What is Digg?Sponsored by Rockstar Games
Grand Theft Auto: Episodes from Liberty City view!
rockstargames.com - Out Now on Disc for Xbox 360. Includes The Lost and Damned plus the all-new The Ballad of Gay Tony.
116 Comments
- theone3, on 10/12/2007, -0/+4Direct Link :
http://blogfiles.wfmu.org.nyud.net:8090/KF/0512/zapruder_stable.mov - thewordwasgod, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2"props to the guys who're able to stabilize these kinds of videos. takes a ***** of work, I'm sure."
well in this case im sure a lot of manual 'fiddeling' was done, but really there are some great almost-compleatly-automated filters to do motion stabilization, and luminance stabilization, etc, available for virtualdub/avisynth. i use them on shaky footage from helicopter mounted cameras and they work great.
these guys do great work
http://www.compression.ru/video/
most of their filters are not available, but some of the stuff they do is amazing
check out demo videos here
http://www.compression.ru/video/subtitles_removal/index_en.html
frame rate conversion (interframe interpolation - done very well!)
http://www.compression.ru/video/frame_rate_conversion/index_en.html
and some fancy resolutions enhancing (well...apparant resolution)
http://www.compression.ru/video/super_resolution/super_resolution_en.html - angelschambers, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2Here are some autopsy photos of JFK from rotten.com http://www.celebritymorgue.com/jfk/
- angelschambers, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2There is one other theory that I would like to bring to the table, it involves Chuck Norris. To date, no one has been able to dispove this theory so remember to take it with a grain of salt... Chuck Norris built a time machine and went back in time to stop the JFK assassination. As Oswald shot, Chuck met all three bullets with his beard, deflecting them. JFK's head exploded out of sheer amazement. Huh?
- loup, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2Hmm, seems to me that at about the 12 sec mark on that video, he gets hit from the right, front of the head, and the force knocks him "back and to the left". Am I the only one?
believe it or not, what was causing his head to jerk back and to the left was the force of the blood and brain matter spray leaving his head from the front, not a bullet. - Flinty, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2Mirror incase of the Digg effect
http://zen.tglounge.net/mirror/zapruder_stable.mov - skyhighrockets, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2dugg, just because i just spent over an hour watching and reading this ***** thing.
- jeckil, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1this was a classic crime of the state and people aren't interested... Nice video though that sign looks like it should not be there. Was it on the original film?
- TimmyK., on 10/12/2007, -1/+2>>> posted by jkfan87 "There is no case to be solved. It has been proven that EVERYTHING related to a lone gunman is very easily recreated. The magic bullet did not need to be magic at all, it was a straight shot, and the conspiracy idiots simply try to bluff their way through the debate (as always) by not accurately describing where the president and Connolly were sitting in the limo.
Oh, and the "back and to the left" part is consistent with a ral gunshot too. When a bullet enters a head, it does not give up much momentum because it is so streamlined. However, when it EXITS the head, it blows out a much bigger hole, and actually creates a "jet" effect of brain matter. The exiting brain matter actually pushes the head TOWARD the shooter."
You make these claims and many more and say nothing except "it's been proven", but you only spout out the official explanations. I've been very interested in the JFK assassination for many years, and know quite a bit about it and what you say has "been proven" actually hasn't. In many cases the official explanations have been disproven. You should see the BBC documentary series "The Men Who Killed Kennedy". It is a non biased examination into ALL the theories that have been put forward. And when you see everything put forward the one theory that simply does not make sense is the Warren Report's official explanation. Yes other theories also sound less than perfect, but they all at least sound plausible to a certain degree. There is just too much missing from the official explanation, and too many unanswered questions to take it as the truth. I'm not saying that Oswald wasn't involved, or that he didn't fire a shot, but there is way too much other evidence that there was more going on, and more people involved, to just ignore it all. And before you cry out with more of your "official theory" response I'll just say that this new stabilized video actually made me start to think that it looks like he was hit from the back. In the frames just after he was hit but before his head actually blows out it looks like he goes forward first and then jerks back. So the whole thing is still questionable from all points of view. I just think that to blindly believe what the "official" conclusion is, and ignore all the inconsistencies in that theory, is very foolish. - CLIFFosakaJAPAN, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1What part of this could be a hoax? This is the original Zapruder Film that was stabilized....still Dugg this since it should be shown to those that couldn't remember this or was born many years after this sad but historic event.
