Discover the best of the web!
Learn more about Digg by taking the tour.
Should National Lampoon make a feature-length film of 72 VIRGINS?
nationallampoon.com — National Lampoon's 72 Virgins. Two idiot college students unwittingly join an Al Qaeda cell in order to get the 72 virgins promised to terrorists when they die. What do you think, should they release this movie? Vote now at NationalLampoons.com
zaibatsu- 967 diggs
- digg it
- tekrat, on 10/11/2007, -11/+52They've made bad parodies on other religious topics, why Islam?
- swordedge, on 10/11/2007, -77/+12Very dangerous. The Islamic idiots kill parody writers.
On the other hand, the 9/11 terrorist got their 72 virgins, only, they are not women. They are extremely well endowed gay men!!!!!!! - AegisGFX, on 10/11/2007, -56/+24YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES. YES.
(72 yeses) - gulpy, on 10/11/2007, -13/+118Well, it really depends why they are virgins...
I really don't want to see a movie involving 72 fat women... - filmbandit, on 10/11/2007, -60/+29just as funny would be a movie about that mythic funnyman jesus that walks on water and comes back from the dead!!
- evilesttoast, on 10/11/2007, -3/+28@swordedge
I prefer to think that thy got nothing - Vicissidude, on 10/11/2007, -3/+56This isn't making fun of Islam, but rather the extremists who use that religion to justify their poor behavior. Frankly, those nuts could use someone making fun of them. They take themselves way too seriously.
Watch the video. It starts out slow, but it actually has some funny scenes in there. I say they should make it. - rusty075, on 10/11/2007, -1/+55@filmbandit:
Have you never seen Life of Brian? - Rekzai, on 10/11/2007, -22/+5Wow most dumb movie idea I've ever heard of.
- asian1, on 10/11/2007, -11/+3Just as long as it doesn't have Chevy Chase in it. He's too old to do it anymore. That guy Kal Penn from Van Wilder could be funny at this, though. So could Cheech and Chong, if they weren't so old.
- filmbandit, on 10/11/2007, -10/+5yeah i did see it rusty075. that was about brian wasn't it? ;)
- hoovcluck, on 10/11/2007, -4/+13Hopefully they got the interpretation correct, you would hate to get to heaven to realize it said 72 Virgils.
You sure got a pretty mouth!
*Robin Williams live on broadway - finkployd6, on 10/11/2007, -7/+1How do they stay virgins???
- spartan777, on 10/11/2007, -13/+8this isn't making fun of extremists, this is making fun of the Koran itself. The Koran does indeed promise 72 virgins to those who die during Jihadist battle. This is very dangerous for the makers, as Salman Rushdie now knows after writing the book "The Satanic Verses." Rushdie now lives in hiding with help from the secret service, after multi-million dollar bounties on his head, and the death of many who translated and published his book.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Satanic_Verses#Reception:_Timeline - outhouseinput, on 10/11/2007, -7/+8I don't like it; not because of the topic, but because it sounds stupid and uninteresting.
- quiksliver, on 10/11/2007, -2/+25I want this to be made just to watch people get all bent out of shape over it...
I have nothing on islam i swear to allah :D - Rekzai, on 10/11/2007, -10/+3Considering NOTHING about it is right about this movie, why are they playing bhangra music when Punjabi's aren't Muslim ?? Wouldn't it be more appropriate to play some Arab tunes?? You silly Americans need to stop thinking everything brown is associated with terrorists. I could state many more things very wrong about just that preview they showed but I'm probably getting buried anyway.
- mygrayarea, on 10/11/2007, -8/+7There when 74 comments when I saw this link, are the virgins coming from digg?
- estydees, on 10/11/2007, -3/+6Yes, they should as long as the writers know the risks involved and still willing to do it. All other religions are always being made fun of. There should be no exception here. If you think its going to be a lame movie then don't go see it.
- Livewire, on 10/11/2007, -4/+21@spartan777 (#7153415)
The Quran mentions nothing about 72 virgins. It's a myth that's been repeated so many times that people believe it's a fact. Here are three different translations of the verse from where this myth originated from:
055.056
YUSUFALI: In them will be (Maidens), chaste, restraining their glances, whom no man or Jinn before them has touched;-
PICKTHAL: Therein are those of modest gaze, whom neither man nor jinni will have touched before them.
