digg

Join DiggAbout

Warning: The Content in this Article May be Inaccurate

Readers have reported that this story contains information that may not be accurate.

The Incredible Hulk Movie Teaser Trailer watch!

slashfilm.com — The trailer for The Incredible Hulk will premiere this Wednesday at 9:56pm eastern standard time on MTV. But to hold you off until then, here's the teaser trailer.

Bury
show profanity settings
expand all
  • SVOboy, on 03/11/2008, -8/+17I feel the excitement bursting my shirt to pieces.
    • alecks, on 03/11/2008, -4/+11I don't get it... didn't we just have a Hulk movie?
      • drachemorder, on 03/11/2008, -2/+7Never happened. Nope. Never was such a thing. Doesn't exist. Don't even think about it.
    • PDubNYC, on 03/11/2008, -2/+1that's not excitement, that's the 4 jelly donuts you had for breakfast
  • Electrix, on 03/11/2008, -2/+118This isn't the teaser trailer...it is a preview of the teaser trailer. Stop misleading with the title!
    • decepticrat, on 03/11/2008, -16/+3First off, It IS a teaser trailer... it's teasing you bits of the trailer coming out on Wednesday. And two, if that's what they call it on slashfilm, that's good enough for me.
      • HouseofEl, on 03/11/2008, -6/+2That doesn't make it correct. Also, their description is valid. Your's is not.
        • JonesJohnson, on 03/11/2008, -3/+1It's "yours" with no apostrophe. Its things like these that get me annoyed and -- oh wait I meant "It's" with an apostrophe.
    • Namco, on 03/11/2008, -1/+1They should change the name to The Redundant Hulk.
    • groberts1980, on 03/11/2008, -0/+15Seriously, a teaser for the ***** teaser? Buried as inaccurate.
  • NightcrawlerX, on 03/11/2008, -11/+2nice one SVOboy
    btw, how much $ did it cost for this one? anyone knows?
  • teriyakisause, on 03/11/2008, -5/+39Well Edward Norton is the hulk, it's gotta be good.
  • Ninjao, on 03/11/2008, -3/+4Nice.
  • filmadic, on 03/11/2008, -6/+37The first one sucked. This needs to be good.
    • Guitarhero10, on 03/11/2008, -1/+15It has Edward Norton in it. How can it be anything but the best movie ever?
      • DiggyWiggy, on 03/11/2008, -1/+2That's what they said about "Keeping the Faith".
        • kevlarbaboon, on 03/11/2008, -0/+6What was wrong with Keeping the Faith? I thought it was pretty good for a directorial debut from Norton.
        • wild, on 03/11/2008, -2/+1Jenna Elfman and the vibrating cell phone.

          Greatest movie ever.
        • MacSuxWindozSux, on 03/11/2008, -0/+1Hahahahah...

          American History X
          The Italian job
          Fight Club

          Keeping the Faith isn't even in the same league as some of his other films.
    • PolishLogic, on 03/11/2008, -2/+3I was thinking along the lines that the last one sucked, why do another.
  • manirock, on 03/11/2008, -1/+19I don't know if this is really a teaser trailer. It's more like a commercial for the trailer, or a teaser for the trailer rather than a teaser for the movie.
    • decepticrat, on 03/11/2008, -0/+16Trailer= 'Assistant Regional Manager.'
      Teaser Trailer = 'Assistant TO the regional manager.'

      Aaa, I don't know. I'm just excited I guess. I think they're gonna get it right this time.
      • groberts1980, on 03/11/2008, -0/+1There's a huge difference between teaser and trailer. A teaser does just that. It teases you and hypes up the movie. A trailer actually shows you what the plot outline is about and gives you much more information about the movie.
        • manirock, on 03/11/2008, -0/+1Yeah but this is an ad for the trailer. There's a big difference between a commercial for a trailer and a trailer. It's like having an ad to advertise the premier of an iPod commercial.
    • raulbot, on 03/11/2008, -0/+9it's a trailer for the trailer
  • JackSrenton, on 03/11/2008, -4/+6Hey its the guy from Dawn of the Dead who resembles Bruce Campbell.