- TimmyK., on 10/12/2007, -0/+1I think we all know that JFK shot himself from the Grassy Knoll while dressed as a police man. He did it in order to retain his reputation as he would have been involved in a scandal and forced to resign, causing a rise in tensions with the soviets, and a severe risk of immediate nuclear war. The crew of The Starbug took him back in order to clear up this time anomaly.
- nonokiaboy, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Dugg
Cause it has NOTHING to do with TECH - evil-doer, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1just snooped around the site, it is indeed from 2003, possibly 2002.
- postroad, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1A serious problem that no one bothers to deal with: Zapruder caught something on tape. Who then processed the tapes" Zapruder? the government etc etc In short: is what is known as the Zapruder tape exactly what came out of that camera? Knowing this would make a big difference, I suggest, and I am not attacking or supporting any theories about the assassination when I ask this.
- osbjmg, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1jkfan87- why weeks, why not months? Who said this was done a day earlier?
- psytek, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1The girl "walking" on the top left (around the shot time) seems to suddenly stop and have her legs standing apart in a "standing" position. Suggesting that some frames were cut out.
There are tons of letters in some writing on the left. Not sure what these are. I saw what looks to me like an F, S, then maybe a 37, then a 1. something. Then an I, M, R, C, D, K, G? F, S, A, 37, I. B? then E, R, C, H, A, O, blank space, L, F, Y, E, A, space, S, 3, (possibly the 37 again) E, O, M, H, R, A?, C, D, R... Not sure about these letters, maybe it was the brand of the film used and possibly 37MM film??
One thing that suggest to me that he was shot in the head from someone standing on the grassy null was that around 15 seconds There is a guy who falls to the ground. The direction that he falls suggest that the reflex reaction was that of something traveling in that direction, if that makes any sense.
Its also strange to me that his wife put her arm around him at the time of it happening. It makes me think that maybe she was involved. She puts her hand right on the back of his neck. From looking at her body language
I see it like this:
They are arriving....she looks to her left and waves....she then looks at jfk and seems to be thinking ((("are you alright??? let me put my arm around you and hold your hand"))) sort of holding him steady for the shot....she looks forward at him almost as a ((("are you ok??? let me fix something on your lapel"))).... again... this time there is a brief pause from her and then the shot happens. then it looks like she's saying ((("wow!!!, ok stay still")))...as she holds him still by the back of his neck.... then ((("let me adjust you,,,,sit up straight ,,,,omg he's dead!!!")))....then she shoves him out of the way with her left hand and she seems like she's reaching back to get something.... maybe the bullet?
Most people next to someone who just got shot would have reacted more of the way of the guy jumping away (in a "running for cover" manner). Her mannerism suggest to me that she was involved.
Just speculation.
+digg - doddilus, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1some people need to get on with their lives
this is rediculous he pointing out minute details on an altered (enhanced) video. I dont care how good video enhancing has gotten its far from perfect and with a video thats nearly 40 years old some things are going to be out of place
it was lee harvey oswald, in the book depository, with the rifle - bunkka, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1There is no case to be solved. It has been proven that EVERYTHING related to a lone gunman is very easily recreated. The magic bullet did not need to be magic at all, it was a straight shot, and the conspiracy idiots simply try to bluff their way through the debate (as always) by not accurately describing where the president and Connolly were sitting in the limo.
Oh, and the "back and to the left" part is consistent with a ral gunshot too. When a bullet enters a head, it does not give up much momentum because it is so streamlined. However, when it EXITS the head, it blows out a much bigger hole, and actually creates a "jet" effect of brain matter. The exiting brain matter actually pushes the head TOWARD the shooter.
COPY X 100000000
Anyway, watch the special with Peter Jennings. A guy re-created a scaled animation of the whole incident, and it is obvious that it was one shooter. BTW, Oswald was the top sniper when he was in the service. He had like a 95% accuracy from 300 yards, and missed less than 3 times. When he shot JFK, he was only 87 yards away.