SHAKIR: In them shall be those who restrained their eyes; before them neither man nor jinni shall have touched them.
that's it. No mention of the number 72 anywhere. period.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/saturday_review/story/0,3605,631332,00.html
educate yourself; you'll see how much you'll stop hating others for what group they belong to, or in other words: stereotyping. - Happy_Phantom, on 10/11/2007, -6/+3I'd kill for 72 (legal) beautiful virgins (no spinsters), but I wouldn't want to die for them.
On ther other hand, If I had 72 (legal) beautiful virgins (no spinsters), I'd probably expire and go straight to Hell. - kaffirkiller, on 10/11/2007, -7/+1You will regret this.
- fakeaccount1, on 10/11/2007, -1/+18comment abuse but this is interesting/ kinda funny: I'm Persian. The people in this clip actually speak Persian (Iranian - Farsi) and not Arabic like most terrorists. I was mildly offended by the switch because as far as I know there has never been an Iranian terrorist who has struck a western target (at least not yet).
Point: The actual dialog between the bearded guys was different than what the translation in the subscripts read.
Subscript: They are a gift from Allah
Actual: These "sister *****" (common insult) are presents from Allah
Subscript:Idiot infidels who can carry out our mission
Actual: We're gonna strap bombs onto them and "***** up their sisters" (common insult)
Subscript: But it's my turn to martyr! I want to martyr!
Real: Unintelligible babbling
...
slight difference; I made the effort to type it just because digg can do that. - spartan777, on 10/11/2007, -0/+2whether its 72 virgins, or an unmentioned number doesn't really make a damn difference. there could be one, there could be 72, or there could be 72,000. Islam fundamentally treats (virgin) women as nothing more than treasure; a material object. that's the point.
- swordedge, on 10/11/2007, -77/+12Very dangerous. The Islamic idiots kill parody writers.
- ripstuntz, on 10/11/2007, -11/+32HAHAHA YES! Can't wait to see this.
- GoldenChild1, on 10/11/2007, -4/+18I completely agree. This is a pretty controversial idea, and I would certainly watch the movie.
- EthylAdded, on 10/11/2007, -1/+3Should be made with expendable actors (and producers, director) only.
- jsmith39, on 10/11/2007, -3/+0But its my turn to Martyr!
I am definitely watching this movie - ricree, on 10/11/2007, -0/+1Did you actually watch the trailer? It's an interesting idea, but the trailer was terrible. It was poorly acted, they pretty much only went for the obvious jokes, and the acting was terrible. If someone did this movie right, it could be real good, but unless they replace everyone involved in making this trailer, that isn't going to happen.
- 10001110101, on 10/11/2007, -4/+30I think that everyone has a "National Lampoon reader" stereotype in their head.. Given that, am I the only one that's surprised that 75% of the respondents said "No"?
- jedioniram, on 10/11/2007, -7/+2This movie has an interesting and humorous concept.. but the "trailer" made it look pathetic, and I really have no desire to ever see this as a movie. If they could make it funny, that might be a different story though.
- thewebguy, on 10/11/2007, -0/+7it's 41 / 58 now
- asian1, on 10/11/2007, -2/+1http://jewschool.com/?p=9750
- seanc6610, on 10/11/2007, -0/+554% Yes / 45% No right now.
Looks like digg has turned the tides
- CanceledCzech, on 10/11/2007, -5/+86Yes, but mostly because I really just want to see the public reaction.
- ZennZero, on 10/11/2007, -6/+56I will give you a hint. It will involve mass protests, burning effigies/flags and calls to stone the infidels to death. Did I spoil it?
- swordedge, on 10/11/2007, -6/+42no, anyone with half a brain knows that the Muslim world is utterly unable to take any criticism. Oh, and your descriptions is only the first hour. Deaths start in the second hour of film release.
- ryanmetcalf, on 10/11/2007, -30/+15@swordedge
"anyone with half a brain knows that the Muslim world is utterly unable to take any criticism"
because the Christian Church has been so open to criticism in the past....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_Galilei#Church_controversy - MadScientist420, on 10/11/2007, -4/+24@Ryan
You do realize you're comparing today with 400 years ago right? Actually you've managed to hit the nail on the head...The religion Islam and most of the Islamic countries are in fact 400 years behind the times...