    and Tim Roth!?
  • mariot75, on 03/11/2008, -1/+43ha ha...so now a trailer has its own trailer....
    • freshyill, on 03/11/2008, -0/+5MTV knows that nobody can stand to watch their TV shows anymore, so they've started promoting their commercials.
  • WWWoody, on 03/11/2008, -19/+1Oh God, it's the guy from Fight Club (forgive my lack of name knowing)! This looks badass, so long as I don't fall asleep like I did in the last one...
    • jc7012, on 03/11/2008, -9/+5Edward Norton for the fail...
      • FatherVic, on 03/11/2008, -0/+1I wonder if he bullied the director out of production and took over...
    • DiggyWiggy, on 03/11/2008, -4/+2I think his name is Meatloaf...
    • spindrift, on 03/11/2008, -0/+5His name is Robert Paulson.
  • rebotfc, on 03/11/2008, -1/+30What is the world coming to when we get advertisements for teaser trailers.
    • boombye, on 03/11/2008, -0/+1Are you surprised that MTV did this?
  • typicalusername, on 03/11/2008, -9/+5Settle down, young fanboy! No need to get this worked up over some crappy trailer, people who freaked out at the 15 sec Indy teaser, say you need to get a grip on your life.
  • EvanVolm, on 03/11/2008, -6/+14To anyone who says Norton is too skinny or "scrawny", you haven't seen American History X.....
    • freshyill, on 03/11/2008, -0/+4They said the same thing about Bill Bixby, but when he tore off that shirt, man was he ripped!
      • Namco, on 03/11/2008, -1/+1I agree, the man was friggin' HUGE. When he put on the ripped pants and the green makeup, he looked absolutely jacked!
      • solid12345, on 03/11/2008, -2/+2Lou Ferigno was the Hulk not Bill Bixby.
        • freshyill, on 03/11/2008, -0/+2Thanks, I was hoping this would go right over somebody's head.
    • Rizmaster, on 03/11/2008, -1/+6To anyone who says Norton is too skinny or scrawny, you don't know what Bruce Banner looks like...
    • o0joshua0o, on 03/11/2008, -0/+3I'm pretty sure it's the HULK that's huge and muscular, not Bruce Banner.
  • smossner, on 03/11/2008, -12/+9Didn't they already make this movie?
    • moofer, on 03/11/2008, -3/+7-1 for actually calling the first one a "movie"
  • ssj2119, on 03/11/2008, -13/+7Didnt the hulk just come out a few years ago? Eric bana?
    • mediaspree, on 03/11/2008, -4/+4Yeah but Hollywood has no original ideas.
      • moofer, on 03/11/2008, -0/+6Consider this one to be an apology for the first one. Kinda like "Batman Begins"
        • form3hide, on 03/11/2008, -2/+1aka another way to make more money
    • form3hide, on 03/11/2008, -2/+4...we really need another hulk movie already?
      • boombye, on 03/11/2008, -0/+2yeah that's how bad the last one was, it should've been called eric bana explores his feelings
  • fratdaddy, on 03/11/2008, -13/+7wasn't there already a ***** movie for this?
  • sctx, on 03/11/2008, -0/+11Hopefully we can figure out whats going on in the last 30 minutes of the movie this time.
  • sljepi, on 03/11/2008, -7/+1Oh the humanity and emotionally thorn characters... croc of crap! Hulk was retarded flick.
  • lcaldas, on 03/11/2008, -9/+2I have this feeling inside... oh yeah... it's Deja Vu
  • BradGroux, on 03/11/2008, -0/+14http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B_S1dOnOztg
    Ignore the "after the jump" blog spam.
    • aetherboy, on 03/11/2008, -0/+4No kidding. How is /Film different than ANY OTHER FORM OF BLOGSPAM? They say two words about something and post a YouTube clip.
  • ocanica, on 03/11/2008, -4/+1Trailer premiere on MTV?! now I know this movie's gonna suck..bring on Batman already.
  • SteveIsTheDude, on 03/11/2008, -3/+7Did anybody else recognize Edward Norton just from his eyes? That's weird. What is it about his eyes that are recognizable?
    • willskillz, on 03/11/2008, -9/+15Probably cause ur in love w/ him Fag
    • displaced1, on 03/11/2008, -4/+4You dream about them looking back into yours everynight?
    • willskillz, on 03/11/2008, -1/+5Because you're a registered member on his fan site?
    • lumbergh, on 03/11/2008, -0/+4True fact: The human brain recognizes faces mostly by the eyes, and it is extraordinarily good at recognizing faces.
  • ChristBehemoth, on 03/11/2008, -3/+4My expectations aren't really THAT high with this one.
  • astrotrain, on 03/11/2008, -7/+3I'm not falling for another poor CGI attempt of the Hulk into a big screen movie. Go peddle your wares someplace else Universal... and take your friend MPAA with you.
  • loktoris, on 03/11/2008, -4/+0And the movie industry wonders why they aren't making as much money as they used to....
    • boombye, on 03/11/2008, -0/+1I read comments like this when they announced Batman Begins.. this is Incredible Hulk, the last movie was simply The Hulk and it spent more time being a drama than an action flick.. This is a remake, doing it right, the way it should be done.
  • JRHodes88, on 03/11/2008, -3/+2Of all the channels they can premiere it on, they pick one of the non-HD channels. I'll wait until its online.
    • jordan1, on 03/11/2008, -2/+1I get MTV in HD on directv
    • moofer, on 03/11/2008, -1/+2It'll be on the Apple Quicktime HD Trailers site soon enough.
  • jeremyduffy, on 03/11/2008, -0/+10For those asking about why they're doing another movie so soon, it's because they feel that they missed the mark with the last one (i.e., they didn't make enough money) so they want to have a "do-over". Seeing how sucessful the Batman redo has been (and it was because it was done so freaking well), they figure they can get a second chance. And according to rumor, they're going to "do it right" this time (as in follow the comic more closely).

