http://www.apple.com/trailers/wb/watchmen/
- zyce, on 12/04/2008, -4/+49BURIED for inaccuracy. These aren't high definition stills, why would you say they were?
600x255 isn't even DVD resolution (720x480 NTSC), let alone HD. *****. - Jonnybin123, on 12/04/2008, -2/+45Wait, haven't I seen ALL of these before?
- mgraham80, on 12/04/2008, -0/+36Needs more squid.
- 4LeggedtriPod, on 12/04/2008, -1/+16and by "HD movie stills" I assume you mean screencaps.
- koldmilk, on 12/03/2008, -2/+16This movie looks better everyday!
- inactive, on 12/04/2008, -2/+10Please tell me more of your balls, msaleem.
- Davers, on 12/04/2008, -0/+8Same. The page title also implies that we "haven't seen" these before, but I believe they're all from the trailers.
- pathouston22, on 12/04/2008, -0/+7False advertising. Wanna buy a spindle of 50 DVD-Rs and really only get 30?
- Beatmiser, on 12/04/2008, -2/+8My balls would be even more blue and painful if I thought for a moment the squid was going to be in this movie. =(
I just can't get over it and to many it may be a small thing, but the first time I turned the page and saw the full two page splash of NYC covered in blood and giant squid parts... that is something that I will never ever forget from both my youth and from what I came to understand a comic/graphic novel could be. - evenstarred, on 12/04/2008, -0/+6Hm... No blue balls...
But then again, I'm a girl...
I can't wait for this movie to come out. This better not dissapoint like X-Men :-X - Shakermaker, on 12/04/2008, -2/+8Why is the article saying "Stills you haven't seen yet" when they are all from the HD trailer?
Buried as inaccurate. - faceless323, on 12/04/2008, -0/+6I want to see Ozymandias cat more then the giant squid
- painting, on 12/04/2008, -1/+6HIgh def but at low resolution = stupid misleading title.
- xChunk, on 12/04/2008, -1/+6Dugg for being visually stunning.
- inactive, on 12/04/2008, -0/+5and yet it will have none, from what I am hearing...
- xxMaxaroni, on 12/04/2008, -1/+6These are all just screencaps taken from the trailer.
- elrac, on 12/04/2008, -0/+5Yep, in the trailer.
- vinceislegend, on 12/04/2008, -1/+5Dugg for blue balls.
...wait, what? - DieselGrunge, on 12/04/2008, -0/+4When I saw the trailer my first thought was: "There's too much sound and motion."
- CynicSight, on 12/04/2008, -1/+5Seen 'em and not HD. Buried.
- jehan60188, on 12/04/2008, -1/+5be still, my beating heart...
- pistonhonda, on 12/04/2008, -0/+3"bradmoreland A person who joined Digg on November 5th, 2005"
You've spent too long on Digg to be making virgin remarks. - krazytom, on 12/04/2008, -1/+5I was so entranced by these images that I missed all the hotness on the right... sad.
- inactive, on 12/04/2008, -0/+4no.
- eloestea, on 12/04/2008, -0/+4Really excited about the movie, but not excited about some pics you can already see in the trailer that been out for months.
- inactive, on 12/04/2008, -3/+7how does this crap get on the front page?
- LittleGerms, on 12/04/2008, -0/+4Uh yeah... I already watched the damn trailers. These pics are worthless.
- msaleem, on 12/04/2008, -0/+4You really wanna know? I'll tell you: http://www.muballs.com/
- GregFD3S, on 12/04/2008, -0/+4I knew clicking on this article would give me blue balls. But for some reason, I did it anyways.
- evildeadguy, on 12/04/2008, -0/+4Not two hours ago I mentioned to my girlfriend (no really, I swear) that I'd not heard anything about Watchmen for a while.
Would have been nice to see something, you know, new. - KublaiKhan, on 12/04/2008, -2/+5Dugg for making a political remark in a totally non-political story within ten comments! Good job!!
- toxsid, on 12/04/2008, -0/+3....I could have sworn these pictures were moving, either that or I had way to much Pepsi cola
- hauntedchippy, on 12/04/2008, -1/+4I was fooled also. Big fat bury on this waste of time.
- EH90, on 12/04/2008, -1/+4Yup my balls are definitely a deep indigo now.
- rrife, on 12/04/2008, -0/+3Submitter needs a girlfriend.
- jawshoeuh, on 12/04/2008, -0/+3It is going to be truly difficult to do the book justice, but here's hoping.
- JaggOff, on 12/04/2008, -1/+4can't wait!
- geekwithsoul, on 12/04/2008, -0/+3Wow, stills from the already released HD version of the trailer -- if I flip through these really fast it would be just like watching the trailer I already saw -- but crappier.
- pistonhonda, on 12/04/2008, -1/+4All the stills are from the two trailers. Bury this ***** off the front page.
- brodiquine, on 12/05/2008, -0/+3Seconded.
- doctordbx, on 12/04/2008, -0/+3Needs a squid as mentioned above.
- artfiend77, on 12/05/2008, -0/+3This is my first attempt at this, so bear with me.
1. Download VLC Media player.
2. Play Downloaded trailer and take random snapshots.
3. ????
4. Post on your cookie cutter "Hollywood blockbuster you've seen it here first one in a million wordpress" blog.
5. Profit!
Did I do it right? - evenstarred, on 12/05/2008, -0/+3I know that the directors aren't the same.
What I was trying to convey is that Comic book movies tend to be VERY disappointing, at least for me. - Morwynd, on 12/04/2008, -1/+4(SPOILER)
How is it not relevant? The point was to provide an EXTRATERRESTRIAL threat, to unite all of earth.
If it's just a big explosion, that would likely just serve to increase tensions between nations already paranoid about each other.
But, we'll have to see what they do in fact use in the final film before we can say one way or another. - guydudeman, on 12/04/2008, -0/+2Coincidentally, Deep Indigo is opening the side stage at Acoustic Christmas this year.
- wrathofg0d, on 12/05/2008, -0/+2dude - youre retarded
- unitedstatians, on 12/05/2008, -0/+2Apparently, too much kung fu and lack of good woo turns men blue.
http://www.blogwaybaby.com/Blue%20Man%20Group.jpg -
Show 51 - 83 of 83 discussions



What is Digg?