digg

Facebook Connect Join Digg About
See the original image at filmschoolrejects.com

Officially Cool: The Entire Star Wars Saga in One Picture (PIC)

filmschoolrejects.com — With the saga complete and the book pretty much closed for Star Wars movies, the following photo is a pretty good display of the entire saga. In fact, if they ever wrote a “Star Wars for Dummies” book, this could serve as page one. Enjoy.

Who dugg this? Made popular Nov 9, 2007

Digg DudeWhat is Digg?

Digg is a place for people to discover and share content from anywhere on the web. Digg surfaces the best stuff as submitted and voted on by the community. Take the Tour to learn more.

338 Comments

show profanity settings
expand all
  • Company_Man, on 11/13/2007, -7/+300WTF (Where TF) is Alec Guiness?
  • NateTheApe21, on 11/11/2007, -14/+150only the right side matters....
  • ttfadia, on 11/10/2007, -5/+109I think having the word "Picture" in the title implies that it's a (PIC)...
  • Synthos, on 11/13/2007, -23/+122They should have the darth vader mask instead of hayden.
  • inactive, on 11/13/2007, -8/+102Disagree, the half-hayden half-vader center figure is a good way to highlight the fall of skywalker which occurs at the mid-point of the saga.
  • beelz, on 11/14/2007, -5/+93http://www.myconfinedspace.com/watermark.php?src=w ...
  • Grova, on 11/13/2007, -1/+77I wouldn't have any problem if they left Jar Jar Binks out.
  • PerfektXj, on 11/10/2007, -3/+68sites down - mirror here http://m3.bestpicsaround.com/piles/?s=starwarssaga
  • Thorin, on 11/13/2007, -10/+76No Alec Guiness, no digg!
  • Aaronichi, on 11/10/2007, -2/+61Jar Jar and no Alec Guiness is a sin, no mater how it's rationalized.
  • cracker42, on 11/13/2007, -1/+51I'm really disappointed with the tiny size of the main characters of Episodes IV - VI... hell Jar-Jar is bigger than Han Solo! WTF!
  • numberneal, on 11/11/2007, -2/+46nice wallpaper material.
  • willbb123, on 11/10/2007, -1/+41i had to look at it cause it is Officially Cool
  • rwkyle, on 11/10/2007, -2/+33I have to agree, I think it was a mistake not to include him.
  • Klarth, on 11/10/2007, -1/+28He ought to adapt Timothy Zahn's novel trilogy. They're pretty epic.
  • DarkSenay, on 11/10/2007, -1/+26Where is President Skroob?
  • Chicken2nite, on 11/12/2007, -11/+36They didn't double up on any of the characters, including Palpatine (who was played by the same actor in all of the films except the original version of Empire Strikes Back.) Considering Alec Guinness was playing a ghost for the majority of the original trilogy, I think it's reasonable for them to go with Obi Wan as a young man in his prime instead of the old hermit.
    EDIT: If you count the silhouette, then they did double up on both Anakin and Obi Wan, but I don't think that really counts.
  • insllvn, on 11/10/2007, -5/+29No no no. The whole original trilogy was botched from the get go. The plot covered in I&II should have been Ep I. Episode II should have been the fall of the republic, the love story between Anakin and Padme, and the climax should have been Vader's fall. By the way, Vader's fall should have taken longer and not been so rediculous. I mean come on, did you at all empathize with Vader's fall? Was there moral ambiguity? I am a HUGE fan of the original trilogy, and I have read all (yes ALL) of the expanded universe novels. Recently in those novels a major character has fallen to the dark side, and the way it was presented, over several books, was amazing. At times, I could even imagine myself making the same decisions. Basically, he chooses to embrace a fascist ideal because his arrogance leads him to believe that imposing strict order is the only way to ensure the galaxy is a safe place for his family. By the end of the most recent book he is willing to commit atrocities that would never have occurred to him at the beginning of his fall. They illustrate the SEDUCTIVE power of the dark side. In Ep. III Anakin goes from "I am going to turn over Palpatine for being a Sith Lord" to "I need to kill Sam Jackson and also a bunch of kids to save my family, and then procede to force choke Padme the NEXT TIME I see her" in one seen, after a STARING CONTEST with Palpatine. *****! In fact ***** doesn't sufficiently express the ridiculousness of this transformation. In my ideal trilogy the story told would in the the apocryphal new trilogy would have been told in Eps. I&II, and Ep. III would have been Vader, hunting down Jedi, the final showdown between Vader, and Obi-Wan, and Vader donning the suit. The chief differences would have been that Vader would have been evil at the beginning of III, the transformation would have been believable, and Vader would have killed, on screen, many more Jedi, not just some kids in an off screen bit.

