45 Comments
- squishee, on 07/18/2008, -7/+38In order::
Badass, badass, badass, badass, badass, badass...Harry Potter. - inactive, on 07/18/2008, -0/+22A nice sampling of images. The Terminator Shot is sick!
- angrynorwegian, on 07/19/2008, -6/+27Spend 5 minutes gathering pictures from the internet
Write short descriptions
Post to Digg
Profit - dturnbull, on 07/19/2008, -0/+17That reply isn't helping push the intelligence of us Potter fans.
- darthgarlic, on 07/19/2008, -0/+16Not exactly "Pictures Galore" -
- NinjaPirateDude, on 07/19/2008, -0/+10Watchmen is so kickass....
- LordStandley, on 07/19/2008, -0/+9Awesome! I think I just rorschached all over the place.
- joelito, on 07/19/2008, -0/+8Is that prof Slughorn in the last pic? He looks rather young for a previously retired professor.
- kitsua, on 07/19/2008, -0/+6"all the "Watchmen" stills were taken directly from the trailer."
No they weren't. Three of the five pics were new and I was stoked to see them for the first time.
Who are you, some kind of inept custodian of the internet? I'll decide when to move along thanks. - Wakkyweed, on 07/19/2008, -1/+6Please, please, please, please, please do not let Watchmen suck!
I swear on Rorschach's grave, if Hollywood ruins the second best comic book ever made I will personally go down there and bitch-slap the producer, director, and anyone else involved! - Theisos, on 07/19/2008, -0/+5Corrected:
I swear on Rorschach's grave, if Hollywood ruins the best comic book ever made I will personally go down there and bitch-slap the producer, director, and anyone else involved! - cshard, on 07/19/2008, -0/+5I see that they've already 'modified' the costumes abit... I guess that only Rorschach is going to look exactly like his comic counterpart, considering that its kind of hard to mess with the looks of a guy who's wearing a hat, a mask, and a trenchcoat.
- novemberdream07, on 07/19/2008, -1/+5the only question is will they make dr manhattan wear pants?
- Wakkyweed, on 07/19/2008, -0/+4Dr. Manhattan pretty much looked the same to me. A bald-headed blue guy who floats. The Silk Specters uniform was defiantly an improvement, and I kind of like the Night Owl's new look. I do object to the fact that Night Owl doesn't have a gut like he does in the comic.
- Darren07, on 07/19/2008, -2/+5Latinoreview: Please don't resize my browser window.
Ok, ese? - cdigioia, on 07/19/2008, -1/+4The joke is on us.
- Dundasbro, on 07/19/2008, -1/+3"It's sorta like some digg users on this site.."
Is there any other kind of user on this site? - obrysii, on 07/19/2008, -0/+2Looks like Slughorn giving that Felix potion to Harry.
- simdak, on 07/19/2008, -1/+3A Pretty Butterfly.
- jax9999, on 07/19/2008, -0/+2Read the books of magic. thats where harry was born.
- dannytehmanny, on 07/19/2008, -0/+2watchmen is the best comic ever .
- Wakkyweed, on 07/19/2008, -0/+2Sorry, but as much as I love Watchmen, Neil Gaiman's Sandman series is the best comic book ever made!
- ryansimbalist, on 07/19/2008, -0/+1I read the first book... That made me hate it even more.
- MavRevMatt, on 07/19/2008, -0/+1Anyone else think that they're on a greenscreen for the Harry Potter one? It just looks weird to me.
- Culero, on 07/19/2008, -0/+1bragger.
- ryansimbalist, on 07/19/2008, -0/+1Hater.
- MavRevMatt, on 07/19/2008, -0/+1Just disable Javascript from doing that...
- cshard, on 07/21/2008, -0/+1I'm guessing that the Doc will just be "casually missing" some certain bits. :P
Re: Night Owl, good point. Though, I still think he looks too much like a Batman wannabe now. The gut might have helped abit. - ryansimbalist, on 07/19/2008, -0/+1So what's the first best?
- Wakkyweed, on 07/19/2008, -0/+1Neil Gaiman's Sandman series, without a doubt.
- Cheeselover, on 07/19/2008, -0/+1Watchmen looks epic, Salvation looks to be the best Terminator yet, and the sixth Harry Potter book is the best of the 7.
Yup, we're in for some good times. - ectocooler, on 07/19/2008, -0/+1shouldn't have to. latinoreview is stuck in 1999.
- Cl1mh4224rd, on 07/19/2008, -0/+1That third Watchmen image... I'm... I'm not quite sure what's going on there. That guy on the left is a little too thrilled about something.
- kitsua, on 07/19/2008, -1/+1I read the first four Harry Potter books. They were derivative, dull works and the films are worse.
Being a kids book has nothing to do with it - read Philip Pullman's "His Dark Materials" trilogy for an example of real, original, exciting children's literature. - cowsgonemadd3, on 07/19/2008, -1/+1I saw these when I went to see The Dark Knight last night at 11:15pm ....It was packed too.
- inactive, on 07/19/2008, -2/+1I'm sure that the books must be way better than the movies (I haven't read one personally). Did you watch the last one? It was clearly designed for kids (and by kids). Lousy plot, if the book is anything like it, it must be ***** too. The first movies were entertaining but the last one is an insult to our intelligence.
You Potter fans can say anything you want but the books are designed having the kids in mind so it really cannot be that deep. That doesn't mean that the story is bad tho. - Chrino, on 07/19/2008, -1/+0I was expecting new pictures...
- Klak, on 07/20/2008, -2/+1SNAPE KILLS DUMBLEDORE!!!!!!!!!
- Persuazion, on 07/19/2008, -2/+1My friend mentioned Christian Bale as John Conner while we were playing WoW earlier so I went and found the teaser trailer for Salvation on IMDB.com and i have to say that just from the little bits in the trailer this movie looks amazing I can't wait to see it too bad i have to until next summer :(
- Soragon, on 07/19/2008, -5/+3More Harry Potter Pics:
http://www.mugglenet.com/app/news/full_story/1727 - hagfish70, on 07/19/2008, -4/+2awesome, awesome, awesome, awesome, awesome, pretty cool, gay.
- HomeBoy123, on 07/19/2008, -5/+2It only works with the ???
Good job spoiling the joke - Asheis, on 07/19/2008, -8/+4How so? Can't I be sick of all the negativity that certain people have for a series of books most of them haven't even read? It's sorta like some digg users on this site.. who don't even read the article, but feel they know everything about it because they've read the description.
It would be nice if the people who bash the series actually took the time to do some reading, and provide some serious criticisms of the story.
Instead, we get LOLOSLOLOL!@!!@!, HARRY POTTR IS FOR KIDDEZZ!.
heh. - apollyon, on 07/18/2008, -12/+6hmm, all the "Watchmen" stills were taken directly from the trailer. (front paged yesterday)
The "Terminator" still is on the front page now.
And the Harry Potter still is... just a picture of that same lucky-as-Fuc* kid actor and some old guy in a musty room.
In short, Move Along. Nothing to See Here. - Asheis, on 07/18/2008, -18/+4you potter bashers are pretty stupid.. especially if you haven't read the books.



What is Digg?
Check out the new & improved