    http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=DC+comics+wan ...

    It IS a little weird to have a restart to a series so soon after the last one though... Here's hoping for an excellent movie.

    • bjs3171, on 03/11/2008, -5/+1Batman begins was, what, the 5th movie in the series?
      • jeremyduffy, on 03/11/2008, -0/+3No. It wasn't in the series at all. It was a redo (and a desperately needed one at that).
      • boombye, on 03/11/2008, -0/+2Yeah Batman, Batman Returns, Batman Forever, and Batman & Robin are all part of the same continuity, that series is done, thankfully. This new Batman is part of a new trilogy of Batman movies meant to have it's own continuity.
    • Bladwor, on 03/11/2008, -0/+2What does DC have to do with the Hulk? Shouldn't it be Marvel wanting a redo, since the Hulk's their character?
    • algo, on 03/11/2008, -0/+3there was nothing wrong with Batman (1989) sure, after that there were some.. issues.
      Hulk (2003) was a good film, it was nice to have something different than the same old Marvel cack (x men 3, spider man 3).
      having said that i also would like this film to be better than good.
  • mechman, on 03/11/2008, -3/+1A much better link (and site) imo:
    http://www.superheroflix.com/news/94/27194.php
  • cmuwriter, on 03/11/2008, -0/+2The fact that they're remaking this thing again reminds me of a Robot Chicken sketch where the creators of the failed Godzilla movie were given the chance to remake the movie. The remake was worse than the original failed movie.
    • bjs3171, on 03/11/2008, -0/+2and Godzilla was like a Scorcese adaptation of ***** Shakespeare compared to the first Hulk film.
  • bjs3171, on 03/11/2008, -4/+5the first Hulk movie was possibly the absolute worst feature film ever made. but Edward Norton gives me some hope.
  • groone, on 03/11/2008, -7/+1first movie sucked, and doesn't lend well to giving me warm fuzzies about a second.
    • boombye, on 03/11/2008, -0/+1This is not a second. It's the first Incredible Hulk movie, the last one was simply titled The Hulk... Much like Batman Begins and Dark Knight are part of a new trilogy of Batman films that do not share the same continuity as the 4 Batman films that came out in the 90s... It's a reboot in other words..
  • Coop1979, on 03/11/2008, -2/+1It'll be shown in HD on MHD for those of us who have the channel.
    • JonesJohnson, on 03/11/2008, -0/+1Are you positive? Where are you getting this information? I'm curious because I have MHD.
      • Coop1979, on 03/11/2008, -0/+0I was watching some videos this morning along with my Cheerios and they had a quick little ad about it. I'm not sure about the specifics on time, but I am sure they said it would on MHD
  • JohnnyHotballs, on 03/11/2008, -0/+18"There are aspects of my personality that I can't control." Like Tyler Durden, for example
    • skyshock1, on 03/11/2008, -0/+2"I want you to hit me as hard as you can"
    • InitialDMP5, on 03/11/2008, -0/+4That would be insane if the Hulk was just Brad Pitt painted up green!! Fight Hulk!!
    • LegendarySock, on 03/11/2008, -0/+2The first rule of fight club is you DON'T TALK ABOUT FIGHT CLUB.
  • osirislink, on 03/11/2008, -0/+1been a while since the last good ed norton movie.... hope this one doesn't suck.
  • heyiquit, on 03/11/2008, -8/+1Why do they insist on trying to remake the Hulk? The original isn't even worth remembering.
  • chrisfu, on 03/11/2008, -7/+4Everyone is talking about Edward Norton like he's mankind's savior. Sure he's a good actor, but so is Eric Bana, and he couldn't save the steaming pile of ***** that 'Hulk' was. If it's a ***** script and a ***** story, Edward Norton wouldn't have that much of a better chance than Bana.
    • loquedesea, on 03/11/2008, -1/+6sorry bud, eric bana doesn't hold a candle to ed norton.
    • badjoke, on 03/11/2008, -0/+4Edward Norton was very involved in helping to create this script. I think it should be at least OK.
      • InitialDMP5, on 03/11/2008, -0/+4Not only help create, but write as well. I believe might have even been a producer. Nobody ever heard of Eric Bana before the Hulk, and he did like what, 2 movies after? Ed Norton has been the man for decades now. He even became such a bad ass that he killed the Jr. in his name.
  • SkullyBocks, on 03/11/2008, -1/+1They filmed a big part of this at the Trenton Ontario, Canada Air Base, which is just down the road from me. Cant wait to see the whole movie
  • willskillz, on 03/11/2008, -8/+1YAY! Another ***** superhero movie!!! What's next, a Popeye flick?
    • ahawks, on 03/11/2008, -0/+4umm, we already had that. Though, that was 1980, so it's due for a remake.
      http://imdb.com/title/tt0081353/
      • willskillz, on 03/11/2008, -2/+1Oh my. Poor Robin Williams. That must have been made during his "sucking dick for coke" days?
    • moofer, on 03/11/2008, -0/+2Bitter much?
      • willskillz, on 03/11/2008, -3/+1Nope. Just not a fan of crappy movies staring a giant, green homosexual in purple pants. I liked Popeye thought. He's Popeye the sailor man.
    • hilo4321, on 03/11/2008, -0/+2id ***** love a popeye movie
      • InitialDMP5, on 03/11/2008, -1/+1as long as its CG and not live action. Robin Williams with giant forearms was one of the scariest memories I have as a child watching movies.
  • Lanefair, on 03/11/2008, -0/+2The TV series was the best. Especially the feature length pilot.