Anyway, as much as I would like to see this, there is no way in hell that they'll make it. - grimreaperev, on 10/11/2007, -3/+10@ryan - You're right that Christians had trouble accepting ANY new concept back then - but so did mostly every religion. I think what swordedge is saying is right, Islam isn't up to par with the equality and acceptingness shown by most people from other religions in the current century. Nobody denies that Christianity or any other religion was that harsh at one point in time, people just need to see that things need to be interpreted more openly (especially in Islam).
I don't want to drag on and ruin the point I've made but I feel some people might want an example: 6,000 year old Earth isn't accepted by all of the Christian community, People argue one day in the bible could be "x" amount of years. When we go over to Islam people issue and carry out death threats because their daily 5 prayers are done at different times (Sunnis believe that they should be at ___ times while shia believe they should be at ___ times of the day). - parasitewasp, on 10/11/2007, -1/+1I hope the movie is made, just to see the over reaction. After hundreds, if not thousands, of innocent people die I think I'll feel guilty about it. Still, I want the movie made. I think that once people see the fury and the results of that fury, maybe people will open their eyes.
- inertic, on 10/11/2007, -40/+3I would love to see this. I can't wait to beat the ***** out of all the dumb muslims that will riot and you can bet the police will too.
- grimreaperev, on 10/11/2007, -3/+11By beating them up, your only as bad as they are. Hypocrisy at it's best.
- timusca, on 10/11/2007, -2/+9This one would rate right up there with "Pledge This", starring Paris "Behind-Bars-But-Probably-Not-For-Long" Hilton.
- Boshow, on 10/11/2007, -0/+34If they do make it, I'm sure it will be very dumb. Much like 90% of National Lampoon movies. There are only like a handful of good ones.
- tehpwnrate, on 10/11/2007, -4/+16Christmas Vacation is one of the funniest movies I've seen. I haven't seen any of the new ones though, so I can't comment on National Lampoon's recent performance.
"Grace? She died years ago!"
"They want you to say Grace. THE BLESSING!"
"Ohh! I pledge allegiance..." - Pause, on 10/11/2007, -1/+13They started to go down the tubes after they made the last Griswolds. Man, those movies were great.
- foxymcfox, on 10/11/2007, -0/+3A friend of mine asked Chevy Chase whether there were going to be any more adventures for the Griswolds, and he said that he's been trying to pitch "Swiss Family Griswolds" for years now. Apparently, National Lampoon didn't like the idea, but if you ask me, it sounds brilliant.
- tehpwnrate, on 10/11/2007, -4/+16Christmas Vacation is one of the funniest movies I've seen. I haven't seen any of the new ones though, so I can't comment on National Lampoon's recent performance.
- mandarin, on 10/11/2007, -5/+27Why do they keep making these movies? No one cares about this crap anymore.
- benmandude, on 10/11/2007, -2/+13Make it and see how many people even watch it. It will be a huge failure.
- homerj14, on 10/11/2007, -2/+21Multiply the Danish cartoon protests by 100 and you got your answer.
- Andytom, on 10/11/2007, -14/+6correction
multiply by 72
/sorry but it was too easy - D3koy, on 10/11/2007, -3/+12Consider this:
That was one image, let's say this is a 90 minute movie with 40 frames per second (a guess)
So multiply the reaction from the danish cartoon by 216000... (90 mins. x 60 seconds per minute x 40 fps)
and that's not to mention the audio....
That should give you a rough estimate.... - actorboy, on 10/11/2007, -3/+9@ D3koy
29.97 frames per second...straight to video. - CptCancer, on 10/11/2007, -7/+4It will be 9/11 times a thousand.
- redneckblues, on 10/11/2007, -2/+8Movie theaters run at 24 fps.
- ISurfTooMuch, on 10/11/2007, -5/+124 fps on film or a 24p video camera.
But 40 fps would be fine with me. I can see the flicker in film in bright scenes. PAL as well. PAL may have more lines of resolution than NTSC, but its lower frame rate gives me a headache.
But yeah, I wouldn't mind seeing it, as long as it's done properly. There's a fine line between being humorous and being insulting. I'm not saying it has to be done in a PC way, but don't make it blasphemous, either.