(don't quote me on the exact numbers/stats, but they're darn close) - millemots, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1jkfan87 wrote: ...
It is amazing that some people can't think for themselvees and actually turn to sites like this, and just beleive EVERYTHING that they tell them without a grain of salt. Most ofhte referecnes are cometeply made up. They want your money. So be sure to send it to them.
Replace 'sites like this' with 'the government' and between the two observations you'll have covered 99% of (today's) Americans. - unclejesse0, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0Were those his brains pouring out of his face when he got shot?
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0Just because THEY say things were scientifically analyzed, and certain things were proved, means nothing. Scientists are also humans, and humans can have what is called, "Selective thinking".
BOTTEM LINE: INCONCLUSIVE - BlueStarr, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0Everyone look at the shot at around 13-14 seconds. You'll see an old man with a camera but look past him at the young man siting on the grass. Look at how he moves. It's almost in reverse. He lunges forward to SIT DOWN!?!?!
One leg underneath that's bent the other in front it also bent with the knee pointing up.This is a very relaxed position. He does this well after the last shot is received. He doesn't run away, he runs to sit down!?! - GIJoey123, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0wtf? i cant write anymore... anyway, how can a single bullet fly about all over the place, causing 7 wounds, then fall out the governor's thigh, on a stretcher he was never on, IN PRISTINE CONDITION???
Lone shooter my ar$e, gentlemen... - fnot, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0Yeah, you actually see tissue of some sort pouring out of his head down on his lap. Well that squashes the 'no blood' theory :)
- thejadedmonkey, on 10/12/2007, -1/+1>>This is honestly about as asinine as the "No plane hi the Pentagon" *****.
>>HUNDREDS of people witnessed this in person. None have backed up this site at
>>all. Just like the fact that dozens of people saw a low flying plane heaing toward the
>>Pentagon.
No plane did hit the pentagon...well, it may have, but they never found it. - Mark_DeRidder, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0I believe this video was created by a guy named Dale Myers... he lives in Southeast Michigan. He is a JFK assassination buff. He was able to match up all the footage avaiable from that moment in a split screen... all stabilized and timed perfectly. That would be a great video to find online... I shall look.
He aslo did a 3D recreation of that moment, which really breaks things down to prove it was not a hoax. Here is a link to that:
http://www.jfkfiles.com/jfk/html/intro.htm
Dale Myers and this video was featured on a primtime show about the assassination. - kokobaroko, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0original Zapruder Film IS a hoax
- orangetiki, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0This is just one of the great mysteries that fascinates people. That's why it's everywhere. I didn't agree with most of what this person said, but there SHOULD have been blood spatter on the car. The jerking and all that seemed very natural to me. and yes a camera is going to jerk around if you hold it by hand. esp if your an old guy. But the only people who know what truly happened were those who were there.
- dacompmandan, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0This is amazing. Sickening, but this beats the crap out of the old video that we were shown in school.
- ProfMo, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0thumbs up @TimmyK.
- truNWA, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0dugg, This is a crazy movie.
- bakatrinh, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0If you watch the movie JFK with Oliver Stone, which was released in 1991, you will see the same thing. This is nothing new or special. No digg.
- fnot, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0The black parts in the film are actually sprocket holes, i.e. the holes for feeding the film through the camera. The images are actually exposed over the entire width of the film but the the sprocket hole parts are always cropped out. So your'e actually seeing parts of the movie that aren't usually visible.
- danmanx, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0There's only one thing that's going to lay all theories to rest:
Replicate the entire sequence. - ConorKiley, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0For all the people who support wild speculation and vast conspiracies, rent The Parallax View and after that Winter Kills. They will blow your mind, you will be in paranoia heaven...
- theman8631, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0The CIA assasinated JFK as was William Bruce Pitzer, the person who had the autopsy information.
- L0phtpDK, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0"(Mrs. Kennedy held) him steady for the shot"
- psytek
Are you kidding me?