    Also the whole escape from the base sequence looked awesome in the film, shame about the plot.
  • ahawks, on 03/11/2008, -6/+1Didn't we already have Hulk movie, and didn't it suck just as much as the comic and everything else ever based on it? Must we really have another?

    I love Norton, but this can't be good for him. It just can't.
    • boombye, on 03/11/2008, -0/+1The comic was always pretty decent. Even Wolverine made his first appearance in the Hulk comics before he joined X-Men in '75.
  • hydrodev, on 03/11/2008, -6/+1I thought they already made this movie.
    • thecrazyd, on 03/11/2008, -0/+3I thought someone had already made that comment.
    • boombye, on 03/11/2008, -0/+1That was "The Hulk" and this is "The Incredible Hulk"...
  • mparker7410, on 03/11/2008, -0/+10Bulls**t! A trailer for a trailer!? BURIED!
  • EntropyGun, on 03/11/2008, -0/+7Needs more mutant poodle.

  • bmorlok, on 03/11/2008, -0/+2Dammit Ed, this better be good, or everyone will blame you!
    • InitialDMP5, on 03/11/2008, -0/+1I agree with that completely. While this commercial only shows "nothing" scenes, and was edited very craptastically, it did give away some of Nortons BA attitude. Until the ACTUAL trailer is shown, this horrible commercial that uses spliced together clips from said real trailer should not be the judge of the movie.

      I wish that Mtv would have been left out of this hulk equation all together though. Iron has done just fine airing online trailers and normal commercials.
      • boombye, on 03/11/2008, -0/+1Probably the fault of Viacom/Paramount..
  • guillebravo6, on 03/11/2008, -2/+1another HULK movie, when are they going to stop making these damn superhero movies?
    • InitialDMP5, on 03/11/2008, -0/+3when people stop going to watch them, and they stop making 300 million dollars+ in the first three weeks of release and billions internationally and on home video.
  • WhoDoneIt, on 03/11/2008, -3/+0This is a tow-hitch, not a trailer. My inner Siskel says two thumbs down. They've got a LOT of work ahead of them if they are going to drag people to the theatre to see this. The last attempt was so lame I don't know if I can even stomach those words together. Hulk and Movie.
  • bshock, on 03/11/2008, -1/+2Sorry. This will just be another clumsy reinterpretation of the character. 90% probability that this movie will suck out the ass.
  • fudgebrown, on 03/11/2008, -1/+1Add this to the free blu-ray movies selection when you purchase your new PS3 in a year...
  • Zippo, on 03/11/2008, -0/+1Guess they're better that everyone forgot about The Hulk movie from 2003...
  • isayagain, on 03/11/2008, -0/+3This commerical for a trailer makes me angry and you wouldn't like me when I'm angry.
  • Fetching more discussions...
    Show 51 - 74 of 74 discussions
  •  

    Login or register to add a comment

    Create a new account or login to join in the conversation on Digg. You'll also be able to Digg stories to help promote things you like.


© Digg Inc. 2008 — Content posted by Digg users is dedicated to the public domain.
DIGG, DIGG IT, DUGG, DIGG THIS, Digg graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, scripts, and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.