- Andytom, on 10/11/2007, -14/+6correction
- MasterThief117, on 10/11/2007, -8/+19I said no. Not because I am offended or anything, but the plot sounds ***** retarded.
- AnotherBrian, on 10/11/2007, -0/+9To be fair to National Lampoon, their source material is pretty retarded too.
- mikefitz2, on 10/11/2007, -10/+378% NO? Why not, exactly?
- exec0extreme, on 10/11/2007, -13/+7"Join the Jihad at NationalLampoon.com!"
Sickening- rig0rmortis, on 10/11/2007, -6/+9Eh, I thought it was kind of funny.
- SteveCUBE, on 10/11/2007, -5/+17National Lampoon movies are terrible films. This one seems even worse...
- jsmith39, on 10/11/2007, -3/+0yeah, but they're amusing to torrent and watch when you're bored.
- saintdesy, on 10/11/2007, -0/+1Dude, Christmas Vacation was ***** hilarious.
- Rizmaster, on 10/11/2007, -8/+8Sickeningly awesome.
I vote Yes. Anyone with balls and a sense of humor would. Even if the movie sucks, on concept alone it deserves a release.- actorboy, on 10/11/2007, -4/+2Sense of humor? Did you see the trailer? If you thought that was funny, then you're not old enough to buy a ticket.
- dh8r, on 10/11/2007, -1/+2What's the concept?
- wonderchemist, on 10/11/2007, -7/+9Why would you want 72 virgins? If your not getting any, 72 girls who haven't been putting out isn't going to help your cause.
- lostradamus, on 10/11/2007, -9/+2I say yes. 72 hot belly dancers!?
- ericdano, on 10/11/2007, -5/+9Oh, Islam should be exempt. NOT!
- funkmachine, on 10/11/2007, -14/+8Little do people know that not only do you get 72 female virgins, but you also get eight "pearly young boys".*
Whoever said that jihad terrorists are not homosexual paedophiles?
*Don't believe me? Study Islam.- p4r1tyb1t, on 10/11/2007, -5/+6You smoking too much dope, need to put that bong down! Houris means girls of heaven!
- funkmachine, on 10/11/2007, -4/+1@p4r1tyb1t
Who said anything about houris?
- cogitocogito, on 10/11/2007, -5/+10This should be fatwalarious!
- parasitewasp, on 10/11/2007, -0/+1I might consider blowing myself up for 72 slutty chicks.
- parasitewasp, on 10/11/2007, -0/+1I might consider blowing myself up for 72 slutty chicks.
- johnhummel, on 10/11/2007, -4/+10Hell yes! Think about how many things to make jokes about:
1. Stupid Muslims. No, not *all* Muslims are stupid, but anyone who says "Hey, I get 72 virgins and into heaven by killing people! Score!" Every Muslim I work with is sick of these guys (it's like judging all Christians based on the KKK).
2. Stupid government, like "We have to curtail liberties to protect freedoms! Stop the brownies!" (Heck, there's a joke right there as they invade a girl scout troops).
3. Stupid conservatives and stupid liberals.
Make it like a nuclear joke bomb: make fun of everybody and how stupid they are, and let God sort them out.- p4r1tyb1t, on 10/11/2007, -12/+2I wonder what four terrorist American soldiers killed yesterday are going to get, 72 Cheney look a likes, eweee?
- actorboy, on 10/11/2007, -3/+5@ johnhummel
And that, sir, is why you are not a screenwriter.
- BobSutan, on 10/11/2007, -2/+8I say go for it. Postal is being made and looks like it has humorous scenes intertwined with the 9/11 attacks Yes, it's in poor taste. But what you need to realize is that it'll still get you to laugh (although feel wrong for doing so). The bottom line is that it's time these movies come out so we can start moving past 9/11 the tragedy and look back at 9/11 the event in history. Its not much different than the first films that came out about Pearl Harbor and the early days of WW2.
- WarrenHarding, on 10/11/2007, -6/+2i don't know of any movies that treat pearl harbor as a joke. what movies are you talking about?
- jellygraph, on 10/11/2007, -1/+5seems like the typical level of humour expects of a national lampoon from the last couple of them anyhow... why should this be particularily problematic? no biggie
- cinemaniac1979, on 10/11/2007, -2/+11The real question is "Should National Lampoon keep making movies period?"