Let me shoot you in the throat and see if people hear you. She was clearing asking her husband what was wrong (after he was hit by the first bullet). - McNamron, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0This is way better than the crappy version we all got to see in high school. :-)
- BlueStarr, on 10/12/2007, -1/+1Hey, then tell me how seismographs recored a response larger than the two towers hitting the earth a few moments right before the towers fell?
They have never been able to explain that one. And how everything in the lower levels of the parking lot were basically turned into a liquid metal soup and fires burned for weeks after the 11th. The news reported that there were vaults beneath the towers and that any hopes of retrieving anything from those vaults was impossible because the fires raging below had melted and destroyed everything. Now, how can a fire that hot burn for such a long time and burn with such a poor oxygen source.
Bunker busters of some kind at the base could cut the reinforced concrete and bring the towers down. Couldn't they....yes they could.
jkfan87
"Ask any demolition person if a skyscraper can be readied for implosion IN SECRET, basically OVERNIGHT. They will laugh in your face. It prepare the WTC for a controlled demloition would have taken WEEKS. In which the supposerts would have been manually cut. People working in the building could not have missed this." - evil-doer, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0why am i seeing this everywhere? i this site and this video has been out for a couple of years. funny how stuff comes around again as new.
- GIJoey123, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0"Hmm, seems to me that at about the 12 sec mark on that video, he gets hit from the right, front of the head, and the force knocks him "back and to the left". Am I the only one?
believe it or not, what was causing his head to jerk back and to the left was the force of the blood and brain matter spray leaving his head from the front, not a bullet"
Are you kidding me? If you took physics AT ALL, you would know that the force of a bullet hitting you would make you move in the opposite direction! If i slapped you, would you move your head towards the side i slapped you from? eh? No, didn't think so. Obviously, there is a conspiracy! Why would the Government fake those autopsy photos so that it looked like there was no exit wound on the back of JFKs head? Why are the SS men oredered to get off JFK's car when going onto Dealy Plaza? Why is the motorcade's route changed so that it's harder to get to the original destination, BUT SO TAHT THE GRASSY KNOLL HAS A CLEAR SHOT??? Why do the majority of witnesses say they heard a shot from the Grassy Knoll? Why do key witnesses just suddenly die starnge deaths? Why does the person who has a Video Camera, and who is closest to JFK when he is shot in the head have her tape convescated by an FBI man and never seen aagin? How does key evidence such as >>>JFK'S BRAIN - Namingishard, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0hmm i know i cant move my head that fast
- V01D, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0shot to the neck, hence when he puts his hand up to his neck just after passing the sign and the guy in front of him takes the initial hit, then the headshot.
Pretty high def, clearest vid i've seen. - enjourni, on 10/10/2007, -0/+0You must still believe that the earth is the center of the universe then. Scientists are humans, but evidence is also EVIDENCE. No offense, but your kind of blind discounting of obvious facts is the reason why science can take so f**king long to find any real truth in this world. It took humans over 400 years before we believed that the sun was the center of the universe, simply because people would not admit to FACTS.
Anyway, http://www.assassinationscience.com/johncostella/jfk/intro/index.html is pretty f**king conclusive evidence that the zepruder film is a forgery. Ignore it if you want, but you might as well be ignoring that ***** George Bush is president. Just because you ignore it doesn't make it not true. - GIJoey123, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0Oh yeah, and how can JFK'S BRAIN, the most important bit of evidence go missing???????? I dont think so...
- Kev585, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0As far as the conspiracies some of it is just seeing what they want, but there have always been anomalies surrounding the assassination.
- thejadedmonkey, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2023320890224991194
- GIJoey123, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0(cont.)
- skartel, on 10/12/2007, -1/+1http://www.assassinationscience.com/johncostella/jfk/intro/index.html
Haha, Dr Costella was my Maths Teacher last year. He would go into speeches about JFK every once in a while. - kindrobot, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0Just to clear a couple of things up...
Yes, this film has been seen before. I can't believe some people here think the film itself is something new. Take your ***** headphones off in class.
And another thing.. it was a FILM not a video. FILM!! (yes people here have referred to the original as a film, I am not talking about those of you who are reffering to the video FILE)
ok I'm done.. move along. -
Show 51 - 100 of 116 discussions
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is