    In conclusion, Ep III was not the worst, but was definitely the most disappointing, and I am a nerd.
  • estacado, on 11/10/2007, -4/+27Why is Jar Jar included?
  • SilverRavage, on 11/10/2007, -3/+26Where the hell is the old ObiWan??????? And why did they just throw a random Ewok in there Wickette should have so bene the one in it.
  • extremeg24, on 11/10/2007, -2/+24...and Natalie Portman
  • monsterofNone, on 11/10/2007, -0/+20you do a star wars collage and leave alec guiness off? really?
  • Charlotte_Web, on 11/10/2007, -2/+22Blogspam, here's the direct link:

    http://www.myconfinedspace.com/2007/11/06/the-star ...
  • hammradio, on 11/10/2007, -0/+20I see that Zev (Rogue Two) was included. Are you kidding me??? No Wedge??? Completely unacceptable. Buried. Not to mention no Alec Guiness.
  • inactive, on 11/10/2007, -2/+22Can I get a copy of just the right side of the picture? You can keep the left.
  • clemdionisio, on 11/10/2007, -0/+19That's fair, but my image of the iconic Obi Wan is not Ewan McGregor. I would've put Alec Guiness on the other side but I guess they didn't like any of Old Obi's action images.
  • LargeTrout, on 11/09/2007, -0/+18Stay off the turpentine.
  • LordSkywalker, on 11/10/2007, -2/+20Sweet. I like it. I want it for a poster.
  • Bilabrin, on 11/10/2007, -1/+18Yeah but it was't quite 1/2 and 1/2, you have to really look to see the Vader mask. And is it just me or were the storm troopers and Admiral Tarkin a little overrepresented?

    Geez I'm a dork! :O)
  • bentman78, on 11/10/2007, -0/+16Vader is there... look harder.
  • cnot3, on 11/10/2007, -1/+17Jar Jar will never be seen on my desktop.
  • WhiskeyLemur, on 06/30/2009, -5/+21Correction: it _used to be_ the greatest saga ever. The only way I can convince myself that I still love SW is to pretend the left side never happened.
  • stevedclarke, on 11/10/2007, -0/+16..."befriended Jar Jar. Jar Jar and"...

    Wow, that hurt my eyes.
  • snyperr2s, on 11/10/2007, -0/+15WTF, they have jar jar binks, but not the ORIGINAL obi-wan, someone needs to die
  • Nick519, on 11/09/2007, -1/+16i'll third that sentiment.
  • inactive, on 11/10/2007, -3/+17He is one with the force now..
  • solo1181, on 11/10/2007, -6/+20I'm hoping for that. I heard that in the final three Jar Jar is revealed as the greatest Sith Lord, the one controlling all the strings in all the other movies. That is why he disappeared for 4, 5, and 6. He comes back and destroys Luke, the droids, and the rebellion. He does this with a brand new light saber that attaches to his tongue. Just think about the emperor was all wrinkled due to he was living with the gungans under water were he befriended Jar Jar. Jar Jar and him were good friends then when his buddy got killed he vowed revenge and would stop at nothing to kill the son of his friends murderer.
  • Sabretou, on 11/09/2007, -0/+13How many ***** are there on this ship?!
  • huggybarrel, on 11/10/2007, -0/+13because JarJar was the character who gave Palpatine his rise to power by forcing the vote in the senate. The fall of the Republic was JarJar's fault.
  • murasako, on 11/10/2007, -0/+12That was the first thing I thought of; where the ***** is the REAL Obi-Wan?
  • jonmlm, on 11/09/2007, -0/+12hm. did you actually look at it? jesus
  • goeatsmsht, on 11/10/2007, -0/+12An "itch" or the need for more money..... keep on the lookout for episode I, II, & III - Special Edition
  • Immij, on 11/10/2007, -0/+11Yeah, me too. I wonder who officiates these things. There must be an International Consortium of Coolness or something.
  • inactive, on 11/09/2007, -0/+11I got a laugh out of it.
  • tbranch227, on 11/10/2007, -2/+13This is definitely confirmed on the DVD interview with Lucas. It might actually be on the old VHS special edition, which was pretty damn sweet back in the day. There are episodes 7, 8, and 9 which were a part of the original OUTLINE. He has not completely written them but the framework is there for him to build on. I definitely hope he continues to produce them.
  • Karkian, on 11/11/2007, -6/+17Your dedication to acronyms astounds me. After having to explain what you meant you used just as many characters as had you just ***** written it out properly.
  • JAGUART, on 11/10/2007, -0/+11Well that's at least how Lucas had planned it, along with the prequels, 30 years ago.
  • DreKor, on 11/09/2007, -1/+11And, ironically, your name is Solo...
  • Fetching more discussions...
    Show 51 - 100 of 343 discussions

  • Add a Comment

    Login or register to comment!
    Or, sign-in super fast with your Facebook account ...


© Digg Inc. 2009 — Content created and posted by Digg users is dedicated to the public domain | Terms of Use Updated | Privacy Policy
DIGG, DIGG IT, DUGG, DIGG THIS, Digg graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, scripts, and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.