What is Digg?Sponsored by Amazon.com
Kindle(TM) - Amazon's #1 most gifted product view!
amazon.com - Order Kindle now and receive it in time for Christmas. Free Expedited shipping. Click to learn more.
110 Comments
- IamNOTmrT, on 09/01/2008, -2/+150We have .......
- Fast car
- Hot girl
- Jason Statham shooting ***** up
What more do we need to know? - ryan83189, on 09/01/2008, -2/+130If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
- blaze03, on 09/02/2008, -2/+96I'm going to place this one in the "who cares" column
- bashnu, on 09/01/2008, -1/+73This Proves : The enemy always attacks from your right.
- ewyatt, on 09/02/2008, -1/+71There is plenty of difference. There is blue.
- Gm7Cadd9, on 09/02/2008, -0/+68"The calendar was great because it gave people a chance to see a side of my versatility"
-Derek Zoolander - vpotok, on 09/02/2008, -0/+42by Transporter 4 the gas will be so expensive he will be using public transportation.
- inactive, on 09/02/2008, -1/+43i kinda like it. it shows continuity and adds familiarity.
- IVIrMP3, on 09/02/2008, -4/+29Transporter 1 - Guns Vertical / Looking Up
Transporter 2 - Guns Horizontal / Looking Straight
Transporter 3 - 1 Horizontal + 1 Vertical / Looking Down
Transporter 4 - Can't happen because creativity will have run out - blaze03, on 09/02/2008, -0/+22Actually, 7 out of 10 attacks are from the rear.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lbW5p8Uq9hg - JavertHolmes, on 09/02/2008, -0/+17I guess the person that creates the Transporter posters must be the same person that creates all the Che Guevara shirt variations.
- grimward, on 09/02/2008, -0/+13Oh, you people think it's just the transporter series? HAH I say!
http://www.imdb.com/media/rm4112816384/tt0258463
http://www.imdb.com/media/rm278699264/tt0372183
http://www.imdb.com/media/rm2665451520/tt0440963
About the only thing they did alter was switching his gun from left to right in one poster.. how's THAT for lack of creativity? :P - FrogKermit, on 09/02/2008, -0/+11He played "Bacon" in "Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels". And is awesome.
- TheCash, on 09/02/2008, -1/+11As long as the movie features the 2009 A8-W12, I'll be a happy camper. Unless they pull more stupid stunts like flipping a 360 in midair to knock the bomb attached to the underside off with an overhead crane hook, that is. Even ***** drunk, that scene just didn't work for me.
- gutistg, on 09/02/2008, -0/+9It's the same movie with some very slight differences.
I don't see why the poster shouldn't reflect that. - liquisoft, on 09/02/2008, -0/+9It's brand similarity and recognition. It's practically marketing 101. It's obvious.
And this article...it's ignorant. - akschnare, on 09/02/2008, -0/+8Maybe after the tenth sequel, the covers will make a flip book where you can watch him jump and shoot some guy.
- veins, on 09/02/2008, -3/+11in the butt
- Gizza, on 09/02/2008, -0/+8Well it makes sense that they would make poster that people can easily recognise as Transporter.
- praisethelard, on 09/02/2008, -1/+9Transporter 5 - Guns suspended in mid-air via telekinesis
- inactive, on 09/02/2008, -2/+9Are you kidding me!? Transporter 4: 1 Gun shooting behind his head + 1 Gun shooting from between his legs/looking bugeyed with his teeth clenched!
- SniperZero, on 09/02/2008, -0/+7It looks fine to me.
- suprememilo, on 09/02/2008, -3/+9The poster owns, and I hope the movie does too.
- cadmiumpaint, on 09/02/2008, -1/+7recycling is good for the planet, not so much in art direction.
- deathsquadx, on 09/02/2008, -2/+8Does it take place in the arctic?
- icurnvs, on 09/02/2008, -1/+7Correct me if I'm wrong, but it's you, mrshare, that is flaming.
- h4mx0r, on 09/02/2008, -0/+5Or maybe it proves that his weakness is on his left side! Stop attacking the right side you noobs!
- tm13lke, on 09/02/2008, -1/+6no, he's not
- Exekutor, on 09/02/2008, -0/+4Get to da choppa!
- Hellman109, on 09/02/2008, -1/+5By being a badass in films is why.
Look at any 80's action flicks, the main heroes were never good at acting, hell some could hardly speak english! - inactive, on 09/02/2008, -0/+4they had me at hot chick
- IJS209, on 09/02/2008, -1/+5who cares? It's just a movie poster.
- Marcatto, on 09/02/2008, -2/+6Maybe I should stop looking at my monitor through a mirror's reflection, but it seems to me that he falling to the LEFT, not right.
- speakafreaka, on 09/02/2008, -2/+5Woah! slow down tiger!
- handheldchimp, on 09/02/2008, -0/+3I don't see anything wrong with it. If anything it kicks too much ass.
- leftcoastfunk, on 09/02/2008, -1/+4this is news-worthy?
- speakafreaka, on 09/02/2008, -0/+3Jason Statham only has one expression: Squint and Rumbly Cockney Voice.
- Koushiro, on 09/02/2008, -0/+3Yeah, and the movies are identical too. Identically *****.
- mmmben, on 09/02/2008, -0/+3First the guns were up, then they were sideways, and now it's both.
I can't ***** wait. - eSJayBee, on 09/02/2008, -0/+3I don't see how you work for a movie site, put all three posters side-by-side and not realise that they're just going for a theme with all the posters with minor variations.
That said, I think the sudden blue flame kind of looks out of place compared to the orange flame of the two previous posters. And yes, I agree that that woman did strike me as animé at first glance.
Still...I can't wait for this movie. Transporter movies are just dumb, pop-corn action flicks and that's what's so good about it. - Dested, on 09/02/2008, -0/+2=( All my teeth play are those "Date Movie" and "Disaster Movie" movies.
- DforSpiD, on 09/02/2008, -0/+2You shouldn't have to look that close to even realize that it's a human...
- noahgelman, on 09/02/2008, -0/+2Every star starts out as a nobody. So yeah, at one point he was a random bald guy, but now hes a bad ass mother ***** so don't mess with him
- Garmr, on 09/02/2008, -0/+2The difference is huge, I tell you! This time around Audi is providing the budget support instead of BMW...
- RAT-Man, on 09/02/2008, -0/+2Robert Knepper is in Transporter 3. That alone makes up for the absurdity of Transporter 2.
- twishart, on 09/02/2008, -0/+2Also, he's holding his guns differently in each picture, and the title of the movie is slightly different.
- virtorio, on 09/02/2008, -3/+5Why change what works?
- NinjaPirateDude, on 09/02/2008, -2/+4would you change bacon?
huh tough guy! would you!
.....didn't think so. - Rev0lver, on 09/02/2008, -0/+2Couldn't have possibly said it better myself.
- swaxhog, on 09/02/2008, -1/+3What, what!?
-
Show 51 - 100 of 113 discussions