Usually comedies are funny, guys... You might want to try that with your 72 direct-to-video releases every year.- foxymcfox, on 10/11/2007, -1/+2I really wish they would bring the magazine back, and take a break from the movies for a bit. Their movies were so much better prior to the end of the magazine. The magazine allowed them to get a much better feel for what their fans liked without having to spend money on a full movie production first to test the waters. After they bring the magazine back for a year or two, THEN make some movies.
- superrcat, on 10/11/2007, -1/+11National Lampoon should stick to the Vacation movies.
- cogitocogito, on 10/11/2007, -1/+10I think a National Lampoon's Saudi Vacation movie would be awesome.
Picture Clark knocking over the pillars of Mecca (a la Stonehenge),
Ellen doing a striptease for Clark that somehow gets broadcast to all of Riyadh.
Rusty hitting on some veiled chicks in front of their families
Audrey corrupting morals all over the place.
A laugh riot! (and a group beheading would be a proper ending to the series) - MadScientist420, on 10/11/2007, -0/+7You might be on to something. I would pay about $2.50 to see that movie.
- cogitocogito, on 10/11/2007, -1/+10I think a National Lampoon's Saudi Vacation movie would be awesome.
- Ironzombie, on 10/11/2007, -5/+2If they don't then the terrorists have won and we are all gonna die anyway
- ToastHerder, on 10/11/2007, -6/+2Why would anyone NOT want this to become a movie?
- actorboy, on 10/11/2007, -2/+3How about because it would stir a hornets nest without even making us laugh in the process.
- AppleTamer, on 10/11/2007, -0/+16You know, if this movie was in the right hands and was realized as a ***** comedy when it was being made, it could have been really funny. There are two ways this movie could be really funny
1.) If it went out of it's way to have the two main characters be the stereotypical but hyperbole-ed college kids, but have everything else be really down-to-earth (think Hank and Dean of the Venture Bros, where they still live in the 60s campiness while everyone else is based in reality and think the bros. are weird,) not only making fun of their past movies, but making fun of how absurd living is at this moment.
OR
2.) If the comedy in the movie is so over the top and generic that it becomes almost like a formulaic Rodney Dangerfield film, ending with an Al-Qaeda pool party with Journey playing in the background. Making a hot-button situation a comedic romp from the 80s, filled with cliches and 4th wall breaching to actually make it stupidly entertaining.
But since National Lampoon has done little of worth in 20 years, we'll be seeing the crappy-ass, straight-to-DVD, excuse-to-see-boobs movie we've come to expect. I hate you, Hollywood. - tumbleweed05, on 10/11/2007, -3/+1site doesnt even work.
edit: site in the description doesnt work(nationallampoons.com)- morriscat, on 10/11/2007, -1/+1Funny, I read that as ¨***** dosent work¨ on first pass :)
- dizzledaking, on 10/11/2007, -2/+2@morriscat (#7153388)
OH MORRISCAT!!! You are so zany!
- Barbarino, on 10/11/2007, -7/+4MAKE IT!
STONER MOVIES KICK ASS WHEN STONED! - whatthefu, on 10/11/2007, -5/+3I'd say yes if it had potential for being a decent movie. But this would suck.
- bluezinc, on 10/11/2007, -2/+5Well it sounds god aweful. But I'm always for releasing something instead of holding it back. So they should do it. I won't see it cuz National Lampoon is rarely even chuckle-worthy, but I'm in favor of it being released.
- MrFlesh, on 10/11/2007, -1/+10Hey we got life of brian and mel brooks history of the world makin fun of the inquisition why not?
- penguinofhonor, on 10/11/2007, -2/+3someone's embassy is going to get bombed for this.
- nephilonic, on 10/11/2007, -3/+3Should National Lampoon make a feature-length film of 72 VIRGINS?
NO!
The trailer is the 'funniest' that this concept would be. It's a skit joke, why would you stretch it out to an unfunny ***** of a movie?- Tweekster, on 10/11/2007, -1/+1apparently you are unfamiliar with national lampoons work...
- Tweekster, on 10/11/2007, -1/+1apparently you are unfamiliar with national lampoons work...
- wolphkaat, on 10/11/2007, -1/+3If Hogan's Hero's worked, than so can this. Col. Klink was da bomb.
- richiestang78, on 10/11/2007, -1/+6I have to agree, Muslims are as fair game as everyone and everything else. If they have a problem with it too bad.
- flawless2c, on 10/11/2007, -7/+4do you islamphobe ***** understand that this entire 72 virgins concept is absolutely false! No where in the Koran, the Hadith or anywhere else does it say anything about a person getting 72 virgins if they are killed. Complete and utter ***** created and "popularized" by western media!
- trer, on 10/11/2007, -5/+2you're probably right, but these people think just the same way as those extremist muslims they purport to be "better" than. Their minds are already committed to the false truths about Islam that they've been drilled with by the media, no matter how much logic or evidence you throw their way.
- geekee, on 10/11/2007, -1/+3http://www.memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Area=ia&ID=IA7401
- tehmoth, on 10/11/2007, -1/+1memri? what a 'good' choice.
- Tweekster, on 10/11/2007, -6/+3The bigger question: why would you want 1 virgin, let alone 72?
Let someone else spend the energy teaching her the ropes.- MadScientist420, on 10/11/2007, -3/+4Oh c'mon, ***** virgin's is great. I mean, it's so painful to them that you can't do anything fun AND you get some blood on your ***** if you're lucky.
- Kikinou, on 10/11/2007, -3/+4Yea make it, but heck I'll wait till the DVD comes out and rent it on netflix... I don't want to get blown up at the movie theatre!
- KaneElson, on 10/11/2007, -2/+2Mail bomb.
- dRuNk3nIrIsHmEn, on 10/11/2007, -2/+1This movie is surely going to bomb at the box office.
- damnyooneek, on 10/11/2007, -3/+2Guys do dumb ***** for pussy but to die for 72 virgins thats the epitome of dumb *****. sex when youre dead just doesnt work.
- techmaster, on 10/11/2007, -2/+1Plus those 72 virgins don't last very long. Once you ***** em all, they're no longer virgins. You could theoretically ***** a lot more virgins in your short life on earth, limiting yourself to 72 for all of eternity is rather selling yourself short, is it not?
- hbeierg, on 10/11/2007, -7/+3"If you vote NO the Terrorists win."
This message bought to you bye George W. Bush - xSEED, on 10/11/2007, -4/+2another example of people warping already completely retarded religions to suit their needs. like cristianity and that other retarded one.
- bagelpirate, on 10/11/2007, -6/+6I believe its actually 72 Virginians.
- kethraal, on 10/11/2007, -2/+2Mr. Williams? Is that you?
.
No?
.
Then don't steal his jokes.
- kethraal, on 10/11/2007, -2/+2Mr. Williams? Is that you?
- Geostrophic, on 10/11/2007, -1/+0The National Lampoon's name hasn't been attached to a movie worth watching in decades. No one would see it, no matter what the subject - so, what's it matter?
This is just an attempt at some cheap-and-easy publicity. It worked. We all lose.
hbeierg: "This message bought to you bye George W. Bush"
[rolls eyes] - morriscat, on 10/11/2007, -3/+1All extremists, all anal retentive folk, should be publicly mocked.
And mocked again! - ZachRetox, on 10/11/2007, -1/+5Iam4real: "no, not because it's to edgy, because it looks terrible"
Couldn't have said it better myself. - Grego123, on 10/11/2007, -3/+2such an awesome idea for a movie, if executed properly could be genius
- spartan777, on 10/11/2007, -3/+5if this were to make fun of Christianity everyone on Digg would be ALL over it.
- filmbandit, on 10/11/2007, -2/+2tell me about -- man what's the deal?
- Livewire, on 10/11/2007, -2/+1@spartan777 (#7153463)
Why would we want that? Stereotyping is wrong and using it to make money is sickening. But for me to say that you, and you alone, are a douche, then there's nothing wrong with that. - Tweekster, on 10/11/2007, -2/+1oh please, if it is anti christianity, anti bush, anti republican or pro aethiest the typical digger has already blown their load before they click the link.
- Grego123, on 10/11/2007, -2/+1they are already making the movie anyway
-
Show 51 - 97 of 97 discussions
Digg is coming to a city (and computer) near you! Check out all the details on our 
© Digg Inc. 2008 —
Content posted by